2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBill Clinton Gets Into 30-Minute Debate With A 24-Year-Old Bernie Fan
Other people are waiting, one staffer said, stepping forward.
I think were gonna agree to disagree here, guys, he tried again.
All right, Mr. President. These folks are waiting, a second aide said.
Snip
https://www.buzzfeed.com/rubycramer/bill-clinton-ends-up-in-30-minute-debate-vs-a-24-year-old-be?utm_term=.kuYK2aVPlR#.nidm69kV4l
Raster
(20,998 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Let them debate!
tularetom
(23,664 posts)A loose cannon rolling around the deck of the campaign.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)One of his more narcissistic qualities.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)bills that did so much damage he must be having a real problem. And Hillary is going to have to talk to us about those "mistakes" if she wants us to vote for her. Welfare reform without one exemption for people who really needed the help; tough crime laws that caused more trouble than they fixed; repeal of Glass-Steagal; the communications act; commodity futures act.
Not to mention all the goodies that Trump wants us to think about.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)You'd have a point if he declined to engage with the guy, but he gave him half an hour of his valuable time.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Doesn't' fit their narrative.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Does your knee hurt when it jerks like that?
larkrake
(1,674 posts)He use to take criticism, now he gets so defensive
Honestly I hope not because that isn't a pretty thing and I wish that on nobody
BootinUp
(47,144 posts)wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)Deer in the headlights - spouting left wing revisionism he learned for DailyKOS and such, never expecting someone to actually refute the points.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)Just struck me as an odd criticism...
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)AntiBank
(1,339 posts)powerful, charismatic, polarising political leaders in the last 50 years. I would love to see you try to replicate with a similar person who you are somewhat ideologically opposed to. Camille Paglia would crush you.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Thank you Mr. President!
BootinUp
(47,144 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He's not on my side at all.
AntiBank
(1,339 posts)Beausoir
(7,540 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But the protracted back-and-forth was also a testament to Clinton's view one he repeats often on the trail that politicians and their opponents don't spend enough time listening to one another anymore. This spring, after an encounter with activists from the Black Lives Matter movement, Clinton vowed to try to close that gap. I realized finally I was talking past [the protester] the way she was talking past me, he said. We gotta stop that in this country. We gotta listen to each other.
babylonsister
(171,059 posts)maybe Bill was listening. But sadly, most pols don't give a damn what their constituents have to say, it's all about the benjamins.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)to break an issue or policy into segments and explain each point in a way that you could understand it.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)He's a natural pedagogue and can lead people to understanding.
2banon
(7,321 posts)That conversation was EPIC.
I don't have the link at my fingertips at the moment, but if anyone is interested it's very definitely worth your time.
I think google Amy Goodman speaks with Bill Clinton during 2000 campaign. something like that.
My memory is a bit fuzzy on details, lots regarding East Timor. Bill was his jolly self for about a minute and then Amy actually asks him hard questions to which he got furious. But he didn't hang up, I'll give him that. He stayed with it for a considerable length of time.
He was actually campaigning for Gore and furious that the conversation was dealing with serious policy matters like East Timor. He wasn't used to having a serious reporter asking serious questions about policy involving things like U.S. backed despots responsible for massacres on his watch and with his support.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)between Bill and Amy. You're right, it was epic. And while I don't recall the substance of it, but I clearly recall his tone of voice, his fury at being asked the hard questions.
Very rarely do politicians get asked the hard questions. Or if so asked, they go off on some tangent of their own choosing, rather than actually answering the question. And more rarely does the interviewer repeat the question, try to hold them accountable. Amy Goodman does that. She's a national treasure.
2banon
(7,321 posts)actual recording begins at :51 seconds into the broadcast.
Note: I did misremember the topics, it wasn't about East Timor, that must have been a different interview with a different pol.
enjoy!
2banon
(7,321 posts)actual recording begins at :51 seconds into the broadcast.
Note: I did misremember the topics, it wasn't about East Timor, that must have been a different interview with a different pol.
Enjoy!
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)of course you don't
2banon
(7,321 posts)actual recording begins at :51 seconds into the broadcast.
Note: I did misremember the topics, it wasn't about East Timor, that must have been a different interview with a different pol.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)She is one of the few real journalists left in the USA.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)He's pretty smart and seems to have an encyclopedia between his ears. Sorry he joined the bfee.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Exilednight
(9,359 posts)The Sanders voter told Clinton that his administration had drawn down investments in basically" every agency, naming the Department of Education in particular.
"I doubled education," Clinton replied.
If you go from the beginning to the end of your term, each of these departments have shrunk, Brody said.
"Thats just wrong. I doubled education," Clinton said. (Reached by email later on Wednesday, a spokesman said Clinton had been referring to federal spending and dollars allocated to college aid.)
Brody was right. Bill partially gutted primary education, but always has a lawyers answer by way of technicality.
The 2007 immigration bill, he said. "Hillary said yes. Her opponent said no... You always have a choice."
Brody should have responded with, "yes, we always have a choice, my candidate voted against the IWR, Hillary voted for it, and now hundreds of thousands Iraqi civilians are dead, always ng with over ten thousand US soldiers."
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)1993: $23,850,756,000
2001: $42,230,821,000
That's way closer to double than your claim of "gutted".
No technicalities needed, just actual data and not just a hunch.
Source: http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/history/index.html
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)"naming the Department of Education in particular.
"I doubled education," Clinton replied."
Clinton didn't say "The Department of Education, except the parts of the budget that Exilednight doesn't think should really apply".
The article also specifically notes that the figure included "federal spending and dollars allocated to college aid" so removing them would be pointless. Your argument makes no sense.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)tritsofme
(17,377 posts)substantive and public debate with a former president over 30 minutes. What an incredible opportunity that political junkies (myself included) on a site like this would cherish.
The kid's spunk is probably what impressed Bill enough to stick around that long.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)Bill Clinton seems to me a tragic figure who is desperate, but is clueless about how out of touch he really is with those he is trying to sway.
Paul Ryan, who wants to get rid of Medicare, could tell us how the Real Bill thinks ...
One Black Sheep
(458 posts)most former presidents would not engage so deeply and long like this with one of the "peasants". Nice to see a former president engage in a respectful debate with a citizen. Good for Bill Clinton.
Yurovsky
(2,064 posts)He didn't have to stick around and debate this young man. The fact that he did does merit a tip of the hat.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)The VIP's I've met in my life made an impact on me because I could see that they were actually listening to me, looking at me and assessing my intelligence and character, with a glance. Sounds simple, but consider that even among married people, so many don't listen to their spouses, or children.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)Just ask all three of them.
danimich1
(175 posts)I think it's great that he spent that time talking with someone who opposes him and his presidency. As much as I'm a Bernie supporter, and I don't like everything the Clintons did, I can't imagine how hard the job of president must be. He could have just walked away and not listened. But he stayed. There's a reason why people who have met him personally like him.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Whatever I may think of him these days, Bill Clinton is one very, very smart guy. Props to both of them for hashing it out.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Honestly, I give both props.
Josh knows his stuff and I give Bill credit for actually taking the time to discuss things with him. Who does that? Nobody.
This is a nice discourse and I wish we saw more of this these days. It allows politicians, and let's face it, most are completely disconnected with America, to get a good vibe and sense of the country.