2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhich past Democratic Primary nominees reached 2383 without Super Delegates?
Which ones did not?
peace13
(11,076 posts)....and then stole them back right under their noses? Only one that I know of.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)Only Obama needed superdelegates. no one else.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)They didn't have proportional delegations (in fact, that is one reason we have them now, Gary Hart and Jackson protested it). It was also a three way split.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I think the blanket statements in this thread should be questioned based on the 1st actual use of superdelegates.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)I wasn't busting your balls, it was the post I was responding to above.
(my post ended up later than yours due to the time it took me to research the Democratic primary history since Supers were implemented.)
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)...of the proportional delegation process. Hart and Jackson had more votes than Mondale but far fewer delegates. Jackson in particular had half as many votes but got a lot less representation in the delegates. It's also why the southern states get to go first in many ways, long term planning by the party to represent the underrepresented.
If it was proportional back then we might have had a Hart/Jackson ticket because they could've combined their delegates in a brokered convention.
I don't know why I didn't consider it when I responded to the OP. It flew under my radar because of how unique it was.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)And he only had 62 pledged delegates more than Clinton.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)Hillary needs Supers and it's a rigged system.
got it.