HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Trumps poll numbers are s...

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:14 PM

 

Trumps poll numbers are surging. Hillary is losing more steam.

http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/05/donald-trumps-poll-numbers-are-surging

17 replies, 1160 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 17 replies Author Time Post
Reply Trumps poll numbers are surging. Hillary is losing more steam. (Original post)
floriduck May 2016 OP
EndElectoral May 2016 #1
Barack_America May 2016 #2
JoePhilly May 2016 #3
uponit7771 May 2016 #4
tabasco May 2016 #5
HooptieWagon May 2016 #7
Merryland May 2016 #9
anigbrowl May 2016 #15
uponit7771 May 2016 #11
LenaBaby61 May 2016 #17
Fawke Em May 2016 #6
Skwmom May 2016 #8
Shadowflash May 2016 #10
MisterP May 2016 #12
katmondoo May 2016 #13
anigbrowl May 2016 #14
BlueNoMatterWho May 2016 #16

Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:17 PM

1. As more Repubs have dropped out, and Sanders approaches dropping, HRC is not picking up new votes

The people voting for Cruz and company aren't going to vote for HRC, and many Sanders supporters are sitting out ,3rd party and some even voting for Trump.

The HRC supporters can yell all they want. This is the reality of what is happening. The trend is going to continue. HRC won't go down alone. She'll bring the whole undercard down with her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:18 PM

2. So, you mean, her numbers are doing what they've always done?

Who could've seen that coming?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:18 PM

3. More Trump fluffing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:18 PM

4. This is false, the internals on every poll looks horrible for tRump especially in the swing states..

... in regards to whites, blacks, Hispanics, women, dogs and cats... he's doing worse now with a nom bump than rMoney did in 2012.

Nationally tRump has the nom bump but he still can't get above HRC's numbers past the MOE.

Clintons camp has the responsibility of defining tRump to the GE electorate which they're starting now...

They're the adults in the room, even during the election they're taking the right steps.

tRump has a floor of 45% of RNC voters... doesn't matter what he says or does they'll vote for him but a 5 - 7% loss of white votes is not good for tRump.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to uponit7771 (Reply #4)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:20 PM

5. Got a link to those "internals?"

 

Thanks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabasco (Reply #5)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:22 PM

7. I think it's Clinton meth.

 

Wishfull thinking, as there doesn't appear to be any factual basis.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HooptieWagon (Reply #7)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:24 PM

9. Clinton meth - is that anything like the blue kind on Breaking Bad? ;-)

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HooptieWagon (Reply #7)

Mon May 23, 2016, 01:09 PM

15. Looks like you owe the other poster an apology

 

Since they have since been posted. For some reason I'm not holding my breath.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabasco (Reply #5)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:25 PM

11. Here are some of them, they don't like to the NYT/CBS poll but MSNBC has been playing them

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to tabasco (Reply #5)

Mon May 23, 2016, 01:53 PM

17. I always want to see ....

What the internals are to these polls.

But then again, it's only May, and we're still in primary more on our side, so

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:20 PM

6. Just saw this on Twitter.

I know it's Fox "News," but even 538 says their polling arm is within normal range.



If this keeps up, we're going to need an, "I Told You So!" smilie.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:23 PM

8. Elected Democrats Response: La, La, La we can not hear this. We live by the rule igorance is bliss.

This year is NO different from any other election year. And if we lose, we will blame it on the Bernie supporters.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:24 PM

10. Won't be long

and you'll have the DNC version of 'Unskewed Polls' here in this thread 'splaining to you why it doesn't matter.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 12:41 PM

12. "we'll make it up later"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 01:07 PM

13. Thanks Bernie

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 01:07 PM

14. What else would you expect, he has no competition on the GOP side

 

Inevitably you would expect support to coalesce around the established nominee on that side and for the trend to reverse one the Democrats select their nominee or one of the candidate drops out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floriduck (Original post)

Mon May 23, 2016, 01:12 PM

16. Scary

 

What is scary is that his advantage with men is now much higher than Clintons advantage with women.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread