Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:26 PM May 2016

Newsweek lays the smackdown on Bernie

http://www.newsweek.com/bernie-sanders-get-control-get-out-race-461195

Violence. Death threats. Vile, misogynistic names screamed at women. Rage. Hatred. Menacing, anonymous phone calls to homes and offices. Public officials whisked offstage by security agents frightened of the growing mob. None of this has any place in a political campaign. And the candidate who has been tolerating this obscene behavior among his supporters is showing himself to be unfit for office.

So, Senator Sanders, either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult or get out of the race. Whatever respect sane liberals had for you is rapidly dwindling, and the damage being inflicted on your reputation may be unfixable. If you can’t even manage the vicious thugs who act in your name, you can’t be trusted to run a convenience store, much less the country.


Signs are emerging that the Sanders campaign is transmogrifying into the type of movement through which tyrants are born.


Yeah, these are exactly the kind of people who Americans want to have as the next president’s base—vicious, sociopathic misogynists. And their threats of violence at the convention is just another sign that Sanders could go down as one of the most destructive forces in American history. Riots and flames at the convention—a repeat of the chaos of the 1968 Democratic Convention—would help open the White House doors for Donald Trump when compared to a nose-holding coronation by Republicans at their gathering in Cleveland.


But when the time came for a presidential run, the party poo-bahs agreed to allow him to run as a Democrat; eventually, he turned on the party, slashing at his erstwhile political home. It was as if you invited someone into your home who proceeded to leave a huge, steaming pile in your living room.


Damn.
69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Newsweek lays the smackdown on Bernie (Original Post) CrowCityDem May 2016 OP
Bernie's campaign has been one big temper tantrum-it's not surprising redstateblues May 2016 #1
+1, privileged people don't like to be told no uponit7771 May 2016 #11
yep I hear Hillary does not being told no-that seems her privilege to say azurnoir May 2016 #16
People who don't like Clinton believe she killed Abe Lincoln, adults ignore them uponit7771 May 2016 #27
well I guess i'm all growed up 'cause she didn't kill Abe Lincoln azurnoir May 2016 #28
neither do I but the ClintonSoEvil is bout stupid as one could get uponit7771 May 2016 #29
Adults also know actions have consequences. Fawke Em May 2016 #60
+1. "Whatever respect sane liberals had for you is rapidly dwindling" Hortensis May 2016 #52
Sane liberals don't vote for candidates under criminal investigation. Fawke Em May 2016 #61
I do believe it would be if you could arrange it. Hortensis May 2016 #63
Corporate media LIES and SMEARS. I am shocked! Skwmom May 2016 #2
Accusations of lies and smears. I am shocked! NurseJackie May 2016 #7
You shouldn't be. Skwmom May 2016 #12
I am. NurseJackie May 2016 #13
So much bullshit, so little time. "They" really do think we're all a herd of dumb sheep. nt nc4bo May 2016 #3
Bernie be Like alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #4
And after July 28, ... scscholar May 2016 #5
Yep, "Sanders, either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult or get out" stevenleser May 2016 #6
Newsweek? This Newsweek? jillan May 2016 #8
People gave up on "Newsweek" after John Meacham turned it into "Jesus Week." Vinca May 2016 #15
Newsweek? The floundering blog site? JackRiddler May 2016 #49
Its starting to look as if LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #9
It seems the media is intent on ensuring no party unity B2G May 2016 #10
Great source. A corporate rag in love with corporate billionnaires and Wall Street sharks. imagine2015 May 2016 #14
I think most hippies reject Bernie, Tavarious Jackson May 2016 #38
not this boy. hobbit709 May 2016 #46
True enough, but also a failed one. JackRiddler May 2016 #50
ooh New Week trying to stay relevant azurnoir May 2016 #17
The Bagger Left snatching defeat from the jaws of victory? workinclasszero May 2016 #18
Either Trump or Clinton will hurt most of us. Fawke Em May 2016 #62
I don't know of any far right wing media that would be for Bernie. They're all for Clinton or trump Doctor_J May 2016 #19
Newsweek reporters, doing what they're paid to do. NT JCanete May 2016 #20
report? WhiteTara May 2016 #22
No. Paint Bernie's party as radical. Anybody could do it to anybody. There are enough crazies to go JCanete May 2016 #23
Bernie's party? I thought he became a Democrat. But that was really telling WhiteTara May 2016 #53
No, it wasn't telling. it was convenient for you that I misspoke. You should definitely run with it. JCanete May 2016 #59
Thanks for letting me know you misspoke WhiteTara May 2016 #64
Is there a link to her announcement that she was endorsing Sanders? frylock May 2016 #35
No one said "endorsing." The article says WhiteTara May 2016 #55
A supporter, without a shred of evidence. frylock May 2016 #56
I can tell you are a supporter WhiteTara May 2016 #57
Here's this gem WhiteTara May 2016 #21
Unfuckingbelivable horseshit. frylock May 2016 #36
Righteous! okasha May 2016 #24
This is a media driven narrative. frylock May 2016 #37
This is a fact-driven narrative. okasha May 2016 #39
Cultists? frylock May 2016 #41
I was being polite. okasha May 2016 #44
Bless your heart. frylock May 2016 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #54
And I'll be polite to you, too okasha May 2016 #58
A movement that should've been intellectual turned anti-intellectual. betsuni May 2016 #25
Meanwhile it's Clinton supporters getting arrested for beating up women Scootaloo May 2016 #26
Quite a few people here thought that was actually funny, QC May 2016 #30
Doesn't surprise me Scootaloo May 2016 #32
Or shooting at campaign headquarters nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #47
Another HRC partisan op-ed piece by Eichenwald. aikoaiko May 2016 #31
Seriously, DAMN. auntpurl May 2016 #33
Is this the same Newsweek that's published by a fundamentalist Christian cult? QC May 2016 #34
Which is worse TimPlo May 2016 #40
Gee, a failing magazine with Clinton ties attacks Bernie... Yurovsky May 2016 #42
K&R mcar May 2016 #43
So a friendly outlet to Clinton continues the comparison to Trump nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #48
Bernie reminds me of Charles Bukowski, an angry twisted up old geezer beloved The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #51
Holy Shit, Lange had already ENDORSED Sanders???!!! Number23 May 2016 #65
Have you seen this link? apnu May 2016 #68
No, I hadn't but thanks very much for posting that. This entire ordeal has sullied Sanders' name Number23 May 2016 #69
This read was so good I need a cigarette now. Dayuum!! Number23 May 2016 #66
That ranks right up ther with the most over the top... GReedDiamond May 2016 #67

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
1. Bernie's campaign has been one big temper tantrum-it's not surprising
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:31 PM
May 2016

that a lot of his followers are constantly outraged about something. It's been that way since day one. Bernie is the anger and envy merchant-like an outboard motor in a cesspool.


azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
16. yep I hear Hillary does not being told no-that seems her privilege to say
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:14 PM
May 2016

but I know to some Hillary is underprivileged to others though she's the very embodiment of privilege

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
28. well I guess i'm all growed up 'cause she didn't kill Abe Lincoln
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:06 PM
May 2016

and on that thought I' don't ignore anyone

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
60. Adults also know actions have consequences.
Wed May 18, 2016, 08:58 PM
May 2016

Like voting for a candidate under criminal investigation and expecting nothing to happen.

That may be true: it could be that nothing happens. But I wouldn't want to take that risk.

 

scscholar

(2,902 posts)
5. And after July 28, ...
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:37 PM
May 2016

they'll just search and replace the names and republish this to hurt Trump. It's sad that it is applicable to both. Of course, both are late-comers to their party. They didn't want to be in the party until they needed us so they could use us. Both are like that.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
6. Yep, "Sanders, either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult or get out"
Wed May 18, 2016, 01:40 PM
May 2016

Or both.

Vinca

(50,236 posts)
15. People gave up on "Newsweek" after John Meacham turned it into "Jesus Week."
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:10 PM
May 2016

Totally irrelevant.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
10. It seems the media is intent on ensuring no party unity
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:01 PM
May 2016

And Clinton supporters are totally on board with that.

Good luck in the GE.

 

imagine2015

(2,054 posts)
14. Great source. A corporate rag in love with corporate billionnaires and Wall Street sharks.
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:07 PM
May 2016

Did the article mention that Bernie and his supporters are communistic terrorist hippies bent on establishing a Marxist dictatorship that will make women and children slaves to serve the almighty federal government overlords?

Or, where you going to make that point CrowCityDem?

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
50. True enough, but also a failed one.
Wed May 18, 2016, 07:13 PM
May 2016

They don't publish (or at any rate distribute) a magazine any more and they no longer report news. It's just a collection of editorials and "analysis" by self-important blowhards. Blogs, in other words. Clickbait. "Upworthy."

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
17. ooh New Week trying to stay relevant
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:16 PM
May 2016

are they still giving away subscriptions for 1.95 a month? Maybe after this they can raise it to 2.50

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
18. The Bagger Left snatching defeat from the jaws of victory?
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:25 PM
May 2016
"Sanders could go down as one of the most destructive forces in American history. Riots and flames at the convention—a repeat of the chaos of the 1968 Democratic Convention—would help open the White House doors for Donald Trump"


Of course it won't hurt Sanders surrogates like Rosario Dawson, 1% Susan Sarandon or Dr. Paul Song when Trump's fascists take over, they won the lottery of life long ago.

But it will be a living hell for the rest of us and much of the world as well no doubt.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
62. Either Trump or Clinton will hurt most of us.
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:04 PM
May 2016

He's a bigoted blowhard who hates immigrants and she's a corporate-owned war hawk who'll have us bombing Iran.

In fact, Trump may be less effective at blowing up the country because most of the Democrats and half the Republicans in Congress probably will work to block any hair-brained legislation he favors, but if Hillary tries to effectively kill Social Security by means-testing it, all the Third Way Democrats and Republicans will be behind her 100 percent.

#ImScrewedNoMatterWho

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
19. I don't know of any far right wing media that would be for Bernie. They're all for Clinton or trump
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:33 PM
May 2016

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
22. report?
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:46 PM
May 2016

From the article

"Even the Nevada state Democratic chairwoman, Roberta Lange, who had endorsed Sanders, needed a security detail just to go to the bathroom in order to protect her from the hypocritical “humanity lovers” who seem to hate everyone but themselves and their idol."

 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
23. No. Paint Bernie's party as radical. Anybody could do it to anybody. There are enough crazies to go
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:50 PM
May 2016

around. And there are ways to stoke anger and provoke reactions from generally sane people. You know this. Or you don't, I don't know. You should though.
 

JCanete

(5,272 posts)
59. No, it wasn't telling. it was convenient for you that I misspoke. You should definitely run with it.
Wed May 18, 2016, 08:47 PM
May 2016

Whatever you do don't elevate the level of conversation.

WhiteTara

(29,692 posts)
21. Here's this gem
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:43 PM
May 2016

When Bernie Sanders launched his presidential campaign, he seemed to be the kind of candidate who would inspire voters from the liberal blocs of the Democratic Party, push the party leftward and influence the future direction of politics—either as the nominee or as a force for change. But Sanders has increasingly signaled that he is in this race for Sanders, and day after day shows himself to be a whining crybaby with little interest in a broader movement. His vicious—and often ridiculous—attacks on the party whenever he doesn’t win a contest have inspired a level of ignorant fanaticism among a large swath of his supporters that is becoming more akin to what might be seen at an out-of-control rally for Donald Trump. Signs are emerging that the Sanders campaign is transmogrifying into the type of movement through which tyrants are born.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
44. I was being polite.
Wed May 18, 2016, 06:40 PM
May 2016

There are other words to describe Bro behavior, but I chose not to use them.

Response to okasha (Reply #44)

okasha

(11,573 posts)
58. And I'll be polite to you, too
Wed May 18, 2016, 08:35 PM
May 2016

I believe my "lyin' eyes," thank you very much, that tell me that the Bros are no myth.

QC

(26,371 posts)
30. Quite a few people here thought that was actually funny,
Wed May 18, 2016, 05:08 PM
May 2016

a real knee-slapper of a joke that some deranged fan would punch a woman in the face.

Ugly stuff, but not surprising, considering the sort of people we're dealing with.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
47. Or shooting at campaign headquarters
Wed May 18, 2016, 06:46 PM
May 2016

or breaking and entering into living quarters and ransacking them.

Virtual assassins...

And then they wonder why we take them seriously, not

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
48. So a friendly outlet to Clinton continues the comparison to Trump
Wed May 18, 2016, 06:48 PM
May 2016

so only one sane leader, yes I wrote LEADER with all that is implies emerges.

Hmm. And they wonder why I call them a modern version of Pravda.

What is next? Erasing people from history like Stalin used to do... oh wait. Capeheart tried.

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
51. Bernie reminds me of Charles Bukowski, an angry twisted up old geezer beloved
Wed May 18, 2016, 07:29 PM
May 2016

by the the young and disenfranchised.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
65. Holy Shit, Lange had already ENDORSED Sanders???!!!
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:47 PM
May 2016


Way to go, Berners! I'm sure she's super eager beaver to pull that lever for your guy now!

Number23

(24,544 posts)
69. No, I hadn't but thanks very much for posting that. This entire ordeal has sullied Sanders' name
Wed May 18, 2016, 10:21 PM
May 2016

made a mockery of his claims to be all about "truth and fairness," and have made far too may of his supporters look like lunatics.

Which of course, everyone on EARTH understands but said supporters that are so far gone no one really worries about what they think anyway.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
66. This read was so good I need a cigarette now. Dayuum!!
Wed May 18, 2016, 10:00 PM
May 2016

Every freaking word of it, TRUTH starting with the headline "Get Control or GET OUT." Lord have mercy!!!


Why is there no organized effort by his supporters, led by Sanders, to start changing the direction of the Democrats by snagging local and state-level positions in the party? Why are Sanders and his revolutionaries doing so little to find like-minded people who could run for office down-ballot—without such people sitting in Congress, the Vermont senator’s proposals could never be transformed into policy. Why is Sanders continuing to bilk his delusional supporters of money, despite the impossibility of his winning the nomination, rather than directing it to candidates who support his ideals? Why do so many of his supporters scream “fraud!” when he loses a state and demand changes to the rules that they proclaim would have led him to victory? (Hey, folks: The way you change rules is by gaining positions in the party, not by screaming and name-calling.)


Questions of the freaking century. But after Sanders has shown his ass so spectacularly, I sincerely doubt if there are hardly any people in politics or thinking about going into politics that would openly admit to sharing his ideals about anything.

So, Senator Sanders, either get control of what is becoming your increasingly unhinged cult or get out of the race. Whatever respect sane liberals had for you is rapidly dwindling, and the damage being inflicted on your reputation may be unfixable. If you can’t even manage the vicious thugs who act in your name, you can’t be trusted to run a convenience store, much less the country.


Truth!

But Sanders has increasingly signaled that he is in this race for Sanders, and day after day shows himself to be a whining crybaby with little interest in a broader movement. His vicious—and often ridiculous—attacks on the party whenever he doesn’t win a contest have inspired a level of ignorant fanaticism among a large swath of his supporters that is becoming more akin to what might be seen at an out-of-control rally for Donald Trump.


TRUTH!!!!

That was one HELL of a read. Good Lord, that was spectacular. K& Fucking Rec'd.

GReedDiamond

(5,310 posts)
67. That ranks right up ther with the most over the top...
Wed May 18, 2016, 10:06 PM
May 2016

...totally contrived BULLSHIT that I've ever seen or heard about ANYTHING!

And I notice it permeates all forms of media, including here at DU.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Newsweek lays the smackdo...