Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumMessage auto-removed
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Message auto-removed (Original Post)
Name removed
May 2016
OP
Obama has NEVER had the baggage of the Clintons. It is comparing apples and oranges.
Skwmom
May 2016
#2
Uh, ya might want to rethink that comment. Obama's skin color was a far greater obstacle.
tonyt53
May 2016
#5
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)1. The very reason that polls until after Labor Day mean absolutely nothing
But political novices don't know any better
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)2. Obama has NEVER had the baggage of the Clintons. It is comparing apples and oranges.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Response to Skwmom (Reply #2)
Name removed Message auto-removed
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)5. Uh, ya might want to rethink that comment. Obama's skin color was a far greater obstacle.
He was able to overcome that
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
onehandle
(51,122 posts)3. He should have resigned that day.
Clearly that was a 'trend.'
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
merrily
(45,251 posts)6. Obama was not a candidate who lost poll points the more he was exposed to people.
False equivalency.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
As a national figure, Obama was relatively unknown to a lot of voters who were starting from "the black guy with the funny name". His obvious wit and consummate professional demeanor tended to increase his appeal with exposure. People went from "I don't know anything about the guy" to "dang, he's pretty good" with exposure.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
merrily
(45,251 posts)8. He also didn't operate out of "Discredit and destroy and worry about Party unity later."
And, he was to Hillary's left politically. And didn't rate as dishonest and untrustworthy with more than half of Americans polled. Etc.
That's a core issue. If people don't believe what you're saying or trust you to keep your word, if elected....
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions