2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie would be NOWHERE without the DNC.
No access to campaign resources. No access to data. No access to voter rolls. No access to debates. No access to fundraising. Etc etc etc. This was decades of work by the Democratic party, and they handed it all over to a non-Democrat.
The DNC bent over backwards for a candidate who not only wasnt a Democrat, but was also at times hostile towards the Democratic party i.e. suggested a primary challenge to Obama in 2012.
So, when does Bernie return the favor?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)Folks like you are the reason Hillary will be unable to gain enough independent votes.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Response to asuhornets (Reply #4)
Post removed
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Android3.14
(5,402 posts)All I have for you is sadness that your spirit is so compromised. Is this where you saw yourself when you graduated high school?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Physician, heal thyself.
bvf
(6,604 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Like that is relevant to anything.
bvf
(6,604 posts)to these words of yours, yes; absolutely so:
Physician, heal thyself.
Well, doc, whaddaya think?
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)arikara
(5,562 posts)Then say you want dialogue? Somehow I doubt dialogue is actually your intention.
asuhornets
(2,405 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Also, no one would even know who Bernie is if not for the DNC. Am I right or wrong?
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)You are soulsick.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)so he needed the DNC to have many debates.
Now all that is not the case.
In all my years voting since 1968 I have never seen a campaign where convenient facts are invented on the fly like Bernie's campaign.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)9999dmg
(18 posts)And many people knew who Bernie Sanders was before his bid. Enjoy your symptom.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)then the DNC will be in the same leaky boat the RNC is in
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Dem 36%, Ind 31%, Rep 28%.
And among indies, its about evenly split 50/50 left/right.
Did you really think you were going to bullshit me?
#OperationChaos2016
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)That's why she has taken her responsibilities as a Democrat seriously for decades, has been an active member of the Party, and has helped other Democrats get elected to office.
What has Bernie ever done for Democrats?
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I would hope he would show kindness.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)And what was Bernie's response when asked if he would be donating to down-ticket Democrats?
"We'll see."
Well, "we'll see" how well Bernie fares among Democrats when he returns to the senate. Once HRC is inaugurated, Bernie loses whatever leverage he thinks he has now. I don't think he's going to be greeted with open arms by the Democrats he's referred to as corrupt, corporate whores.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I knew you knew, just added to your comment.
frylock
(34,825 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Call it whatever you want.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)If she had not married Bill she would have been president 30 years ago.
sheshe2
(83,751 posts)We are incapable of raising our selves up.
I find the dinosaur gif interesting.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)Unless you're talking about something that's nothing to do with this sub-thread ...
frylock
(34,825 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)barrow-wight
(744 posts)And this kind of attitude is why Bernie is losing.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Anyone with half a brain knows why he's "losing".
barrow-wight
(744 posts)And he's losing because he's a terrible candidate.
frylock
(34,825 posts)What a terrible campaigner.
barrow-wight
(744 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)With the backing of the entire Democratic Machine. She's toast in November.
barrow-wight
(744 posts)Because I'd be willing to bet some coin that she's going to win. Out there on social media, people get occasional flak for pushing Bernie or Hillary, but I see people being outright shamed for supporting Trump. There's just no selling him. He's isolated on the extreme right in a way that even Bernie could never be isolated on the extreme left. Trump is just too much of a freak. I don't think he's going to get that many independents. We shall see, I suppose, but I'd be willing to bet this is Hillary's race to lose. It always has been.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)Arguably she became star struck by Bill's rhetoric and that set her back. Bill has said she's the one who got him elected. If she didn't focus on him but instead tried it the solo way she might have still succeeded.
But you're correct that the barrier for women in politics is higher than for men.
frylock
(34,825 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)...and was the first in her colleges history to be elected by the student body to speak on their behalf. She got a standing ovation.
https://web.archive.org/web/20141225145440/http://life.time.com/history/hillary-clinton-in-1969-photos-of-a-recent-college-grad/attachment/15_hillary2/
cali
(114,904 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)Control the DNC. And yeah, being the president's spouse had even more to do with her success. Face it, she isn't a good campaigner. And hill had her corrupt pal payday debbie to help.
cali
(114,904 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Looking back at my past I wouldnt change a thing.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)It's a big part of why I support Sanders.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Sanders has the charisma, politican smarts and drive to have mounted a third party campaign that would have still gotten publicity, support and money on his own.
Sure it would have been uphill -- it has been even with the so-called support of the dems.
But the party establishment did not bring in the crowds, fire up the enthusiasm...etc.
Noooooo...Bernie could have been a Grade A spoiler and possible tipped it against Clinton if he'd run on his own.
The democrats ought to be grateful to him, not the otehr way around.
NanceGreggs
(27,814 posts)Had Bernie run as a third party candidate, he wouldn't have had the publicity needed to generate donations, which in turn would have meant he couldn't compete.
He kept saying from the start "nobody knows who I am". Who do you think would "know him" without the debates, without the backing of the Dem Party? How many Sunday political shows do you think he would have been invited to appear on as a guy who "nobody knows"?
He's been complaining since day one that the media has "blacked him out" and not given him the attention he needs. Exactly how much media attention do you think he would have gotten WITHOUT the debates, without the fact that he was running on the ticket of one of the two major parties?
He himself admitted that he ran as a Dem because it was the only way he could get any media attention at all.
I only wish the Democrats had told him to screw off when he asked to run on our ticket. But I think that's a lesson that's been learned. It will be a cold day in hell before the Party again opens its doors and its coffers to someone who has done nothing but disparage the party throughout his entire campaign.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)No he would not have won, but he would have been able to go through November and make enough difference to swing the election from the Dems
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)That would be an awful way to live life - being pathetically grateful to someone because they didn't make everyone's lives worse. That would be like a spouse saying they're thankful they're not abused.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)..as if he had no other options, Well he did, he could have run as a Third Party candidate.
Saying they should be grateful to him for not running in a way that would be more detrimental to the Dems is not a stretch
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)The OP says they have helped him; and I think that's true. Voter lists is a given example, and I think it's pretty undeniable that it helps him.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Yielding the same reaction from me ...
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)I just dont understand how he can play the victim after all theyve done for him.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Had he run as an independent he would not have gotten far. Without DNC resources he would be arguing in a parking lot with Jill Stein and Gary Johnson.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)since they illegally accessed it. They improperly accessing confidential voter information, and the people that did it were fired.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)shit all over the new converts.
Also, have you forgetter that he has always caucused with the Dems?
larkrake
(1,674 posts)the DNC would be NOWHERE without Bernie. he has half the dems and most the Indies. If he had run Indy, he would be miles ahead and growing
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)so it looks like your numbers aren't true.
And I don't think he'd be 'miles ahead' as an Indy; he wouldn't have got the publicity of debates, it'd be far harder to get time and space in the media, and many people who are long-term Dems would be working against him on principle.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...had excluded the candidate polling second.
Regarding voter data, it's a sharing arrangement which benefits both Sanders and the DNC.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)And I will fight you tooth and nail to prove you're wrong.
YOU see the world as US vs THEM. You, vs those who will ALWAYS be part of the lower class. Those are YOUR FUCKING WORDS.
Some people are PIECES, of, SHIT.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)First off, us vs. them is Bernie's entire platform. Everyone is the enemy. Purity tests arent very inclusive.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)We'll never know how third party might have worked out.
But "bent over backwards"??
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)DWS was put in charge to LOSE elections.
And that is one thing she is damn good at.
The Sanders campaign has the better tools, the better fundraising approach, the better message, the better everything.
The DNC is nothing but a corporate slush fund for revolving door Democratic party backstabbers.
840high
(17,196 posts)akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)Gothmog
(145,176 posts)Jitter65
(3,089 posts)He is an evil, grouchy old man trying garner in his last years just a taste of the wealth he says he despises.
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)But DNC has gained him national exposure...which he said himself btw.