2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSFnomad
(3,473 posts)They're turning the place into a sewer.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)We missed you during all those other shifts!
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Almost no one in the US knows about this incident.....
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)By the time those two are done, the American people will be totally disgusted.
If an impressive third party person is able to stand up, I think that they could win the Presidency.
I never saw Ross Perot coming, and if a much better candidate than Perot were to stand up....This might be the time.
If it does happen, it won't be anyone we know.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)without constant scandal and investigation.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Any non-republican administration would be subject to constant "investigation" and "SCANDAL!!!!!"
The only difference, I suppose, is with a Bernie Administration ... "Democrats" wouldn't be leading the charge/carrying the water.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)...and you know they wanted to.
That is the kind of Presidency that I want.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Second, then, why are you supporting Sanders?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Zero Scandal.
I support Sanders for the same reason that I supported Obama...trust.....and they are both rational.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)On Mon May 23, 2016, 11:46 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
If anyone asks later.......
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512038905
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Are we swiping material from Free Repubic now? This RW garbage does not belong here. Period. Primary or no, this is pure Limbaugh-worthy trash.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon May 23, 2016, 11:54 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It will be impossible to sugar-coat Clinton because she comes with so much baggage.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Lighten up, Francis
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I'll take a pass this time and will vote to leave it alone. However, once HRC is the Democratic Candidate (oh yes, it will happen), it is a violation of terms of service to go after the Democratic NOMINEE. At that point, there will be quite a few people around here who won't be able to post.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: There has been too damn much right wing ridiculousness on this website. This kind of stuff makes DU suck. I totally agree with the alerter. I vote to hide, probably to no avail, because of the crowd that have taken over this place.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Why preview and expose Trump's lies?
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)If she becomes the nominee....I won't say another critical word about Hillary.
My post is not a right wing attack. This is an example of a story that she made up designed to make her look brave in a "dangerous" situation.
The Obama campaign barely mentioned it and Bernie would never go there.
That means she has not been vetted on this issue, and Trump will go to town on this issue.
Funny how they call a major news story at the time a lie. Sec Clinton eventually owned up to it, kind of. She misspoke. In Clinton speak that's lied.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/25/campaign.wrap/index.html
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Renew Deal
(81,844 posts)virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)Voting for Hillary is helping Trump.....
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)The most vetted candidate EVAH!