2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum50% of both Clinton & DWS's platform committee picks are women. Sanders only chose one
Skye M. @almasecretkey50% of both Clinton & DWS's picks are women. Sanders chose 1.
from TPM:
Under the new arrangement, the Washington Post reported Monday, Clinton will appoint six representatives to the platform committee while Sanders will appoint five.
The Post reported that Clinton has selected president of the Center for American Progress Neera Tanden, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) who has worked extensively on immigration reform in the House, Wendy Sherman, who worked with Clinton at the Department of State, Carol Browner, an environmentalist who worked in the Obama administration, Ohio lawmaker Alicia Reece, and Paul Booth who is the executive assistant to the president at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees union
The paper also reported that Sanders picked James Zogby, the president of the Arab-American Institute in Washington and a well-known advocate for Palestinian issues, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN), one of two Muslim members of Congress, Dr. Cornel West, an academic and an activist for racial equality, author and environmentalist Bill McKibben and Deborah Parker, an advocate for the Native American community.
DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz named Rep. Elijah Cummings, who served as the the ranking member in the select committee on Benghazi, to be the chairman. She also selected former CEO Bonnie Schaefer, one-time Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA) and current Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) to serve.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)EVER.
Sanders was allowed to take over the platform because Hillary has been surpassed by Trump in national polls. Deal with it.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'd hope we'd have diversity as a goal in choosing our platform committee. You don't?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)There may be and I'm not aware -- genuinely curious. I would not have chosen Cornel West (prefer Alexander)
Recursion
(56,582 posts)The West pick was a pretty predictable "fuck you" to Obama, and is neither here nor there, IMO
WhiteTara
(29,705 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Plus it's good to see an Indian-American on the committee
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I'm not okay with that kind of naked imperalism, and I don't think you are either, right?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Male is also a gender, BTW.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)E
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And being chosen because you are a male is equally 'a negative'.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)so this position isn't terribly surprising.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2037869
still_one
(92,187 posts)Gore1FL
(21,130 posts)Or are you trolling?
okasha
(11,573 posts)He named 5 out of 17 co.mittee members.
That said, Keith Ellison is a good choice, and Deborah Parker an even better one.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)The DNC is experiencing BUYERS REMORSE since Trump has now surpassed Clinton.
okasha
(11,573 posts)It's a "feel good" concession. Nothing will make it onto the platform without at least nine votes. Math again.
riversedge
(70,204 posts)peacemaker-and has had to be, esp in her role as SOS. Deal with that.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)She knows how negotiate us into war.
She knows how to negotiate so that Wall Street gets all the spoils while Main Street suffers.
But, peacemaker? LOL! She's the biggest war hawk running.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)Good one! lol
athena
(4,187 posts)You're really making a statement to the effect that you should have unfair privilege thanks to your gender.
Anyone who thinks women and men play on a level playing field in our society is either clueless, or male, or, more likely, both.
P.S. When a group is made up entirely of men, or overwhelmingly of men, that is not evidence that the members were chosen fairly, based on their merits. Quite the contrary. But to some people, bias is perfectly acceptable as long as it benefits men.
Dems2002
(509 posts)I saw his list of names and I immediately noticed 4-1 male/female. There is no way it needed to be this way. You know who he could have easily picked? Nina Turner.
I wouldn't have noticed 3-2. But 4-1 when this is a continuous issue for his campaign really shows he doesn't get it.
Not surprising. He's old. His lead staff are old white men too. But I wish he could have learned to do better on this issue.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)they always expect someone else to go out and start doing the work.... but they have set themselves up to not even understand what the work should look like by excluding so many.
Dems2002
(509 posts)Sanders is mission focus. He has a one track mind. He's completely focused on the economic front and he gets easily exacerbated by other items. He cares, but he thinks if we fix the economic side first that will do the most good for women and minorities. He isn't wrong, but he isn't completely right either.
Such is life.
I've been around the block for a long time. And the reason I went to work for him is the fact that he is strong, he doesn't back down and he knows how to bring back the moral frame necessary to push a liberal economic agenda.
To me, this is vital. Working people deserve dignity. And our crony capitalism has stripped it from us and then told us we're to blame.
I am proud to have worked for Bernie. I don't worship anyone though. It's up to us to carry his legacy forward.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)has not don;t the work and picked up facile ideas on how to cope. it;s not his wheelhouse, and he has not done the work to improve it much. it is lip service. he's not actually that interested in anything but Wall St and financial issues.
George II
(67,782 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)I have no problem with having gender, race or orientation being substantial factors in these matters, especially when the opposing side talks about women bleeding out of their wherever or Mexicans being rapists etc.
People who have different life experiences bring different perspectives. What's wrong with wanting to take advantage of that?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,912 posts)insta8er
(960 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Otherwise, I think it's a good idea to select powerful voices on the most pressing issues facing America, not try to exactly represent every constituency proportionally.
floppyboo
(2,461 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)completed controlled by AIPAC.
wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)bigtree
(85,996 posts)...the Sanders campaign takes the prize.
Wanting women proportionately represented at the negotiating table isn't divisive. ALL of Sanders top campaign staff are men. There should be a point where representation of women is more than just a campaign slogan.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)you know the lobbyist money, the corporate money, the super pac money, the fracking etc.. stop making shit up never has the democratic platform been to make our water dirtier, but it is under Hillary. never has it been Big business is great , but it is under Hillary's vision.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)No matter what he does, nothing, but nothing is ever anything but "proof" of what a godawful piece of shit he is, huh?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)but here is a real shero -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaDonna_Harris
Her husband former Senator Fred Harris is a SuperD.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Admit it, that's what you're unhappy about
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...you don't know a damn thing of substance about the people you project against here.
Blocking you.
insta8er
(960 posts)bigtree
(85,996 posts)...ugly personal attacks posing as progressiveness.
What a fraud.
jillan
(39,451 posts)attendance.
Seriously people?
cali
(114,904 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Compared him to George Zimmerman?
Called him a war criminal?
No one is a worse choice than Cornel West. He makes any other "bad" choices look like Paul Wellstone.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)Better a male with empathy and understanding for ordinary Americans than a female corporatist and hawk.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...the majority of men making political and policy decisions have not given priority or inclusion of issues which predominately affect women.
Moreover, it's way past time for women to have a seat at the political table. Unless you feel there are no qualified women to include in the deliberations, there isn't any excuse for excluding or under-representing them.
okasha
(11,573 posts)require gender parity. That seems pretty "progressive" to me.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...I agree.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)required gender parity in pledged delegates from each state unless they requested and received an exemption.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)I just don't happen to like this particular one who is running for president.
And not because of Whitewater or Vince Foster or covens in the White House or any other such right-wing nonsense.
It's because of being a corporatist and a hawk and a defender of the status quo. It's because of valuing harmony with the Republicans over the good of the country.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...highlighted by Sanders already assuming a lesser role in the convention platform process.
This concerns representation of women on the platform committee.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)and now the Hillary supporters want to make those picks for him? You guys are unbelievable.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...and not above criticism for them.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)a rest. I've been a feminist for over 40 years and I'm so sick of the faux outrage from Clinton supporters. It's really getting embarrassing. Stop using women to gain political advantage for your candidate. You're turning off a lot of feminists who support the other candidate and you need us in the Fall if she gets the nomination.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...one that women in politics have been enduring for decades.
It's really simple.There are more than enough women in Democratic politics for the Sanders camp to find who are qualified to make these decisions. It's a shame he didn't care enough to include them.
That, and these deflections are more of a 'turn off' than pointing this out.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)I've seen the meme pushed all over DU. Spare me.
...blocking you.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)would not have settled for less than Hillary.
TheFarseer
(9,322 posts)In you estimation, is there any group bernie doesn't hate? Hillary didn't pick any native Americans. Why does she hate native Americans?
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...they just weren't included, for whatever reason, and it sucks.
I have noticed the lack of discussion by Hillary of Native American issues and the lack of prominent representation of those citizens in her campaign, and it's ripe for criticism.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)So instead you just insinuate endlessly.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...but you still found a way to imply he's against diversity.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)The hatred of Bernie renders them blind to anything positive.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...you can make of it what you want, but it stands as an exclusion on this influential committee.
(heading to work now, will check on this thread later)
jillan
(39,451 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Yep. Stupid talking points are stupid.
Response to bigtree (Original post)
frylock This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Sure, we can throw in a few more labels in there. I'll be black, male, straight penis #24 million because apparently all we are and ever can be is a demographic.
My friend white female lesbian vagina #501,071 just texted me she is upset with Asian female lesbian vagina #18,976 cause she talked shit about her brother white male straight penis #98,536,237.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...and continue to pretend that their particular needs and concerns are already being addressed by the majority of men in our national legislature.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)The problems go way, way deeper than how many vaginas and penises one can count.
It is the who not the what that is at the root. You can have 535 Joni Ernst in DC and women would be worse off than ever by and you can have 535 Bernie Sanders and women and minorities would never have been better off.
It's the conservatives and the regressives, not the dicks and pussies at the root of the problems.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...and making what has been, for decades, a conservative argument.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)I'm going to have to ask for a link to that, never heard that a single time in my life.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...of an argument.
Shifting to arguing about 'strong liberals' is a hell of a way to address a vast majority of men making decisions for women for decades in our political system. Thanks for making my point.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)I didn't shift shit, that is bull. My focus was ever on the who not the what.
If there was a shift it was from whatever crap you made up in your head.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...not much of a progressive policy which under-represents women; supposing as the male-dominated system has for decades, that men are fully capable of representing those concerns. History say no.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Hopefully West will arrive without his disparaging remarks.
RazBerryBeret
(3,075 posts)because of one's gender is sexism. This campaign screams sexism at every turn, yet they have proven themselves to be sexist, IMO.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)person by gender, race, religion, sexual orientation etc.
Forgot about age, another large dividing line we'll be seeing more of in the coming months/years.
Does a woman who is Native American get more weighting than a white woman? Maybe we should devise a rating system where we break people down by factors they cannot change and ignore their positions on issues? Great idea
That is not something I wish to do in politics or life and I say that as a woman over 60.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...under representation on this influential committee is a travesty. Pointing that out isn't divisive, it's a reality check. You're not going to keep women out of the decision-making circle by trying to shame those calling for equal access at the political bargaining table.
I'm surprised anyone objecting can call themselves progressive.
choie
(4,111 posts)as the Democratic nominee is not in the position to decide who can call themselves Progressive..
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...not everyone believes progressiveness begins and ends with Bernie Sanders.
choie
(4,111 posts)with Clinton. You can demean Bernie all you want, but nothing will change the wolf in sheep's clothing (and not very credible clothing) you are supporting.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...and the debate over which candidate in our Democratic primary is good or bad is over, like Bernie's bid to be president.
See, I spared you all of that. I'm not all bad.
MineralMan
(146,288 posts)position must be equally divided between men and woman. If there are six positions, say for a district body, there must be three men and three women on that body.
It's a strict rule and one that is followed rigorously. Even for individual positions, such as Precinct Chair, if a male is the chair, a woman must be the vice-chair, and vice-versa.
We also have rules regarding other demographic equality, and our party leadership is supposed to be a mirror of the community.
That's a progressive goal and, in Minnesota, we work hard to achieve that goal. If you ever attend a Minnesota DFL Party convention at any level, you'll see the results in action. It works.
Hillary appears to share that goal.
George II
(67,782 posts)still_one
(92,187 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)Larkspur
(12,804 posts)His choices help balance the ones HRC made.
Just because they are men does not mean that they have less value than women.
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...the 'value' of women in our political system, at bargaining tables just like this influential one, is evidently not enough for Sanders to provide more than a token of representation (reflecting our political system, on the whole).
Does he not know any progressive women who will represent him?
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)I looked over Sander's picks and am VERY happy with what I see. The many interest I find most important -- including equality -- will be well represented in that mix.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)simply don't see this kind of thing as an issue. It doesn't mean that they are bad people, more that they are "of their time".
BlueStateLib
(937 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)But it's not a issue to me. He's known for selecting smart and honest people. Key to his success No Rubin, Kissinger or Summers in his administration.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)A progressive majority!
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Bernie has few women of any stature in his cabinet and has totally ignored women's issues.