Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Merryland

(1,134 posts)
Sun May 22, 2016, 12:09 AM May 2016

Interesting editorial in the Wall Street Journal about the primary

As more polls show that Hillary Clinton could lose to Donald Trump, Democratic media and political elites have decided that the problem is—Bernie Sanders. The socialist warhorse has had his campaign fun, but now he and his supporters refuse to slink away quietly into Howard Dean obscurity. Doesn’t he know that his persistence is helping Republicans?

We’d humbly suggest that these Democrats are looking through the wrong end of the campaign telescope. Bernie’s continuing string of victories is the symptom of the political...

To Read the Full Story,


http://www.wsj.com/articles/bernie-isnt-hillarys-problem-1463784149
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Interesting editorial in the Wall Street Journal about the primary (Original Post) Merryland May 2016 OP
HRC is HRC's problem. nt antigop May 2016 #1
And ours until she is finally dispatched from this primary. nt silvershadow May 2016 #6
The problem is Hillary Clinton and her party boss buddies. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #2
The time for her to have done that with grace and dignity was when the wheels fell off the bus silvershadow May 2016 #7
Most Clinton supporters will never entertain such a thought. snowy owl May 2016 #3
more importantly, he gets Republicans to vote for him by *being a Democrat* MisterP May 2016 #4
Like something from Lewis Carroll isn't it? silvershadow May 2016 #8
This is a very important point. Obama did that too. Ignore his base and court the Republicans pdsimdars May 2016 #11
his rightie instincts (Rahm used him to destroy any IL Congresspeople who got too liberal) and his MisterP May 2016 #18
At some point, there might have been *something* that the WSJ editorial page said Orangepeel May 2016 #5
Surprise, surprise. The RW extremist WSJ editorial page supports Bernie Sanders. baldguy May 2016 #9
Amazing, isn't it? No matter how RW the source, the Bernistas COLGATE4 May 2016 #14
Funny how popular right-wing sources are around here oberliner May 2016 #10
Yea, you can't read the whole story at that link unless you are a subscriber so I don't know pdsimdars May 2016 #12
A "Trudge Up The Hill" candidate in an insurgent year. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #15
Christopher Ruddy of Newsmax and James Murdoch of Fox News are Clinton allies BernieforPres2016 May 2016 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #17
shocking that the WSJ thinks the Democratic Party is the problem bigtree May 2016 #19
The leading paragraphs and the conclusion paragraphs are accurate. The middle is propaganda. w4rma May 2016 #20
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
7. The time for her to have done that with grace and dignity was when the wheels fell off the bus
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:43 AM
May 2016

at the first of the year.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
3. Most Clinton supporters will never entertain such a thought.
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:01 AM
May 2016

I agree. Bernie has a great shot at getting Republicans to vote for him. In the end, they are as disgusted with the establishment as he and we are. Craig Melvin on MSNBC asked a Republican woman working in a greenhouse who she would vote for. She answered Trump in the primary and Bernie in the GE. I know, only one person. But representative of many I believe. Melvin was rather surprised.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
4. more importantly, he gets Republicans to vote for him by *being a Democrat*
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:19 AM
May 2016

Clinton gets them to vote for her by being a Republican

we can see which path succeeds

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
11. This is a very important point. Obama did that too. Ignore his base and court the Republicans
Sun May 22, 2016, 08:43 AM
May 2016

Disaster!

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
18. his rightie instincts (Rahm used him to destroy any IL Congresspeople who got too liberal) and his
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:04 PM
May 2016

constant wavering gave the Republicans all their power 2009-11

he let DeMint hold up State Department nominations over Honduras, and then caved on Honduras anyway--lose-lose

Orangepeel

(13,933 posts)
5. At some point, there might have been *something* that the WSJ editorial page said
Sun May 22, 2016, 01:33 AM
May 2016

That wasn't complete right-wing serving horseshit. I didn't read this one, so maybe this is it. Probably not though.

 

baldguy

(36,649 posts)
9. Surprise, surprise. The RW extremist WSJ editorial page supports Bernie Sanders.
Sun May 22, 2016, 08:28 AM
May 2016

For most people, that would be a big ol' dope slap to the back of the head.

For Bernistas, it's just more proof that Bernie is The Chosen One.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
14. Amazing, isn't it? No matter how RW the source, the Bernistas
Sun May 22, 2016, 09:45 AM
May 2016

just gobble it up so long as it's unfavorable to Hillary.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
12. Yea, you can't read the whole story at that link unless you are a subscriber so I don't know
Sun May 22, 2016, 08:45 AM
May 2016

what it was about except the piece you posted.
But thanks, it is good news none the less.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
13. A "Trudge Up The Hill" candidate in an insurgent year.
Sun May 22, 2016, 08:47 AM
May 2016

Add on top of that a huge mountain of corruption, a lousy neocon neoliberal track record, and a shapeshifting message.

Only someone who wants to lose would run HRC over Bernie this year.

Response to Merryland (Original post)

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
16. Christopher Ruddy of Newsmax and James Murdoch of Fox News are Clinton allies
Sun May 22, 2016, 09:54 AM
May 2016

They both contributed from $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation.

Does that mean Fox and Newsmax are no longer flawed, right-wing sources? Or are they now OK, like Henry Kissinger?

Response to BernieforPres2016 (Reply #16)

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
19. shocking that the WSJ thinks the Democratic Party is the problem
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:07 PM
May 2016

...shocking that would be echoed by a Sanders supporter in this forum.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
20. The leading paragraphs and the conclusion paragraphs are accurate. The middle is propaganda.
Sun May 22, 2016, 02:17 PM
May 2016

But, it's the Wall Street Journal opinion page, so twisted pro-billionaire propaganda is to be expected. And there are some tidbits of information in the editorial, if you ignore the middle:

The latest Fox News poll shows that Mrs. Clinton is viewed as more corrupt than Mr. Trump, 49% to 37%. She is also now viewed negatively by more of the electorate than is Mr. Trump—61% to 56%. This takes some doing given Mr. Trump’s incendiary primary campaign and the continuing doubts about him among millions of Republicans.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Interesting editorial in ...