Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NWCorona

(8,541 posts)
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:22 PM May 2016

Hillary Clinton Won’t Say How Much Goldman Sachs CEO Invested With Her Son-in-Law

"WHEN HILLARY CLINTON’S son-in-law sought funding for his new hedge fund in 2011, he found financial backing from one of the biggest names on Wall Street: Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein.

The fund, called Eaglevale Partners, was founded by Chelsea Clinton’s husband, Marc Mezvinsky, and two of his partners. Blankfein not only personally invested in the fund, but allowed his association with it to be used in the fund’s marketing.

The investment did not turn out to be savvy business decision. Earlier this month, Mezvinsky was forced to shutter one of the investment vehicles he launched under Eaglevale, called Eaglevale Hellenic Opportunity, after losing 90 percent of its money betting on the Greek recovery. The flagship Eaglevale fund has also lost money, according to the New York Times.

There has been minimal reporting on the Blankfein investment in Eaglevale Partners, which is a private fund that faces few disclosure requirements. At a campaign rally in downtown San Francisco on Thursday, I attempted to ask Hillary Clinton if she knew the amount that Blankfein invested in her son-in-law’s fund.

Watch the video:


After repeated attempts on the rope line, I asked the Clinton campaign traveling press secretary Nick Merrill, who said, “I don’t know, has it been reported?” and said he would get in touch with me over email. I sent the question but have not heard a response back.

The decision for Blankfein to invest in Hillary Clinton’s son-in-law’s company is just one of many ways Goldman Sachs has used its wealth to forge a tight bond with the Clinton family. The company paid Hillary Clinton $675,000 in personal speaking fees, paid Bill Clinton $1,550,000 in personal speaking fees, and donated between $250,000 and $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. At a time when Goldman Sachs directly lobbied Hillary Clinton’s State Department, the company routinely partnered with the Clinton Foundation for events, even convening a donor meeting for the foundation at the Goldman Sachs headquarters in Manhattan.

Clinton has dodged questions about her relationship with Goldman Sachs throughout the campaign."


https://theintercept.com/2016/05/27/hillary-clinton-wont-say-how-much-goldman-sachs-ceo-invested-with-her-son-in-law/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton Won’t Say How Much Goldman Sachs CEO Invested With Her Son-in-Law (Original Post) NWCorona May 2016 OP
it's not her business to say, it is the son-in-law's nt msongs May 2016 #1
Exactly- and people who hide their own tax returns arguing this? Nope. bettyellen May 2016 #6
Agreed. TwilightZone May 2016 #7
This people is what is important... mikeysnot May 2016 #2
My thoughts about the server are known but I actually agree with you. NWCorona May 2016 #3
Graft mikeysnot May 2016 #4
With real world implications. NWCorona May 2016 #5

mikeysnot

(4,756 posts)
2. This people is what is important...
Fri May 27, 2016, 04:37 PM
May 2016

not emails, not servers.... not Benghazi.... this should be her death knell but the r's will never call her on this since they ride that same gravy train of corruption.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Won’t Say...