Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
Thu May 26, 2016, 05:53 AM May 2016

But, but, "it was allowed!" Translates into, "but, but, nobody stopped me, so it was OK!"

And now we learn she was asked to stop, and she didn't. She ignored them. She ignored everyone.

Here's the problem with Hillary Clinton: if it isn't explicitly spelled out as illegal, with definite prison time, she thinks she's "allowed" to do it. If it's merely against "the rules", she will laugh at that and do her own thing. In other words, she is completely unethical.

But we are coming to the one thing the Clintons always run in trouble with... in their disrespect for ethics, they often refuse to cooperate with authorities during investigations. This is what is called obstruction of justice. And unfortunately for them, that's not merely "unethical" - that's illegal.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But, but, "it was allowed!" Translates into, "but, but, nobody stopped me, so it was OK!" (Original Post) reformist2 May 2016 OP
Rules do not apply to special people Duckhunter935 May 2016 #1
Hill is a master of rationalization/double-speak. Divernan May 2016 #2
And they are always "on". They are in lawyer mode 24/7. You can never know what they really think. reformist2 May 2016 #3
Maybe she could trot out that old 90's nugget markbark May 2016 #4
It may or may not have been criminal, but Chasstev365 May 2016 #5
Yes- like Bill blocking the voting in blondie58 May 2016 #6

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
2. Hill is a master of rationalization/double-speak.
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:08 AM
May 2016

When backed into a corner both she & Bill can each be relied upon to play the "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is card."

In law school we were taught that one can always make an argument on opposite sides of any issue. Whether a judge (bench trial) or jury rejects that argument is the bottom line.

Chasstev365

(5,191 posts)
5. It may or may not have been criminal, but
Thu May 26, 2016, 07:02 AM
May 2016

would ONE Clinton supporter admit she fucked up? Honest to God, it's pathetic that none of the regulars on DU can ever admit she is wrong about anything.

blondie58

(2,570 posts)
6. Yes- like Bill blocking the voting in
Thu May 26, 2016, 09:50 AM
May 2016

Was it North Carolina?

Anyone else would have been arrestd, but not Bill. He is like a celebrity.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»But, but, "it was al...