Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
Wed May 18, 2016, 09:57 PM May 2016

Rolling Stone: Pro-Bernie Trolls on Why They Harassed Nevada's Democratic Chair

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-20160518

BY TESSA STUART May 18, 2016

Here's what several men had to say for themselves after threatening Roberta Lange and calling her a "b-tch"



Democrats have been in a froth this week in the aftermath of Saturday's contentious, and at times violent, Nevada state convention. As Rolling Stone reported Tuesday, Bernie Sanders supporters, incensed by the party's handling of the proceedings — and the fact that Sanders failed to hold on to two pledged delegates he unexpectedly gained at the Clark County convention — clashed with Clinton supporters, who in turn called for the Sanders supporters' arrest.

Pissed off Sanders supporters, watching the events unfold online from around the country, began circulating the personal contact information for state party chair Roberta Lange. As a result, Lange became the target of a barrage of harassment, including death threats and threats of violence sent via voicemail and text message. On Monday, the party shared many of those messages — notably, and perhaps regrettably, without redacting some of the senders' phone numbers.

Rolling Stone spoke to several of the men who sent Lange angry, menacing text messages to find out what was going through their heads as they pelted a stranger with epithets and threats, both veiled or explicit, to her and her family's safety, and to find out if — as some diehard Sanders supporters have suggested — they were actually Clinton campaign operatives out to smear Bernie.

They were not. All of the men we spoke to were genuine Sanders supporters, most with well-documented histories online of feeling the Bern. (Although only their first names are used below and their phone numbers have been redacted, we verified all of their identities.)

None of them were present at the convention; none of them even live in Nevada. They watched from their homes in Texas, Georgia and Utah, and felt the brazen theft they witnessed validated their actions. All of the men we spoke to reject the idea that their words could be interpreted as threats or harassment. And all of them were concerned about the media contorting their words. So, in their words — edited only for length and clarity — here is what they had to say for themselves.

(Rest in link)
57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rolling Stone: Pro-Bernie Trolls on Why They Harassed Nevada's Democratic Chair (Original Post) MrWendel May 2016 OP
"None of them were present at the convention; none of them even live in Nevada."... SidDithers May 2016 #1
Wonder what their DU names are. nt msanthrope May 2016 #2
Haa!!! The sad thing is that you are probably right! nt eastwestdem May 2016 #3
To a person, these guys are clueless douches. nt msanthrope May 2016 #4
Willfully clueless! They all know nothing, too self indulgent Hortensis May 2016 #31
I don't think anyone of them would leave the basement. nt msanthrope May 2016 #33
Oh thanks, Msanthrope! Hortensis May 2016 #34
The interviews... MrWendel May 2016 #5
Assholes. This behavior is unacceptable. (nt) apnu May 2016 #6
Q: Did you intend your message as a threat? MrWendel May 2016 #7
Sounds to me like an admission of a crime. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #21
Tyler NCTraveler May 2016 #8
Moron thinks he will get an interview that way? What the fuck! bettyellen May 2016 #44
The amount of self-delusion in these guys is truly remarkable. TwilightZone May 2016 #9
Interesting how they walk it all back lovemydog May 2016 #10
They will be publicly identified Txbluedog May 2016 #11
Nasty pieces of work. joshcryer May 2016 #12
It will be interesting to see if and how Sanders reacts to this Txbluedog May 2016 #13
This message was self-deleted by its author Skwmom May 2016 #14
This person? MrWendel May 2016 #15
The article didn't strike me as objective journalism. Skwmom May 2016 #16
Rolling Stone under the bus. betsuni May 2016 #17
If they really found the people who sent those messages, the authorities should be involved. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #20
I don't know if the authorities should be involved or not, no idea about law. betsuni May 2016 #23
I'm about as pro-1st Amendment as they come, but it's against the law to threaten people. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #24
By the way, wondering if you still think that if Hillary doesn't get the nomination: betsuni May 2016 #35
Off topic, but yes, I still think that. But then, I'm a stickler for precise language, so please Warren DeMontague May 2016 #46
oh how sweet RollingStone is trying to be relevant again after running a fake rape story azurnoir May 2016 #18
Rolling stone, that font of Journalistic integrity. "We verified all of their identities" Warren DeMontague May 2016 #19
beat me to it AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #51
No shit. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #52
What were they responding to though? Somebody was stoking the fire. ucrdem May 2016 #22
A lot of Americans have died for our democracy. It's probably a bad idea to steal elections. (nt) w4rma May 2016 #27
You mean the one where Clinton received 52.6 percent of the vote? BeyondGeography May 2016 #28
So, you believe that since Bernie's folks showed up, for the rest of the caucus, you should change w4rma May 2016 #29
You'll always have the county conventions BeyondGeography May 2016 #30
They tried to the steal the election and were foiled. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #36
SMH DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #25
I see RS is wooing millennials by jumping on the MSM meme bandwagon again. Lodestar May 2016 #26
Archie Bunker is alive and loves Bernie.... Sancho May 2016 #32
"because it felt like democracy was stolen" Kip Humphrey May 2016 #37
And... MrWendel May 2016 #38
And... Kip Humphrey May 2016 #40
The war... MrWendel May 2016 #48
Arrest and prosecute every single one of them Renew Deal May 2016 #39
I hope they have retained counsel. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #42
On one hand, fuck. These people are lunatics. VulgarPoet May 2016 #41
They aren't lunatics, they've just been played for suckers by a deeply cynical campaign. ucrdem May 2016 #45
That seems a touch or three too gentle. VulgarPoet May 2016 #56
Here's a Jezebel link in which they contacted others PeaceNikki May 2016 #43
Honestly what was the symbolic significance of the bird on the podium for him? tandem5 May 2016 #47
To be honest Nonhlanhla May 2016 #57
Members of the Broletariate, Tweet! The Second Stone May 2016 #49
Look, if you want to make the language joke, do it right. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #53
Grammerletariat The Second Stone May 2016 #54
You know, language persnicketiness is part of the "bro code" Warren DeMontague May 2016 #55
"All of the men we spoke to were genuine Sanders supporters" and "none of them were in Nevada" Number23 May 2016 #50

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
31. Willfully clueless! They all know nothing, too self indulgent
Thu May 19, 2016, 05:50 AM
May 2016

and what?...willfully self deceptive? to spend a few minutes relaxing in a chair educating themselves about background and context. Drives me crazy. In another world, every one of these people would grab a torch or machete and run out the door to join a current leader's riot, no questions asked. In a manner of speaking, they did.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
34. Oh thanks, Msanthrope!
Thu May 19, 2016, 06:51 AM
May 2016
I needed that. I misplaced my sense of humor last night, and...sonofagun, here it is! Thank goodness.

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
7. Q: Did you intend your message as a threat?
Wed May 18, 2016, 10:13 PM
May 2016

A: Like, from a legal perspective… I didn't make it a direct threat. There's an implication, and I'm implying, right? I'm inferring that I could do something, but I was doing that to show — it was kind of just a, Hey, let's set the mood here and see if anything will happen.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
21. Sounds to me like an admission of a crime.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:53 AM
May 2016

Is RS interested in justice being served? Can we expect this person to be arrested?

If this article is true, then i would expect to see charges filed.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
8. Tyler
Wed May 18, 2016, 10:18 PM
May 2016

"I get to work with CFOs and executives all day and night. I don't even sweat anymore. I don't feel that intensity, I don't get scared."

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-20160518#ixzz49424kCve
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

TwilightZone

(27,173 posts)
9. The amount of self-delusion in these guys is truly remarkable.
Wed May 18, 2016, 10:28 PM
May 2016

The entitlement evident is equally remarkable.

 

Txbluedog

(1,128 posts)
11. They will be publicly identified
Thu May 19, 2016, 01:37 AM
May 2016

In this day and age, it is virtually impossible that these people won't be publicly identified

Response to MrWendel (Original post)

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
15. This person?
Thu May 19, 2016, 02:23 AM
May 2016
Do you worry when you're writing texts like these that they might be bad for the Sanders campaign?
I am going to get in so much trouble for answering this phone call, but since I guess we're bringing the topic up, personally, I don't work for any campaign. I don't know anybody who does. I was not talking to anybody on Saturday. I was watching it with myself and my boyfriend, and we were just watching it in our own home. So just to make it very clear, there's nobody else. When you call me, I'm the only person. Like, I haven't talked to anybody else [who] may have done anything like that. I just want to make sure [you know] that I'm not with any organization or anything like that.

Right, but your social media accounts show you have a long history of supporting Bernie. So are you worried about that?
You're right, stuff like that doesn't benefit the campaign, but it's not necessarily about his campaign, as [much as] it is [about] anger. And I'm not justifying any threats or anything like that, but I would justify people who were upset. Because there is clearly stuff that should not have happened that did happen on Saturday. I can speak for myself: that was very upsetting to me, and the person I was viewing it with, because it felt like democracy was stolen. Like, people weren't getting their voices heard. The DNC is a private organization — they can do whatever they want to do, but if you watch the video, and I'm sure you have (there are several videos and live-streams and news reports), you could understand there were a few different times when [Lange] didn't do the best job of making sure people's voices were heard fairly.


Yeah....

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
16. The article didn't strike me as objective journalism.
Thu May 19, 2016, 02:53 AM
May 2016

In addition, anyone who thinks online web activity can identify real Bernie Supporters hasn't spent much time
on political sites on the web. Why do people play the games they do? Besides the ones who do it for the pay, I have no idea.

From the article: All of the men we spoke to were genuine Sanders supporters, most with well-documented histories online of feeling the Bern.

So if they didn't have well-documented online histories how did they verify they were genuine Sanders supporters? And again, there are long time self identified Bernie supporters on the web who are NOT Bernie supporters.

Secondly, no discussion of what happened at the convention. To call someone a troll without discussing the events which led people to their actions seems rather unfair.

Did some Bernie supporters send messages? Probably. I think some paid political operatives get a perverse joy of manufacturing uproars in part because they can reel in and use unsuspecting people to push their narrative.

But where they all Bernie supporters who sent messages? Considering that it is the political world we are talking about and the conduct of the NV democratic party members who led the Convention and others, I would find that hard to believe. Also, hard to draw that conclusion from only a few of the texts or calls being looked at.

Interesting how the one person kept disavowing association with any group. And some of the questions..

From the article: I think people are curious about who sends these kinds of messages. There is a conspiracy that these weren't Bernie Sanders supporters at all, but operatives for Hillary Clinton.

Not a conspiracy. But considering the operative paid to work online and the manufactured nature of the uproar it seems like a reasonable suspicion - one this article did not disprove. People were wondering why the Democratic Establishment did this? In part, it seems that the events were intended to upset Bernie supporters, to spread the event so that they could get his supporters to react and then use those actions to feed their narratives about Bernie Supporters. What a wonderful business.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-20160518#ixzz495C0qd5i
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook



betsuni

(27,226 posts)
17. Rolling Stone under the bus.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:02 AM
May 2016

Say hello to Wonkette, The Rude Pundit, Mother Jones, Rachel Maddow, NPR, who also rolled under there this week.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
20. If they really found the people who sent those messages, the authorities should be involved.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:50 AM
May 2016

Whether or not these "verified identities" believe what they did was criminal, or not, threatening people is an actual crime. Like against the actual law.

And if rolling stone could find them, then law enforcement should be able to, as well--- Or hell, RS ought to turn them in.

Because threats are serious business, and should be prosecuted.


Wouldnt you agree?

betsuni

(27,226 posts)
23. I don't know if the authorities should be involved or not, no idea about law.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:04 AM
May 2016

There are people insisting that at least some of calls must be made by paid operatives. I'm wondering though, surely they wouldn't be instructed to make such threats, what with the possibility that the authorities would be involved. And if they were contacted by the press or authorities, wouldn't they get scared and name names, say "Karl Rove made me do it!" I know I would. Most of the callers sound like idiots.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
24. I'm about as pro-1st Amendment as they come, but it's against the law to threaten people.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:12 AM
May 2016

And those messages were threats.

If Rolling Stone could find the people, the cops should be able to, too. I mean, they'll track some sick 52 year old lady home from the hydroponics store so they can have her sent to prison for 10 years over the weed she's growing in her basement, one would think threats of violence and physical harm ought to warrant at least as much interest.



Also, Rolling Stone's track record on these sorts of investigative journalism/criminal allegation stories hasn't exactly been stellar lately.

betsuni

(27,226 posts)
35. By the way, wondering if you still think that if Hillary doesn't get the nomination:
Thu May 19, 2016, 08:54 AM
May 2016

"There is going to be a series of meltdowns that make Fukushima took tame by comparison." I remember that because I live in Japan and don't think it's funny. Who's melting down, freaking out, paranoid? Not Hillary supporters. Hillary supporters will vote for the Democratic nominee because they are not stupid.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
46. Off topic, but yes, I still think that. But then, I'm a stickler for precise language, so please
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:42 PM
May 2016

examine what that sentence actually says.

I give incredibly low odds at this point, of Hillary NOT getting the nomination, but then I've always figured she probably would.

And who is melting down about it? Not me.

Edited to add: if the Fukushima thing offended you, I do apologize. What happened there is terrible and I certainly dont intend to make light of it.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
19. Rolling stone, that font of Journalistic integrity. "We verified all of their identities"
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:42 AM
May 2016

Was any of them named "Haven Monahan", perchance?

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
51. beat me to it
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:59 PM
May 2016

anyone who takes unverifiable information from Rolling Stone at face value is a moron.

Too bad Hunter S Thompson was cremated instead of buried, otherwise we could light up Denver by wrapping some copper wire around the casket.

ucrdem

(15,700 posts)
22. What were they responding to though? Somebody was stoking the fire.
Thu May 19, 2016, 03:57 AM
May 2016

That's the sad fact that was also noted in the complaint filed against the Sanders campaign by the Nevada State Democratic Party, also observable in the video tweets that came out of the May 5 ELAC confrontations:

The Sanders Campaign spent its time either ignoring or profiting from the chaos it did much to create and nothing to diminish or mitigate.

It was clear to the NSDP that part of the approach by the Sanders Campaign was to employ these easily-incensed delegates as shock troops to sway the convention proceedings.

At the very least, these delegates became a way for the Sanders Campaign to seek the advantage of disruption at any particular moment while trying to disavow any responsibility for their actions even as it was ongoing.

At no time did any Sanders representative make anything more than token gestures towards peace in the hall, and at the times of most intense crisis offered little more than shrugs and smirks.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/312844982/160516-Letter-DNC-RBC-NVDemsConvention


I see no plausible deniability here.
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
27. A lot of Americans have died for our democracy. It's probably a bad idea to steal elections. (nt)
Thu May 19, 2016, 05:31 AM
May 2016
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
29. So, you believe that since Bernie's folks showed up, for the rest of the caucus, you should change
Thu May 19, 2016, 05:38 AM
May 2016

the rules of the caucus, and undermine democracy.

Sorry, but Bernie stayed within the rules. Clinton abused the rules and broke them and stole the Nevada election in the end.

DemocratSinceBirth

(100,000 posts)
36. They tried to the steal the election and were foiled.
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:04 AM
May 2016

The phone calls are perfect examples of the bullying tactics used to cow us. It won't work.


BTW, this is risible:


I'm a person that has a military dad, my parents got divorced, my grandmother had Parkinson's — I just had this very rough, challenging childhood where I was just kind of sad. It was such a sad childhood.... I was just a tough kid. I only cry in a funeral for family, and all of a sudden I'm 29, I see a man who I'm already just all about his campaign, and then the bird lands on his thing, and people's reaction — I connected. I connected to a moment with all those people about something just way different.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-





Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
37. "because it felt like democracy was stolen"
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:04 AM
May 2016

Right, or wrong, people tend to get angry when they experience this.

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
48. The war...
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:28 PM
May 2016

between the Americans and British was a revolution. The French revolution was A Revolution. Keep drawing parallels.

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
41. On one hand, fuck. These people are lunatics.
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:39 AM
May 2016

On the other hand, this doesn't make me want to support Hillary Clinton any more than it did yesterday-- now I'm just on the verge of saying screw both candidates, if Sanders hasn't come out to publically denounce this kind of bullshit.

ucrdem

(15,700 posts)
45. They aren't lunatics, they've just been played for suckers by a deeply cynical campaign.
Thu May 19, 2016, 04:18 PM
May 2016

Where did the first one for example find that handy graphic that he passed along? The slick "3 ways you can say fired" pic that helpfully supplies the NV party chair's full name, photo, title, and phone number?

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
56. That seems a touch or three too gentle.
Fri May 20, 2016, 08:18 AM
May 2016

I've completed hated every single time a Clinton supporter called a Sanders supporter unhinged. But this? While I won't lie, I understand the sentiment-- I have a deep disdain for people who think death threats are a good road to take. In my eyes, that's unhinged. Cynicism only goes so far, and in my case, it has never led to me doxxing someone and threatening their life. That's a completely wrong way to go about things-- I have to believe there's more instability there than "played for suckers by a deeply cynical campaign".

tandem5

(2,077 posts)
47. Honestly what was the symbolic significance of the bird on the podium for him?
Thu May 19, 2016, 05:20 PM
May 2016

I believe that guy in the last interview when he said he was hooked by the bird. But what was it? Something akin to Snow White being one with nature? An emotional cue for shared comradery where the specific symbol has no special meaning. Was it being caught off guard at an emotionally vulnerable moment ("full double rainbow -- what does it mean?&quot .

There's nothing wrong with critical introspection especially when that individual goes from feeling a shared connection via a finch to texting death threats or least some very negative words.

Nonhlanhla

(2,074 posts)
57. To be honest
Fri May 20, 2016, 09:14 AM
May 2016

He sounded like a religious cultist.

By the way, a bird flying into your house is traditionally seen as a bad omen...

 

The Second Stone

(2,900 posts)
49. Members of the Broletariate, Tweet!
Thu May 19, 2016, 09:39 PM
May 2016

You have nothing else to do and are bored! Threaten a woman and her family! I hope they are charged.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
55. You know, language persnicketiness is part of the "bro code"
Thu May 19, 2016, 11:48 PM
May 2016

It's right up there with "he who kills the keg is in charge of returning the tap to the liquor store"

Number23

(24,544 posts)
50. "All of the men we spoke to were genuine Sanders supporters" and "none of them were in Nevada"
Thu May 19, 2016, 10:45 PM
May 2016

We're all shocked. Really.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Rolling Stone: Pro-Bernie...