2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumwhy would Sanders be the nominee if Hillary is forced to withdraw
He has done nothing to support the Democratic Party, in one of his recent campaign events he even led his listeners in booing the party. What makes anyone think that the Democratic Party establishment would want him as their nominee---
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Joe Biden would step in....sanders never will be the nominee under any scenario
Stallion
(6,642 posts)nm
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Again no sanders... Not now...not ever
yodermon
(6,153 posts)message received
cloudbase
(6,270 posts)Party uber alles.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)nt
flor-de-jasmim
(2,282 posts)Party names are labels - what has DWS done for the PARTY?
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)The democratic establishment does not care about your "ideals" so I ask again: why would they give him the nomination
Buns_of_Fire
(19,161 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(130,533 posts)And a hell of a lot of people have voted, and will vote for him. If it's true that the corrupt, Wall Street-owned Democratic Party "establishment" doesn't want him, that's all the more reason to support him, IMO. Of course, the party could just pull some other candidate out of its collective ass and call that person the nominee - just like in 1968, when the PTB decided Humphrey, who had never even run in any primary election, should be their guy. And we all saw how that turned out.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)If not, I would hope Pledhed and Supers would hold out. We would no longer be able to honor the will of the voters. The delegates should consider the number of votes Sanders has gotten.
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Who is more likely to win against Trump. Biden or Sanders? The delegates would have to decide.
At least there is an option if it happens before convention time. Nobody seems to know what to do if it happens just before the GE.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)on a hot mike with Obama
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Howler
(4,225 posts)SANDERS should run independent. He would owe nothing to the democratic establishment then or now.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Getting votes because they are on the ballots. Hillary will have more than the required delegates in June so maybe you meant to say Hillary would be forced to withdraw, looks like Sanders will be forced to withdraw.
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)More than Hillary because of his campaign funding of more than $2700 from one donor.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)Out of all of the recent Sanders scandals, that one is the most disturbing.
frylock
(34,825 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)So what do you have our heroine getting "forced to withdraw" for this time? Is about that silly plot with the alien lizard overlords living under the White House, or that One World Order cabal? Its all lies and conspiracies, I tells ya!
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)He has done nothing to support the Democratic Party?
Fine...
He has done everything to push an agenda that represents the very best of what the Democratic Party once advocated for and stood for.
So I quite frankly don't care what letter you place next to his name, his ideals are very much in step with ours
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Interesting philosophy.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)are nothing more than tools to be used and discarded when it is no longer profitable to keep them.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)The voters should leave politics to the professionals......
And the result is a stagnant economy, dropping levels of unionization, increasing wealth concentration. And the Democrats ask why voters are apathetic.
Gothmog
(179,868 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)others want to discredit his position by providing the record where he has helped with Democratic fundraising.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/sanders-democratic-fundraisers/index.html
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)If Bernie were out in Kasich-land in terms of popularity, the DNC could get away with replacing Hillary with someone other than Bernie, but that's not the case. It would be the height of folly to bring in someone else.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)He'd have the most after the hypothetical withdrawn candidate.
I'd hate to see the party commit suicide (in this hypothetical situation), but that would be on their heads.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Delegates, if Hillary with draws the delegates are still pledged, she could release them to Biden or O'Malley. There will not be enough delegates left for Sanders to even get half of the pledged delegates.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)It may have worked that way in the past, but should it work that way at any point in the future, I'm out.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Million more voted than Sanders, she has more delegates than Sanders, why should Sanders get the nomination when it is clear he did not get the votes or delegates, one of his issues is oligarchy, then allowing him the nomination is oligarchy.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)The discussion here is of a hypothetical situation where she withdraws. That should mean the nomination goes to second place, not that she gets to pick all by herself. In a rational world. If it were not so close you might possibly have a point. But it is.
Ideal thing, should she get the nomination, is she's not forced to withdraw. I don't think she will be, at least before the convention. If there's any there there, I think it's being saved for maximum disruption.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)"Released delegates" can be encouraged to vote the way they are being "released"...but they can't be compelled to do so. "Release" makes them technically unpledged. On average, they tend to vote about 80-85% the way they've been encouraged to.
Unfortunately for Clintonites like ThinkingAbout, Sanders would probably only need to peel about 4% of them to take the nomination on the 1st ballot. If Hillary drops, the nomination is almost certainly Sanders. A replacement candidate like Biden would have a nearly-impossible path to the nomination...and for that reason, it's unlikely that they will actually even find someone to stand for the race.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)Cal33
(7,018 posts)rating, there is simply no one else. The majority of the American people want him.
To the Republicans and Corporatists, of course, the American people mean nothing at all.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/2016_presidential_race.html
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Her numbers never go up.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Unless you can provide video of Bernie LEADING HIS LISTENERS IN BOOING THE PARTY. Can you?
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Our party would not choose him if he were the last human being alive. He has caused them so much trouble, rocked the boat so violently, revealed the special interests that dominate our party, and, worst of all, given people a genuine alternative to Republican and not quite Republican, that they will never forgive him. I predict they will not allow him to caucus with them in the Senate. They hate him.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)In that case it wouldn't be MY party anymore.
Cal33
(7,018 posts)click the link in Post #33 above.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I personally think that if the party went with anyone except the (very close) second-place finisher, it would be political suicide for the party. I know it would be as far as I'm concerned.
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)I'm done with Bernie Sanders. He's the Nader of the day and is trying to become Joe Lieberman.
Response to Txbluedog (Original post)
NowSam This message was self-deleted by its author.
Karma13612
(4,981 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)the only way I could tell them apart is that Trump has better clothes and has more money.
frylock
(34,825 posts)mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)Karma13612
(4,981 posts)Biden would be selected.
If all the Clinton supporters are so against Bernie "angry old white guy" Sanders, why would they simply substitute Joe (old white guy) Biden?
And I thought Biden didn't want to be President. He decided not to run.
I am very confused.
But, open to clarification.
Just to be clear, I like Joe Biden, and , I don't think Bernie is an angry old white guy. I love him dearly and am supporting him 150%. I just know that this is a very common description for him which I personally find very offensive.
Hillary will be the nominee, as long as the FBI investigation doesn't unearth anything bad.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)This is a silly thread. But there are a lot of silly threads in GDP.
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)a batshit crazy move would be.
frylock
(34,825 posts)That would be the death knell of your precious Party.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Why else would you post this shit.