Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:26 AM May 2016

WAPO EdBoard:using..private server, Clinton circumventd policies desgned 2 follow federal record law

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/281311-washington-post-editorial-board-fbi-needs-to-finish-clinton

snip


But there is no excuse for the way Ms. Clinton breezed through all the warnings and notifications."

By exclusively using a personal email address routed through a private server, Clinton circumvented policies designed to follow federal records laws and might have jeopardized official secrets, the Inspector General said in the report.

Clinton never requested permission to use the personal server, which was located at her New York home, and it “would not” have been approved, in part, because of “the security risks in doing so,” the watchdog agency wrote.

Additionally, Clinton “never demonstrated” to State Department security officials that her personal server or BlackBerry device “met minimum information security requirements.”

And Clinton’s decision not to use an official email department email address “is not an appropriate method” of preserving emails under the Federal Records Act, the inspector general said.

“Therefore, Secretary Clinton should have preserved any federal records she created and received on her personal account by printing and filing those records with the related files in the Office of the Secretary,” it said. “At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she did not comply with the department’s policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WAPO EdBoard:using..private server, Clinton circumventd policies desgned 2 follow federal record law (Original Post) amborin May 2016 OP
Well, they can't fire her now, so what can they do? ` hollysmom May 2016 #1
It's just a right-wing conspiracy ibegurpard May 2016 #2
K & R AzDar May 2016 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #4
Eventually we will all begin asking why it was so important to have a private server. DisgustipatedinCA May 2016 #5
^^^^THIS^^^ cliffordu May 2016 #7
the private server hid all the subterfuge w/ Clinton Foundation & Blumenthal amborin May 2016 #8
Oy nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #6
Nothing new, She already acknowledged it was not the smartest decision ... BootinUp May 2016 #9
Only partisans care about FOLLOWING THE LAW? IdaBriggs May 2016 #10

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
1. Well, they can't fire her now, so what can they do? `
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:29 AM
May 2016

I doubt that they want to prosecute her. what are their options.

ibegurpard

(16,685 posts)
2. It's just a right-wing conspiracy
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:32 AM
May 2016

Cooked up by Bernie supporters in their vicious Volvos... or something...

Seriously I have no idea how this is going to play out but it's not looking good right now and I think we're already over the cliff.

Response to amborin (Original post)

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
5. Eventually we will all begin asking why it was so important to have a private server.
Thu May 26, 2016, 02:51 AM
May 2016

We may end up asking what it is that the Clinton Foundation does. We may wonder why she was getting out-of-band and forbidden intelligence from Sid Blumenthal. Was she functioning as an appointee of the President? Everything we know tells us that the President didn't know what she was doing. None of this squares with a logical and rational world...at least not with the information we have at present.

BootinUp

(47,141 posts)
9. Nothing new, She already acknowledged it was not the smartest decision ...
Thu May 26, 2016, 10:19 AM
May 2016

only partisans care, get over it.

 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
10. Only partisans care about FOLLOWING THE LAW?
Thu May 26, 2016, 10:30 AM
May 2016

You just read an article that says she "...circumvented policies designed to follow federal records laws..." and you really think this is a PARTISAN issue?

Do you know what the duties of the Executive Branch entail? From my third graders social studies textbook:

"The executive branch enforces laws."

And this matters because

"The President is the head of the executive branch. The executive branch carries out the law."

But you think only PARTISAN people care whether or not Hillary followed the law?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WAPO EdBoard:using..priva...