2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDid Sanders really put forward a team consisting of eighty percent men to influence the platform?
Does he have any thoughts in changing this or is it final?
Women are a huge part of the parties base, we are underrepresented in every single area of government, and his team is eighty percent men?
brush
(53,771 posts)And Sanders took a swipe at the President and the AAs with appointing West.
He apparently didn't learn anything from all the black votes he lost with Obama-hating West as a surrogate.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)does progressive / liberal ideology have gender? interesting that HRC supporter is trying to inject one...
any thoughts in changing this or is it final?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I understand that isn't a concern of yours. Bet you didn't even come close to that comment when we were discussing Fergusons representation.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)my 'concern' is to the facts... like the striking ones you avoided
proof here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512041238#post6
care to try again?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Eighty percent of his picks to influence the parties platform are men. That is a fact. Sorry you find that to be acceptable representation.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)facts.... yes those, let's see how you reply to this: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512041238#post15
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Then again, trying to justify what you are doing on a progressive board is going to leave some of your posts with the appearance of the lights being out.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Larkspur
(12,804 posts)Bias attitudes, like this, contribute to the party disunity.
The choices Sanders made to the platform committee are prominent progressive voices. Just because they are men, does not mean that they have little value.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I'm sorry you don't agree with that.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)I'm sorry you don't agree with that.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)(ETA: He also included a Lebanese Arab)
But you did indeed find one metric to criticize him on 'diversity'.
Have you considered that he couldn't find people who ticked off all your boxes who share his bold vision?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)What were the heights of the choices? Are short people represented? How about left handed people? They make up almost half the electorate too!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)That is sick.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)what Hillary supporters in this thread are doing is sick. The twisted meme that Bernie is sexist has been pushed during this entire campaign just to benefit your candidate and it fools no one except some Clinton supporters. It would be laughable if it wasn't so destructive to all the work that so many of us women have done for equal rights over the years. This is what I think of your campaign tactic -
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Is and remains that Hillary continues to belie her biases in her criticisms of Sanders. Oh no, he appointed 80% men...she appointed 3 upper-class Caucasian women who all attended Ivy League schools, once again reinforcing that Hillary's concern for women is anti-intersectional and only concerned with women who look like her and come from similar backgrounds.
If I was Alicia Reece, I'd be strongly considering rejecting my appointment as the token black middle-class female who didn't attend an Ivy.
pmorlan1
(2,096 posts)Good observation.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Wasserman picks a man but that can be overlooked I guess.
What happened to the Sanders is the enemy of POC meme?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Can you tell me the rest of her picks?
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)"who will chair the committee, was named by Wasserman Schultz. "
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)odd that 'gender' lens is only pointed Bernie's way... have you dissected HRC's gender representation within her campaign?
Please provide comparative analysis, let's see how far your intellectual honesty goes shall we?
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Many times.
My intellectual honesty doesn't leave me attempting to justify placing eighty percent men to work on the party platform. That's on you and what you are doing here. Even as far as to deflect about something that has been widely discussed.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1532173
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)If he hadn't picked enough POC, THAT would be what you throw.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Deflect however you want. Eighty percent men.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)odd.. you didn't include it here when a comparative to what you posted would be warranted...
...'My intellectual honesty doesn't leave me'... yeah, it's left ya... otherwise you'd have included it in this initial post
my 'deflection' is to get you back to the truth, odd that you replied but didn't add the facts concerning the comparative to HRC female demographics....
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)your timeframe? That is one of the best arguments I have ever seen here.
Please correct a number of your sentences to make them legible.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)pivot..pivot..pivot...
'shown the truth'? I'm still waiting on your comparative demographics... I get that you'd avoid posting the factual details as it would up-end your initial post....
the only 'blind eye' is yours, but then again, well... HRC supporters make me laugh... thx for the comedic distraction of the day..
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Are you comparing LGBT to equal representation for women!!!
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)as the party fights for the rights of LGBQT.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Who were her picks? All of them. Were eighty percent men?
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Sick!
He must hate them too
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Not to worry. His Bros know best.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Bernie would not do such a thing.
Bernie may have written about rape fantasies, but there';'s no evidence he engaged in sexually exploitative behavior....unlike one former President I could mention
cali
(114,904 posts)it was about gender roles.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Got it.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Did you find Fergusons county commission equally as representative of their constituency?
That is exactly the direction you are going.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)go back to reddit and get that "progressive" out of your name
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Arazi
(6,829 posts)and remove the "progressive" from his name.
This latest influx of newbies are just lovely
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT
cali
(114,904 posts)He put up people who best represent the issues he has focused on.
Name me anyone, make or female who is more renowned or has been more effective, on the issue of climate change than Bill McKibben. Don't bother, there isn't one.
James Zogby is far and away the best choice on Palestinian issues because he's known and respected in democratic circles.
I do think he could have chosen Nina Turner instead of Dr. West. West inevitably becomes a big distraction.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)pretty sure Sanders didn't appoint someone who seriously suggested this:
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)he put forward a Native American, an environmentalist, one of America's foremost black intellectuals, an Arab-American activist who has actually worked for peace in Israel and Palestine, and a black Muslim.
What do all these constituencies have in common?
They're all more underrepresented in our government than women are.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)are the largest "minority group" still, and minority women the most underpaid in the nation.
But I view his 5 choices the way you do anyway.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Keith Ellison has been a tireless supporter, is the only Muslim member of Congress and an AA.
Perhaps no one but Al Gore has had a more significant role that Bill McKibben in raising awareness of Climate Change and the need to move in a more sustainable direction.
If one wants a more balanced view of our policies to the Israel Palestine issue, and an advocate for the Arab American community, Zogby is a respected figure.
Don't know much about Deborah Parker but sounds impressive and was selected as a White House "Champion for Change" https://www.whitehouse.gov/champions/civic-hacking-and-open-government/deborah-parker
Cornell West -- Personally I think "Meh" but he is certainly accomplished.
TheBlackAdder
(28,186 posts).
You're living in the past there.
.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)PufPuf23
(8,767 posts)professionals from various sectors considered potential committee appointments is far more male than female at present.
I have no idea of the actual percents, but the proportion of high profile professionals from various sectors of the appointee pool is most certainly more male than female just like the upper level personnel of Congress, most universities, most non-profits, practicing senior attorneys, government at all levels, law enforcement, etc.
The proportion of such females has increased and the proportion of male with similar qualifications and experience has greatly decreased over the last 40 years but is still far from 50%-50% parity. One could argue that, because of child-bearing and other factors including willingness, woman may never reach the 50%-50% parity even if a wanted and worthy social goal.
I would argue that for pragmatic, egalitarian, and representation of women reasons, woman should and are likely to be appointed in excess of their proportion of the appointee pool but overall males would remain the majority of appointments because of the math.
The Democratic party is most certainly greater than 50% female in registered party members and active voters, the party base.
My response to this OP is my opinion and perception in general.
From the above regarding the male-female ratio in the committee candidate pool:
(1) A candidate that makes appointments at a 50%-50% is biased in trading off average qualification and is biased in favor of women from the appointee pool.
(2) Where a majority of males are appointed and a significant and more than the proportion occurrence in the appointee pool of women is where we want to be at most pragmatic.
(3) Where the proportion of women appointees is less than the proportion of women in the appointee pool , is biased in favor of males and historic male dominance.