HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » I've been told Trump has ...

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:43 AM

 

I've been told Trump has clips from Hillarys speeches to wall st

that he intends to use in ads. His ad against Bill was just creepy, but clips are as dangerous as Romney's foo-paa tape.

I hope this isnt true, but I can see his contacts on wall street could obtain that .

80 replies, 7402 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 80 replies Author Time Post
Reply I've been told Trump has clips from Hillarys speeches to wall st (Original post)
larkrake May 2016 OP
Cali_Democrat May 2016 #1
larkrake May 2016 #2
Renew Deal May 2016 #19
pinebox May 2016 #3
larkrake May 2016 #54
larkrake May 2016 #73
oldandhappy May 2016 #4
larkrake May 2016 #6
oldandhappy May 2016 #22
senz May 2016 #5
larkrake May 2016 #7
One Black Sheep May 2016 #15
larkrake May 2016 #42
Arkansas Granny May 2016 #8
auntpurl May 2016 #31
stillwaiting May 2016 #9
lagomorph777 May 2016 #18
larkrake May 2016 #29
lagomorph777 May 2016 #33
larkrake May 2016 #51
lagomorph777 May 2016 #52
larkrake May 2016 #62
lagomorph777 May 2016 #64
Spacedog1973 May 2016 #35
JEB May 2016 #50
lagomorph777 May 2016 #53
larkrake May 2016 #63
larkrake May 2016 #58
zappaman May 2016 #34
larkrake May 2016 #57
JudyM May 2016 #61
larkrake May 2016 #75
Renew Deal May 2016 #10
larkrake May 2016 #24
floppyboo May 2016 #55
larkrake May 2016 #65
Codeine May 2016 #74
boston bean May 2016 #11
oasis May 2016 #12
larkrake May 2016 #28
sufrommich May 2016 #13
cali May 2016 #14
MineralMan May 2016 #16
B Calm May 2016 #17
jcgoldie May 2016 #20
larkrake May 2016 #25
betsuni May 2016 #21
larkrake May 2016 #43
Orsino May 2016 #23
larkrake May 2016 #37
Orsino May 2016 #38
larkrake May 2016 #46
imagine2015 May 2016 #26
larkrake May 2016 #39
Beausoir May 2016 #27
Tarc May 2016 #30
larkrake May 2016 #47
zappaman May 2016 #32
CincyDem May 2016 #36
larkrake May 2016 #40
Dem2 May 2016 #41
CincyDem May 2016 #44
larkrake May 2016 #48
procon May 2016 #45
larkrake May 2016 #49
procon May 2016 #68
JRLeft May 2016 #56
larkrake May 2016 #59
arely staircase May 2016 #60
larkrake May 2016 #67
arely staircase May 2016 #69
larkrake May 2016 #72
Sheepshank May 2016 #66
larkrake May 2016 #71
larkrake May 2016 #70
underthematrix May 2016 #76
riversedge May 2016 #77
pdsimdars May 2016 #78
wyldwolf May 2016 #79
seabeyond May 2016 #80

Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:46 AM

1. Your concern is noted. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #1)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:55 AM

2. I am genuinely concerned she could lose the general

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #2)

Wed May 25, 2016, 08:26 AM

19. Is that why you made this story up?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:06 AM

3. I wouldn't doubt it. Cruz's wife worked for Goldman-Sachs

 

Bad blood between them but they have a common enemy.
If Hillary is the nominee, this is going to be something off of reality tv. People will be so turned off the 2 of them......

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pinebox (Reply #3)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:23 PM

54. true, but this is a recent leak

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to pinebox (Reply #3)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:49 PM

73. I think Cruz works for Cruz and is too much of a crud to care further about the election

 

Cruz has no sight or sound, time to scrape him off the bottom of our shoes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:07 AM

4. It is going to be a filthy G.E.

I don't want to have to watch it! I am sure both sides have awful stuff on each other.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oldandhappy (Reply #4)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:15 AM

6. You are probably right, I shudder to think. I think I will focus on state elections and

 

just shut both of them out. Thank god I quit my TV. The air waves will be full of sour milk and may generate despair in the ranks

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #6)

Wed May 25, 2016, 10:00 AM

22. with you

Our local Dem club is focusing on local both in terms of time and money. And I am off MSM, beat decision of the year!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:17 AM

5. Well I wish he'd share a little sample

 

Would be interesting to know what a $250,000 speech sounds like.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to senz (Reply #5)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:16 AM

7. more of the same, only Repub leaning I suppose

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to senz (Reply #5)

Wed May 25, 2016, 07:17 AM

15. Yep, same here.

I'm very interested to see what Hillary says in one of those quarter million dollar speeches, it surely must be something noteworthy, or if nothing else, halfway interesting.

Not sure why she is so resistant to release one of them either, why not even just one? Hell, let her pick the one she wants to share. I'm just really curious...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to One Black Sheep (Reply #15)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:40 PM

42. She has always been secretive, having been abused in the past by Media, Congress,

 

Bill, friends turning, legal charges, investigations, ......

I understand why she is secretive, but it is just smart to release them. That is why the silly e-mail issue ballooned.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 03:32 AM

8. I've been told the moon is made of green cheese.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Arkansas Granny (Reply #8)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:01 PM

31. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 07:09 AM

9. If he does it shows he would rather face HRC than Bernie.

Like most Bernie supporters have believed throughout this primary for very obvious reasons.

He would have released them earlier to sabotage HRC if he wanted to go against Bernie. Especially if they show HRC saying things that have been reported to have been said to Wall Street.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stillwaiting (Reply #9)

Wed May 25, 2016, 08:22 AM

18. ^^^Bingo^^^

Trump is a pig, but he didn't get this far with poorly-timed dirty tricks. He knows exactly when to release the kraken.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #18)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:00 PM

29. He is a master at timing. Unfortunate. Maybe he wont use it

 

but he loves drama

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #29)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:03 PM

33. Is it a coincidence your username is similar to "kraken"?



I think not....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #33)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:20 PM

51. is it? It is a family name actually- never made sense to me. now I can imagine

 

that great graphic, thanx

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #51)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:21 PM

52. Oops - sorry.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #52)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:36 PM

62. thats ok, does it mean Kraken? I would really like to know if it means anything

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #62)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:46 PM

64. I have no idea, but if it was my last name, I'd go with that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #29)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:13 PM

35. What

He is a master at timing.


Example?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Spacedog1973 (Reply #35)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:15 PM

50. I think he meant master baiter.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JEB (Reply #50)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:22 PM

53. Bada-BOOM!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JEB (Reply #50)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:38 PM

63. He is good at baiting, even a master

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to lagomorph777 (Reply #18)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:33 PM

58. Love this!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stillwaiting (Reply #9)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:04 PM

34. Yes, because he couldn't touch Bernie.

He has nothing to attack Bernie with cuz Bernie is perfect.
Which is why he is winning the Democratic nomination!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stillwaiting (Reply #9)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:32 PM

57. interesting theory

 

It would be so hard for him to find dirt on Bernie, he would just red-bait him. Hillary is a smorgasboard he could bloviate about, but picking "ENABLER" was just a bad idea, appealing only to bible thumpers and weak women. Hopefully the ad manager will screw up any Hillary clips they have too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to stillwaiting (Reply #9)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:35 PM

61. +1. We can only hope that if he has them she will get him angry enough to let em go before

the Convention so the party will still have a chance to win in November.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JudyM (Reply #61)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:54 PM

75. She is smart enough to do that- citing his bankrupsys is brilliant

 

Last edited Thu May 26, 2016, 02:52 AM - Edit history (1)

just keep poking him with what triggers him- his hair, his hands, his failures. Maybe he will have a coronary and we will end up with Jeb Bush. He has as much baggage as Hillary, that would be a win for her.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 07:10 AM

10. Who told you this?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Renew Deal (Reply #10)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:54 PM

24. I have a friend of the advertising agent T is using. He splices video

 

for a living and is now researching for a contract job out of country. He is scared T will get an upperhand using his bluster at the right time in the election. He asked me for my Australian contacts saying it is the only continent he will feel safe in if T is elected. I will probably follow his lead

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #24)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:31 PM

55. they still splice tape? Isn't it all digital today?

Or maybe they hang onto old terms for editing?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to floppyboo (Reply #55)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:47 PM

65. he calls it splicing when he takes chosen clips, its probably his langage habit

 

as he is in his 40s

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #24)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:50 PM

74. Cool story, bro. nt

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 07:10 AM

11. Did a little birdie land on a podium and whisper this in your ear?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 07:13 AM

12. If you were told by someone here at DU, take it to the bank.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to oasis (Reply #12)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:58 PM

28. I'm a scientist, I require proof, not rumor

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 07:13 AM

13. You've been told by who?

?1319478951

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 07:15 AM

14. Told by whom

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 08:17 AM

16. You've been told?

By whom? Who told you? See, unattributed "sayings" are worthless.

So, fill us in on who said that to you, please.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 08:19 AM

17. October Surprise?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 08:29 AM

20. Haha

This is so ridiculous. Pretty sure most republicans or independents for that matter aren't going to give a rats ass if Hillary is tight with Wall Street... that's a liberal talking point.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to jcgoldie (Reply #20)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:56 PM

25. Indies do care, thats why they are Indies. Most Indies are liberal

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 08:32 AM

21. OMG OMG OMG *lights hair on fire and passes out*



Romney vs. Clinton, whose foo-paa are more badder?!! It is like Mothra and Godzilla; they is battling MONSTERS (I hope this isnt true). I are sure Hillary is most worst!111

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to betsuni (Reply #21)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:43 PM

43. No, Romney is far worse, he is a vulture

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 10:57 AM

23. If Trump says he does, you can bank on its not being so.

I could well believe that there is some video out there, though, despite Clinton's mania for secrecy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Orsino (Reply #23)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:21 PM

37. My first thought was "damn", then "would Trump poke a wolverine?" then

 

I thought if I paid that much for 3 speeches, then I would certainly tape them. They liked the first speech so much they paid for 2 more? Hillary is very good at saying what her audience wants to hear, so those tapes have to have the potential to cause trouble. They are out there and it would take one disgruntled employee, or Hillary hater to sell them to her enemy, for a price.

My source is not a paranoid fellow, but he is scared and not his humorous self.

I dont have to see tape or read transcripts to know they are damning. Of course, her followers will forgive and forget or disbelieve, but they are only 12 million out of what? 140 million registered voters in this country?

I dont think Trump has said anything about this publicly, which worrys me. When will he use it?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #37)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:24 PM

38. Clinton's contract specifically forbade recording...

...or transcription by any other party.

However, this is the age of the camera phone. There were many attendees, any one of whom might have captured at least some crappy audio.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Orsino (Reply #38)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:51 PM

46. wall street isnt a party, and they do as they damn well please

 

I dont believe they follow any contract rules and Hillary would never sue Goldman. I also doubt a CEO would leak a tape. They want her in the whitehouse- it had to be a subjugate employee bribed by a Trump agent. People get fired every day from these banks.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:56 PM

26. If true that would clinch the election for Trump and bigger Republican majorities in Congress

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to imagine2015 (Reply #26)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:24 PM

39. Would it effect Congress? Not if we do our jobs at our state levels

 

Research your republican Reps and senators, and expose them now, boost your dem official in state, and change Congress for the better

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 12:56 PM

27. Oh noooooo!

 

OMG. We're dooooomed.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:01 PM

30. "I've been told..."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tarc (Reply #30)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:52 PM

47. luv you Jon

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:02 PM

32. Well, if you were told that, it must be true!!!

This is very concerning!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:17 PM

36. This has always been a possibility...



Think about this from a probability point of view.

We know HRC was a speaker for GS. What are the odds that one or several of those speeches was officially recorded? My guess is pretty high since corporations look at things like this as "assets" to be used for other purposes within the firm at a future date. Maybe with another group of managers, maybe in another geography...whatever...just used again.

So, high odds there are videos.

What are the odds there is passage in those videos that can be carved out of context and presented as HRC's "47%" moment. My guess is pretty high, especially in the hands of such a$$hats as Roger Stone. I'm sure that in the context of her entire message, her comments will be benign but cut and paste messaging could make anyone sound bad.

So, high odds there are videos and high odds that there is a 10 second out of context sound bite that will sound pretty bad.

What are the odds that the Roger Stone's of the world will find someone willing to pay any price for a copy of that tape. My guess is that these tapes will be the hottest commodity of the general election season (unless someone has photos of Trump in a compromising position with a doberman - oh that we be so lucky...lol).

So, high odds there's a 10 second cut from these videos that ends up in a Trump or PAC ad going into November.

I don't know if this turns into October surprise but if anyone is going to dump this pile of BS out in the street and try to make a story of it...it's Trump. Unfortunately, the way it's been handled by the campaign leaves this as the only potential piece of meat in the chitstorm he's going to be peddling.

I voted to Bernie in the Ohio Primary and I fully intend to vote for HRC in the general (as well as very downticket D I can find). My biggest regret of the primary season is NOT that Bernie has run out of steam. It is that HRC didn't dump these tapes out at midnight on that debate night when the question was raised. By this time...whatever quote cutting that could be done would be old old news.

Instead, it's like trying to hold a fart in while riding the elevator up the Empire State Building. It's a long way to the top and you know you're going to lose the fight with mother nature around the 87th floor...and nobody has anywhere to hide.

In the end (i.e. the morning of 11/9/16) she wins but it's going to be so f'ing ugly along the way.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CincyDem (Reply #36)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:32 PM

40. I'm in total agreement, clips can be so misleading and the public

 

believes them.

It is going to be ugly and farcical. Even when she wins, damage will be done

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:34 PM

41. I love all this concern

I wonder if anybody has any idea what can be unleashed against the sleazy womanizing mobster who pretended to be his own image agent and is ready to re-start torture and says he has no reservations to using nuclear weapons. Oh, and he has "small hands"

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dem2 (Reply #41)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:44 PM

44. I'm sure there's a Yuuuge can of whoop-ass waiting for him.



The issue, however, is if that whoop-ass will be consistent with his "brand". Suppose we find out that he took some zoning officials from Chicago to the Bahama's to get zoning variances for his new building on the river.

His response - "yeah. BFD, that's how ya gotta do bidness in Chicago"...and he blames the system for forcing him to bribe those guys. From an image point of view, it just reinforces the idea that we have to change the system. And besides, unless he's actually convicted...it's not going to stick with his voters. I don't think he was exaggerating when he said he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and it wouldn't hurt his image. It's sort of like "dog bites man" news.

On the other hand, if we find out that HRC used 49 cent stamps on a postcard in 1996...we're going to have a f'ing congressional investigation into her "wastefulness".

It's bullchit but when you think about "unleashing" anything on Trump consider this - whatever we discover about Trump that most "normal" people would find appalling - his supporters will look at it like finding out there were naked pictures in Playboy...what the heck did you expect, it's part of the brand.

I have confidence there are enough "normal" people in America. I just hope to god they get out and vote.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Dem2 (Reply #41)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:12 PM

48. So very true. He only attracts the very angry, the put upon , the reactive, the "under educated,

 

nazis, rednecks, frustrated, jocks, wall streeters, the 1%, the hopeless republicans, wall street, special interests, 10% of indies,and most repug women, Clinton haters who lack good sense, the foolish, the careless,

Hillary has in her corner 12 million, and roughly 10% of indies that will hold their noses. this includes latinos, AAs and loyal women, maybe 80% of Bernie folk, a smattering of republicans

So far her team hasnt thrown any crap that sticks to Trump- I dont think his people care. They know he is a CEO, and cheer his loonacy. Will they wake up? We best pray so

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 01:48 PM

45. I've been told the Lizard Overlords are plotting to take over the world. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to procon (Reply #45)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:15 PM

49. grow up, this is a real possibility in the digital world

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #49)

Wed May 25, 2016, 03:00 PM

68. People drive themselves crazy speculating on what's 'possible'... looks like a short trip. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:32 PM

56. You believe that liar?

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JRLeft (Reply #56)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:34 PM

59. try reading replys.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:34 PM

60. So? Who cares? NT

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Reply #60)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:53 PM

67. I'm sorry you dont care- but alot of people dont

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Reply #67)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:24 PM

69. (Virtually) nobody gives a shit.

I mean seriously, I am guessing a Clinton speech to a bunch of Wall St. is the most yawn inducing 45 minutes or so that one could endure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to arely staircase (Reply #69)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:46 PM

72. Hillary voters dont care, nor should they. It has to be boring, I agree

 

nor were e-mails, and they bore me and anyone with a brain

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 02:48 PM

66. He also said he had really damning evidence against Obama's Birth in Hawaii

 

...he repeated it over and over...and *nothing*

He throws things out there all the time.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Sheepshank (Reply #66)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:41 PM

71. Trump has not claimed he has these clips

 

and I too would be bored by them, but those on the fence just need a nudge

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:38 PM

70. I have to go to work now, will check in at midnight to reply

 

I admire the diversity in DU

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 04:58 PM

76. He had President Obama's REAL birth certificate too

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 05:10 PM

77. I've been told that boogymen will get you.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 05:55 PM

78. I tried to post a quote someone put up that was supposedly from one of her speeches.

 

It was a long sentence, there was no link, but they banned it. It was DAMNING. She was basically calling us stupid and glad that they had elites like them to steer the country in the right direction.
Call that my fantasy, but that is what someone posted on twitter and I put the picture up here and it got banned.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 05:56 PM

79. Cool story bro

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to larkrake (Original post)

Wed May 25, 2016, 05:59 PM

80. I imagine she will use those speeches in GE and there will be nothing to see. As much as you all

 

want a gotcha. Your candidate can't win on his own so it has to be the emails or transcripts. Really pathetic.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread