Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:25 AM May 2016

Uh oh. Seems Bernie has quite a scandal on his hands with the collapse of Burlington College.

Check this out. Seems Bernie has quite problem on his hands. Tsk tsk tsk. Um, Bernie, pressuring a bank to give a loan on behalf of his wife? Did you do it Bernie? Ran a college into the ground and now it is closing. I'd imagine some folks in VT aren't too happy.

https://www.scribd.com/doc/313932605/Toensing-Letter-to-Senator-Sanders-Re-Burlington-College-Documents

By the way, where is Jane Sanders lately? Haven't seen her on the campaign trail much.


98 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Uh oh. Seems Bernie has quite a scandal on his hands with the collapse of Burlington College. (Original Post) RBInMaine May 2016 OP
This doesn't look good at all.... Cali_Democrat May 2016 #1
So a college that goes bankrupt SIX YEARS after she left is her fault. B Calm May 2016 #2
jane's financial mismanagement put burlington in jeopardy and why they bought her off to leave beachbum bob May 2016 #5
You do know the link above is to a Right-Wing discredited lawyer? Here is a B Calm May 2016 #14
So you agree Hillary hasn't committee any crimes over this email nonsense, right? RBInMaine May 2016 #27
So you admit that you didn't research the source? B Calm May 2016 #31
+1 Bohunk68 May 2016 #84
Why on earth would anyone agree to that? The investigation is not even finished. merrily May 2016 #54
I'm not talking about the link I am talking why jane sanders and bernie sanders refusing to answer beachbum bob May 2016 #42
So when are they arresting her? This is nothing but a manufactured decoy to Hillarys scandal. B Calm May 2016 #46
can you please link one time, just one will do dsc May 2016 #68
Thanks, B Calm. Duval May 2016 #78
Alert bait? left-of-center2012 May 2016 #15
They know better, this was all discredited yesterday. B Calm May 2016 #20
the link maybe an issue but the facts that Jane ran burlington college is still a fact and the fact beachbum bob May 2016 #49
How about "Washington Post"? yallerdawg May 2016 #80
Oh yes, and the endless Hillary Haters are perfect angels, right? RBInMaine May 2016 #24
You used to be quite the "Hillary Hater" yourself, as I recall. QC May 2016 #74
OMG, that is hilarious! THANK YOU, omg the hypocrisy!! B Calm May 2016 #85
Some people seem to think the Internet gets wiped clean every morning, QC May 2016 #86
Gotta Bookmark that post! I'm still LOL. B Calm May 2016 #87
There's some good stuff in the archives. QC May 2016 #97
LINK? merrily May 2016 #34
We need this resolved! Trump - just sayin'! yallerdawg May 2016 #83
THAT's your response to my asking someone for a link to support claims that merrily May 2016 #96
Link? B Calm May 2016 #43
Yes, because she was in charge when the financial mismanagement happened resulting in this. RBInMaine May 2016 #11
False. The board was in charge and the entire board approved the loan. Moreover, she left FIVE YEARS merrily May 2016 #36
Yes, since they directly cited debt from her loan/expansion as the reason they went under. CrowCityDem May 2016 #37
Grasping for a straw to deflect Hillary's weak on National Security scandal. You guys/gals B Calm May 2016 #41
BINGO! merrily May 2016 #47
Hillary's irrelevant to this topic. This is about Jane bankrupting a college. That's a big deal. CrowCityDem May 2016 #61
It's so obvious! Duval May 2016 #81
Same old deceit and slander from the OwlinAZ May 2016 #58
The college indicated in their press release that the loan she secured is the primary reason TwilightZone May 2016 #70
Link? B Calm May 2016 #71
can't be true . . . he walks on water . . . read it right here so it must be true DrDan May 2016 #3
LINK? If you are going to pull stuff out of your ear, at least make up something semi-plausible. merrily May 2016 #50
He is an honest man. OwlinAZ May 2016 #59
Personal server designed to evade FOI ....that is the topic this week, please keep up txbai MaeScott May 2016 #4
Right Demsrule86 May 2016 #6
Bullshit. 99Forever May 2016 #7
No, you're the bullshitter. IG report said little new, and she didn't ruin a college. RBInMaine May 2016 #9
More lying bullshit. 99Forever May 2016 #18
but shr did ruin a country or two n/t PaulaFarrell May 2016 #79
This message was self-deleted by its author TM99 May 2016 #95
Anyone who's ever cornered a rat recognizes this behavior... Yurovsky May 2016 #16
Yep. 99Forever May 2016 #19
The "clowns" are those who can't do math and spout insanity about "rigged" elections night and day. RBInMaine May 2016 #23
Keep digging... 99Forever May 2016 #30
The only hole is the hole Bernie is in both in votes and pledged delegates. And he won't get out. RBInMaine May 2016 #44
Cognitive dissonance is a thing. 99Forever May 2016 #51
I guess this is your new shtick since red baiting didn't work? hobbit709 May 2016 #8
I didn't "red bait." I said the R's would. Next, you have NO refutation, only an attack. Typical. RBInMaine May 2016 #10
Res ipsa loquitur hobbit709 May 2016 #25
Damning B Calm May 2016 #35
Let me explain the MEANING of what I have said with the "socialist" point: RBInMaine May 2016 #39
Backpedal, backpedal, backpedal. blackspade May 2016 #57
The Rs have been calling Obama a Communist for 8 years. They have neutered their attack words. Zen Democrat May 2016 #65
I like what you said in post 74, that was a real eye opener! B Calm May 2016 #93
lol vintx May 2016 #66
Six years later dude. Autumn May 2016 #12
This will get the FBI off Hillary !!!!!!! left-of-center2012 May 2016 #13
Oh Christ. Enough of this "FBI Is After Hillary" silly RIGHT WING bullshit. RBInMaine May 2016 #22
I thought the Justice Dept. is under the direction of the WH, so how did the RW start hobbit709 May 2016 #33
That the "FBI is AFTER Hillary" is not true and a right wing meme. Good grief. RBInMaine May 2016 #48
So why do YOU keep bringing it up? hobbit709 May 2016 #56
Fraud runs in the family. The perfect couple. n/t livetohike May 2016 #17
Yes it does. The Clinton family. 99Forever May 2016 #55
Genetic? Seriously? Bleacher Creature May 2016 #62
I appreciate your private emails asking saltpoint May 2016 #21
Reliably Spreading Establishment FUD - Meme 17 cantbeserious May 2016 #26
And who has been helping Trump by constantly parroting all the "Email!" bullshit? RBInMaine May 2016 #29
HRC IS To Blame For Her Email Problems - Not Trump - HRC Has Displayed Bad Judgment Her Whole Life cantbeserious May 2016 #32
Oh what ridiculous nonsense. "Goldwater girl"? My goodness. Please go back to your sandbox. RBInMaine May 2016 #45
Sunshine Is The Best Disinfectant - One Might Consider Trying It Someday cantbeserious May 2016 #53
The Sanders group here on DU snuck into saltpoint May 2016 #38
jane enid602 May 2016 #28
^^ mikeysnot May 2016 #40
. merrily May 2016 #52
If Bernie was nominated it would be hard for him to attack Trump University. Nye Bevan May 2016 #60
Trump would have fun using this if Sanders was the nominee Gothmog May 2016 #63
Bigger than lying about conducting state department business on an unsecured server? Doctor_J May 2016 #64
Did you pressure a bank? Eric J in MN May 2016 #67
The """""Honorable"""" Bernie Sanders forjusticethunders May 2016 #69
Wow this is serious workinclasszero May 2016 #72
where's all the Goldman-Sachs transcripts? HMMMM Bohunk68 May 2016 #89
No obligation to disclose those workinclasszero May 2016 #91
Uh oh. Tsk tsk tsk. Um...by the way... Miles Archer May 2016 #73
How 'bout full disclosure on Clinton & Sanders spouses left-of-center2012 May 2016 #75
.......... imari362 May 2016 #82
Ooooo! Scandal! Call the National Enquirer! (eom) HassleCat May 2016 #76
Only on DU. nt Live and Learn May 2016 #77
And the pressure the big banks for contribution no less. wow. nt LaydeeBug May 2016 #88
$225,00 per speech that we have not seen the transcripts of. Bohunk68 May 2016 #90
Look! A squirrel!!! cliffordu May 2016 #92
I can't believe she took $16.5M from a for-profit CanadaexPat May 2016 #94
No, he doesn't AgingAmerican May 2016 #98
 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
5. jane's financial mismanagement put burlington in jeopardy and why they bought her off to leave
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:35 AM
May 2016

of course....sanders campaign as burned thru millions with same mentality...btw where is jane? Uncomfortable with answering questions? Where are sanders tax returns? Tough to go at trump when you do the same

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
42. I'm not talking about the link I am talking why jane sanders and bernie sanders refusing to answer
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:10 AM
May 2016

questions about Jane's involvement in the financial mess at Burlington and why she were bought off to leave. There is NO question that Jane ran Burlington and her rule she put the college at risk with poor strategies. What are they hiding? Why is Jane hiding?

While we are talking about that, why haven't sanders released their tax returns, bernie been demanding trump to do it. SO what are they hiding?

For a campaign thats suppose to be transparency, open and honest, the sanders are hiding a lot... Its hard to demand virtue of others if you yourself wont do it. One reason I find the sanders to be fake

dsc

(52,160 posts)
68. can you please link one time, just one will do
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:24 AM
May 2016

where you made this complaint in a thread where Hillary was trashed by such a source. BTW you are right we shouldn't listen to right wing sources, I just am checking to see if you believe this all the time or only when it is Bernie being trashed by them.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
49. the link maybe an issue but the facts that Jane ran burlington college is still a fact and the fact
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:16 AM
May 2016

jane did things that put burlington college in financial difficulty is still a fact and the fact that Jand and Bernie refuse to talk about it is still a fact...


Transparency with the sanders??? Don't think so...he can set himself as the moral compass and he himself fails to live up to it. If there are simple answers why not give them. If jane's malfeasance caused the mess, take responsibility. If sanders tax returns are covering up something, take responsibility. You have no business proclaiming your infallibility while hiding and being silent

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
80. How about "Washington Post"?
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:39 PM
May 2016
The Daily 202: Failure of Burlington College is a big problem for Bernie and Jane Sanders

THE BIG IDEA: Burlington College is feeling the burn.

Bernie Sanders is huge on college campuses—or yuuuuge, as he likes to say—but the small private school in Vermont that his wife, Jane, ran for seven years announced yesterday that it will shutter because of “the crushing weight” of debt incurred under her leadership.

Burlington College said its financial troubles are connected to Mrs. Sanders’s 2010 purchase of 32 acres of lakefront property, part of a botched expansion plan. The college was placed on academic probation in 2014 by its accrediting agency and it faced cash flow problems due to the imminent loss of a line of credit, The Post’s Nick Anderson reports. To survive, the school has tried to sell land but it was not enough to remain solvent.

Jane Sanders was president from 2004 until 2011, when she stepped down amid an apparent dispute with the college’s board. She left with a $200,000 severance package.

First, Bernie and Jane were insufficiently vetted by the mainstream media. Many reporters have passed on writing up opposition research hits about the Vermont senator, or focusing on the problems at the college, because they did not believe he ever had any realistic chance of being the nominee. The Clintons, owing to their status as the front-runners and former occupants of the White House, have continued to command a more intense level of scrutiny.

Read the rest at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2016/05/17/daily-202-failure-of-burlington-college-is-a-big-problem-for-bernie-and-jane-sanders/573a388c981b92a22d837b46/?tid=hybrid_collaborative_1_na--

QC

(26,371 posts)
97. There's some good stuff in the archives.
Mon May 30, 2016, 01:30 AM
May 2016

Some of those who now believe that HRC is a goddess walking among us trashed her as bad as any freeper ever dreamed of just a few short years ago.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
96. THAT's your response to my asking someone for a link to support claims that
Mon May 30, 2016, 12:43 AM
May 2016

Last edited Mon May 30, 2016, 01:25 AM - Edit history (1)

Jane mismanaged the college and had to be bought off to leave?

By any remote chance, does ANYone at DU know how the real world operates?

Jane is an educator, not a financial person. She was hired as President of this college because she had done a good job as acting head of another Vermont college. The Catholic Church had to raise money fast to pay settlements of lawsuits from abuse victims. It put a chunk of land up for sale for a great price and offered to take back part of the mortgage. One source speculates that it was even zero interest for the first two years. A board of directors of Jane's college of about 14 members, including financial experts, approved a property acquisition on what seem to have been great terms because they thought the extra land would attract more students. There is no way in hell this was Jane's call and not the call of the entire board.

Is there ANY indication that this was even her idea as opposed to an offer the Catholic Church brought to the college, or something another board member raised? Even if it was her idea when she saw the property for sale, so what? Many colleges have done the same, for the same reasons. As President at the time, Jane, OF COURSE, would have been the one to implement it, to get a loan, to sign papers, but the call was that of the board of directors. She is getting scapegoated solely because her husband is in public life.


A President of a PRIVATE college got a one time severance package of $200,000 in 2011? Is that what you need resolved? What's to resolve? Presidents of colleges who leave get severance packages all the time. Often, it's negotiated when they're being hired or when they are leaving. Here's one, a former state senator, who, in 2003, got a million dollar package from a PUBLIC university who had to leave his post because he refused to cooperate with a federal investigation trying to find his gang boss murdering brother, who was literally Public Enemy No. 1 until Ben Laden knocked him out of the No.1 spot. http://articles.latimes.com/2003/aug/07/nation/na-bulger7

Jane left the college ONE year after the loan was taken. Contrary to the post for which I requested a link, NO ONE knows why she left. In 2014, three years after Jane left, the accreditation people put the college on a two year watch. The person who was President in 2015 was forced to resign by student protests. We don't seem to know why because hit pieces on Jane don't mention that. One year later, five years after Jane left, the college is down 75 students and THAT's also her fault? How? What was the board of directors doing about paying the loan (or selling the property sooner) or raising enrollment during the five years just before it closed?

But all this was already discussed on DU.


Meanwhile, six years after the loan was made and five years after Jane left the college, a GOP state official alleges that some anonymous person told him that Sanders told the person handling the loan to get the loan done? OMIGOD. Sanders told a loan officer to do his job. Someone get me smelling salts STAT!

Not a single allegation that the board did not approve the acquisition or the loan. Not a single allegation that either of the Sanders profited personally from this. Not a single allegation that Sanders got better terms for the college from the bank because his wife was there. Not a single allegation that a crime was committed.

Shall we discuss every thing Dick Morris alleged about Hillary, too?

Sorry, exactly what is it you think you need resolved again? And why?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
36. False. The board was in charge and the entire board approved the loan. Moreover, she left FIVE YEARS
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:04 AM
May 2016

before the college went out of business. As far as Bernie allegedly pressuring the bank, the allegation from a GOP Vermont state official is that Bernie told someone to (gasp) get the loan done.

Are you prepared to defend Hillary against accusations from every minor state GOP official?

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
41. Grasping for a straw to deflect Hillary's weak on National Security scandal. You guys/gals
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:09 AM
May 2016

are so transparent on what you are doing.

 

CrowCityDem

(2,348 posts)
61. Hillary's irrelevant to this topic. This is about Jane bankrupting a college. That's a big deal.
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:41 AM
May 2016

TwilightZone

(25,469 posts)
70. The college indicated in their press release that the loan she secured is the primary reason
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:54 AM
May 2016

Try to keep up.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
50. LINK? If you are going to pull stuff out of your ear, at least make up something semi-plausible.
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:16 AM
May 2016
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
9. No, you're the bullshitter. IG report said little new, and she didn't ruin a college.
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:39 AM
May 2016

The IG reported "systemic" problems that went on for years across administrations. Try actually reading the report.

Jane Sanders, possibly with Bernie's help, ruined a college. No comparison.

Response to RBInMaine (Reply #9)

Yurovsky

(2,064 posts)
16. Anyone who's ever cornered a rat recognizes this behavior...
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:43 AM
May 2016

I imagine our "friends" in the corporate wing of the Party will soon be informing us that it was Bernie on the grassy knoll in Dallas and Bernie, not Bruno Hauptmanm, who kidnapped the Lindbergh baby...

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
23. The "clowns" are those who can't do math and spout insanity about "rigged" elections night and day.
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:54 AM
May 2016
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
44. The only hole is the hole Bernie is in both in votes and pledged delegates. And he won't get out.
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:12 AM
May 2016

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
51. Cognitive dissonance is a thing.
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:16 AM
May 2016

Not a good thing, but a thing.

Leave it to Hillary to snatch complete and utter defeat and total humiliation out of the jaws of an easy victory. WTG, HRH.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
10. I didn't "red bait." I said the R's would. Next, you have NO refutation, only an attack. Typical.
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:40 AM
May 2016

Try reading the letter in the link. Try researching something. Try "Berning" a calorie or two.

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
39. Let me explain the MEANING of what I have said with the "socialist" point:
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:06 AM
May 2016

As a self-declared "socialist" Bernie has placed himself so far to the left on the political spectrum that the R's, in a GE, will SLAM him ENDLESSLY calling him not just a socialist but a COMMMUNIST.

The general population simply does not want a "socialist" president. They simply won't accept it. We are not a European socialist country.

Now those are just plain facts. That isn't "red baiting." That is just political reality in the United States.

The fact is Bernie WOULD be "red baited" by the R's BIGTIME in a general election, which makes him un-electable.

And if you also have read my messages, I have said time and again that I AGREE with Bernie's goals on most issues and many of his sentiments around the need for political and economic reform.

Now, do you get it?

And do you actually think the R's won't tear Bernie to shreds over this?

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
33. I thought the Justice Dept. is under the direction of the WH, so how did the RW start
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:01 AM
May 2016

an FBI investigation?

 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
48. That the "FBI is AFTER Hillary" is not true and a right wing meme. Good grief.
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:16 AM
May 2016

Sorry, but your silly corporate media BERNED OUT email NON-SCANDAL is load of pathetic horseshit.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
56. So why do YOU keep bringing it up?
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:20 AM
May 2016

You keep bringing up crap and trying to deny you are doing so just to keep stirring.
You've done more to bring up these attacks than any "supporter" you claim to be would be doing.

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
21. I appreciate your private emails asking
Sun May 29, 2016, 08:50 AM
May 2016

for more video footage of hippo attacks.

Pleased to accommodate your request.



Pumpkins, no less!

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
32. HRC IS To Blame For Her Email Problems - Not Trump - HRC Has Displayed Bad Judgment Her Whole Life
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:00 AM
May 2016

What more could one expect from a Goldwater Girl - Once a conservative - Always a conservative.

saltpoint

(50,986 posts)
38. The Sanders group here on DU snuck into
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:05 AM
May 2016

Hillary's office at State and reconfigured her system to create the email problem later in advance of the primary season.

It was really fun. We bought dark clothes and ski masks and everything.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
60. If Bernie was nominated it would be hard for him to attack Trump University.
Sun May 29, 2016, 09:33 AM
May 2016

Trump would be all over the Burlington collapse and Jill's $200,000 severance package.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
67. Did you pressure a bank?
Sun May 29, 2016, 10:23 AM
May 2016

Probably not, but someone could accuse you of pressuring a bank without evidence.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
91. No obligation to disclose those
Sun May 29, 2016, 04:00 PM
May 2016

Tax returns and running a college into the ground is a whole nother ballgame.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
73. Uh oh. Tsk tsk tsk. Um...by the way...
Sun May 29, 2016, 11:24 AM
May 2016

...thank Christ for DU's "Ignore" feature.

Well, Christ and the DU admins.

But mostly thank Christ.

Bye now.

Bohunk68

(1,364 posts)
90. $225,00 per speech that we have not seen the transcripts of.
Sun May 29, 2016, 03:57 PM
May 2016

Course, those weren't contributions, were they?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Uh oh. Seems Bernie has ...