2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum'Show me on the doll where Hillary touched you, Salon dot com'
First off, I want to say that Im not mad at the good folks who run Salon.com Im just very very very disappointed in them. My history with Salon goes back years to when Table Talk was the place to be for liberals at a time when Drudge ruled our world and blogs (remember them?) seemed to be the future.
Trading quips on TT with like-minded people was responsible for my personal growth from Internet smartass to a somewhat popular blogger to word scribbler to
Internet smartass.
Time really is a flat circle.
Salon had and still has many excellent writers who were and are provocative without going off the rails into Slate-pitchy grotesquery. I mean: Creed is good? You are dead to me, Slate. Dead. But then someone flipped a switch at Salon with The Rise Of The Bernie and things got
.weird.
This isnt to say that Salon went, Bernie is just like Jesus only better. More like they went: Hillary is the anti-Christ only worse.
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/05/show-me-on-the-doll-where-hillary-touched-you-salon-dot-com/
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Response to Scootaloo (Reply #1)
Post removed
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)"wanting to be where the boys are".
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Wanting to be where boys are is not even remotely the same idea as being a slut- no one called anyone a slut. Also, same with racist. So sick of these lies. You should be ashamed.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Trying to slut-shame women into voting for Clinton, that is what you should condemn.
And camp Weathervane has been pushing the idea that Bernie is only for whites since day one, which implied racism. And that action was just as shameful. Shame on Clinton, shame on DWS, shame on David Brock - and shame on you for trying to excuse it all.
Response to Betty Karlson (Reply #9)
Post removed
reddread
(6,896 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Shame on her. Shame on the candidate who allowed her to do so.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)That is a bizarre leap YOU made. She does NOT slut shame. She would never in a million years say something like that, and you admit knowing she did not.
Stop lying about people. You're embarrassing yourself, DU and your candidate.
CBHagman
(16,981 posts)Ah, who said the above? And does it qualify as "slut-shaming"?
Then there's this:
...[young women are] mad as hell because theyre graduating in debt, and theyre going to earn a million dollars less over their lifetime to pay it back. You know, theyre mad about whats happening to them.
How about that? Anything offensive there?
Well, guess who said the above. It was Gloria Steinem, at least when she could get a word in edgewise during Bill Maher's mansplain-a-thon.
[url]http://www.hbo.com/real-time-with-bill-maher/episodes/14/376-episode/article/376-transcript.html[/url]
Also, if you say, "Shame on her," where do you stand on her decades-long work for progressive causes? For instance, she supported marriage equality back in 1970 and, Bill Maher's interruptions notwithstanding, was speaking out against FGM and other human rights violations decades ago.
renate
(13,776 posts)(I should make sure to explain--since on DU these days it's hard to tell--that I genuinely think it's hilarious and I'm not being snarky or sarcastic.)
It's interesting that you get that anti-Hillary vibe from Salon because I get an anti-Bernie one from them. I guess that's a good lesson to me that my perceptions aren't the same thing as reality.
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)It's where I keep my wallet.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)A decision the author apparently came down on the other side of.
polly7
(20,582 posts)kdmorris
(5,649 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Tue May 24, 2016, 01:18 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2041954
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Posts like this violate the Terms of Service, which forbid posting shock content and images of human suffering simply to argue: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=termsofservice
Don't post "shock content" or porn.
Do not post or link to extreme images of violence, gore, bodily functions, pain, or human suffering for no purpose other than to shock and disgust. Do not post or link to pornography.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue May 24, 2016, 01:26 PM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: It is deplorable to use this child's death to win an argument on a message board. The poster has no shame or decency.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see a soldier carrying a child. vote to "Leave It Alone"
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This is WAY OTT.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Seriously, what are we now? Barbara Bush... don't want to soil our pretty minds about such things??? Sometimes REALITY is shocking and I refuse to censor such things just because someone doesn't want to see it. It's relevant. Stop with the idiotic alerting.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: it is an image of human suffering, but it is not "for no purpose other than to shock and disgust": Clinton brags about Syria and wants us to go in ten times as hard--in fact, blames all the suffering on us holding back
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: A point is a point. Leave it.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Surprised that truth about the human suffering her foreign policy decisions caused bothers so many here.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)kdmorris
(5,649 posts)polly has had a target on her back for a while now.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)They are also publishing the work of writers who demand that Sanders drop out.
I don't think there's a unified editorial agenda over there, but they do print a buch of weak shit.