Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:07 AM May 2016

Hillary has been magnanimous and offered generous concessions to Bernie ...

... in the form of major influence on the Democratic Party platform-writing body.

Bernie has accomplished all he is going to accomplish.

He is welcome to continue campaigning up to the convention, but it is now time for him to stop with the aggression and divisiveness aimed at the Democratic party and its presumptive nominee.

Kudos to the Clinton campaign for the unifying gesture.

85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary has been magnanimous and offered generous concessions to Bernie ... (Original Post) salinsky May 2016 OP
I think it's called FREEDOM OF SPEECH Perogie May 2016 #1
Freedom of Speech has nothing to do with writing the party platform. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #20
What are they going to do for rage endorphins after Bernie concedes? LuvLoogie May 2016 #85
nothing matters to sanders, he will do what he is doing, destroy democratic unity and the party beachbum bob May 2016 #2
Total foolishness....He can't stand Trump and you know it Armstead May 2016 #3
sanders cares more about hearing himself talk than anything else, his ego is out of beachbum bob May 2016 #8
Silly personalized snitting....Bernie still speaks for millions and millions of people Armstead May 2016 #10
The opposite of the truth about Sanders. merrily May 2016 #6
And how exactly is he "destroying the party"? Scootaloo May 2016 #23
Magnanimous Maggie, LOL! merrily May 2016 #4
A few seats on the platform committee is 'generous' for a major party candidate? Kentonio May 2016 #5
A simple "thank you" would suffice ... nt salinsky May 2016 #12
Sure, she's doing it out of the goodness of her heart. lagomorph777 May 2016 #38
Yes, it's actually unprecedented in party history oberliner May 2016 #40
Oh, he'll accomplish more. cali May 2016 #7
He has no more leverage left. fun n serious May 2016 #19
Magnanimity and Clinton in the same sentence: Betty Karlson May 2016 #9
Ingrate ... nt salinsky May 2016 #11
What should I be grateful for? Betty Karlson May 2016 #14
"Ungrateful" is not a personal attack .... salinsky May 2016 #17
Ungrateful isnt a personal.attack but " ingrate" is SwampG8r May 2016 #21
"Ingrate" means an ungrateful person ... salinsky May 2016 #31
Correct. No way "ingrate" gets a single hide in a jury. The alerter oasis May 2016 #36
An offensive term in general when applied in specific is a personal attack. SwampG8r May 2016 #37
It's not an offensive term ... salinsky May 2016 #43
Oh so Bernie is an ingrate for not nominating pre-approved cmmittee members? Betty Karlson May 2016 #48
Not factual and an ugly offensive attack on the democratic candidate SwampG8r May 2016 #52
The ToS doesn't apply to anyone who supports Clinton here Scootaloo May 2016 #24
5 out of 15 is NOT a major influence. And they accuse Bernie supporters of having problems w/math. Skwmom May 2016 #13
Clinton only has 6. Should he have as much or more than her? brush May 2016 #33
The DNC has 4. So basically Clinton has 10. Skwmom May 2016 #46
That's the problem many have with Sanders. He asked to run as a Democrat . . . brush May 2016 #49
Magnanimity seems to be a foreign concept to the Bernie bros ... nt salinsky May 2016 #15
+1, he doesn't deserve shit his campaign "didnt compete" in the "southern states" and is losing by 3 uponit7771 May 2016 #16
I think you're confusing "didn't compete" with "was noncompetitive" Scootaloo May 2016 #25
+1 JudyM May 2016 #29
You think his being Jewish was a factor? oberliner May 2016 #41
+1, Their consummate whining is a turn off uponit7771 May 2016 #56
I'm certain it is Scootaloo May 2016 #61
Bernie lost badly with African-Americans, and did much better with Southern whites oberliner May 2016 #63
He lost both demographics though Scootaloo May 2016 #65
That's true oberliner May 2016 #71
I think if you missed it, you weren't paying much attention to the primary between August and March Scootaloo May 2016 #73
No, I'm not buying into Unicornia.. Weaver and Divine said they DID NOT COMPETE in those states uponit7771 May 2016 #55
Except of course, he did compete there Scootaloo May 2016 #60
Hmmm, someones wrong... I'll take the Campaign managers word for it no offense uponit7771 May 2016 #64
Or you could google. Scootaloo May 2016 #66
I did and still see what Divine and Weaver say and how much the SPENT... which was very little uponit7771 May 2016 #67
Oh okay, so now that he did compete, you complain he didn't spend enough. Scootaloo May 2016 #68
Again, I'll take what Divine and Weavers words and deeds were. They didn't spend enough to win uponit7771 May 2016 #69
Were you going to vote for him until you found out he didn't drain his treasury for Mississippi? Scootaloo May 2016 #70
Reform of the Democratic Party is what it is called Equinox Moon May 2016 #18
Her plans be damned she hasnt won so the gesture is empty SwampG8r May 2016 #22
Did she let him kiss her ring? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #26
Runner-up candidates normally get some say on the platform committee. brush May 2016 #34
LOL! polly7 May 2016 #27
she has been very gracious. Hillary is fantastic and will make a great President. MariaThinks May 2016 #28
Well said Maria pressbox69 May 2016 #57
Thank you. MariaThinks May 2016 #59
She did not slam him in the last speech, and in fact complimented him. She has a lot of class Sheepshank May 2016 #30
Such As ... cantbeserious May 2016 #32
By all means, wish away the revolution. Orsino May 2016 #35
Hello exactly!!! Yurovsky May 2016 #42
Of course, you are correct ... salinsky May 2016 #45
I've always felt that, but she is WAAAY too close to some very bad actors... Yurovsky May 2016 #47
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #39
Yes, she does ... salinsky May 2016 #44
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #50
He will have one pressbox69 May 2016 #58
I'd hardly call the platform "gesture" generous. More like token recognition. ancianita May 2016 #51
Sanders has treated HRC and the party fairly. aikoaiko May 2016 #53
DWS is in charge of those committee seats. Orsino May 2016 #54
At least you're admitting Hillary and DWS are working as one unit Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #62
Is it somehow unusual for the head of the DNC to coordinate with ... salinsky May 2016 #74
Hillary coldly leveraged her delegates for the SOS spot amongst other things riderinthestorm May 2016 #72
She was in a far stronger position in '08 than Bernie is in today ... salinsky May 2016 #75
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #76
It's bad karma to wish ill health on others. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #77
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #80
I stand by my inference. DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #82
Biden is ready in case anything happens Renew Deal May 2016 #79
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #81
And fewer people voted for Bernie Renew Deal May 2016 #84
I think they went too far in giving into his; ericson00 May 2016 #78
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #83

Perogie

(687 posts)
1. I think it's called FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:10 AM
May 2016

If he believes there is wrong in the Democratic Party he should shout it out for all to hear.

I support that.

You seem to support Lockstep devotion.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
20. Freedom of Speech has nothing to do with writing the party platform.
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:18 AM
May 2016

You have freedom of speech, you do not have freedom to write the party platform. You're attacking someone who wasn't saying anything negative about anyone.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
2. nothing matters to sanders, he will do what he is doing, destroy democratic unity and the party
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:10 AM
May 2016

time to admit it. He wants trump to be our next president

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
3. Total foolishness....He can't stand Trump and you know it
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:12 AM
May 2016

or at least you should know it if you bother to pay attention to anything

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
8. sanders cares more about hearing himself talk than anything else, his ego is out of
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:24 AM
May 2016

control and he has crossed the line....as far as I care....he is no better than trump at this point...everyday he proves it

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
10. Silly personalized snitting....Bernie still speaks for millions and millions of people
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:33 AM
May 2016

You can try to marginalize that all you want by attributing it all to bernie's personality, but it is a fact that he is a messenger for a very large spectrum, including many Democratic loyalists.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
23. And how exactly is he "destroying the party"?
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:49 AM
May 2016

Show me the evidence of the party crumbling because of Bernie, please. Actual evidence, not "Rando on the internet says" evidence.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
38. Sure, she's doing it out of the goodness of her heart.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:31 AM
May 2016

She is doing it because she knows millions of people will stay home if she doesn't acknowledge our demands.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
40. Yes, it's actually unprecedented in party history
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:36 AM
May 2016

Every other time, the chair just picks whoever they want.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
19. He has no more leverage left.
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:54 AM
May 2016

The damage is done. Hillary not only should not but can not accept his endorcement after he has painted her crooked and evil state after state. He has nothing left. Unity? Nope. those that will, will and those that won't.. wont. She has to now rely on Obama, Biden and others to campaign with her. All he can do now is attract protesters to Philly for a few days. So what. Not worth the risk of losing your base by bargaining with him.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
9. Magnanimity and Clinton in the same sentence:
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:31 AM
May 2016

that put upon the semantics and logical resources of the English language a heavier burden than it reasonably can be expected to bear.

Unifying gesture: belated realisation that even Sanders can't sway his supporters to come around to the camp that IS STILL TREATING THEM WITH CONTEMPT, when he has nothing to show in the way of concessions. The divisiveness came when camp Weathervane slung its accusations of racism, sexism, complacency, sluttiness, dupes, and general Hellboundness. And then came the praise for Nancy fucking Reagan. All that was aggression. None of it came from Bernie. Clinton deserves to go down to a most ignomineous defeat in California.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
14. What should I be grateful for?
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:44 AM
May 2016

Be careful you don't cross the line into a personal attack on me. You know the TOS as well as I do.

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
17. "Ungrateful" is not a personal attack ....
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:47 AM
May 2016

"Magnanimity consists in enduring tactlessness with mildness". - Democritus

oasis

(49,376 posts)
36. Correct. No way "ingrate" gets a single hide in a jury. The alerter
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:22 AM
May 2016

would be called worse for annoying members with petty nonsense.

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
43. It's not an offensive term ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:40 AM
May 2016

Bernie is an ingrate for naming someone as divisive as Cornell West to the DNC platform committee.

See? ... not a personal attack.

Entirely factual.

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
48. Oh so Bernie is an ingrate for not nominating pre-approved cmmittee members?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:58 AM
May 2016

But Clinton is magnanimous for having Debbie on her side.

Yes, and the "ingrate" wasn't directed at me?

I'm sorry, but I think you re confusing some of David Brock's talking points at this time.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
52. Not factual and an ugly offensive attack on the democratic candidate
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:58 PM
May 2016

For what does he owe this gratitude? To who does he owe it?
You dont like west good for you
a buck and your disapproval might get a cup of mc coffee .
The belief that sanders owes the dnc for anything is central to your delusion of ungrateful.behaviour .

brush

(53,764 posts)
33. Clinton only has 6. Should he have as much or more than her?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:15 AM
May 2016

Of course not. She's ahead in votes and delegates so 6 to 5 is about right.

brush

(53,764 posts)
49. That's the problem many have with Sanders. He asked to run as a Democrat . . .
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

yet he wants all the rules changed for him. The DNC always has had seats on the platform committee, along with the winning candidate and the runner-up.

And btw, is he even registered as a Democrat since Vermont doesn't have party registrations?

There are reports that he has already filed as an independent for his 2018 senate run — talk about covering all the bases.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
16. +1, he doesn't deserve shit his campaign "didnt compete" in the "southern states" and is losing by 3
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:46 AM
May 2016

... 3 million or so votes.

He totally ignored Obama's 08 campaign and decided to go the least diverse route of supporters...

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
25. I think you're confusing "didn't compete" with "was noncompetitive"
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:57 AM
May 2016

I know you love to claim Bernie ignored the southern states, but... No, he didn't. He campaigned in them. He opened offices in the major southern cities. he hired people, he bought ads. Now, he didn't throw the kind of money into the south that he threw into oh, say, Michigan. But that's likely because of Clinton's already insurmountable lead in the Southern states. She was running 80%, she got 80%.

The fact is uponit, a Jewish liberal wasn't going to win southern voters. Even Democratic southern voters.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
41. You think his being Jewish was a factor?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:37 AM
May 2016

If he was a Christian liberal would he have won over southern voters?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
61. I'm certain it is
Tue May 24, 2016, 07:23 PM
May 2016

Same as obama's race, or Clinton's gender, or Webb's being created in a laboratory out of other, smaller politicians.

(I said I'd stop poking at Webb. I LIED.)

I have no idea about what would have happened in Speculative Scenarios. I do know that not being a Christian and not beign a WASP though, certainly had some impact on the outcome.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
63. Bernie lost badly with African-Americans, and did much better with Southern whites
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:02 PM
May 2016

Do you think, then, that Bernie being Jewish hurt him in particular with respect to African-American voters?

That was the demographic in the region that voted most overwhelmingly for Hillary over Bernie.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
65. He lost both demographics though
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:15 PM
May 2016

Having grown up in Alabama, I can say that the attempt to cast white and black southerners as being radically different is... kind of dumb. Really the only major difference - politically speaking of course - is that black southerners are obviously very pro-black, and white southerners are generally... ambivalent with a trend towards hostile to the concept. Take that away and you've got a fairly uniform political grouping. White and black southerners trend towards conservative ideals, are generally politically Christian, and they harbor very similar biases and attitudes towards demographics beyond the white / black divide.

Why did Sanders lose less-hard with southern whites than with southern blacks? Beats the hell out of me. Maybe because there was no massive campaign to cast Sanders as a frothing anti-white bigot the way there was to cast him as a frothing anti-black bigot?

After all, if propaganda didn't work, all our television would be commercial-free.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
71. That's true
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:41 PM
May 2016

Again, I can only speak to the poll results as I am not from the region and have no particular insights. I just know that Hillary won with African-Americans over Bernie by extremely large margins (80-20 was not unusual) and among whites by much smaller margins. That seems statistically significant to me, though I do not know what it signifies. I don't think there was a massive campaign to cast him as a frothing anti-black bigot. Do you really think that is a reasonable claim?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
73. I think if you missed it, you weren't paying much attention to the primary between August and March
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:52 AM
May 2016

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
55. No, I'm not buying into Unicornia.. Weaver and Divine said they DID NOT COMPETE in those states
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:47 PM
May 2016

... so your response on its face is bullshit.

But Team Sanders has a response. “Her grasp now on the nomination is almost entirely on the basis of victories where Bernie Sanders did not compete,” said senior strategist Tad Devine in a March conference call with reporters, listing eight states in the South: Texas, Alabama, Virginia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, and Arkansas. Clinton, Devine continued, “has emerged as a weak frontrunner.”


http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/04/bernie_sanders_deep_south_excuse_doesn_t_hold_up.html

The fact is uponit, a Jewish liberal wasn't going to win southern voters. Even Democratic southern voters.


More whiny bullshit, the long shot black guy won with damn near the same system Sanders is losing with right now...

Nothing was 'rigged' nothing was anti Jewish (shit, somehow that's harder than being anti black) and nothing was anti Sanders...

Sanders ran a piss poor campaign... PERIOD
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
60. Except of course, he did compete there
Tue May 24, 2016, 07:20 PM
May 2016

Plenty of campaign stops. Plenty of campaign offices. A fair amount of ads.

And pointing out that a Jewish liberal wasn't going to win over southern Democrats isn't "whiny," it's simple acknowledgement of facts. Barack obama ain't got anything to do with that, so I dunno what you're trying to get out of that.

And considering Sanders came out of nowhere, started at 3% with no name recognition and his "official" non-membership of the party, coming out with 40% of the vote ain't too shabby.

If anyone is whining, it's you and your straw-grasping to explain why a nobody from nowhere did so damn well.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
66. Or you could google.
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:20 PM
May 2016

Odds are Mr. Devine is simply meaning that Sanders was not competitive in those states. 'Cause he very certainly opened offices, held his rallies, bought ads, etc.

I'm sorry that you were too busy trying to imagine new fig leaves for the obvious reason you hate the man so much that you entirely missed this stuff.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
68. Oh okay, so now that he did compete, you complain he didn't spend enough.
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:30 PM
May 2016

"Waiter, the soup is awful and you didn't bring me enough of it!"

I already addressed this before. Clinton's lead in the south was already pretty damned overwhelming as to be insurmountable. Bernie's campaign decided to not shovel their entire budget into the south, since it would have been a Clinton blowout anyway. The campaign allocated funds to make sure there was a Bernie presence, to make sure he was more than just "the other guy in the ballot" at least, and chose to focus on more competitive states.

See, Sanders doesn't have infinite money. It might be an hard thing for a Clinton supporter to try to fathom, but, that's how it is.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
69. Again, I'll take what Divine and Weavers words and deeds were. They didn't spend enough to win
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:33 PM
May 2016

... and backed that up with words about not competing for those states.

Sanders said he'd fight for every vote... except the "southern" ones hunh?

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
70. Were you going to vote for him until you found out he didn't drain his treasury for Mississippi?
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:37 PM
May 2016

No? I didn't think so.

Equinox Moon

(6,344 posts)
18. Reform of the Democratic Party is what it is called
Tue May 24, 2016, 08:51 AM
May 2016

The Party has gotten away from "We the People" and Bernie's platform is helping to move it back in that direction. The Primary process is a good thing.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
22. Her plans be damned she hasnt won so the gesture is empty
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:35 AM
May 2016

Maybe she should be trying to get concessions from him since she may still yet lose.

brush

(53,764 posts)
34. Runner-up candidates normally get some say on the platform committee.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:18 AM
May 2016

I don't get the kerfuffle about this. It's not unprecedented.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
30. She did not slam him in the last speech, and in fact complimented him. She has a lot of class
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:02 AM
May 2016

not sure how to describe Bernie's bitter, vindictive, crusty, angry, lying, inflammatory rhetoric. Oh wait, I just did.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
35. By all means, wish away the revolution.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:22 AM
May 2016

Or pretend that Sanders is its author.

The Establishment still has an uncomfortable future ahead, to the precise extent that they live in denial.

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
42. Hello exactly!!!
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:39 AM
May 2016

Take a look at the crowd at a Sanders event. Average age? Probably 30. You have young and old and everywhere in between, but a lot of youthful faces.

Take a look at one of Hillary's events. Many of the 40 or 50 faces are folks that probably won't be alive by the next election, or for certain will be chilling with the FSM by 2024. They are going the way of the dodo bird.

3rd Way politics might win the battle but they will lose the war.

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
45. Of course, you are correct ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:49 AM
May 2016

... so with that concession are you willing to acknowledge that it would be better to protect the progress Obama has made, and having that as a starting point for your revolution, as opposed to taking several hundred huge steps backward?

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
47. I've always felt that, but she is WAAAY too close to some very bad actors...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:56 AM
May 2016

And Bernie has shown you don't need dirty corporate cash to fund a campaign.

She could still win over much of the progressive vote, but the DWS playbook needs to be abandoned immediately.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
39. ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:33 AM
May 2016

She's already tried to co-opt Bernie's progressive campaign issues so, she owes his quite a bit this primary cycle

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
44. Yes, she does ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:46 AM
May 2016

... and, at this point Bernie has wrung just about every bit of political capital from the process.

He'd be wise to pocket those gains and look forward to where he can best steer his movement outside of the nomination process.

He needs to start thinking about his legacy or he won't have one.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
50. ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

progressive / liberal ideology doesn't have ego... you assume too much as it pertains to Bernie, this is why HRC and her supporters don't get it, never will

this isn't about political capital, this is about ideology and the heart of what the DEM party should stand for

ancianita

(36,023 posts)
51. I'd hardly call the platform "gesture" generous. More like token recognition.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:05 PM
May 2016

He's not been divisive. He simply calls out unfair treatment by the party, not Hillary, to whom he's been respectful in debates, when he's only debated pro-corporate ideas. He has not attacked her personally.

His differences, well articulated, are what primary politics are all about.

Hillary's "gesture" means more than the party acknowledges, which is the fact that she can't win without Bernie's constituents and she knows it.

aikoaiko

(34,169 posts)
53. Sanders has treated HRC and the party fairly.
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:03 PM
May 2016

They are fortunate that Bernie committed to not running as a third party. He could win it all.
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
72. Hillary coldly leveraged her delegates for the SOS spot amongst other things
Tue May 24, 2016, 09:48 PM
May 2016

She went to Obama in an extremely powerful spot and used it to enrich herself.

Bernie getting 5 spots on the platform committee is laughable as a "magnanimous" gesture. I suspect if he's in Hillary's 2008 spot pre-convention Hillary should meet with him and similarly negotiate.

She won't tho, she's notoriously viciously vindictive. Bernie is now a huge enemy.

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
75. She was in a far stronger position in '08 than Bernie is in today ...
Wed May 25, 2016, 06:30 AM
May 2016

... but she warmly and wisely chose unity.

Because she is a Democrat.

Response to salinsky (Original post)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
77. It's bad karma to wish ill health on others.
Wed May 25, 2016, 08:28 AM
May 2016
He needs to keep going
Hillary's health could fail her and there is the potential indictment to consider. Both look likely to prevent Hillary being the nominee at this point.




It's bad karma to wish ill health on others. If I were you I would get a physical examination immediately just to make sure.


Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #77)

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
82. I stand by my inference.
Wed May 25, 2016, 08:35 AM
May 2016

Nasty... I would say a lot more but my post would be hidden. You can infer what I would say if I felt no such constraints.


Nasty...

Response to Renew Deal (Reply #79)

Renew Deal

(81,855 posts)
84. And fewer people voted for Bernie
Wed May 25, 2016, 08:48 AM
May 2016

Sanders lost. The voters picked someone else. He has no more or less right to the nomination than Biden. Sanders shouldn't get it just because he happened to run this cycle.

Response to ericson00 (Reply #78)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary has been magnanim...