2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhen swiftboating is more important than democracy itself.
What a sad time we are in when ardent supporters and surrogates of one candidate - who represents half of the Democratic Party - feel it is more important to smear supporters (with a lie, I might add) of the other candidate - who represents half of the Democratic Party - than it is to stand up and make sure democracy is working.
What happened in Nevada is on video. We can all see it and there is no dispute that it happened. This was not democracy in action. This was a manipulation of an election to benefit one candidate at the expense of what the people voted at that moment. That is corruption of democracy.
People rightly got angry and booed and caused a commotion. There was, however, NO chair throwing. Yet Hillary surrogates and supporters spread that meme as far and wide as possible, they talked down to Bernie supporters, scolding us if we are children having a tantrum for not being allowed to eat up an entire 7-11's worth of candy. They knew they didn't have proof of a chair being thrown and yet they STILL TO THIS DAY continue to catapult the propaganda.
There has been no discussion about the corruption itself, just a massive "outrage" about the response to the corruption.
So my question is this. What are people supposed to do when they witness the corruption of democracy right before their very eyes? Are we supposed to sit there politely and say "thank you"? Is that what Hillary supporters think democracy is about?
Democracy is supposed to be of, by and for the people. It is supposed to be a govt that governs at the consent of the people. How can that happen if the people are not heard? If the people are ignored? If the people who get angered and point out the corruption are the ones who get smeared?
Why do Hillary supporters think so little of democracy that they would rather allow the corruption and get mad at the response to the corruption? To the point where they exaggerate it so much they make up things that never ever happened? And then when it is discredited they still continue to push false story?
I have been disheartened by the corporate takeover of our govt for quite some time. I am now sickened by its takeover of the Dem Party to the point where the behavior of its members proves that too many in it no longer care about the very core values of our Founding Fathers.
This election cycle is both a sad time and a hopeful time for me. Sad to see how ruthless and unprincipled the Dem Party has become and hopeful because I see the change coming and the people who are fed up with corruption and lack of a voice and representation are fighting back. And we will fight for democracy and representation and no one will shut us up. Especially not with lies.
.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)kayakjohnny
(5,235 posts)Get a little creative, for fuck sake.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)They couldn't care less that democracy is in peril as long as their candidate is ahead.
.
vintx
(1,748 posts)It would be amusing if the stakes weren't so high.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Your candidate is losing and you are being well forgive the phrase but being bitter about it.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)See, you guys can be helpful after all.
.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)What ilk is that?
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)aggressive, intimidating men moving my way, without feeling fear.
For you to excuse this is atrocious, and I expect no less.
I really hadn't been in this fight. Mostly listening to others. The video certainly says it all and says everything that expect others to have to be a part of that, within our Democratic party, while exercising our right to vote.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Intimidation and aggression.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Whoever you are.
.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)aggression and intimidation, the threat of violence would have had me leaving the building. Are you suggesting I should feel shame, having said that out loud?
I have never had my ass kicked. One of the reasons, is if there are a mob of men threatening, I would not stick around to see IF they became violent.
jillan
(39,451 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)'Cause first they were getting punched and kicked by Trump supporters. Now apparently Clinton supporters are getting in on the fun.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Good.
See, not hard.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Print it out and hand out flyers at the market. The more it gets seen the better!
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)No need for me to say the words 'violence' or 'chair throwing'...the video really speaks for itself.
My next door neighbors have been having an internal feud for months since the husband was for Sanders and the wife for Hillary. After the NV video (and the audio of the threatening phone messages), they are both now for Hillary! Yes!! I regularly canvass for Hillary, and many of us have been using that video for the last several days. Works like a charm. Even those who don't seem convinced, look very concerned.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Especially a woman wouldn't feel threatened.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)in a fight. I need to apologize fearing the aggression/intimidation of a mob of young men?
As an old woman, I do not feel that I need to validate the fact I do refuse to be involved in this type of anger. That my expectation of voting should not include physical intimidation and aggression.
polly7
(20,582 posts)No. Not all women would feel threatened at all.
Your views are your own.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Reply fail.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Especially a woman wouldn't feel threatened."
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Me? Not so much.
Hey.... I am even cowardly facing a mob of young, angry men. What can I say. Silly me. Am I right?
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Especially a woman wouldn't feel threatened.
That is a direct quote from your post. If you're going to keep making shit up you'll have to keep in mind what evidence is out there to prove you are doing so.
.
That Guy 888
(1,214 posts)anotherjameso'keefe
eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)Too bad I'm done with college!
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Thanks.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)It is a divide among people in general, that goes beyond this election.
I completely agree with what you wrote here.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)vintx
(1,748 posts)People here used to care about elections. Now they sneer and snicker as much as Barbara Boxer - it's no wonder they have no problem with any of the 'irregularities'.
liberal from boston
(856 posts)WOW-- no evidence, no injuries, no arrests. Chanting Recount, Shame is now violent. Suggest Hillary Supporters click on link provided & read what Erin who with her father, a former Congressman, both delegates witnessed what happened. BTW, when will the apologies be forthcoming from the Clinton Campaign for the assault on 2 Bernie Supporters (1 Female) by a Hillary supporter who was arrested??
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511975215
pacalo
(24,721 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)It explained why Bernie has done so well in caucus states.
Sid
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Plus, just think how well Bernie would have done in Iowa and Nevada if there weren't such shenanigans going on? But we couldn't have him win the first state now, could we? That would have been a real disaster for the establishment candidate everyone assumed would easily nab the nom this time.
.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)if his supporters hadn't intimidated Hillary voters.
Sid
PufPuf23
(8,776 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)can I get you a tissue?
Sid
PufPuf23
(8,776 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Democrats voting for Clinton are a solid majority. He does not represent half of the Democratic Party. He doesn't even represent half of the primary voters, some of whom are independents and Republicans.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)About all the hoopla being concentrated on the response to corruption rather than the corruption itself?
.
kayakjohnny
(5,235 posts)Thank you very much! It says everything I've been thinking, and more.
Very well reasoned and most wonderfully written.
You have your finger on the pulse for sure.
Cheers!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)where that term...swiftboating...came from, and adopt it as a campaign tactic.
Hypocritical, at the very least.
LonePirate
(13,420 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)About all the hoopla being concentrated on the response to corruption rather than the corruption itself?
.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)* On Saturday at the State Convention, after all of the alternates were seated, Hillary Clinton filled 1,695 of her delegate slots and Bernie Sanders only filled 1,662 at the State Convention giving Clinton a 33-delegate margin of victory.
* Clinton only had 27 delegate positions vacant on Saturday. Sanders left 462 vacant. Clinton filled 98 percent of her available delegate slots at the State Convention, and Sanders only filled 78 percent of his available delegate slots.
* In plain terms, the Clinton campaign organized and got nearly all of their delegates to the State Convention. The Sanders campaign did not.
On the false and wildly inaccurate accusations that there were 64 potential Sanders delegates in question who were denied by the State Conventions Credentials Committee on Saturday:
* Six of the 64 potential delegates were seated as delegates after investigation.
* The remaining potential delegates were ineligible for two main reasons: 1) They were not registered Democratic voters in Nevada by May 1, 2016, and 2) Their information such as address, date of birth and name could not be found or identified, and they did not respond to requests from the party and campaigns to correct it.
* Only eight of the ineligible delegates even attempted to register at the State Convention.
* The so-called minority report about these ineligible delegates was not written by the Credentials Committee it was written by national Sanders campaign staff on site. A member of Sanders National Delegate Operations Team drafted and arranged for a member of that committee to attempt to deliver an incendiary report that caused chaos and violence at the convention. It was inaccurate, misleading and subsequently discredited by the Credentials Committee.
* The Credentials Committee, the panel that made decisions on these issues, was co-chaired by supporters of both campaigns and the membership of the committee was also equally divided between supporters of both campaigns. This was done to ensure that the entire process was fair, transparent and accountable for both campaigns and their supporters. The committee worked diligently and cooperatively all day, under incredibly trying circumstances, to be fair and impartial in its work.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Lange squashed it by not allowing the people's voice to be heard. By voting to change a rule at the last minute while things were already in progress and not allowing a recount when judging by the voice count one could not tell who won at best, and one that was clearly not what she called it as at worst. Then the crowd reacted to that.
So Lange refused to enact a democratic vote and basically became a dictator at that point. What did the "mob" do that stopped democracy from being enacted?
.
LuvLoogie
(7,003 posts)asuhornets
(2,405 posts)Sanders lost fair and square. why is that so hard? Bernie supporters tried to flip the delegates in their favor---it did not work. Clinton won Nevada in February...Let it go and forget the chair...
bjo59
(1,166 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)to a state that Hillary won handily in Feb. Sanders fans got upset, screamed, cursed, nearly-rioted, vandalized the building, and left in a huff.
All's well that ends well.
riversedge
(70,218 posts)It really is this simple!
Tweet:
@BernieSanders is not going to be the nominee because he hasn't won enough votes or delegates. http://www.pressherald.com/2016/05/22/cynthia-dill-sanders-is-losing-fair-and-square/ #HRCIsOurNominee
cui bono
(19,926 posts)yellerpup
(12,253 posts)Sorry it got so rained on. I feel you very much.
msongs
(67,405 posts)GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)Swiftboating is when CNN talks about you but never to you, when they spend a week airing lies without allowing one key fact to be included.
ms liberty
(8,574 posts)I'm just disgusted by it, to the point that I spend very little time here anymore.
jillan
(39,451 posts)paraphrasing here -
The Dem Party of Nevada was pissed because they had some democracy spill on them.
trudyco
(1,258 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Loudestlib
(980 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)That it hasn't happened in nearly 40 years, just means it is still on its' way.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)it's gonna be YUGE!!!
.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)the voting in so many states. I am a California resident voting for Bernie Sanders.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)and most corrupt times in the Dem Party during my lifetime, especially since it's headed by someone who backs Republicans and payday loan centers, but I didn't want to take the chance that I couldn't vote for Bernie.
In L.A. I've been seeing a lot more Bernie bumper stickers! And at the pizzeria yesterday, as I walked in wearing a Bernie for President shirt, the guy who worked there standing at the door said, "Hello. Bernie for president." and initiated a fist bump.
.
felix_numinous
(5,198 posts)Last edited Mon May 23, 2016, 03:36 PM - Edit history (1)
and keep digging deeper with more lies. There are no talking points in existence that can cover what happened in NV.
We don't want to hear any more cries of RW conspiracy, or sexism--the ONLY way forward from here is to DENOUNCE the fraudulent activities of the DNC and all involved.
I understand loyalty, but this goes beyond any loyalty. This fraud was done OPENLY and PROUDLY, and attempted to incite and frame people for VIOLENCE.
Now peaceful Bernie Sanders supporters have TRUMP inciting violence on one side and Clintons and DNC inciting violence on the other. Good job imitating another extremist group!
vintx
(1,748 posts)cui bono
(19,926 posts)Yet another right wing idea/tactic. The less people that vote the better it is for the right wing. Thom Hartmann plays that quote and I can't remember who said it, but it was a right winger stating it as a plan.
Seriously, it's like Faux News and Karl Rove working together. The Popegate and the one where they claimed Bernie mistreated his wife when it clearly wasn't on the video (of course) and now the chair thing, that is classic Faux News stuff there.
And now they are more concerned with smearing their opponents than standing up for democracy. That's some old school Karl Rove stuff there.
Very eye-opening primary. They have really showed their true colors and I think they have gone so far that there cannot be unity. How do you unite with people like that? Would they unite with Republicans? It's the same degree of difference that needs to be overcome. Or maybe more for us to unite with the right wing of the Dem Party than for them to unite with the GOP. I mean they are what moderate Republicans used to be, Obama said that about himself. And DWS actually backs Republicans over Democrats!
.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Today my local paper had an editorial claiming that Bernie supporters threw chairs and got violent at the Nevada caucus. Incredible!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)It's unbelievable. What the hell happened to finding out the facts in journalism?
.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)so kindly get off your high horse
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Also, that's really not the point of the OP. How do you feel about the fact that Hillary supporters find it more important to discredit Bernie supporters with lies rather than complain about the corruption of democracy that led to the booing and commotion?
.