Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merbex

(3,123 posts)
Tue May 24, 2016, 04:52 PM May 2016

So they are blaming Bernie Sanders for HRC's unfavorables? Excuse me while I laugh

She has always had high unfavorables when she runs for office.

If Martin O'Malley made it this far, they'd be blaming him.

Or Jim Webb.

Or even Lincoln Chafee.

Because it is never HRC's responsibility that so many people do not like or trust her.

She wins - people LOVE her and Bill and the whole kit and kaboodle who tags along with them. She takes the credit.

She loses?

Even after it has been TOLD to the country by the talking heads that she is inevitable?

Guess the people in RI, Indiana, West Virginia, Oregon, and half the voting electorate in Kentucky, did not see or hear that memo - so it HAS to be because Bernie Sanders' FAULT that people are still voting for him; he is making the voters dislike her.

Dumbest excuse for a weak candidate EVER.

If he had dropped out, wonder what the % of those elections would be?

All fired up and ready to run to the polling place to vote for HRC?

Umm, no - what is her message anyway?

If no-one ran against her......she sort of threw Obama's foreign policy since she's been gone under the bus.....so what's her message?

What was it besides a referendum on she, herself and IT IS HER TURN.

Enlighten me please - take me back to that 'listening tour' and the opening days of her campaign......wtf was her message?

But it's all Bernie's fault. Got it.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So they are blaming Bernie Sanders for HRC's unfavorables? Excuse me while I laugh (Original Post) merbex May 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Actor May 2016 #1
Her favorables always go up when she is in office. JaneyVee May 2016 #2
Highest unfavs for both candidates in history - the Parties are imploding right before your eyes merbex May 2016 #4
no grasswire May 2016 #7
Bush and the Republicans Loved Her , they knew she could be depended on a vote for War. bahrbearian May 2016 #9
Exactamundo Ned_Devine May 2016 #3
I have no idea why she is running. I've looked at the website, but IdaBriggs May 2016 #5
Rich woman with nothing else to do..n/t monmouth4 May 2016 #6
personal hegemony grasswire May 2016 #8
Deep sense of entitlement Doctor_J May 2016 #10
So you're saying that a generic candidate with an opponent has the same favorables as that anotherproletariat May 2016 #11
Her favorables go up when she's NOT running for office Flying Squirrel May 2016 #12

Response to merbex (Original post)

merbex

(3,123 posts)
4. Highest unfavs for both candidates in history - the Parties are imploding right before your eyes
Tue May 24, 2016, 04:58 PM
May 2016

But you cling to that hope.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
7. no
Tue May 24, 2016, 05:40 PM
May 2016

her numbers do not go up.

It just doesn't happen. She can't attract new people, and she loses old ones.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
5. I have no idea why she is running. I've looked at the website, but
Tue May 24, 2016, 05:16 PM
May 2016

I think she is running for the same reason Trump is - Ego, Money, Power.

Maybe that is why all politicians run for office, and I am just naive. I know that when Al Gore and John Kerry and Obama were running, I believed 100% that it was because they wanted to make a positive difference and serve their fellow citizens. I know I get the same vibe with Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren and especially Bernie Sanders.

Maybe they just "fake sincerity" better than others. Bush Junior always gave off a nasty vibe, and Cheney makes me want to grab a cross and some garlic. I also used to get that "I'm working for you, America" feel from Bill Clinton, but the magic has faded since 2008. Maybe it was when the Clinton-Bush Haiti thing turned into such a debacle and it felt like he'd gone over to the Dark Side.

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
8. personal hegemony
Tue May 24, 2016, 05:46 PM
May 2016

Global authority.
The power to shape the nations of the world and to profit from it, using the world's largest military.
Riches untold. The Foundation was just a test.

The problem for us it that the lust driving the Clintons is also responsible for recklessness. They are imminently blackmailable. They are ripe for manipulations.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
10. Deep sense of entitlement
Tue May 24, 2016, 06:28 PM
May 2016

For at least thirty years She's been obsessed with being the first female president. But an entire adult life of political calculations instead of morals has turned her delusional. If someone were to ask her why she wants to be president, she would come up with yet another lie. The only authentic thing about her is the millions she making secret speeches pandering to the owning class.

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
11. So you're saying that a generic candidate with an opponent has the same favorables as that
Tue May 24, 2016, 06:39 PM
May 2016

candidate would without an opponent? This makes no sense. The job of a politician is to draw contrast between themselves and their opponent. Of course some of the negative views of Hillary have to do with Sanders' attacks (which did more than just draw a contrast). No one says that it is all his fault, but why don't you save this thread, and compare her negatives today to those 2 weeks after Sanders leaves the race.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So they are blaming Berni...