Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Quixote1818

(28,928 posts)
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:26 PM May 2016

Will Hillary supporters allow suspect Wall Street insiders on Hillary's cabinet like Bill had?

Last edited Sun May 22, 2016, 05:17 PM - Edit history (2)

This isn't a jab at Hillary supporters, I am just asking you if you will join us to fight any attempts to stop this if the attempt is made?

If Sanders loses which is very likely I will be voting for Hillary but it's going to take all of us to put pressure on her to break away from those who have financed her over the years. Can we at least agree to do this?

Nice video at link: https://www.facebook.com/HuffPostPolitics/videos/10153779671562911/

45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Will Hillary supporters allow suspect Wall Street insiders on Hillary's cabinet like Bill had? (Original Post) Quixote1818 May 2016 OP
Sorry, I dont believe all bankers are bad. JaneyVee May 2016 #1
Fair point and we can take a look at them closely, but if it smells fishy will you get involved? nt Quixote1818 May 2016 #2
What the hell am I gonna do? JaneyVee May 2016 #6
Well, at least you are honest. nt Quixote1818 May 2016 #14
Lol. cali May 2016 #15
Right! Like Im gonna stand outside the WH 24/7 protesting. JaneyVee May 2016 #35
Gensler helped write the CFMA. He's a peach.... think May 2016 #3
Sanders must have approved the CFMA, he voted for the bill. Thinkingabout May 2016 #12
Do you enjoy spreading Hillary half truths? What a load of crap.... think May 2016 #19
Hillary was not in congress at the time CFMA was passed in 2000, Sanders voting Thinkingabout May 2016 #31
Your loyalty is astounding. Hope you have a nice day.... think May 2016 #40
Here is the link to the votes on CFMA, four Representatives voted nay Thinkingabout May 2016 #32
This is bending reality to suit preconceptions Armstead May 2016 #41
The supporters will have no say. Investors will. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #4
I get the impression, sincerely, that all Hillary's supporters care about is Hillary becoming djean111 May 2016 #5
So far, by the reaction to this thread you are looking on point Quixote1818 May 2016 #8
Don't count on it pmorlan1 May 2016 #18
Or is it the opposite? There is no attack on her policies, its all made up bullshit! BootinUp May 2016 #9
What's made up? Usually the stuff that Sanders supporters dislike about Clinton involve That Guy 888 May 2016 #24
Thanks for proving my point. BootinUp May 2016 #25
Those are statements by her or positions she has already taken. That Guy 888 May 2016 #30
All of which is quite evident with every single HRC supporter here. Not ONE has EVER, EVER 2banon May 2016 #26
They're making "herstory"! This election is going to be "herstoric"! "A Herstorical Landmark"! cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #34
She should get who she needs to enact her dang policies that no one wants to talk about. nt BootinUp May 2016 #7
The Anointed One can do no wrong and walks on water to her supporters. hobbit709 May 2016 #10
Thats funny because that's how I would describe Sanders supporters. hrmjustin May 2016 #21
"She's the one" "It's her turn" hobbit709 May 2016 #22
"He is the real deal" "he is the true Democrat" hrmjustin May 2016 #23
I don't know if she will consider Sanders Wall Street banker friend or not. Thinkingabout May 2016 #11
Typically less than cogent response. cali May 2016 #16
There have always been Wall Street insiders creeksneakers2 May 2016 #13
There are many economists who aren't Wall Street insiders. cali May 2016 #17
Any one of these 170 would probably be good (better than those thieves we've had up until now)... 2cannan May 2016 #38
Doesn't the position require more than being an economist? creeksneakers2 May 2016 #39
There are people with "knowledge of" who do not approve of shenaganins Armstead May 2016 #42
It seems mostly economics but yes it would probably be helpful to have some background in banking. 2cannan May 2016 #43
Allow? I don't get a say so... hrmjustin May 2016 #20
Sure you do, she is a public servant and she works for you. Quixote1818 May 2016 #28
Well i did protest her office on the Iraq War vote. hrmjustin May 2016 #33
Americans didn't seem to care when Obama appointed bankers and corporate reps right after bjo59 May 2016 #27
We cared, there just wasn't much we could do about it. Big money speaks loudly. hobbit709 May 2016 #29
Yes, why do you think they are giving her millions now? They're buying their onecaliberal May 2016 #36
Once the demons, vampires and werewolves are seated, there won't be any more room. procon May 2016 #37
You may be more accurate than you know Armstead May 2016 #44
Or ACTUAL Wall Streeters like Obama had. pdsimdars May 2016 #45
 

think

(11,641 posts)
3. Gensler helped write the CFMA. He's a peach....
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:33 PM
May 2016
The Most Disingenuous Attack on Bernie Yet

Wednesday, 20 January 2016 00:00
By The Daily Take Team, The Thom Hartmann Program | Op-Ed


~snip~

During his time at the Treasury, Gensler had pushed hard for Wall Street deregulation and even helped write the CFMA, something now-Senator Bernie Sanders found unacceptable. And so Bernie moved to block Gensler's nomination. Sanders explained his actions during an appearance on Democracy Now...

http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/34497-the-most-disingenuous-attack-on-bernie-yet
 

think

(11,641 posts)
19. Do you enjoy spreading Hillary half truths? What a load of crap....
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:54 PM
May 2016
The Most Disingenuous Attack on Bernie Yet

Wednesday, 20 January 2016 00:00
By The Daily Take Team, The Thom Hartmann Program | Op-Ed


If you watched Sunday's Democratic debate, you learned something interesting about Bernie Sanders: he voted for the Commodities Futures Modernization Act, something Hillary Clinton was all too eager to point out when the two of them got to talking about Wall Street reform.

~Snip~

As Robert Scheer has pointed out over at Truthdig, then-Congressman Sanders voted for the CFMA, not because he wanted to, but because he had to.

The CFMA had been shoved into an omnibus spending bill at the last minute as part of a deal between Republicans and President Bill Clinton, and because this was a time when, you know, Congress actually did its job, Sanders bit the bullet and voted for the whole package - CFMA included - to keep the government open.

Only four members of Congress ended up opposing the final spending bill that included the CFMA
, and one of them was Ron Paul, who opposed pretty much every spending bill. But that's just of the tip of the iceberg when it comes to how dishonest Clinton was being when she called Bernie out for voting for the CFMA....

Read more:
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/34497-the-most-disingenuous-attack-on-bernie-yet


So former Goldman Sachs partner and Clinton administration official, Gary Gensler, pushed for Wall Street regulation and helped write the CFMA which got snuck into the final Omnibus spending bill. President Bill Clinton, Gensler's boss signed the Omnibus spending bill into law.

Had Sanders and the rest not voted on the spending bill the government would default on their monetary obligations to keep the government running.

And Hillary had the nerve to claim that it was Bernie's fault the CFMA passed. Such hypocrisy....

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
31. Hillary was not in congress at the time CFMA was passed in 2000, Sanders voting
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:19 PM
May 2016

For this bill is on Sanders, Hillary did not make him vote for the bill. Hartmann knows Sanders voted for this bill which played heavy in financial crisis.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
41. This is bending reality to suit preconceptions
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:36 PM
May 2016

Voting against the spending bill in which the CMFA was buried in would have cut off funding for the government.

Sanders did the only responsible thing, and voted to keep government running.

That did NOT NOT NOT mean he supported that section of it. If he could have voted against it in a clean bill he would have.

If you had any clue of everything he was saying and doing at the time you would realize that.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
5. I get the impression, sincerely, that all Hillary's supporters care about is Hillary becoming
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:35 PM
May 2016

president. And that they would instantly go into attack mode against anyone who dared to criticize anything at all. I mean - I never thought I would see a Rick Warren defended by DEMOCRATS, ya know? The Iraq war does not bother them, nor do her positions on the TPP and fracking and Social Security and single payer. Issues don't seem mean squat to them now, there is no reason to think that would change one little bit. Any criticism would likely be slapped with a charge of sexism.

And the thought of Hillary even giving a rat's ass about pressure is pretty damned amusing.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
18. Don't count on it
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:52 PM
May 2016

Hillary supporters are not progressive, they never were. They are A-ok with corporations and banksters running this country.

 

That Guy 888

(1,214 posts)
24. What's made up? Usually the stuff that Sanders supporters dislike about Clinton involve
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:01 PM
May 2016

either statements directly from her or positions she took:

Hillary Clinton’s insane plan for a no-fly zone
The Democratic presidential frontrunner is calling for war against Russia over Syria and hoping no one notices

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/12/hillary-clintons-insane-plan-for-a-no-fly-zone.html

45 times Secretary Clinton pushed the trade bill she now opposes

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/15/politics/45-times-secretary-clinton-pushed-the-trade-bill-she-now-opposes/

As secretary of state in 2010, Clinton argued in favor of gas as "the cleanest fossil fuel available for power generation today," and said that "if developed, shale gas could make an important contribution to our region's energy supply, just as it does now for the United States." Her office, meanwhile, promoted fracking in developing nations.

After leaving the Obama administration in 2014, Clinton still emphasized the benefits of fracking, implying that strict limits on fracking should be the exception to the rule. In 2016, Clinton has flipped her emphasis, as Sanders has gained an edge from his anti-fracking stance: Now, she suggests it will be a rare, unlikely case when fracking should be allowed.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2016/03/hillary-clinton-debate-fracking

 

That Guy 888

(1,214 posts)
30. Those are statements by her or positions she has already taken.
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:10 PM
May 2016

Once again Clinton supporters are asking us "Who do you believe, Hillary or your lyin' eyes?"

Show that she didn't advocate for a "No Fly Zone" in Syria.

Show that she wasn't an advocate for fracking.

Show that she didn't approve whole-heartedly of the "Gold Standard" TPP.

It's by her actions that we prove who she is, not pie in the sky "policies" that may or may not disappear once she is in office.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
26. All of which is quite evident with every single HRC supporter here. Not ONE has EVER, EVER
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:05 PM
May 2016

expressed any concern about any these issues or other issues not mentioned, here.

Not a single HRC supporter. Not One. Not Ever.


I could copy and paste it over and over again, and never be refuted.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
34. They're making "herstory"! This election is going to be "herstoric"! "A Herstorical Landmark"!
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:37 PM
May 2016

Policy? What's that.

"Herstory!"

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
13. There have always been Wall Street insiders
Sun May 22, 2016, 04:47 PM
May 2016

running the Treasury Department. Find somebody qualified who isn't.

2cannan

(344 posts)
38. Any one of these 170 would probably be good (better than those thieves we've had up until now)...
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:18 PM
May 2016

170 Top Economists ‘Feel The Bern,’ Endorse Bernie Sanders’ Wall Street Reform Plan
https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Wall-St-Letter-1.pdf

creeksneakers2

(7,473 posts)
39. Doesn't the position require more than being an economist?
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:25 PM
May 2016

I think it would require knowledge about the nuts and bolts of how things work in major financial institutions.

2cannan

(344 posts)
43. It seems mostly economics but yes it would probably be helpful to have some background in banking.
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:42 PM
May 2016

There are some on the list who have that background, William K Black, for example, who was instrumental in dealing with the past savings and loan scandals. Our current Treasury Secretary is another winner (sarcasm): http://wallstreetonparade.com/?s=jack+lew

snip
Secretary and Senior Officials
https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/faqs/About-Treasury/Pages/officials.aspx

Who is the current Secretary of the Treasury, what is his background, and what does he do?
The current Secretary of the Treasury​ is Jacob J. Lew. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on February 27, 2013.

The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for formulating and recommending domestic and international financial, economic, and tax policy, participating in the formulation of broad fiscal policies that have general significance for the economy, and managing the public debt. The Secretary oversees the activities of the Treasury Department in carrying out his major law enforcement responsibilities; in serving as the financial agent for the U.S. Government; and in manufacturing coins and currency.

The chief financial officer of the Government, the Secretary of the Treasury serves on the President's National Economic Council. He is also Chairman of the Boards and Managing Trustee of the Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, Chairman of the Thrift Depositor Protection Oversight Board, and serves as U.S. Governor of the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the African Development Bank, and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

Quixote1818

(28,928 posts)
28. Sure you do, she is a public servant and she works for you.
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:08 PM
May 2016

I am not saying you have to speak up and put pressure if you like someone but if they look fishy to you wouldn't you want to try? The public has frequently prevented cabinet members from being appointed. It's nothing new at all.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
33. Well i did protest her office on the Iraq War vote.
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:30 PM
May 2016

If she appointed someone i didn't like i would raise my voice.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
27. Americans didn't seem to care when Obama appointed bankers and corporate reps right after
Sun May 22, 2016, 05:07 PM
May 2016

he was elected. No wonder the corporatists couldn't see Bernie Sanders' popularity coming.

procon

(15,805 posts)
37. Once the demons, vampires and werewolves are seated, there won't be any more room.
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:13 PM
May 2016

You lot crack me up.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
44. You may be more accurate than you know
Sun May 22, 2016, 06:42 PM
May 2016

You really want Lloyd Blankfein calling the shots, either officially or unofficially as a "trusted advisor"?.....

Wait a minute, what am I saying? Silly question. Sorry.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Will Hillary supporters a...