Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary did NOT turn over emails sent/received while her server was UNENCRYPTED.
via ( https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/05/25/here-are-the-most-critical-parts-of-the-state-dept-inspector-general-report-on-clintons-email-use/ )
well,
March 29, 2009: For the first two months Clinton uses her private server for all her emails, it operates without the standard encryption generally used to protect Internet communication. This is according to a 2015 independent analysis by Venafi Inc., a cybersecurity firm that specializes in the encryption process. Not until this day does the server receive a "digital certificate" that encrypts and protects communication over the Internet through encryption. The Washington Post will later report, "It is unknown whether the system had some other way to encrypt the email traffic at the time. Without encryption - a process that scrambles communication for anyone without the correct key - email, attachments and passwords are transmitted in plain text." A Venafi official will later comment, "That means that anyone could have accessed it. Anyone." (The Washington Post, 3/27/2016) Clinton began sending emails using the server by January 28, 2009, but will later claim she didn't start using it until March 18, 2009 - a two month gap similar to the two month gap the server apparently wasn't properly protected. Apparently, she has not given investigators any of her emails from before March 18. (The New York Times, 9/25/2015) A 2016 op-ed in The Washington Post will suggest that security concerns during Clinton's February 2009 trip to Asia could have prompted the use of encryption on her server. (The Washington Post, 4/4/2016)
Source: The Clinton Email Scandal Timeline ©2016 #ClintonEmailTimeline
http://thompsontimeline.com/The_Clinton_Email_Scandal_-_Long_Version_-_Part_1#entry032909noencrypt
She claimed she wasn't even using email until March 18. The last line is damning: "OIG
discovered multiple instances in which Secretary Clintons personal email account sent and
received official business email during this period."
Oops.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 621 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary did NOT turn over emails sent/received while her server was UNENCRYPTED. (Original Post)
yodermon
May 2016
OP
She's done. I'm sure there will be spinning attempts worthy of Olympic medals
winter is coming
May 2016
#4
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)1. Staggering arrogance. Liar liar pantsuit on fire Hillary!
AzDar
(14,023 posts)2. This... and also the multiple HACKING attempts (!) that went UNREPORTED...
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)4. She's done. I'm sure there will be spinning attempts worthy of Olympic medals
in the coming days, but she's done.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)3. Here's a good link
yodermon
(6,143 posts)5. ah, thanks. n/t
grasswire
(50,130 posts)6. kick nt