2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary and Bill Clinton Made $6.7 Million from Speeches in 2015
Source: ABC News
By LIZ KREUTZ SENIBOYE TIENABESO
May 17, 2016, 11:06 PM ET
Hillary and Bill Clinton raked in a combined $6.725 million in paid speeches in 2015, a decrease from the year before, according to a personal financial disclosure form released late Tuesday night.
As a presidential candidate, Clinton has come under fire for paid speeches she gave, particularly to big banks and Wall Street, after leaving the State Department. Her Democratic opponent, Bernie Sanders, and his supporters have called on her to release the transcripts of these speeches, which she has thus far refused to do.
According to the document her campaign released, last year, Clinton gave six paid speeches for a total income of $1.475 million. Her biggest pay day was speech to Ebay on March 3, 2015 for $315,000. Her lowest was to the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce for $150,000. She did not speak to any American banks last year and has not given any paid speeches since announcing her presidential campaign on April 12, 2015.
The document also shows that Bill Clinton gave 22 paid speeches last year for a total of $5.25 million. Of these speeches, 11 of them occurred after his wife became a presidential candidate. Prior to the announcement, the former president raked in $225,000 for a speech to UBS. Following the announcement, he made $250,000 speaking to the private equity firm, Apollo Global Management.
Since Hillary Clinton became a candidate, the couple has drastically scaled back their paid speeches. For example, in 2014, the Clintons made roughly $18 million from roughly 100 paid speeches many of which were to banks.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-bill-clinton-made-67-million-speeches-2015/story?id=39184952
DavidDvorkin
(19,473 posts)Trying to change the subject? Too funny.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Ditto Bill Gates.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Oh, right.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)people get to speak.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)I don't care if steve jobs got paid that much to talk. He could have given sweet heart deals on iphones to those who paid him and I couldn't care less. If he were a politician who had power to implement policy, then it would affect me and that is what we should all care about.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)What's the difference, to you? Because that makes no sense to me.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)In order to help you understand I will try to rephrase things. Please read the response this time.
Steve Jobs is a business man. He has no influence on the policies of the united states of America. He can get paid whatever he wants in exchange for all the iphones in the world and I don't care. When a career politician is given that kind of money, we should all care about what is given back in exchange. That includes policy decisions that will be made at the highest level.
Please re-read that at least 5 times and spend 10 minutes thinking about it before replying
Recursion
(56,582 posts)We know what's given back in exchange: a speech. I don't see what's so mysterious about that.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)"I don't see what's so mysterious about that."
At this point you have made that obvious
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Rather than just giving money with no record of it
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Handing out cash for no reason can get you busted. Handing it out for a "speech" is smart. Very clean way to skirt the whole bribery laws
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Response to Eugene (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
QC
(26,371 posts)are reluctant to vote for the war/Goldman/fracking candidate.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)You think those are the bee's knees.