2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBREAKING -Leopold to DoJ: Call it Criminal Or Release the Correspondence Between The FBI and Clinton
http://www.inquisitr.com/3107839/hillary-clinton-email-probe-update-top-journalists-attorneys-rip-into-fbi-for-not-releasing-correspondence-with-clinton-over-emails/This is it folks, either she's the subject of a criminal investigation or she isn't. The DoJ is going to be forced to respond or release the FBI's correspondence with Clinton on the private server matter.
According to LawNewz, Vice News investigative journalist Jason Leopolds attorneys filed a document in court Tuesday ripping into the FBIs reasoning for withholding its correspondence with Hillary Clinton over the email server. Leopold has been seeking the emails that the agency exchanged with Hillary Clintons office in regard to the investigation under the Freedom of Information Act, but his efforts to gain access to the emails have been blocked by the U.S. Justice Department.
As The Inquisitr reported earlier this month, the Justice Department declined to respond to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request related to the investigation because it involved a law enforcement matter, which, at the time, was the first indication that the FBI was conducting a criminal investigation over Hillary Clintons emails.
The DOJ argued that the requested emails are subject to FOIA exemption because their release could interfere with the investigation.
That is a CRIMINAL investigation because that is the only exemption to FOIA.
So basically the DoJ is being forced to call it what it is: Criminal. Or release what the FBI has said to Clinton.
Csainvestor
(388 posts)They don't do electrical work right? And they don't do civil investigations.
What could it be other than a criminal investigation.
Beowulf
(761 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Along with processing finger prints.
KPN
(15,645 posts)FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Doing Security Inquiry's.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)He is asking the court to name the subject and the crimes which is required to use the reason as an exemption to FOIA.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)White-washing. Might be the case this time.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)the best-quality whitewash is on backorder, he wouldn't have bothered with the "I don't know what a security inquiry is" statement. That was intentional pushback against the "it's no big deal" narrative being push by Camp Weathervane.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)If you know someone with an IQ of 55 or less, the FBI has a proposal for them. Brown skin and Arabic name preferred.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Hell, up until last week, they were parroting her in calling it a "security review" and the FBI definitely does not do that.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)You, however, have much to answer for.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)mrdmk
(2,943 posts)with 12 hides. Does this person sleep?
Just updated my IL...
amborin
(16,631 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)Which I believe is required to use the FOIA exemption.
aspirant
(3,533 posts)now that's a game changer
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Nice try, though.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
trudyco
(1,258 posts)within a certain time frame?
They always seem to drag this out. I think it's fair for them to say what they are up to. It can impact the Presidency.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)They have done neither to date.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Why anybody would waste any time listening to a disgraced liar and clown like Jason Leopold is anybody's guess.
Good Lord.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)riversedge
(70,218 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)journalist who has done important work.
I am surprised so many here are celebrating his being hoodwinked (much like Rather was) by the right. I've little doubt that he was set up in order to be discredited. The feds once described him as a FOIA terrorist. If it were me, I'd wear that label with pride.