2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton’s Emails Are ‘Really A Concern,’ ‘Also A Felony,’ According To A Memo Addressed To..
Hillary Clintons Emails Are Really A Concern, Also A Felony, According To A Memo Addressed To President Obama From Senior Intelligence OfficialsMay 25, 2016
By Kim McLendon
Hillary Clintons email is a huge deal, despite what the pundits might tell their viewers. Fourteen high-ranking U.S. intelligence veterans signed a memo addressed directly to the president of the United States, urging him to take prompt action on the situation because the public has a right to know how serious the matter really is.
By all indications, the FBI is slow-walking the investigation and mainstream media are soft-pedaling the issue. As things now stand, most Americans remain unaware of the import of this industrial-scale compromise of very sensitive national security information in Secretary Clintons emails.
Hillary Clintons situation is really quite ominous. A lengthy document posted to the Global Research site by the authors of the memo gives the most detailed and expert information yet available on the nature of Hillarys situation with the FBI. It seems the group, who refer to themselves as Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, is demanding more timely action on Senator Clintons case.
Your White House has also made excuses for deliberate security violations by Secretary Clinton that would have gotten senior officials like us fired and probably indicted. We look with suspicion at what we see as contrasting and totally inappropriate attempts by the administration and media to play down the importance of Secretary Clintons deliberate disregard of basic security instructions and procedures.
Hillary Clintons high-profile position is the only thing saving her from years of prison time, according to the memo. The senior officials remind the president they have 400 years of experience in working with classified information between the 14 of them. They know exactly how serious the situation is. Intelligence officials have been imprisoned for less. The memo states that an official named Jeffrey Sterling is serving three and a half years, and he was convicted with far less evidence than what the FBI has on Hillary.
The contrast between the copious evidence some of it self-admitted of Secretary Clintons demonstrable infractions, on the one hand, and the very sketchy, circumstantial evidence used to convict and imprison Jeffrey Sterling, on the other, lend weight to the suspicion that there is one law for the rich and powerful in the United States and another for the rest of us.
Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/3131237/hillary-clintons-emails-are-really-a-concern-also-a-felony-according-to-a-memo-addressed-to-president-obama-from-senior-intelligence-officials/#GUd63kUI4OiJXyzE.99
aspirant
(3,533 posts)She has been convicted of nothing.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)Bob41213
(491 posts)BainsBane
(53,012 posts)Sanders has racked up thousands of violations of campaign finance law. That's not even up to debate. He's been cited by the FEC on four separate occasions. And that relates to an issue he has made central to his campaign!
yodermon
(6,143 posts)All over but the crying. Why even bring him up.
TRUMP is who I'm worried about. He will fucking POUND her on this. You think the BernieBros were bad for this, with "timelines" and shit? ha ha ha, you ain't seen nothing yet.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)So you're supporting Calling Clinton a felon, not in order to promote Bernie but out of grave concern for the Democratic Party's general election prospects?
Well, if the goal is to engage in Trump-level discussion of these issues, this is certainly a good primer.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Barack Obama's presidential campaign has been fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for violating federal disclosure laws, Politico reports.
An FEC audit of Obama for America's 2008 records found the committee failed to disclose millions of dollars in contributions and dragged its feet in refunding millions more in excess contributions.
The resulting fine, one of the largest ever handed down by the FEC, is the result of a failure to disclose or improperly disclosing thousands of contributions to Obama for America during the then-senator's 2008 presidential run, documents show.
<more>
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/01/07/obama-campaign-fined-big-for-hiding-donors-keeping-illegal-donations
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)and I'm particularly interested in tracing the money trail for Old Towne Media, specifically just who is getting the 15% ad placement fees for the campaign, and if that somebody is the same somebody in his Senate and Congressional elections. https://medium.com/@VonEbsy/old-towne-media-llc-buying-a-political-revolution-40cbac5cb4c3#.dfddgliyc
frylock
(34,825 posts)But, back to your original point, when did the FEC arrest Obama?
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)not arrests. Clinton hasn't even been cited with a legal violation.
Thanks for showing how little concern you actually have about campaign finance. Of course it's obvious that there no issue that hasn't been thrown overboard to promote Sanders.
frylock
(34,825 posts)He's in process of doing that.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)They also aren't illegal unless they go unaddressed. Hillary let hers go for so long that the FEC had to audit her, something that they haven't done to Sanders. Also, that entire argument is bullshit because every campaign in the history of time has gotten FEC violations, they're a non-issue.
frylock
(34,825 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,167 posts).
Good. Good.
.
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)" In addition, the law cited above explicitly makes it a felony to cut and paste classified information removing its classification designation."
The e-mails weren't classified until after the fact. There was no classification designation there to remove.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)It's also Hillary's job to mark anything she does classified if needed.
This is huge!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Nope.
The emails were not marked classified. The Clinton campaign has worked very, very hard to conflate the after-the-fact marking with after-the-fact classification.
Information is classified, whether or not it is properly marked. This is extensively covered during your in-briefing when you are given access to classified information, and repeated in your annual re-training. They also provide phone-book-sized classification guides you can look at to figure out if something is classified, as well as the people to contact if you have any questions. And if you do have questions, you are supposed to treat it as classified until they are answered.
Government peon #26947 would be in deep shit for this. But it's Hillary Clinton, so we'll see if she gets regular justice or Petraeus-Rove justice.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)2cannan
(344 posts)Exclusive: Dozens of Clinton emails were classified from the start, U.S. rules suggest
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821
snip
The new stamps indicate that some of Clinton's emails from her time as the nation's most senior diplomat are filled with a type of information the U.S. government and the department's own regulations automatically deems classified from the get-go regardless of whether it is already marked that way or not.
In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts.
This sort of information, which the department says Clinton both sent and received in her emails, is the only kind that must be "presumed" classified, in part to protect national security and the integrity of diplomatic interactions, according to U.S. regulations examined by Reuters.
"It's born classified," said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). Leonard was director of ISOO, part of the National Archives and Records Administration, from 2002 until 2008, and worked for both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.
"If a foreign minister just told the secretary of state something in confidence, by U.S. rules that is classified at the moment it's in U.S. channels and U.S. possession," he said in a telephone interview, adding that for the State Department to say otherwise was "blowing smoke."
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)article and posted them exactly as presented in the originating source.
Nice try though...
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)14 unnamed send Obama a letter or memo...sounds like Right wing shit...no indictment so they want to milk it..to bad you all really believe it...two weeks...folks.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)joshcryer
(62,266 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)but at the very least, why didn't they identify the people who supposedly wrote under the guise of "Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity".
Until there's actually some identifiable source that any legitimate news outlet would have vetted and validated their claims, this remains a work of fiction, or, considering the website you lifted it from, another rightwing conspiracy theory.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)is a Who's Who of intelligence experts that have mostly criticized right-wing presidents and/or whistle-blew on torture.
Dem2
(8,166 posts)I wish people wouldn't use these shady websites.
Demsrule86
(68,469 posts)14 unnamed right wingers...tell me who they are...
panader0
(25,816 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)And, no... they aren't all right-wingers. In fact, most are whistle-blowers who criticized right-wing administrations.
William Binney, Technical Director, NSA; co-founder, SIGINT Automation Research Center (ret.) is a former highly placed intelligence official with the United States National Security Agency (NSA) turned whistleblower who resigned on October 31, 2001, after more than 30 years with the agency. He was a high-profile critic of his former employers during the George W. Bush administration.
Thomas Drake, Senior Executive, NSA (former)Philip Giraldi, CIA, Operations Officer (ret.): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews_Drake#Drake_action_within_the_NSA
Sen. Mike Gravel, DEMOCRAT, Alaska; earlier, Army Intelligence
Matthew Hoh, former Capt., USMC, Iraq & Foreign Service Officer, Afghanistan (associate VIPS): http://www.ciponline.org/about-us/experts-staff/matthew_hoh
Larry C. Johnson, CIA & State Department (ret.): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_C._Johnson
Michael S. Kearns, Captain, USAF Intelligence Agency (ret.), ex-Master SERE Instructor: Michael S. Kearnsey Kearns is a retired Air Force Intelligence Officer, and former Master SERE instructor, who has been a vocal opponent of the Bush/Cheney torture program and the dark complexities of political war profiteering at the expense of the American people.
John Kiriakou, Former CIA Counterterrorism Officer <-- This guy was actually convicted of accidentally releasing classified info and spent 30 months in jail. He's the perfect example of what could happen to Clinton.
Ray McGovern, former US Army infantry/intelligence officer & CIA analyst (ret.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_McGovern
Elizabeth Murray, Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East, CIA (ret.) Worked for Ray McGovern
Todd Pierce, MAJ, US Army Judge Advocate (ret.): Todd E. Pierce retired as a Major in the US Army Judge Advocate General (JAG) Corps in November 2012. His most recent assignment was defense counsel in the Office of Chief Defense Counsel, Office of Military Commissions. In the course of that assignment, he researched and reviewed the complete records of military commissions held during the Civil War and stored at the National Archives in Washington, DC.
Scott Ritter, former MAJ, USMC, former UN Weapon Inspector, Iraq: Surely you know this guy.
Diane Roark, DOE, DOD, NSC, & professional staff, House Intelligence Committee (ret.):
Robert David Steele, former CIA Operations Officer: This is the only coo-coo bird of the bunch. He's an Alex Jones type.
Peter Van Buren, U.S. Department of State, Foreign Service Officer (ret.) (associate VIPS)
Kirk Wiebe, former Senior Analyst, SIGINT Automation Research Center, NSA, (ret.)
Ann Wright, U.S. Army Reserve Colonel (ret) and former U.S. Diplomat
You can research the last few, but it proves my point: these aren't right-wingers.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Who the hell takes you seriously?
MattP
(3,304 posts)But Gravel a Alaskan Dem, as right a Dem as you can get has Dem street cred
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Scott Ritter, Ray McGovern, Michael Kearns, William Binney and Thomas Drake are nothing to sneeze at.
BainsBane
(53,012 posts)So much for due process. If only she were an accused rapist, with a pending arrest warrant, on the run, hiding out in foreign embassies, rather than the Democratic nominee for president, she might find defenders more defenders.
Homicidal despots with billions stashed in foreign banks are also big heroes in certain quarters.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)regarding FOIA.
To me, the important things are all of the classified emails dealing with national security that were illegally on that private server.
Then there are the connections with her foundation and her actions at state department.
Oh, man, you must have really stirred the Hillary hornet's nest. I see there were 41 replies and I can only see 3 of them. . WOW! That's a new high.