2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRachel Maddow: early cross-party debates is a 'dramatic and creative proposal.'
In June 2015, Maddow was interviewing Bernie Sanders. She told him his idea of debates between Democratic and Republican candidates before the nominee is chosen is a 'dramatic and creative proposal:'
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sanders-i-want-to-debate-gopers-before-general-election-they-get-away-with-murder/
gordianot
(15,234 posts)Unless someone is being interviewed elsewhere.
JudyM
(29,201 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)makes no sense. It's like inviting candidates to debates after they drop out. Why not have Warren debate Trump instead? That wouldn't hurt as much as Sanders doing this to us.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...not a Trump-Sanders debate?
arcane1
(38,613 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)Trump has just won all the delegates he needs to be the GOPs nominee. The only reason he would meet Sanders is because he's the perfect patsy for everything that Republicans hate about Democrats. Sanders can't even handle the least little criticisms against him, and he constantly complains that Hillary is picking on him, so what's he going to do when Trump turns him into a punching bag... faint or bawl?
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...or the many opponents he's debated in Vermont.
procon
(15,805 posts)After Trump chews him to bits, I'm going with bawling Just like he's done in the past, if Sanders were to ever face Trump, he will cry that the debate was rigged, the questions were biased, the moderators were paid off, the broadcast station was bought, the audience was stuffed, and the polls were out to get him... therefore, he won. It's his whole MO.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...he's done for over 40 years.
procon
(15,805 posts)against him, I might very well pass out myself.