2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary's ignorance of technology may be her achilles heel.
Since she obviously has no clue outside of pushing buttons on her blackberry. So when Hillary tries to do what she always does and talk around the elephant in the room, she isn't able to do it. She's good at obfuscation when asked about something she knows a lot about but not this.
Her contradictory answers and what appear to be outright lies regarding her emails are exposing her for what she really is.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)she does not understand to what extent things live on forever on the interwebs. Like her arrival that day in Bosnia, the one she seems to remember as involving sniper fire. Of other of the many lies she has told that are so easily refuted. She came of age in an era when researching such things was sufficiently tedious and time consuming, that it didn't usually get done. Now, a few key strokes and voila! What actually occurred is right there. But she still doesn't get it. She thinks that what she says must be true, and does not get it that her lies can be easily refuted.
Her appalling ignorance of technology is part and parcel of this.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)But wherever I worked, there was IT personnel who taught me how to separate professional from personal e-mail accounts and how to use web technology that would protect secure communications with my office when I was at home. I worked in the private sector.
I was nowhere near the level or near the need for security that Hillary was.
I am having difficulty believing that the two IT people who worked on her system, her server did not advise her on the importance of security measures.
Something does not make sense in the story we are getting on this.
She had two IT advisors as I now understand it. Security measures like multiple e-mail accounts were the norm.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)or she bullied them into setting up an unsecure server.
Sancho
(9,069 posts)As for the departments unclassified system, the inspector general's report demonstrates that it was horribly insecure, and that hackers obtained terabytes worth of documents out of it; on the other hand, Clintons email system was quite secure and, when evidence emerged that someone was trying to hack in, the security officer overseeing the server immediately shut it down, then notified the relevant officials at State. In other words, while boxcars of documents were digitally pulled out of the agency, there is no evidence a single email was snagged out of Clintons server. So it could be the Clinton arrangement didnt follow the security procedures laid out in the federal regulationsthe inspector general did not reach a conclusion as to whether it did or notbut, as often happens, private security contractors did a better job than the government.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)and clearly did not do that.
If our government technology is not secure, Congress need so do its job and provide the money to bring it up to date and make it secure.
The security issue is not the sole issue. Transparency in government is also important, and Hillary's e-mail system fails and failed there.
lmbradford
(517 posts)Go back and read what the testimony says. This report is based on what Hillary said BEFORE the IG report came out, as I understand it.
The timeline that a DUer put together makes it all very clear.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...
Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...
Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"
Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"
Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)trusted and that she worked so hard to avoid transparency. I wonder if she was trying to protect her e-mails so that they could not be used against her in her coming campaign for the presidency -- so that her mistakes as Secretary of State would not be so easily proved.
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)For the job since George Washington....he couldn't e-mail from a computer either so there is some similarity
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)tech shit. They are too busy living life.
840high
(17,196 posts)the Oval Office.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)athena
(4,187 posts)Posts like this make it clear that people who are against Hillary are against her for personal reasons. I don't support Sanders, yet I would not make such a hateful statement about his life and how he lives it.
No one makes statements like this about white male presidential candidates. It's only when we're talking about a minority candidate that people suddenly start having issues with the idea that a member of a minority might actually live in the White House as POTUS. It's such a strange thing to focus on. Once again, such statements reveal more about the speaker (or poster) than they do about Hillary Clinton.
Response to athena (Reply #53)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
athena
(4,187 posts)ridicule and personal attacks -- coming from Bernie supporters. Your post doesn't even make sense; yet it manages to be nasty. I suppose that's a sort of accomplishment.
Response to athena (Reply #66)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
840high
(17,196 posts)dare we vote for someone we believe in.
Response to 840high (Reply #70)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
840high
(17,196 posts)a candidate that can't beat Trump.
athena
(4,187 posts)Your nastiness says something about you -- it says nothing about those you are nasty to, nor about the candidate you clearly hate.
The lack of logic in your post is also delightful. You claim that I support a candidate who can't beat Trump, yet you support a candidate who can't even beat that candidate..
840high
(17,196 posts)my post. Debbie and DNC and the media have a lot to do with this election. Support who you want and I will do the same.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)Is the internet also a series of tubes?
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...in charge of the "geek tech shit" then she does not belong in high office.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Hahahahahahaha
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...as I am the person who posts opinions from this account.
Duh.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)how about someone who can listen to a person who is better at security? Why am I sure that this whole campaign is on a more secure server now, probably protected with the latest security and the blackberry is retired now.
If she were as careless with this campaign as she was as SOS, she would be sitting inher garden right now as all her secrets would be out.
geeks rule.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...you should at least know enough to listen to people who do. Fact is, she didn't and now she's having to answer questions about it. Questions like: Why did you listen to the experts about the geek tech shit?
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)Judgement - if you don't know something find someone who does. Dont try and run a home server if you are too cheap to have a qualified person keep the security up to date. And passwords are important.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...either learn it yourself or rely on someone who knows it. A president should be comfortable with the fact that they don't know everything...
Press Virginia
(2,329 posts)considering it was widely used when her husband was in office
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Good god, now I understand why you place such an odd demand for having "facts at your fingertips" --a completely redundant ability. Facts are now something that is at your fingertips, but off loaded into the cloud.
Remembering shit is not nearly as trustworthy since memory is unreliable.
We don't need a pre-internet dinosaur who can't use a computer.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Them on security.
I do not believe that Hillary's IT assistants were unaware of the security risks she was taking or that they failed to warn her to separate private and business e-mails.
She chose one account for a reason, and it was not covenience.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The jr. high kids with the glasses who couldn't get through a single day in 1973 without being subjected to a swirly or a melvin, now run the world.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)much harder than on a BB.
brush
(53,776 posts)and email and servers and all that in their work and home lives. And her, being a top manager, she always had executive assistants to take care of most of that for her.
I don't think she's lying, she's was just not entirely literate in computer tech, as were most of the rest of top officials.
Hell, the governments computers and systems when she was SOS were antiquated, years behind state of the art and training was just about non-existent.
I'm sure most of us have people in their family like that.
Same with Condoleeza Rice. She didn't even use email.
Kerry is the first SOS with a .gov email address, and he's the SOS now the first one.
840high
(17,196 posts)brush
(53,776 posts)familiar with computers?
840high
(17,196 posts)family is good with PC. My grandsons started at an early age and my daughter is a web developer.
brush
(53,776 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)are dead. I am 77.
leftinportland
(247 posts)learned to use a computer...no excuses
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)brush
(53,776 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)their experience is everyone's experience. I.e., "MY 90 year old mother ...", ""Everyone in MY family ...".
And, I woun't even get into wondering whether that is even true, or just serves their argument ... because that would lead me to ponder whether DU is, in fact, the epicenter of one-off genius.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)you don't have to know everything but you have to have good judgement in knowing when to listen to an expert. Or at least someone capable.
and you are wrong Colin Powell also had a gov e-mail account that he used for most e-mail and the handful he used his own account for were all printed out and in the hands of the state department before he left office.
brush
(53,776 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)I won't have time to check until tomorrow night, I will try and remember to look for it.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Who were responsible for making sure I understood how to securr business information that was confidential.
I do not believe that her I T assistants did not warn her about the importance of separate e-mail accounts and security. She had two I T employees part-time. She chose to do things the waybshe did.
ms liberty
(8,573 posts)She is a retired teacher who went back to college when her kids were in school and got her degree. Taught business and computers at the local high school. That excuse doesn't wash.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)People need to quit making excuses for her. They set up the private server so they could do State business with outsiders.
So much so that hackers were able to read all the communications. There are laws that prohibit that, and they knew it, but figured they wouldn't get caught.
Guess what: They got caught,
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)when she gets caught. The statement is inconsistent with her actions and is likely just part of her defense and PR.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)barrow-wight
(744 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)hollysmom
(5,946 posts)I was replaced by an H1B, my department was .
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,976 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)the Clinton's were quite adept with high tech when it comes to seizing a political opportunity,
and I seriously doubt they ever intended to lose that advantage.
GreatGazoo
(3,937 posts)that combines a time capsule of the 1992 election year with a peek into what is said "off camera"
I had nearly forgotten Larry Agran's campaign (17:30) and how he got arrested for trying to get out of the MSM's black out of him.
The Clinton stuff at 53:00 shows how they grabbed satellite feeds and used them to generate their own rapid response. Fascinating that they grabbed their opponents commercials when they were being fed to regional stations. In those days stuff was still on cartridges, so you had like 3/4" beta cassettes that were commercials and you had to load them physically into the players. So one way to get ads out to regional stations was to feed them to the local station via satellite and then the station would have someone dupe them off to the individual cartridges. So when they say the Clinton campaign could see their opponents ads up to 36 hours before they aired, that is how they did, by grabbing the satellite feed just like the producer of this documentary.
Reminded me of the Italian documentary "Videocracy" -- worth a watch if you like this subject.
ancianita
(36,053 posts)I'm with JD on this. She's pleading ignorance for cover. Not cool.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)Who really don't keep up with it to some degree or understand it themselves.
My 77 year old mother has a passing familiarity with technology to be sure, she worked with computers in the 80's and 90's and has had plenty of family deeply mired in it.
But she was amused when she was at a store recently and they were unable to finish out a purchase for her because it required an email address.
She's never, ever, had one. Her office work experience ended in the 90's before the company had an email at all because everything was done in person and it was just document management.
Just try to remember that people have a range of very different views on the situation with this.
Response to Blue_Adept (Reply #46)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Vinca
(50,269 posts)If the FBI was investigating me, I'd be wiping the computer clean with a dust cloth, too.
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)yourout
(7,527 posts)In my opinion.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... setting up servers to hide her many many many illegal activities ... and the next minute ... Berners claim she's ignorant of all things technical.
brush
(53,776 posts)She an evil technical genius, no wait, she's technically ignorant but still evil.
Response to JoePhilly (Reply #56)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Her actions were calculated, deliberate, and done with purpose.
Her ignorance, was being so damn arrogant that she actually thought that even if she did get caught, that she was so far above the law so it wouldn't matter.