Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:42 PM May 2016

50% of both Clinton & DWS's platform committee picks are women. Sanders only chose one

Skye M. @almasecretkey
50% of both Clinton & DWS's picks are women. Sanders chose 1.

from TPM:

Under the new arrangement, the Washington Post reported Monday, Clinton will appoint six representatives to the platform committee while Sanders will appoint five.

The Post reported that Clinton has selected president of the Center for American Progress Neera Tanden, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) who has worked extensively on immigration reform in the House, Wendy Sherman, who worked with Clinton at the Department of State, Carol Browner, an environmentalist who worked in the Obama administration, Ohio lawmaker Alicia Reece, and Paul Booth who is the executive assistant to the president at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union

The paper also reported that Sanders picked James Zogby, the president of the Arab-American Institute in Washington and a well-known advocate for Palestinian issues, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), one of two Muslim members of Congress, Dr. Cornel West, an academic and an activist for racial equality, author and environmentalist Bill McKibben and Deborah Parker, an advocate for the Native American community.

DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz named Rep. Elijah Cummings, who served as the the ranking member in the select committee on Benghazi, to be the chairman. She also selected former CEO Bonnie Schaefer, one-time Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA) and current Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) to serve.

107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
50% of both Clinton & DWS's platform committee picks are women. Sanders only chose one (Original Post) bigtree May 2016 OP
Gender should never be a deciding factor in these matters AgingAmerican May 2016 #1
That's an odd claim. Why not? Recursion May 2016 #2
Is there a female equivalent of McKibben? JonLeibowitz May 2016 #6
Winona LaDuke, Hunter Lovins, Temple Grandin (sort of)... Recursion May 2016 #9
Carol Browner is on the committee WhiteTara May 2016 #102
Because then we get people like Neera Tanden AgingAmerican May 2016 #8
I like Tanden Recursion May 2016 #10
Tanden suggested forcing Libya to pay us for our intervention there, since they are oil-rich JonLeibowitz May 2016 #79
Why? nt msanthrope May 2016 #13
Because ideas are more important than window dressing AgingAmerican May 2016 #14
Women are window dressing? Nt msanthrope May 2016 #17
If someone is chosen because of their gender or race, then yes AgingAmerican May 2016 #19
How interesting that you think being chosen because you are female is a negative. Nt msanthrope May 2016 #24
Yes AgingAmerican May 2016 #25
no,being chosen as a man has been the default setting for centuries. bettyellen May 2016 #60
He insists that the N word isn't a slur.... TwilightZone May 2016 #26
everyone one of the women chosen on that commiteee are extremely qualified still_one May 2016 #80
Are you really that lost that you can't piece this together? Gore1FL May 2016 #58
Sanders was not allowed to "take over" the platform. okasha May 2016 #27
Sanders to the rescue! AgingAmerican May 2016 #29
Now, that is just silly. okasha May 2016 #42
Hillary knows how to negotiate instead of like Sanders who bullies his way though. She is the riversedge May 2016 #28
She knows how to negotiate our jobs away. Fawke Em May 2016 #39
Peacemaker! tazkcmo May 2016 #52
You're male, aren't you? athena May 2016 #44
As someone who was employed by the sanders campaign, I noticed Dems2002 May 2016 #46
And that is what happens when people think platitudes is a substitute for action- bettyellen May 2016 #61
Being blind on this doesn't equal platitudes Dems2002 May 2016 #62
his "stance" on abortion is an empty platitude, and most other social justice issues he bettyellen May 2016 #64
Sanders didn't "take over the platform". George II May 2016 #72
Until the default isn't a straight white male mythology May 2016 #73
Using Trump to smear wholesome respectful, unbigoted Democratic white men is not a good look JonLeibowitz May 2016 #81
Then you must be opposed to gender division being used for national delegates. LiberalFighter May 2016 #75
A the rehash...The Sexism Clubber. Not this time! insta8er May 2016 #3
I would have dropped Cornel West for Michelle Alexander on the merits. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #4
maybe Alexander is a VP consideration? Just guessing... floppyboo May 2016 #33
Neera Tanden is awful, she's a staunch corporatist and JRLeft May 2016 #5
no,just stop.divide and conquer sucks,no matter who does it. wendylaroux May 2016 #7
when it comes to attempting to divide the Democratic party bigtree May 2016 #15
The democratic platform and hillary is the divide timmymoff May 2016 #34
By joining in to build the Platform Committee? Scootaloo May 2016 #53
Is this the first time for a Native American advocate to have been selected? NWCorona May 2016 #11
Not sure what all committees she has served on for the DNC DURHAM D May 2016 #50
It does appear that way. What are we to deduce from this observation? hellofromreddit May 2016 #12
100% of Sanders picks are liberals Doctor_J May 2016 #16
admit it bigtree May 2016 #18
.....oh come on..don't get mad.. insta8er May 2016 #21
this is the face of the Sanders campaign bigtree May 2016 #31
Everybody must go to the convention and strip so we can count how many vaginas vs penises are in jillan May 2016 #20
Some of Hillary's picks are awful. Particularly Neera Tanden. cali May 2016 #22
Has she ever called the President of the United States the N word? TwilightZone May 2016 #23
I care more about policies than inborn traits Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #30
problem has been bigtree May 2016 #32
Texas Democratic delegate-selection rules okasha May 2016 #48
interesting bigtree May 2016 #68
I believe there was a time when the DNC DURHAM D May 2016 #88
There are plenty of qualified women Lydia Leftcoast May 2016 #76
that's a different issue. Opposing Hillary would seem moot in this primary bigtree May 2016 #86
Sanders Only Gets 5 Picks pmorlan1 May 2016 #35
he's responsible for his picks bigtree May 2016 #38
Give the Sexism Meme pmorlan1 May 2016 #40
it's not a meme, it's a reality bigtree May 2016 #45
I've been here for the entire campaign pmorlan1 May 2016 #49
okay. bigtree May 2016 #66
Do you realize that by accepting 5 picks, he admitted defeat? If he really thinks he might win, he anotherproletariat May 2016 #63
Oh for fuck sake TheFarseer May 2016 #36
didn't say hate, that's just a deflection bigtree May 2016 #37
Of course you didn't SAY. SAYING things means you can be held to them Scootaloo May 2016 #104
Four of Sanders' five choices are non-white Eric J in MN May 2016 #41
+1. Way to diss Arab Americans, Muslim Americans, Native Americans...it's sick riderinthestorm May 2016 #43
I pointed out that his platform committee picks only include one woman bigtree May 2016 #47
Does Hillary have any Native Americans in her group? jillan May 2016 #51
Why does Hillary Clinton dismiss Native Americans? Orsino May 2016 #90
This message was self-deleted by its author frylock May 2016 #54
Let's just do away with names and identify by penis or vagina followed by a number TheKentuckian May 2016 #55
let's just ignore the fact that the male-dominated political system has NOT met the needs of women bigtree May 2016 #67
I don't see anyone's needs met below about the the top 10%, not even men. Not even white men TheKentuckian May 2016 #69
you're acting as if there aren't progressive women who could fill those roles bigtree May 2016 #74
Conservatives have been arguing to focus on being more inclusive of strong liberals? TheKentuckian May 2016 #98
what a joke bigtree May 2016 #99
Your point is plumbing over policy, ideology, and worldview, I'm glad to help. TheKentuckian May 2016 #100
again, you're supposing there are no progressive women available bigtree May 2016 #105
I am very happy to see Rep Elijah Cummings, he is very strong and smart, he will be an asset. Thinkingabout May 2016 #56
expecting or giving preferential treatment RazBerryBeret May 2016 #57
Do you realize how divisive the title of this OP is? Many people do not automatically segment a ... slipslidingaway May 2016 #59
women have been fighting for political access for decades bigtree May 2016 #65
Somebody who supports a Neocon choie May 2016 #78
I support Hillary over the leader of this hapless revolution against the Democratic party bigtree May 2016 #83
It neither begins, ends or middles choie May 2016 #85
it's been a hoot, but this primary is over bigtree May 2016 #87
Here, in the Minnesota DFL party, every party leadership MineralMan May 2016 #70
Interesting. George II May 2016 #71
I noticed that one also still_one May 2016 #77
Wo! How could they let that happen!!! nt LAS14 May 2016 #82
Excellent MariaThinks May 2016 #84
Sanders picks were excellent choices Larkspur May 2016 #89
nice try bigtree May 2016 #91
I am a woman and a feminist. Hell Hath No Fury May 2016 #92
Ditto. I don't judge people based on their genitals. jillan May 2016 #95
Those are all good choices by all 3 of them and actually balance the D-platform. Sunlei May 2016 #93
A lot of white men of Bernie Sanders' generation Nye Bevan May 2016 #94
males yell louder BlueStateLib May 2016 #96
I wish he'd picked M. Alexander or Holmes Norton. He missed a chance here to add women, I agree snowy owl May 2016 #97
How many support putting medical marijuana users in prison, like DWS does? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #101
Say what you want about whoever. The picks are excellent from both sides. Tiggeroshii May 2016 #103
Naturally Demsrule86 May 2016 #106
he has zero women senior staffers bigtree May 2016 #107
 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
1. Gender should never be a deciding factor in these matters
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:44 PM
May 2016

EVER.

Sanders was allowed to take over the platform because Hillary has been surpassed by Trump in national polls. Deal with it.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. That's an odd claim. Why not?
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:45 PM
May 2016

I'd hope we'd have diversity as a goal in choosing our platform committee. You don't?

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
6. Is there a female equivalent of McKibben?
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:48 PM
May 2016

There may be and I'm not aware -- genuinely curious. I would not have chosen Cornel West (prefer Alexander)

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. Winona LaDuke, Hunter Lovins, Temple Grandin (sort of)...
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:50 PM
May 2016

The West pick was a pretty predictable "fuck you" to Obama, and is neither here nor there, IMO

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
79. Tanden suggested forcing Libya to pay us for our intervention there, since they are oil-rich
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:53 AM
May 2016

I'm not okay with that kind of naked imperalism, and I don't think you are either, right?

okasha

(11,573 posts)
27. Sanders was not allowed to "take over" the platform.
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:31 PM
May 2016

He named 5 out of 17 co.mittee members.

That said, Keith Ellison is a good choice, and Deborah Parker an even better one.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
29. Sanders to the rescue!
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:32 PM
May 2016

The DNC is experiencing BUYERS REMORSE since Trump has now surpassed Clinton.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
42. Now, that is just silly.
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:49 PM
May 2016

It's a "feel good" concession. Nothing will make it onto the platform without at least nine votes. Math again.

riversedge

(70,204 posts)
28. Hillary knows how to negotiate instead of like Sanders who bullies his way though. She is the
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:32 PM
May 2016

peacemaker-and has had to be, esp in her role as SOS. Deal with that.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
39. She knows how to negotiate our jobs away.
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:42 PM
May 2016

She knows how negotiate us into war.

She knows how to negotiate so that Wall Street gets all the spoils while Main Street suffers.

But, peacemaker? LOL! She's the biggest war hawk running.

athena

(4,187 posts)
44. You're male, aren't you?
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:52 PM
May 2016

You're really making a statement to the effect that you should have unfair privilege thanks to your gender.

Anyone who thinks women and men play on a level playing field in our society is either clueless, or male, or, more likely, both.

P.S. When a group is made up entirely of men, or overwhelmingly of men, that is not evidence that the members were chosen fairly, based on their merits. Quite the contrary. But to some people, bias is perfectly acceptable as long as it benefits men.

Dems2002

(509 posts)
46. As someone who was employed by the sanders campaign, I noticed
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:54 PM
May 2016

I saw his list of names and I immediately noticed 4-1 male/female. There is no way it needed to be this way. You know who he could have easily picked? Nina Turner.

I wouldn't have noticed 3-2. But 4-1 when this is a continuous issue for his campaign really shows he doesn't get it.

Not surprising. He's old. His lead staff are old white men too. But I wish he could have learned to do better on this issue.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
61. And that is what happens when people think platitudes is a substitute for action-
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:43 AM
May 2016

they always expect someone else to go out and start doing the work.... but they have set themselves up to not even understand what the work should look like by excluding so many.

Dems2002

(509 posts)
62. Being blind on this doesn't equal platitudes
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:10 AM
May 2016

Sanders is mission focus. He has a one track mind. He's completely focused on the economic front and he gets easily exacerbated by other items. He cares, but he thinks if we fix the economic side first that will do the most good for women and minorities. He isn't wrong, but he isn't completely right either.

Such is life.

I've been around the block for a long time. And the reason I went to work for him is the fact that he is strong, he doesn't back down and he knows how to bring back the moral frame necessary to push a liberal economic agenda.

To me, this is vital. Working people deserve dignity. And our crony capitalism has stripped it from us and then told us we're to blame.

I am proud to have worked for Bernie. I don't worship anyone though. It's up to us to carry his legacy forward.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
64. his "stance" on abortion is an empty platitude, and most other social justice issues he
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:17 AM
May 2016

has not don;t the work and picked up facile ideas on how to cope. it;s not his wheelhouse, and he has not done the work to improve it much. it is lip service. he's not actually that interested in anything but Wall St and financial issues.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
73. Until the default isn't a straight white male
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:58 AM
May 2016

I have no problem with having gender, race or orientation being substantial factors in these matters, especially when the opposing side talks about women bleeding out of their wherever or Mexicans being rapists etc.

People who have different life experiences bring different perspectives. What's wrong with wanting to take advantage of that?

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
4. I would have dropped Cornel West for Michelle Alexander on the merits.
Mon May 23, 2016, 09:46 PM
May 2016

Otherwise, I think it's a good idea to select powerful voices on the most pressing issues facing America, not try to exactly represent every constituency proportionally.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
15. when it comes to attempting to divide the Democratic party
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:07 PM
May 2016

...the Sanders campaign takes the prize.

Wanting women proportionately represented at the negotiating table isn't divisive. ALL of Sanders top campaign staff are men. There should be a point where representation of women is more than just a campaign slogan.

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
34. The democratic platform and hillary is the divide
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:39 PM
May 2016

you know the lobbyist money, the corporate money, the super pac money, the fracking etc.. stop making shit up never has the democratic platform been to make our water dirtier, but it is under Hillary. never has it been Big business is great , but it is under Hillary's vision.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
53. By joining in to build the Platform Committee?
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:12 PM
May 2016

No matter what he does, nothing, but nothing is ever anything but "proof" of what a godawful piece of shit he is, huh?

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
50. Not sure what all committees she has served on for the DNC
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:01 PM
May 2016

but here is a real shero -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaDonna_Harris

Her husband former Senator Fred Harris is a SuperD.


bigtree

(85,996 posts)
18. admit it
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:11 PM
May 2016

...you don't know a damn thing of substance about the people you project against here.

Blocking you.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
31. this is the face of the Sanders campaign
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:35 PM
May 2016

...ugly personal attacks posing as progressiveness.

What a fraud.

jillan

(39,451 posts)
20. Everybody must go to the convention and strip so we can count how many vaginas vs penises are in
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:14 PM
May 2016

attendance.



Seriously people?

TwilightZone

(25,471 posts)
23. Has she ever called the President of the United States the N word?
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:22 PM
May 2016

Compared him to George Zimmerman?

Called him a war criminal?

No one is a worse choice than Cornel West. He makes any other "bad" choices look like Paul Wellstone.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
30. I care more about policies than inborn traits
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:34 PM
May 2016

Better a male with empathy and understanding for ordinary Americans than a female corporatist and hawk.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
32. problem has been
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:38 PM
May 2016

...the majority of men making political and policy decisions have not given priority or inclusion of issues which predominately affect women.

Moreover, it's way past time for women to have a seat at the political table. Unless you feel there are no qualified women to include in the deliberations, there isn't any excuse for excluding or under-representing them.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
48. Texas Democratic delegate-selection rules
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:56 PM
May 2016

require gender parity. That seems pretty "progressive" to me.

DURHAM D

(32,609 posts)
88. I believe there was a time when the DNC
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:18 AM
May 2016

required gender parity in pledged delegates from each state unless they requested and received an exemption.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
76. There are plenty of qualified women
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:45 AM
May 2016

I just don't happen to like this particular one who is running for president.

And not because of Whitewater or Vince Foster or covens in the White House or any other such right-wing nonsense.

It's because of being a corporatist and a hawk and a defender of the status quo. It's because of valuing harmony with the Republicans over the good of the country.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
86. that's a different issue. Opposing Hillary would seem moot in this primary
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:06 AM
May 2016

...highlighted by Sanders already assuming a lesser role in the convention platform process.

This concerns representation of women on the platform committee.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
35. Sanders Only Gets 5 Picks
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:40 PM
May 2016

and now the Hillary supporters want to make those picks for him? You guys are unbelievable.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
40. Give the Sexism Meme
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:47 PM
May 2016

a rest. I've been a feminist for over 40 years and I'm so sick of the faux outrage from Clinton supporters. It's really getting embarrassing. Stop using women to gain political advantage for your candidate. You're turning off a lot of feminists who support the other candidate and you need us in the Fall if she gets the nomination.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
45. it's not a meme, it's a reality
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:52 PM
May 2016

...one that women in politics have been enduring for decades.

It's really simple.There are more than enough women in Democratic politics for the Sanders camp to find who are qualified to make these decisions. It's a shame he didn't care enough to include them.

That, and these deflections are more of a 'turn off' than pointing this out.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
63. Do you realize that by accepting 5 picks, he admitted defeat? If he really thinks he might win, he
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:12 AM
May 2016

would not have settled for less than Hillary.

TheFarseer

(9,322 posts)
36. Oh for fuck sake
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:40 PM
May 2016

In you estimation, is there any group bernie doesn't hate? Hillary didn't pick any native Americans. Why does she hate native Americans?

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
37. didn't say hate, that's just a deflection
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:41 PM
May 2016

...they just weren't included, for whatever reason, and it sucks.

I have noticed the lack of discussion by Hillary of Native American issues and the lack of prominent representation of those citizens in her campaign, and it's ripe for criticism.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
104. Of course you didn't SAY. SAYING things means you can be held to them
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:32 PM
May 2016

So instead you just insinuate endlessly.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
41. Four of Sanders' five choices are non-white
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:47 PM
May 2016

...but you still found a way to imply he's against diversity.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
43. +1. Way to diss Arab Americans, Muslim Americans, Native Americans...it's sick
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:50 PM
May 2016

The hatred of Bernie renders them blind to anything positive.


bigtree

(85,996 posts)
47. I pointed out that his platform committee picks only include one woman
Mon May 23, 2016, 10:55 PM
May 2016

...you can make of it what you want, but it stands as an exclusion on this influential committee.

(heading to work now, will check on this thread later)

Response to bigtree (Original post)

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
55. Let's just do away with names and identify by penis or vagina followed by a number
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:15 PM
May 2016

Sure, we can throw in a few more labels in there. I'll be black, male, straight penis #24 million because apparently all we are and ever can be is a demographic.

My friend white female lesbian vagina #501,071 just texted me she is upset with Asian female lesbian vagina #18,976 cause she talked shit about her brother white male straight penis #98,536,237.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
67. let's just ignore the fact that the male-dominated political system has NOT met the needs of women
Tue May 24, 2016, 07:58 AM
May 2016

...and continue to pretend that their particular needs and concerns are already being addressed by the majority of men in our national legislature.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
69. I don't see anyone's needs met below about the the top 10%, not even men. Not even white men
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:36 AM
May 2016

The problems go way, way deeper than how many vaginas and penises one can count.

It is the who not the what that is at the root. You can have 535 Joni Ernst in DC and women would be worse off than ever by and you can have 535 Bernie Sanders and women and minorities would never have been better off.

It's the conservatives and the regressives, not the dicks and pussies at the root of the problems.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
74. you're acting as if there aren't progressive women who could fill those roles
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:02 AM
May 2016

...and making what has been, for decades, a conservative argument.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
98. Conservatives have been arguing to focus on being more inclusive of strong liberals?
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:19 PM
May 2016

I'm going to have to ask for a link to that, never heard that a single time in my life.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
99. what a joke
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:21 PM
May 2016

...of an argument.

Shifting to arguing about 'strong liberals' is a hell of a way to address a vast majority of men making decisions for women for decades in our political system. Thanks for making my point.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
100. Your point is plumbing over policy, ideology, and worldview, I'm glad to help.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:28 PM
May 2016

I didn't shift shit, that is bull. My focus was ever on the who not the what.

If there was a shift it was from whatever crap you made up in your head.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
105. again, you're supposing there are no progressive women available
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:49 PM
May 2016

...not much of a progressive policy which under-represents women; supposing as the male-dominated system has for decades, that men are fully capable of representing those concerns. History say no.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
56. I am very happy to see Rep Elijah Cummings, he is very strong and smart, he will be an asset.
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:16 PM
May 2016

Hopefully West will arrive without his disparaging remarks.

RazBerryBeret

(3,075 posts)
57. expecting or giving preferential treatment
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:20 PM
May 2016

because of one's gender is sexism. This campaign screams sexism at every turn, yet they have proven themselves to be sexist, IMO.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
59. Do you realize how divisive the title of this OP is? Many people do not automatically segment a ...
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:52 PM
May 2016

person by gender, race, religion, sexual orientation etc.

Forgot about age, another large dividing line we'll be seeing more of in the coming months/years.

Does a woman who is Native American get more weighting than a white woman? Maybe we should devise a rating system where we break people down by factors they cannot change and ignore their positions on issues? Great idea

That is not something I wish to do in politics or life and I say that as a woman over 60.







bigtree

(85,996 posts)
65. women have been fighting for political access for decades
Tue May 24, 2016, 07:55 AM
May 2016

...under representation on this influential committee is a travesty. Pointing that out isn't divisive, it's a reality check. You're not going to keep women out of the decision-making circle by trying to shame those calling for equal access at the political bargaining table.

I'm surprised anyone objecting can call themselves progressive.

choie

(4,111 posts)
78. Somebody who supports a Neocon
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:52 AM
May 2016

as the Democratic nominee is not in the position to decide who can call themselves Progressive..

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
83. I support Hillary over the leader of this hapless revolution against the Democratic party
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:01 AM
May 2016

...not everyone believes progressiveness begins and ends with Bernie Sanders.

choie

(4,111 posts)
85. It neither begins, ends or middles
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:05 AM
May 2016

with Clinton. You can demean Bernie all you want, but nothing will change the wolf in sheep's clothing (and not very credible clothing) you are supporting.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
87. it's been a hoot, but this primary is over
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:12 AM
May 2016

...and the debate over which candidate in our Democratic primary is good or bad is over, like Bernie's bid to be president.

See, I spared you all of that. I'm not all bad.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
70. Here, in the Minnesota DFL party, every party leadership
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:48 AM
May 2016

position must be equally divided between men and woman. If there are six positions, say for a district body, there must be three men and three women on that body.

It's a strict rule and one that is followed rigorously. Even for individual positions, such as Precinct Chair, if a male is the chair, a woman must be the vice-chair, and vice-versa.

We also have rules regarding other demographic equality, and our party leadership is supposed to be a mirror of the community.

That's a progressive goal and, in Minnesota, we work hard to achieve that goal. If you ever attend a Minnesota DFL Party convention at any level, you'll see the results in action. It works.

Hillary appears to share that goal.

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
89. Sanders picks were excellent choices
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:33 AM
May 2016

His choices help balance the ones HRC made.

Just because they are men does not mean that they have less value than women.

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
91. nice try
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:03 PM
May 2016

...the 'value' of women in our political system, at bargaining tables just like this influential one, is evidently not enough for Sanders to provide more than a token of representation (reflecting our political system, on the whole).

Does he not know any progressive women who will represent him?

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
92. I am a woman and a feminist.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:45 PM
May 2016

I looked over Sander's picks and am VERY happy with what I see. The many interest I find most important -- including equality -- will be well represented in that mix.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
94. A lot of white men of Bernie Sanders' generation
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:51 PM
May 2016

simply don't see this kind of thing as an issue. It doesn't mean that they are bad people, more that they are "of their time".

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
97. I wish he'd picked M. Alexander or Holmes Norton. He missed a chance here to add women, I agree
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:17 PM
May 2016

But it's not a issue to me. He's known for selecting smart and honest people. Key to his success No Rubin, Kissinger or Summers in his administration.

Demsrule86

(68,556 posts)
106. Naturally
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:54 PM
May 2016

Bernie has few women of any stature in his cabinet and has totally ignored women's issues.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»50% of both Clinton & DWS...