2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie agreed to appear on Fox News to coordinate attacks against Hillary with Fox and Trump
That's all the "debate" was about. Sanders was going to team up with Trump to attack Hillary. And best of all, Fox News was going to facilitate it all.
Once again I ask, whose side is Bernie on?
EDIT: I told you so...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512060269
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Or just making shit up?
Response to Matt_in_STL (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
thesquanderer
(11,982 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Fail
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)A lot of us didn't want to believe it but this debate debacle is pretty indicative of inflicting maximum damage on Hillary and the Democratic Party.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)Clinton, you can complain.
Oh, hold it, you can't even then.
One Black Sheep
(458 posts)Turin_C3PO
(13,952 posts)If a debate were to occur, Sanders would take down Trump based on Trump's foolishness. He would never coordinate with that vulgar fool to take down Clinton.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)So if Trump attacked Hillary, would Bernie defend her?
Turin_C3PO
(13,952 posts)but I think he would. Well whatever the case, no debate is going to occur between Trump and Sanders anyway.
cali
(114,904 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)So I am not sure why you are saying "absolutely" here.
cali
(114,904 posts)Hillary hasn't defended Sanders against trump either and not only wouldn't I expect it in the context of the primary to date, I think it would be odd. How and when would one even raise the issue? It would be out of the blue.
I say absolutely because I know him.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)In the section where he talks about Trump, he could specifically make a point of saying that the comments Trump has made about Hillary have been over the line and/or inappropriate.
To my ear, it seems like Bernie, at his most recent rallies, has spent more time on the going after Hillary section than the going after Trump section. Certainly the former seems to get a stronger crowd response than the latter. That's why I don't think he would absolutely defend her against his attacks. Maybe a quick dismissive remark and then pivot to what he wants to talk about.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
cali
(114,904 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)That is certainly possible. I will try to watch a recent Bernie speech as objectively as I can and see if I can catch myself from misrepresenting anything based on any conscious or subconscious bias. I hope that isn't the case, but you might be right.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)"To my ear, it seems like Bernie, at his most recent rallies, has spent more time on the going after Hillary section than the going after Trump section. Certainly the former seems to get a stronger crowd response than the latter."
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I was responding to the claim that Sanders would absolutely defend Hillary against Trump's attacks. I don't know that I would assert that so confidently.
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)pandr32
(11,574 posts)He is not going to be the nominee, and if he engaged in any smearing of Hillary at all with Trump he will ostracize himself in the Senate when he returns. He has already crossed his own line that he drew in the beginning of his campaign due to his zeal to win. His attacks against her have hurt his credibility. He will be returning to the Senate already on thin ice, and his colleagues will be paying attention to how he behaves from now on.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)He just used us to get our money. He will hurt the party in this debate which excludes women.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)timmymoff
(1,947 posts)But I can positively say I wouldn't donate to the DNC. They've screwed shit up for to long to get anymore of my money.
840high
(17,196 posts)hell do you come up with this.
TheBlackAdder
(28,182 posts)Gothmog
(145,086 posts)barrow-wight
(744 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)insta8er
(960 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Will he disagree with any criticism from the moderators or Trump?
cali
(114,904 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Wax endlessly on how wonderful she is?
Do you realize the absurdity of what you are suggesting?
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Wow. You are hopelessly naive as to the machinations of the political world
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)He will not defend her. I guess we are hopelessly naive.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Naive
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
NowSam This message was self-deleted by its author.
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Lack of class is appalling
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Or should we just consider this talking out of your ass?
Response to Matt_in_STL (Reply #15)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)And this debate is slated for Fox. So yes there is proof. Weaver admitted it.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)I get it. I understand your lies. You learn it from you queen.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)You asked if there was proof of coordination. I proved that there was. I never said anything about him getting paid from Fox, though I'm sure he'll use the opportunity to fundraise.
And it is no lie that money he raised has gone to family. http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/01/bernie-sanders-family-money
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)It was alleged Fox News is paying Bernie. I asked for proof of this coordination.
There, now you are caught up.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)yodermon
(6,143 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Who are unquestionably economic progressives are attacking him on his credibility on that in a way that Clinton is unable to do because of her own complicity with Wall Street.
Here is the territory Trump is staking out.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/trump-gop-workers-party-223598
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)We need Bernie.
cali
(114,904 posts)anything beyond scorn.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)vintx
(1,748 posts)Buddyblazon
(3,014 posts)Or is this your own conspiracy theory?
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)To the office of the DNC chair.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)He agrees with Bernie strangely enough.
barrow-wight
(744 posts)The Right has spent years nurturing conservative spin sources like Fox and claiming that the "msm" are rife with progressive spin. When people on this site start holding them up as a source for truth in the face of the rest of the media, they're simply emboldening the superiority of Right Wing positions and spin. It's so disappointing to me that Bernie has become worth aligning with the Right in this way. It's all horseshoe theory, though I'm starting to think even the horseshoe doesn't describe how close these extremes actually touch.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Now if I could only find my shoes...
barrow-wight
(744 posts)Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)To 341 posts in 9 days. You must have just been holding it all back.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)barrow-wight
(744 posts)I couldn't see the point of actually posting till o got offered money to.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)barrow-wight
(744 posts)Hey get it right. I'm a troll not a sock.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)Just because you registered recently doesn't mean you're automatically wrong. I too am amazed at the right wing sources currently being used on this site. The Daily Caller (Tucker fucking Carlson) The Washington times (Sun Myung Moon), Fox, The Blaze and Breitbart News!!!! Breitbart!!! I can't wait for this primary to be over.
It's unbelievable. And the justifications are even more so. One Fox post was prefaced on how the reporter had donated part of her liver, or was it kidney. Maybe it was the skin off her nose. I can't remember but in any event it had nothing to do with her integrity as a journalist.
And as for longevity here, that's even weirder. It's like people think folks don't have political opinions till they sign up.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)If you look at the profiles of the most strident, many of them joined up recently. Like April or May. AgaIn, that doesn't make them wrong, just new.
barrow-wight
(744 posts)It doesn't bother me. I love that they think I'm a Brock troll because, in the story they've concocted in their minds, I'm making money doing this and they're just sitting there having to shill their candidate for free. Whether the story's true or not, it still burns.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Someone is actually paying for this nonsense?
jillan
(39,451 posts)It seems that some of you have no filter and just post any thoughts that cross your mind.
still_one
(92,117 posts)floriduck
(2,262 posts)Vinca
(50,258 posts)If he could pull off a major smack down it would send a clear message that Hillary is the wrong candidate to run in this year's general election.
Which of course terrifies the HRC tribe
MariaThinks
(2,495 posts)Hekate
(90,633 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
On Thu May 26, 2016, 11:44 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Bernie agreed to appear on Fox News to coordinate attacks against Hillary with Fox and Trump
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512058046
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
unsubstantiated flame bait
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu May 26, 2016, 11:50 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If all speculation were banned, DU would be a very small site.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Why FOX? A lot of us have wondered. Let this one ride.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: nah
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's an opinion; because many on this board won't agree with it doesn't mean the poster has no right to post it. No swearing, name calling or calling out anyone else. Leave it alone.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: violation of TOS
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)I try hard not to personally attack. If unsubstantiated flame bait was banned this place would be boring.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Not Devolve into a Hillary bash fest is out of their mind.
Fortunately Trump has no intention of doing this.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...expose Trump supporters to a new set of plans and ideas???
arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's a damn shame. Maybe I just imagined you had credibility
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)They're not all going to be gems.
vintx
(1,748 posts)It's one thing seeing batshit posts from obvious trolls... when it's longtime DUers who seemed reasonable before it just makes you sad.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)vintx
(1,748 posts)I'd use 'i don't drink with you'
amborin
(16,631 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)when everyday here they are posting all kinds of accusations against Hillary without any proof whatsoever.
You guys can sure dish it out by the ton, but can't take any of it.
emulatorloo
(44,109 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)imagine2015
(2,054 posts)tonyt53
(5,737 posts)He seems to like to hear himself talk.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)Actor
(626 posts)Bernie would do the debate so he could expose Trump for the horrible person he is.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)What happens when Trump attacks Hillary?
a) Agree
b) Pile on
c) Say nothing
d) Counter it and undermine his campaign
Which do you think it would be?
Actor
(626 posts)and I work to elect them.
Some are more left than others, sure.
I think any person from the right is destructive and to be opposed.
Bernie and Hillary are both to be supported and Trump is to be opposed as if life itself depended on it.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)I think I'm gonna trash all these 'debate' threads unless something of substance surfaces.
Bill USA
(6,436 posts)Bill USA
(6,436 posts)jpmonk91
(290 posts)You would have to be an idiot to believe that Bernie is teaming up with trump.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)What does Bernie do when Trump attacks Hillary in the debate?
a) Agree
b) Pile on
c) Say nothing
d) Counter it and undermine his campaign
Which do you think it would be?
jpmonk91
(290 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)jpmonk91
(290 posts)When you bring up a serious issue
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Saviolo
(3,280 posts)As he did in the earlier primary debates when people brought up Hillary's emails, and he said, "Let's not talk about that, I'm sick of hearing about your emails!"
He doesn't care about that shit, he wants to pivot away from it and talk about the issues.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)But I don't think you're wrong.
Saviolo
(3,280 posts)Piling on is different from saying "Baiting me on Hillary is irrelevant, here's the issue we should be talking about."
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Always pick C.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)How can an opinion be a lie?
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Same shit-stirrer, different day.
TomJulie
(98 posts)I'm for Hillary, and believes Bernie should step aside for the sake of the Party. But, if some unexpected event happens and Bernie does end up with the nomination, I'll be a biggest Bernie fan you'll see. Until then, it's Hillary all the way.
Yesterday, I think it was, when coming home from work I had the radio on and during the top of the hour news was something about Biden getting into the race. WTF?? I have heard the scenario if Hillary gets indicted Biden will jump into the arena, before. I like Biden a LOT. He's smart and knows how the game is played. At this stage it's too late and it's just not his time.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
840high
(17,196 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Oh, wait, she's afraid to debate Bernie..
ecstatic
(32,679 posts)Neither option is good.
Number23
(24,544 posts)so that his ailing campaign could get a last, desperate dash of publicity or he's been duped by Donald FUCKING Trump.
Like you said, neither option is good.
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.