2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton's extraordinary defense for not speaking to Inspector General about her secret server:
Hillary Clinton broke her silence today about a State Department Inspector General's report that was critical of her use of private server and email address.
Clinton told news networks that the report created without her input after she and her State Department aides declined to be interviewed by the watchdog agency was insignificant and 'nothing has changed.'
More than 24 hours after the release of the damning report Clinton finally spoke to reporters, telling ABC News that she didn't speak to the IG because she had already testified before the Benghazi committee and she posted 'information' about the emails on her website.
Those moves, she suggested, should count.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3611682/Clinton-s-extraordinary-defense-not-speaking-Inspector-General-secret-server-look-website-wanted-spoke-Benghazi-committee-11-hours.html#ixzz49rfd6pm7
Well Alrighty then.
Well that settles that
I wonder if she'll telll the FBI that ?
The IOG is such a peon........ didn't he know that
the Senate does his job?............... Geez
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)Sorry, I already answered questions about a hit and run last month. That should be good. If you have questions about the bank, you can check my blog.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Affluenza............ so there!
Bob41213
(491 posts)xynthee
(477 posts)appalachiablue
(41,127 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Damn
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Where she said she wanted to avoid them going public. It might have happened last night but I heard it today. It didn't go well.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Senator Stevens went to jail for a Chair...Trafucant for a car rental...and Givernor Siegelman..even less.
This woman was Sec of State..with a "Foundation" that took in .....M I I L L I O N S....from foreigners who benefitted from Sec. of State decisions
It is so F.....n pathetic that we are debating how serious these offenses are ...and how willfully blind the populace is to the requisite purity ...being tossed out the window
lasttrip
(1,013 posts)Peace.
LT
yourpaljoey
(2,166 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Does all that lying count, too??
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)She never sought approval, even though she claimed her server and e-mail practices were approved....and because of that, her claims of everything being "above board" are nothing but lies.
The rules, in place when she took office, were pretty clear, according to the IG, so anything she says has to be in the context of specific and explicit rules , probably etched in stone tablets and delivered to her via certified mail and verifying her receipt with video recordings, forbidding her private server.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)to "I thought that I was fully complying with the rules"
I heard it on the news this morning. This, of course, conflicts with other parts of the report.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)PDittie
(8,322 posts)No, really. And if she did break the rules (or the law), she didn't mean to. But she didn't. Break the law. Or the rules, no matter what that mean old State Dept IG report said.
By the way, did you know that mortgage companies that defrauded both the borrowers and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are making the same excuse? So it turns out that we actually are prosecuting the people responsible for the 2008-09 Great Depression, but appeals court judges are overturning those convictions.
(This is how you know Clinton will skate, folks. It's all rigged. All of it. For them, and against us.)
bobthedrummer
(26,083 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)And her website doesn't mention she was running her e-mail through her unauthorized server when it makes the comparison of her actions and Powells.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Double plus Irony on that website thingy answer that uses a server vs written testimony.