2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRolling Stone: Pro-Bernie Trolls on Why They Harassed Nevada's Democratic Chair
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-20160518BY TESSA STUART May 18, 2016
Here's what several men had to say for themselves after threatening Roberta Lange and calling her a "b-tch"
Democrats have been in a froth this week in the aftermath of Saturday's contentious, and at times violent, Nevada state convention. As Rolling Stone reported Tuesday, Bernie Sanders supporters, incensed by the party's handling of the proceedings and the fact that Sanders failed to hold on to two pledged delegates he unexpectedly gained at the Clark County convention clashed with Clinton supporters, who in turn called for the Sanders supporters' arrest.
Pissed off Sanders supporters, watching the events unfold online from around the country, began circulating the personal contact information for state party chair Roberta Lange. As a result, Lange became the target of a barrage of harassment, including death threats and threats of violence sent via voicemail and text message. On Monday, the party shared many of those messages notably, and perhaps regrettably, without redacting some of the senders' phone numbers.
Rolling Stone spoke to several of the men who sent Lange angry, menacing text messages to find out what was going through their heads as they pelted a stranger with epithets and threats, both veiled or explicit, to her and her family's safety, and to find out if as some diehard Sanders supporters have suggested they were actually Clinton campaign operatives out to smear Bernie.
They were not. All of the men we spoke to were genuine Sanders supporters, most with well-documented histories online of feeling the Bern. (Although only their first names are used below and their phone numbers have been redacted, we verified all of their identities.)
None of them were present at the convention; none of them even live in Nevada. They watched from their homes in Texas, Georgia and Utah, and felt the brazen theft they witnessed validated their actions. All of the men we spoke to reject the idea that their words could be interpreted as threats or harassment. And all of them were concerned about the media contorting their words. So, in their words edited only for length and clarity here is what they had to say for themselves.
(Rest in link)
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Huh.
Sid
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and what?...willfully self deceptive? to spend a few minutes relaxing in a chair educating themselves about background and context. Drives me crazy. In another world, every one of these people would grab a torch or machete and run out the door to join a current leader's riot, no questions asked. In a manner of speaking, they did.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)in this are amazing.
apnu
(8,788 posts)MrWendel
(1,881 posts)A: Like, from a legal perspective I didn't make it a direct threat. There's an implication, and I'm implying, right? I'm inferring that I could do something, but I was doing that to show it was kind of just a, Hey, let's set the mood here and see if anything will happen.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Is RS interested in justice being served? Can we expect this person to be arrested?
If this article is true, then i would expect to see charges filed.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)"I get to work with CFOs and executives all day and night. I don't even sweat anymore. I don't feel that intensity, I don't get scared."
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-20160518#ixzz49424kCve
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)TwilightZone
(27,173 posts)The entitlement evident is equally remarkable.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)after they're identified.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)In this day and age, it is virtually impossible that these people won't be publicly identified
joshcryer
(62,347 posts)And as if there was any doubt they were supporters.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)Response to MrWendel (Original post)
Skwmom This message was self-deleted by its author.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)I am going to get in so much trouble for answering this phone call, but since I guess we're bringing the topic up, personally, I don't work for any campaign. I don't know anybody who does. I was not talking to anybody on Saturday. I was watching it with myself and my boyfriend, and we were just watching it in our own home. So just to make it very clear, there's nobody else. When you call me, I'm the only person. Like, I haven't talked to anybody else [who] may have done anything like that. I just want to make sure [you know] that I'm not with any organization or anything like that.
Right, but your social media accounts show you have a long history of supporting Bernie. So are you worried about that?
You're right, stuff like that doesn't benefit the campaign, but it's not necessarily about his campaign, as [much as] it is [about] anger. And I'm not justifying any threats or anything like that, but I would justify people who were upset. Because there is clearly stuff that should not have happened that did happen on Saturday. I can speak for myself: that was very upsetting to me, and the person I was viewing it with, because it felt like democracy was stolen. Like, people weren't getting their voices heard. The DNC is a private organization they can do whatever they want to do, but if you watch the video, and I'm sure you have (there are several videos and live-streams and news reports), you could understand there were a few different times when [Lange] didn't do the best job of making sure people's voices were heard fairly.
Yeah....
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)In addition, anyone who thinks online web activity can identify real Bernie Supporters hasn't spent much time
on political sites on the web. Why do people play the games they do? Besides the ones who do it for the pay, I have no idea.
From the article: All of the men we spoke to were genuine Sanders supporters, most with well-documented histories online of feeling the Bern.
So if they didn't have well-documented online histories how did they verify they were genuine Sanders supporters? And again, there are long time self identified Bernie supporters on the web who are NOT Bernie supporters.
Secondly, no discussion of what happened at the convention. To call someone a troll without discussing the events which led people to their actions seems rather unfair.
Did some Bernie supporters send messages? Probably. I think some paid political operatives get a perverse joy of manufacturing uproars in part because they can reel in and use unsuspecting people to push their narrative.
But where they all Bernie supporters who sent messages? Considering that it is the political world we are talking about and the conduct of the NV democratic party members who led the Convention and others, I would find that hard to believe. Also, hard to draw that conclusion from only a few of the texts or calls being looked at.
Interesting how the one person kept disavowing association with any group. And some of the questions..
From the article: I think people are curious about who sends these kinds of messages. There is a conspiracy that these weren't Bernie Sanders supporters at all, but operatives for Hillary Clinton.
Not a conspiracy. But considering the operative paid to work online and the manufactured nature of the uproar it seems like a reasonable suspicion - one this article did not disprove. People were wondering why the Democratic Establishment did this? In part, it seems that the events were intended to upset Bernie supporters, to spread the event so that they could get his supporters to react and then use those actions to feed their narratives about Bernie Supporters. What a wonderful business.
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-20160518#ixzz495C0qd5i
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook
betsuni
(27,226 posts)Say hello to Wonkette, The Rude Pundit, Mother Jones, Rachel Maddow, NPR, who also rolled under there this week.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Whether or not these "verified identities" believe what they did was criminal, or not, threatening people is an actual crime. Like against the actual law.
And if rolling stone could find them, then law enforcement should be able to, as well--- Or hell, RS ought to turn them in.
Because threats are serious business, and should be prosecuted.
Wouldnt you agree?
betsuni
(27,226 posts)There are people insisting that at least some of calls must be made by paid operatives. I'm wondering though, surely they wouldn't be instructed to make such threats, what with the possibility that the authorities would be involved. And if they were contacted by the press or authorities, wouldn't they get scared and name names, say "Karl Rove made me do it!" I know I would. Most of the callers sound like idiots.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And those messages were threats.
If Rolling Stone could find the people, the cops should be able to, too. I mean, they'll track some sick 52 year old lady home from the hydroponics store so they can have her sent to prison for 10 years over the weed she's growing in her basement, one would think threats of violence and physical harm ought to warrant at least as much interest.
Also, Rolling Stone's track record on these sorts of investigative journalism/criminal allegation stories hasn't exactly been stellar lately.
betsuni
(27,226 posts)"There is going to be a series of meltdowns that make Fukushima took tame by comparison." I remember that because I live in Japan and don't think it's funny. Who's melting down, freaking out, paranoid? Not Hillary supporters. Hillary supporters will vote for the Democratic nominee because they are not stupid.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)examine what that sentence actually says.
I give incredibly low odds at this point, of Hillary NOT getting the nomination, but then I've always figured she probably would.
And who is melting down about it? Not me.
Edited to add: if the Fukushima thing offended you, I do apologize. What happened there is terrible and I certainly dont intend to make light of it.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Was any of them named "Haven Monahan", perchance?
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)anyone who takes unverifiable information from Rolling Stone at face value is a moron.
Too bad Hunter S Thompson was cremated instead of buried, otherwise we could light up Denver by wrapping some copper wire around the casket.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)He would have some choice words for a lot of people, I think.
ucrdem
(15,700 posts)That's the sad fact that was also noted in the complaint filed against the Sanders campaign by the Nevada State Democratic Party, also observable in the video tweets that came out of the May 5 ELAC confrontations:
It was clear to the NSDP that part of the approach by the Sanders Campaign was to employ these easily-incensed delegates as shock troops to sway the convention proceedings.
At the very least, these delegates became a way for the Sanders Campaign to seek the advantage of disruption at any particular moment while trying to disavow any responsibility for their actions even as it was ongoing.
At no time did any Sanders representative make anything more than token gestures towards peace in the hall, and at the times of most intense crisis offered little more than shrugs and smirks.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/312844982/160516-Letter-DNC-RBC-NVDemsConvention
I see no plausible deniability here.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,921 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)the rules of the caucus, and undermine democracy.
Sorry, but Bernie stayed within the rules. Clinton abused the rules and broke them and stole the Nevada election in the end.
BeyondGeography
(39,921 posts)What a great victory for democracy that was.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,000 posts)The phone calls are perfect examples of the bullying tactics used to cow us. It won't work.
BTW, this is risible:
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/pro-bernie-trolls-on-why-they-harassed-nevadas-democratic-chair-
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,000 posts)Lodestar
(2,388 posts)Good luck with that.
Sancho
(9,085 posts)Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)Right, or wrong, people tend to get angry when they experience this.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)threaten someone's family. These things happen.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)start revolutions.
MrWendel
(1,881 posts)between the Americans and British was a revolution. The French revolution was A Revolution. Keep drawing parallels.
Renew Deal
(82,812 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(100,000 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)On the other hand, this doesn't make me want to support Hillary Clinton any more than it did yesterday-- now I'm just on the verge of saying screw both candidates, if Sanders hasn't come out to publically denounce this kind of bullshit.
ucrdem
(15,700 posts)Where did the first one for example find that handy graphic that he passed along? The slick "3 ways you can say fired" pic that helpfully supplies the NV party chair's full name, photo, title, and phone number?
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)I've completed hated every single time a Clinton supporter called a Sanders supporter unhinged. But this? While I won't lie, I understand the sentiment-- I have a deep disdain for people who think death threats are a good road to take. In my eyes, that's unhinged. Cynicism only goes so far, and in my case, it has never led to me doxxing someone and threatening their life. That's a completely wrong way to go about things-- I have to believe there's more instability there than "played for suckers by a deeply cynical campaign".
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)tandem5
(2,077 posts)I believe that guy in the last interview when he said he was hooked by the bird. But what was it? Something akin to Snow White being one with nature? An emotional cue for shared comradery where the specific symbol has no special meaning. Was it being caught off guard at an emotionally vulnerable moment ("full double rainbow -- what does it mean?" .
There's nothing wrong with critical introspection especially when that individual goes from feeling a shared connection via a finch to texting death threats or least some very negative words.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)He sounded like a religious cultist.
By the way, a bird flying into your house is traditionally seen as a bad omen...
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)You have nothing else to do and are bored! Threaten a woman and her family! I hope they are charged.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It should be broletariat. no "e".
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)is only the right way to do it!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's right up there with "he who kills the keg is in charge of returning the tap to the liquor store"
Number23
(24,544 posts)We're all shocked. Really.