To Hillary supporters I don't think she's evil or machiavellian.

[JRLeft]

I think she's wrong and her neoliberal, neoconservative policies are bad for the country. She's light years better than Trump but her policies will continue the expansion of income inequality gap.

[TheBlackAdder]

1. Self-Affecting is a closer term, right down to the server and BlackBerry to make her life easier.

.


Any other social byproducts of her actions are a direct result of self-affecting behavior.

Her non-committal of KXL, and other recent changes of opinion--mostly driven by market research over core values.


.

[Lizzie Poppet]

2. For me, no to the former, yes to the latter.

Evil? Of course not. For one thing, I don't ascribe that trait to people at all...only to actions. Moreover, Human being are complex, and I don't think I've ever met any that were cartoonish enough to actually resemble the "evil" bad guys in poorly-written fiction.

But Machiavellian? Yeah, I think that's fair, actually. She's an "anything to win" type, through and through.

[auntpurl]

6. Up to a certain point, I like Machiavellian in a politician.

Politics ain't hopscotch.

I sure want her to be as MACHIAVELLIAN as possible against Drumpf in November. If it means she's more prepared and more ruthless than her opponent, we all win.

[BootinUp]

3. Weak sauce. Her policies are very liberal which is why Bernie resorted to character attacks. nt

[Vincardog]

5. Her policies are very neo-liberal when they are not neo-conservative. She is a war hawk & corporate

[procon]

4. What policies are you talking about?

Unless you're just editorializing and making things up to coincide with your point of view, we must be looking at different policies. If I go browse through her website and read, first hand, what her policies are, I can't see anything that would correspond with what you're saying.

I'm not saying you're lying... exactly, but where are these policies you referring to?