Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How do Californians feel about the HRC snub? (Original Post) Skink May 2016 OP
This Californian doesn't give a rip. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #1
The sensible ones know that the primary is already wrapped up, and a debate is unnecessary Tarc May 2016 #2
The sensible ones know Bernie's attack only help Donald Trump. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #4
And will a Hillary attack on Bernie in a debate also help Trump? imagine2015 May 2016 #20
She doesn't need to attack Bernie metroins May 2016 #36
exactly MFM008 May 2016 #53
Cool, all you sensible ones, don't worry about voting one little bit. highprincipleswork May 2016 #56
Yes, absolutely. mac56 May 2016 #62
I'm not miffed ... there is no upside to Secretary Clinton doing another debate SFnomad May 2016 #3
Are you from California? still_one May 2016 #5
Lived in SD for awhile also in the Bay Area Skink May 2016 #9
Well I live here, and have voted here for more than 30 years, and sorry Hillary is NOT still_one May 2016 #16
I would think donco May 2016 #6
sanders + fox + trump + republicans vs hillary. smart move HRC . be miffed if you wish nt msongs May 2016 #7
They know it's not about them. fun n serious May 2016 #8
The FOX NEWS ambush? RandySF May 2016 #10
What Democrat in their right mind would agree to that? nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #72
True to form. eom PufPuf23 May 2016 #11
You are always "miffed". JoePhilly May 2016 #12
Miffed at you Skink May 2016 #13
No ... just "miffed". JoePhilly May 2016 #15
He can debate the GOP runner up, Ted Cruz. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #14
Best response in the entire thread!!! beaglelover May 2016 #67
It reinforces that she cannot be trusted. AtomicKitten May 2016 #17
I'm sure they are fine having the Dem candidate picked by the Southern states Fumesucker May 2016 #18
You seem a little salty. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #21
There are quite a few people of color in CA, like the south. So we have that in common. ContinentalOp May 2016 #25
Sanders won the least white state by a landslide. Ash_F May 2016 #55
Here is why it matters that we still have a race nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #19
Same ol', same ol' NV Whino May 2016 #22
Repping the 818... Love her madly... DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #24
Yeah HRC stay out of California. Skink May 2016 #45
How is this different than most primaries -- seriously??? Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #23
April would be good. oldandhappy May 2016 #30
California's 2008 primary was 05 Feb. Brother Buzz May 2016 #33
I forgot .CA moved up Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #38
California's 12 year experiment with an early primary was a mixed bag Brother Buzz May 2016 #48
Every vote should count. The fact that states have to compete to see who will go first and have liberal_at_heart May 2016 #37
Yes Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #41
Absolutely. I live in WA. We have a great mail in ballot primary which the Democratic liberal_at_heart May 2016 #42
people who want to beat Trump are thrilled. Those who want the Democratic party to be destroyed, not samsingh May 2016 #26
+1 BootinUp May 2016 #40
She said we do not matter. oldandhappy May 2016 #27
not miffed and not surprised dana_b May 2016 #28
How were they snubbed? The lack of a debate? Did they not watch the numerous other debates? LonePirate May 2016 #29
Not angry at all... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #31
I'm a Californian. I'm fine with no more debates. I've seen plenty of them already. writes3000 May 2016 #32
NJ does not matter as well. nt slipslidingaway May 2016 #34
Forgot about you Skink May 2016 #46
Thx and will do :) nt slipslidingaway May 2016 #47
No harm no foul... Silver_Witch May 2016 #35
What snub is that? BootinUp May 2016 #39
Wouldn't walk across the street to see her for free... cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #43
suit me just fine if she never darkened my state's door again. Hiraeth May 2016 #44
As a Californian I tend to look at the bigger picture. rufus dog May 2016 #49
The California primary was in March in 2000 and 2004 Califonz May 2016 #58
It wouldn't change anything unless one of them really slipped up. We've already started voting. nt ucrdem May 2016 #50
She's blowing off all but the wealthy LibDemAlways May 2016 #51
Yes I think she was fundraising in Oakland recently dreamnightwind May 2016 #52
Holmby Hills in LA tonight, at the multi-million dollar home of Bryan Lourde who heads up LibDemAlways May 2016 #54
This Californian... yuiyoshida May 2016 #57
Did she snub California? JustABozoOnThisBus May 2016 #59
Do you recall any question at the Brooklyn debate that dealt with Brooklyn? brooklynite May 2016 #60
Brooklyn is a State with nearly 39 million people? Any questions about NY in that debate? Bluenorthwest May 2016 #66
Is this the 1st time the primary was over before California voted? FSogol May 2016 #61
Great, thank you for asking. grossproffit May 2016 #63
I remember being a blind minion fool to the Clintons' inane games back in the 1990s deepestblue May 2016 #64
she never agreed to debate there. Bernie just wants free publicity. He's out of money. Lil Missy May 2016 #65
We've got TVs out here you know and have seen the 10 other damn debates already. taught_me_patience May 2016 #68
What percentage of Californians get to watch the debate in person? MadBadger May 2016 #69
I don't watch TV. nt bemildred May 2016 #70
Love it! It means we already won and don't need to debate. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #71

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
53. exactly
Tue May 24, 2016, 03:34 AM
May 2016

No need, unless she picks Sanders as VP( and hes making that difficult by trying to burn the bridge to the democratic party) this really has 2 weeks left to go even though the last primary is June 14 with Washington D.C. pretty predictable one for HRC.
Why discuss things that have been discussed 100 times before.

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
3. I'm not miffed ... there is no upside to Secretary Clinton doing another debate
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:32 PM
May 2016

The Democratic Primary is all but over ... we all know who the nominee will be. Why would Secretary Clinton want to chance a Rick Perry "oops" moment?

still_one

(92,061 posts)
16. Well I live here, and have voted here for more than 30 years, and sorry Hillary is NOT
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:46 PM
May 2016

snubbing California

Other OPs seem far less refined than yours:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512021387

The common thread is most people in California do not view it as such or have a problem with it. The only ones who seem to have an issue with it are those at Fox news, and some Bernie supporters.

Most Californians are well aware of where both candidates stand, and we will see what happens on June 7

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
8. They know it's not about them.
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:33 PM
May 2016

It's about saying enough is enough. NO say on cabinet picks or anything else. DONE

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
15. No ... just "miffed".
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:46 PM
May 2016

The perpetually disgruntled are always disgruntled.

It does not matter what the actual situation is.

We've seen this throughout the Obama Presidency.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. I'm sure they are fine having the Dem candidate picked by the Southern states
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:48 PM
May 2016

You know, the ones that will never vote for the Democrat in the general.

After all, California is just like the South.

ContinentalOp

(5,356 posts)
25. There are quite a few people of color in CA, like the south. So we have that in common.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:13 AM
May 2016

If you look at the top 15 whitest states, Sanders won 10 of them, and Clinton only won two (3 haven't voted yet). So that's something! I don't think it's going to help you much in CA though.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
19. Here is why it matters that we still have a race
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:49 PM
May 2016

on the 7. Whether people here get it or not, is another story. And I suspect that many of the folks who usually go GOTV don't... DOWN BALLOT INITIATIVES and yes turnout.

For many like me the primary is an afterthought, and I have said this before, it did not start today. PROP I, PROP I, PROP I.

As to her snub... it depends who you ask.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,781 posts)
23. How is this different than most primaries -- seriously???
Mon May 23, 2016, 11:57 PM
May 2016

By the first week of June, every Democratic primary in my lifetime has been settled for all practical purposes. If California wants to change that, they need to do what other intelligent states were doing in '08 before the party higher-ups shot them down -- move up. Vote in January. Beat New Hampshire and Iowa to the punch.

oldandhappy

(6,719 posts)
30. April would be good.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:17 AM
May 2016

I like having a chance to see how candidates do in other states and each one speaks in unstructured situations.

Brother Buzz

(36,380 posts)
33. California's 2008 primary was 05 Feb.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:37 AM
May 2016

The 'higher-ups', our elected state legislators, change the date to consolidate it with the state primaries to save money.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,781 posts)
38. I forgot .CA moved up
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:54 AM
May 2016

I remember Florida moved up, and some other states, and both parties bitched mightily.

Brother Buzz

(36,380 posts)
48. California's 12 year experiment with an early primary was a mixed bag
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:13 AM
May 2016

When it got rolled back to the original date, the Democrats were indifferent, and the Republicans dragged their feet a bit until it was pointed out the change was the fiscally responsible thing to do.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
37. Every vote should count. The fact that states have to compete to see who will go first and have
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:54 AM
May 2016

more of a say is ridiculous. We should have a national voting day where everybody votes on the same day that way every vote counts.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,781 posts)
41. Yes
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:56 AM
May 2016

Just get rid of the whole delegate thing and the caucuses. 50 states and the District and territories vote at once. I advocate by mail.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
42. Absolutely. I live in WA. We have a great mail in ballot primary which the Democratic
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:58 AM
May 2016

Party has completely ignored. None of the delegates will come from the primary. Our entire electoral system sucks.

samsingh

(17,590 posts)
26. people who want to beat Trump are thrilled. Those who want the Democratic party to be destroyed, not
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:14 AM
May 2016

so much

LonePirate

(13,408 posts)
29. How were they snubbed? The lack of a debate? Did they not watch the numerous other debates?
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:17 AM
May 2016

It's not like primary season started a couple of weeks ago and we've yet to see the candidates debate each other.

LenaBaby61

(6,972 posts)
31. Not angry at all...
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:21 AM
May 2016

Mailed in my absentee ballot voting for Hillary Clinton in California's primary and feel fine having done so.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
35. No harm no foul...
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:40 AM
May 2016

She doesn't have time for us - we don't have time or a vote for her. It is really okay - Bernie out stumped her here.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
43. Wouldn't walk across the street to see her for free...
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:59 AM
May 2016

But I'd gladly pay $27 for a nosebleed seat at a Bernie Sanders rally.

 

rufus dog

(8,419 posts)
49. As a Californian I tend to look at the bigger picture.
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:22 AM
May 2016

Is the snub annoying? Yes, minor though.

My major issue is with California always being last in the process. AND IT IS BY DESIGN!

Those in power want to front load Southern States thus weakening the impact of the more progressive states. Basically a big Fuck You to Californians. So there isn't much I can do, other than change my affiliation from Democrat to refuse to declare. Basically a big Fuck You back at ya to the Democratic Party.

 

Califonz

(465 posts)
58. The California primary was in March in 2000 and 2004
Tue May 24, 2016, 06:34 AM
May 2016

Maybe they thought it was bad luck? Gore and Kerry both lost to Bush in the general.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
50. It wouldn't change anything unless one of them really slipped up. We've already started voting. nt
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:25 AM
May 2016

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
51. She's blowing off all but the wealthy
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:25 AM
May 2016

donors at high ticket fundraisers and carefully chosen audiences at smallish events. Hope the rest of the voters remember who blew them off and return the favor on June 7.

dreamnightwind

(4,775 posts)
52. Yes I think she was fundraising in Oakland recently
Tue May 24, 2016, 02:36 AM
May 2016

High-rollers all, didn't bother with the little people.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
54. Holmby Hills in LA tonight, at the multi-million dollar home of Bryan Lourde who heads up
Tue May 24, 2016, 03:44 AM
May 2016

CAA -- Creative Artists talent agency. Hollywood heavy hitter. Price of admission was $2700 to get in the door. A photo with Clinton set a donor back 10K.

Compare that with Bernie, who's criss-crossing the state at large rallies and asking for $27.00 from those who can spare it.

The contrast couldn't be more clear.

yuiyoshida

(41,818 posts)
57. This Californian...
Tue May 24, 2016, 05:47 AM
May 2016

and YES, I was born in San Francisco, not Japan, Not China... (Not all Asians are immigrants) is not miffed at all about the HRC Snub. I don't like her.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,321 posts)
59. Did she snub California?
Tue May 24, 2016, 06:58 AM
May 2016

I thought she showed up for a gala fundraiser at George Clooney's house.

Where's the snub?

brooklynite

(94,356 posts)
60. Do you recall any question at the Brooklyn debate that dealt with Brooklyn?
Tue May 24, 2016, 07:12 AM
May 2016

Neither do I.

A "California Debate" would be no different than the seven other debates they've held and wouldn't cover any new ground.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
66. Brooklyn is a State with nearly 39 million people? Any questions about NY in that debate?
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:45 AM
May 2016

How about East Coast issues? New York State has 19 million people. But of course it's more important because it thinks it is.
Brooklyn has about 2.5 million people and perhaps an inflated sense of position. Oregon has more people than Brooklyn, Hillary did not even drop in for tea this cycle. She lost by a large margin and I think it would have been narrower had she bothered to do an event or two. But she didn't.

I'm sure Californians feel they don't need a debate, as long as Clooney gets an event all of California feels massively respected.

deepestblue

(349 posts)
64. I remember being a blind minion fool to the Clintons' inane games back in the 1990s
Tue May 24, 2016, 07:38 AM
May 2016

I'm glad I grew up and stopped paying attention to the .01%'s propaganda via their paid-for establishment media.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
68. We've got TVs out here you know and have seen the 10 other damn debates already.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:41 AM
May 2016

I couldn't give two shits about a "snub"... this thing has been over since she smoked Bernie in Texas.


Oh yeah... Long Beach represent here!

MadBadger

(24,089 posts)
69. What percentage of Californians get to watch the debate in person?
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:53 AM
May 2016

And what percentage would watch the debate on TV like everybody else.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»How do Californians feel ...