Recent polls exhibit Clintons glaring weakenesses as a canidate

[RDANGELO]

Any healthy democratic candidate would be beating Trump by double digits, combining the favorable demographics and the unfavorable perceived traits of the Donald. It is evident that what severely hurts her is the honesty question.
People cite polls from 1988 as an example of where there there was a big swing in the polls after the convention from Dukakis to Bush sr, but that was before the days of twenty for hour news channels, the internet and social media. A great slice of the voting population already have a cemented sense of the two candidates. If Hillary is the nominee, and she wins, it will be a squeaker. No way will carry a big enough wage to win the house.

[Trust Buster]

1. Then vote for Trump if you wish. What do you want from us ?

[RDANGELO]

2. Critical thinking.

[Trust Buster]

3. Critical thinking leads to the fact that Hillary is the Democratic nominee. If you prefer Trump,

then vote for the guy. But, this is the DU.

[RDANGELO]

6. The convention hasn't voted yet.

There is a possibility that neither of them will get the nomination.

[Trust Buster]

13. Nonsense. Even when they officially vote at the convention, you will still be in a state of denial.

[CrowCityDem]

4. Then do some yourself...

Bernie has faced the least amount of criticism and negative coverage this entire cycle. His numbers are propped up by Republicans who want to run against him, and his voters who are butt-hurt about losing.

Bernie's numbers will likewise sink like a rock when subjected to months of attacks on his socialism, massive tax increases, out of wedlock son, and his wife bankrupting a college out of existence.

[RDANGELO]

5. Even if all of that is true,

it doesn't change the fact that Clinton is a severely flawed candidate. That was the subject of the post.

[CrowCityDem]

7. There's no such thing as a candidate without flaws.

[RDANGELO]

11. Yes, but there are different degrees. Jack the ripper woud be a much more flawed candidate then

either of them.

[CrowCityDem]

17. And I think being an unvetted socialist is a fatal flaw in a general election.

[workinclasszero]

8. Hillary is fighting a two front war because of Sanders

As soon as he faces reality..if ever..Hillary will start mopping the floor with Trump

[RDANGELO]

9. If she wasn't such a flawed candidate, she would have put him away by now.

[workinclasszero]

10. Oh she has put him away

But because Bernie is a pretend democrat he stays in to inflict maximum damage to the democratic party and its candidate for president.

And who gains from this?

hmm...

[RDANGELO]

12. At this stage, why is he still winning primaries?

[Trust Buster]

14. Hillary beat Obama in 4 of the last 6 primaries. Numbers don't lie. It's meaningless.

[workinclasszero]

16. It just doesn't matter

There is nothing sanders can do to get the nomination...nothing.

He could win all the remaining primaries and he still loses the nomination.

Math hates Bernie. It is what it is.

[RDANGELO]

22. It matters if she is the nominee becuase we could lose a race that we never should have.

[DemocratSinceBirth]

18. It would be like a boxer facing two opponents at once.

I wouldn't be surprised if I learned they are in cahoots, you?

[workinclasszero]

19. Or setting up a third party run...

Take your pick.

[nashville_brook]

15. it's been pointed out repeatedly that HRC polls best at first

and always loses ground thereafter.

She needs to be in healthy double-digits to keep enough of a lead to continue her usual downward trend and still win. but we'll see. maybe she'll reverse her career-long history.

[Skink]

20. If Hillary did well in late contests last time

What's changed?

[Cobalt Violet]

21. With debbie's record I'm not sure why anyone drank the Hillary's Got this Koolaid.

We're just throwing 2016 away. This isn't going to end well. Been saying for months now that a vote for hillary in the primary is a vote for trump. Seem to be the case.