Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

leeroysphitz

(10,462 posts)
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:58 PM May 2016

Why are Clinton supporters so spiteful when Sanders is doing their candidate a YUGE favor in cali

by not kicking their candidate's ass by buying air time on TV?

Why is the DNC begging Sanders to go easy on their "nominee"? If Clinton was everything her supporters say she is he wouldn't HAVE to pull his punches (figuratively speaking).

Clinton is a deeply, deeply flawed candidate and Sanders is an honorable, decent person to not go negative on her when it would be SO very, very easy. But while pointing out Clinton's many, many flaws may hurt our "nominee" in the general ignoring those flaws or pretending that they somehow don't exist could hurt her much worse. This election is littered with the corpses of those who underestimated the popularity of Trump's low information populist message.

You guys should be kissing Sanders' ass. He's got the money and content to NUKE Clinton's campaign but decency and loyalty stays his hand. Would Clinton be that decent where her ambitions are concerned? We all know she wouldn't.




17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are Clinton supporters so spiteful when Sanders is doing their candidate a YUGE favor in cali (Original Post) leeroysphitz May 2016 OP
??? auntpurl May 2016 #1
Tell the truth about HRC and DNC = Attack. Got it Ned_Devine May 2016 #2
I mean, my main point was #1, which was the topic of the OP auntpurl May 2016 #3
He is taking it easy in the sense that he's only talking issues Ned_Devine May 2016 #7
+ 1 JoePhilly May 2016 #5
LOL firebrand80 May 2016 #4
Um, Bernie's campaign is almost broke. Hillary could outspend him anytime she wants now. CrowCityDem May 2016 #6
He doesn't have the $ to buy air time Trenzalore May 2016 #8
Don't buy into the premise; Bernie IS running ads in CA auntpurl May 2016 #13
I could have sworn there were threads just yesterday about a Sanders California ad. Garrett78 May 2016 #9
Smear campaigns are just that and it does effect how people see things, hence the creepy seabeyond May 2016 #10
She hasn't even said his name since N.Y., kid gloves treatment MattP May 2016 #11
History jamese777 May 2016 #12
Bernie Sanders Unveils Californa TV Ad jamese777 May 2016 #14
No he is not Demsrule86 May 2016 #15
Who is 'begging'? randome May 2016 #16
You can't run ads without money KingFlorez May 2016 #17

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
1. ???
Wed May 25, 2016, 01:59 PM
May 2016

1. Bernie IS running TV ads in California
2. He's losing every poll there
3. Hillary can lose California by a good percentage and still easily win the nomination
4. Bernie and his campaign have done very little except attack both Hillary and the Democratic party for about a month

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
3. I mean, my main point was #1, which was the topic of the OP
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:03 PM
May 2016

The OP is wrong, Bernie IS running ads in California.

Whether you want to call it attacking or "telling the truth" as Bernie sees it, he has been making nonstop negative statements about Hillary and the Democratic Party for about a month. So the OP's point that Bernie is taking it easy on Hillary is also wrong.

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
7. He is taking it easy in the sense that he's only talking issues
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:08 PM
May 2016

I don't know why the OP said he wasn't running spots in CA, because I'm pretty sure he is.

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
4. LOL
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:06 PM
May 2016

Bernie is most likely running low on money. If he was flush with cash he would be competing in NJ, which would be critical to any realistic path to the nomination.

Bernie hasn't been as negative on Hillary as he could have, but Hillary could have gone more negative as well.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
8. He doesn't have the $ to buy air time
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:09 PM
May 2016

Otherwise he would.

Most expensive state to run a political ad campaign.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
9. I could have sworn there were threads just yesterday about a Sanders California ad.
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:09 PM
May 2016

I must have imagined that.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
10. Smear campaigns are just that and it does effect how people see things, hence the creepy
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:11 PM
May 2016

politician that has already lost, never was a Democrat and issue with a woman kicking his ass has to resort to.

jamese777

(546 posts)
12. History
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:12 PM
May 2016

What is happening now in the political dynamics of primary season has happened in every presidential election year since political parties were first formed.
This campaign season has been rather mild in comparison. People who take their politics seriously don't like to lose and other folks are not gracious in victory.
In 2008 it was the P.U.M.A. ("Party Unity My Ass) group of disgruntled Clinton supporters who vowed to never support Barack Obama. Obama beat McCain by 10 million votes.
And so it goes.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
16. Who is 'begging'?
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:21 PM
May 2016

Both candidates are flawed. The voters can decide who they want. Remember when Sanders supporters used to talk about issues? My, those were the days...
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
17. You can't run ads without money
Wed May 25, 2016, 02:22 PM
May 2016

Do you really think that Sanders would not run ads as a favor to his opponent? That really makes no sense in the grand scheme of politics.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why are Clinton supporter...