2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat difference does it make if Clinton is called the "presumptive nominee"...
...once the voting is over? At that point, the decision is in the hands of the delegates (pledged and Super) and nobody will be swayed by the "corporate media".
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Post removed
LexVegas
(6,059 posts)JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)See the new poll out of California?
brooklynite
(94,501 posts)Sanders has to win 80% of the California vote to come anywhere near Clinton's PD count.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)the dynamics of the general.
Vinca
(50,261 posts)From the way things are going it appears she might be called the "disgraced presumptive nominee" by everyone else.
brooklynite
(94,501 posts)by which you mean: disgruntled Bernie supporters?
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)on DU do because I come from a very large tradition of not counting any chicken that is not hatched and a few days old to boot.
So I'd never call any candidate presumptive until they actually were such. To call for it early, which has been habitual on DU, is to me an extraordinarily indulgent and risky thing.
Hillary often cites her allegedly profound faith, her faith teaches the principle I speak of repeatedly an in various ways both positive and negative. That faith offers the great advice that arrogance is natural prelude to failure, that excessive pride actually creates failure
My own professional culture is steeped in such thinking.
So It is just not something I would seek, to be early proclaimed or lauded in advance. Plenty of time to praise me once the bridge is crossed, I do not need an early dose to sustain.
So I'm the sort of guy who lets the check clear before I say 'I sold another one'. Literally. Until the check clears.