Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:32 AM May 2016

Did Sanders really put forward a team consisting of eighty percent men to influence the platform?

Does he have any thoughts in changing this or is it final?

Women are a huge part of the parties base, we are underrepresented in every single area of government, and his team is eighty percent men?

65 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Sanders really put forward a team consisting of eighty percent men to influence the platform? (Original Post) NCTraveler May 2016 OP
Yeah, I noticed that too. Hillary split her selections 50/50, 3 women, 3 men brush May 2016 #1
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #2
I have zero thoughts on changing the fact that we are fighting for equal representation. NCTraveler May 2016 #5
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #11
Your concern should be to the facts. NCTraveler May 2016 #12
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #18
What a strange post you have here. NCTraveler May 2016 #37
Women are the majority of the democratic base.nt sufrommich May 2016 #3
This is an example of HRC supporter bias and why HRC can't unite the party Larkspur May 2016 #4
Women should be represented at all levels in the party. NCTraveler May 2016 #7
So should blacks, Native Americans, Arabs, environmentalists and Muslims. Chan790 May 2016 #52
Right? Appointing someone based on gender is, well... SEXIST. But really, they have NOTHING else... AzDar May 2016 #9
His picks included 1 Muslim, 2 black men, 1 woman Native American. JonLeibowitz May 2016 #6
Eighty percent men. Great job on representation. nt. NCTraveler May 2016 #8
There were no people with disabilities either. Bonobo May 2016 #13
You are comparing equal representation for women with left handers. NCTraveler May 2016 #17
I am pointing out that there are a near infinite number of ways to divide people up. nt Bonobo May 2016 #21
No pmorlan1 May 2016 #43
The funny part for me. Chan790 May 2016 #56
Thank you pmorlan1 May 2016 #58
Oh I forgot! He also appointed a Lebanese Arab! My bad! JonLeibowitz May 2016 #16
Thank you, you beat me to it. Its really unbelievable. Bonobo May 2016 #10
Wasserman picked a man? NCTraveler May 2016 #14
"Rep. Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland, Bonobo May 2016 #19
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #15
We have absolutley discussed gender representation within the Clinton campaign. NCTraveler May 2016 #23
You're just looking for stuff to throw. Bonobo May 2016 #26
Continue dismissing the massive disparity from Sanders campaign. NCTraveler May 2016 #29
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #31
So now that you have been shown the truth, you turn a blind eye because it didn't meet.... NCTraveler May 2016 #35
... HumanityExperiment May 2016 #46
why no LGBT representatives? Does he hate LGBT people? JonLeibowitz May 2016 #20
OMG that's sick! Bonobo May 2016 #24
Oops! You got me! JonLeibowitz May 2016 #32
West is on record as saying AA's have been sent to the back of the bus.... NCTraveler May 2016 #28
Why didn't Debbie pick a qualified woman to head the committee? nt Bonobo May 2016 #30
I really don't know. NCTraveler May 2016 #36
She picked a woman to head the party (HRC). JonLeibowitz May 2016 #39
No Latinos either. He must hate Latinos and doesn't want their vote Arazi May 2016 #34
Sick!! nt Bonobo May 2016 #38
What about Asians? Bonobo May 2016 #40
Right! Arazi May 2016 #45
I was waiting for this shoe to drop. n/t Orsino May 2016 #22
That guy who wrote of rape fantasies and who pushed his wife away from "his" podium? Him? Surya Gayatri May 2016 #25
Don't forget boys having tho endure "an old b*tch of a teacher" lunamagica May 2016 #53
Oh, yeah, he's an educational expert as well. Forgot about that. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #54
That's a deranged comment...Jane Sanders is not one to be "pushed from the podium" and.... Armstead May 2016 #61
That essay,poorly expressed as it was, wasn't about rape fantasies cali May 2016 #62
I know, but there's so much nonsense out there.... Armstead May 2016 #63
If you can't be divisive enough using race as an issue... use gender. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #27
So you find that to be positive representation for women when making the party platform? NCTraveler May 2016 #33
"talking about race and gender is divisive" forjusticethunders May 2016 #47
Since you are occupying land taken from cherokeeprogressive's ancestors, maybe don't instruct them? JonLeibowitz May 2016 #49
You're here 4 mths and tell CP, member since 2005, to "go back to reddit" Arazi May 2016 #60
Did Sanders put forward a team of eighty percent non-whites to influence the platform? Yes. (NT) Eric J in MN May 2016 #41
I care about the she individuals he put up more than i care about their gender cali May 2016 #42
To your point about the positions the committee members take on issues..... JonLeibowitz May 2016 #48
One of Hillary's picks is extremely bad. Neera Tanden is awful. JRLeft May 2016 #44
I prefer to look at it as... Chan790 May 2016 #50
Half of all are women. Women Hortensis May 2016 #57
More phony outrage AgingAmerican May 2016 #51
Most of them deserve to be chosen on their merits Armstead May 2016 #55
First-Wave Feminism of the 70s, pick by gender; Current Third-Wave Feminism, pick by qualifications. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #59
+10000 nt riderinthestorm May 2016 #64
Don't spin this please. The pool of Democrats, progressives and liberals that are the high profile PufPuf23 May 2016 #65

brush

(53,771 posts)
1. Yeah, I noticed that too. Hillary split her selections 50/50, 3 women, 3 men
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:35 AM
May 2016

And Sanders took a swipe at the President and the AAs with appointing West.

He apparently didn't learn anything from all the black votes he lost with Obama-hating West as a surrogate.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
2. ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:35 AM
May 2016

does progressive / liberal ideology have gender? interesting that HRC supporter is trying to inject one...

any thoughts in changing this or is it final?

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
5. I have zero thoughts on changing the fact that we are fighting for equal representation.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:37 AM
May 2016

I understand that isn't a concern of yours. Bet you didn't even come close to that comment when we were discussing Fergusons representation.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
12. Your concern should be to the facts.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:41 AM
May 2016

Eighty percent of his picks to influence the parties platform are men. That is a fact. Sorry you find that to be acceptable representation.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
37. What a strange post you have here.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:55 AM
May 2016

Then again, trying to justify what you are doing on a progressive board is going to leave some of your posts with the appearance of the lights being out.

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
4. This is an example of HRC supporter bias and why HRC can't unite the party
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:36 AM
May 2016

Bias attitudes, like this, contribute to the party disunity.

The choices Sanders made to the platform committee are prominent progressive voices. Just because they are men, does not mean that they have little value.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
52. So should blacks, Native Americans, Arabs, environmentalists and Muslims.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:15 PM
May 2016

I'm sorry you don't agree with that.

 

AzDar

(14,023 posts)
9. Right? Appointing someone based on gender is, well... SEXIST. But really, they have NOTHING else...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:39 AM
May 2016

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
6. His picks included 1 Muslim, 2 black men, 1 woman Native American.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:37 AM
May 2016

(ETA: He also included a Lebanese Arab)

But you did indeed find one metric to criticize him on 'diversity'.

Have you considered that he couldn't find people who ticked off all your boxes who share his bold vision?

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
13. There were no people with disabilities either.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:41 AM
May 2016

What were the heights of the choices? Are short people represented? How about left handed people? They make up almost half the electorate too!

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
43. No
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:00 PM
May 2016

what Hillary supporters in this thread are doing is sick. The twisted meme that Bernie is sexist has been pushed during this entire campaign just to benefit your candidate and it fools no one except some Clinton supporters. It would be laughable if it wasn't so destructive to all the work that so many of us women have done for equal rights over the years. This is what I think of your campaign tactic -

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
56. The funny part for me.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:24 PM
May 2016

Is and remains that Hillary continues to belie her biases in her criticisms of Sanders. Oh no, he appointed 80% men...she appointed 3 upper-class Caucasian women who all attended Ivy League schools, once again reinforcing that Hillary's concern for women is anti-intersectional and only concerned with women who look like her and come from similar backgrounds.

If I was Alicia Reece, I'd be strongly considering rejecting my appointment as the token black middle-class female who didn't attend an Ivy.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
10. Thank you, you beat me to it. Its really unbelievable.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:39 AM
May 2016

Wasserman picks a man but that can be overlooked I guess.

What happened to the Sanders is the enemy of POC meme?

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
19. "Rep. Elijah E. Cummings of Maryland,
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:43 AM
May 2016

"who will chair the committee, was named by Wasserman Schultz. "

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
15. ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:42 AM
May 2016

odd that 'gender' lens is only pointed Bernie's way... have you dissected HRC's gender representation within her campaign?

Please provide comparative analysis, let's see how far your intellectual honesty goes shall we?

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
23. We have absolutley discussed gender representation within the Clinton campaign.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:45 AM
May 2016

Many times.

My intellectual honesty doesn't leave me attempting to justify placing eighty percent men to work on the party platform. That's on you and what you are doing here. Even as far as to deflect about something that has been widely discussed.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1532173

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
26. You're just looking for stuff to throw.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:47 AM
May 2016

If he hadn't picked enough POC, THAT would be what you throw.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
29. Continue dismissing the massive disparity from Sanders campaign.
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:49 AM
May 2016

Deflect however you want. Eighty percent men.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
31. ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:50 AM
May 2016

odd.. you didn't include it here when a comparative to what you posted would be warranted...

...'My intellectual honesty doesn't leave me'... yeah, it's left ya... otherwise you'd have included it in this initial post

my 'deflection' is to get you back to the truth, odd that you replied but didn't add the facts concerning the comparative to HRC female demographics....

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
35. So now that you have been shown the truth, you turn a blind eye because it didn't meet....
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:53 AM
May 2016

your timeframe? That is one of the best arguments I have ever seen here.

Please correct a number of your sentences to make them legible.

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
46. ...
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:03 PM
May 2016

pivot..pivot..pivot...

'shown the truth'? I'm still waiting on your comparative demographics... I get that you'd avoid posting the factual details as it would up-end your initial post....

the only 'blind eye' is yours, but then again, well... HRC supporters make me laugh... thx for the comedic distraction of the day..

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
28. West is on record as saying AA's have been sent to the back of the bus....
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:48 AM
May 2016

as the party fights for the rights of LGBQT.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
25. That guy who wrote of rape fantasies and who pushed his wife away from "his" podium? Him?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:46 AM
May 2016

Not to worry. His Bros know best.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
61. That's a deranged comment...Jane Sanders is not one to be "pushed from the podium" and....
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:34 PM
May 2016

Bernie would not do such a thing.

Bernie may have written about rape fantasies, but there';'s no evidence he engaged in sexually exploitative behavior....unlike one former President I could mention

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
62. That essay,poorly expressed as it was, wasn't about rape fantasies
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:48 PM
May 2016

it was about gender roles.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
33. So you find that to be positive representation for women when making the party platform?
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:51 AM
May 2016

Did you find Fergusons county commission equally as representative of their constituency?

That is exactly the direction you are going.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
60. You're here 4 mths and tell CP, member since 2005, to "go back to reddit"
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:31 PM
May 2016

and remove the "progressive" from his name.



This latest influx of newbies are just lovely

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
42. I care about the she individuals he put up more than i care about their gender
Tue May 24, 2016, 11:59 AM
May 2016

He put up people who best represent the issues he has focused on.

Name me anyone, make or female who is more renowned or has been more effective, on the issue of climate change than Bill McKibben. Don't bother, there isn't one.

James Zogby is far and away the best choice on Palestinian issues because he's known and respected in democratic circles.

I do think he could have chosen Nina Turner instead of Dr. West. West inevitably becomes a big distraction.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
48. To your point about the positions the committee members take on issues.....
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:03 PM
May 2016

pretty sure Sanders didn't appoint someone who seriously suggested this:

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
50. I prefer to look at it as...
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:13 PM
May 2016

he put forward a Native American, an environmentalist, one of America's foremost black intellectuals, an Arab-American activist who has actually worked for peace in Israel and Palestine, and a black Muslim.

What do all these constituencies have in common?

They're all more underrepresented in our government than women are.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
57. Half of all are women. Women
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:30 PM
May 2016

are the largest "minority group" still, and minority women the most underpaid in the nation.

But I view his 5 choices the way you do anyway.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
55. Most of them deserve to be chosen on their merits
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:22 PM
May 2016
Sanders' appointees to the 15-member Platform Drafting Committee include: racial justice activist and scholar Dr. Cornel West, 350.org co-founder and noted environmentalist Bill McKibben, Native American activist Deborah Parker, Progressive Caucus co-chair Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), and James Zogby, a pro-Palestinian scholar as well as founder and president of the Arab American Institute (AAI).


Keith Ellison has been a tireless supporter, is the only Muslim member of Congress and an AA.

Perhaps no one but Al Gore has had a more significant role that Bill McKibben in raising awareness of Climate Change and the need to move in a more sustainable direction.

If one wants a more balanced view of our policies to the Israel Palestine issue, and an advocate for the Arab American community, Zogby is a respected figure.

Don't know much about Deborah Parker but sounds impressive and was selected as a White House "Champion for Change" https://www.whitehouse.gov/champions/civic-hacking-and-open-government/deborah-parker

Cornell West -- Personally I think "Meh" but he is certainly accomplished.

TheBlackAdder

(28,186 posts)
59. First-Wave Feminism of the 70s, pick by gender; Current Third-Wave Feminism, pick by qualifications.
Tue May 24, 2016, 12:31 PM
May 2016

.


You're living in the past there.


.

PufPuf23

(8,767 posts)
65. Don't spin this please. The pool of Democrats, progressives and liberals that are the high profile
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:31 PM
May 2016

professionals from various sectors considered potential committee appointments is far more male than female at present.

I have no idea of the actual percents, but the proportion of high profile professionals from various sectors of the appointee pool is most certainly more male than female just like the upper level personnel of Congress, most universities, most non-profits, practicing senior attorneys, government at all levels, law enforcement, etc.

The proportion of such females has increased and the proportion of male with similar qualifications and experience has greatly decreased over the last 40 years but is still far from 50%-50% parity. One could argue that, because of child-bearing and other factors including willingness, woman may never reach the 50%-50% parity even if a wanted and worthy social goal.

I would argue that for pragmatic, egalitarian, and representation of women reasons, woman should and are likely to be appointed in excess of their proportion of the appointee pool but overall males would remain the majority of appointments because of the math.

The Democratic party is most certainly greater than 50% female in registered party members and active voters, the party base.

My response to this OP is my opinion and perception in general.

From the above regarding the male-female ratio in the committee candidate pool:

(1) A candidate that makes appointments at a 50%-50% is biased in trading off average qualification and is biased in favor of women from the appointee pool.

(2) Where a majority of males are appointed and a significant and more than the proportion occurrence in the appointee pool of women is where we want to be at most pragmatic.

(3) Where the proportion of women appointees is less than the proportion of women in the appointee pool , is biased in favor of males and historic male dominance.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Did Sanders really put fo...