Clinton Surrogates Attack Sanders' Wife

[Jester Messiah]

It’s amazing that for months and months the Hillary Clinton campaign and her followers scream “sexist” at every negative comment even ones on her policies, and then in one night can shatter that whole narrative as well as the one of the “Bernie Bro” by attacking Jane Sanders looks, her appearance, the kind of clothes she wears, or her weight.

Keep it up, Hillarites. You're making yourselves look just so, so good.

https://pivotamerica.com/ironically-jane-sanders-attacked-hillary-supporters-manner-sexist-comments/

[cantbeserious]

1. When This Is All Over - We Will Know The Enemy More Clearly Than Ever Before

eom

[Thinkingabout]

2. I am more interested in the events around the Burlington College finanical problems

This does not havev anything to do whether the person is male or female.

[Jester Messiah]

15. Are you? Or are you just using that as an excuse to attack Jane?

Any pretext to take a swing at her, even though she's not the one running.

[Armstead]

68. I'm sure you reallllly care about some little college in Vermont

[hrmjustin]

3. A few people on twitter do not represent Clinton supporters.

Jane Sanders is a very likable person and was a great asset to his campaign.

The college story has sidelined her for now but she certainly helped his campaign.

[Live and Learn]

6. Funny, it seems every person on Twitter that speaks ill of Hillary represent Bernie supporters

to some on DU.

[leftinportland]

13. True and do not represent Sanders supporters either...

sure would not know that by the Twitters...shame on those conducting the personal attacks, shows they are nothing.

[AgingAmerican]

22. Yet her supporters constantly link to tweets from supposed Hillary supporters as 'proof'

in their kooky attack OPs.

[hrmjustin]

24. Oh?

[AgingAmerican]

25. Yeah, oh...

[hrmjustin]

26. Oh.

[AgingAmerican]

27. Here is a juicy one for ya

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1968722

[hrmjustin]

28. What about it?

[Armstead]

69. YOU ARE GODDAMN RIGHT!

Just as some assholes who support Sanders do not represent Sanders or the vast majority of his supporters.

I hope that sinks in to people.

[beachbumbob]

4. I'm saying about Jane sanders is about what she did to burlington

College and why she won't answer questions...and why is she hiding...and what are the true reasons the sanders are refusing to release their taxes and been lying and giving excuses for months....nothing to do about her looks...or wears..

Seems like the virtual of truth is thing but....

[Live and Learn]

7. Answered long ago. Do some research. nt

[beachbumbob]

38. Then why is she hiding and not taking questions?

[Jester Messiah]

16. That's the excuse of the day

But some people will take any excuse to take a swing at a woman.

[oberliner]

5. Clinton surrogates?

Or just a bunch losers on reddit?

[Jester Messiah]

17. Take a look at the Latest Threads tab

And then tell me there's not a coordinated assault happening. I will laugh in your virtual face.

[oberliner]

56. I don't think there a coordinated assault happening

Laugh away.

[HassleCat]

8. Those people should love Trump, then.

His wife is hot, wears revealing clothes, or no clothes, watches her weight, and stays beautiful.

[Metric System]

9. One of the supposed Hillary supporters has "@HillarySuxNutz" as a Twitter handle. Judging by other

tweets that one is a ratfucker.

[TwilightZone]

12. Many, if not most, of them are clearly trolls.

Deductive reasoning is not the strong suit around here.

[Armstead]

70. But when obnoxious sanders supporters are singled out the idea they are trolls is dismissed

[TwilightZone]

73. If they were as blatantly obvious as some of these guys...

it shouldn't be too hard for you to identify and dismiss them as trolls. My point is that people like the OP and the source used couldn't even see the most obvious trolls (I mean, come on, "HillarySuxNutz"?) because they were too busy hyperventilating. Instead of taking absolutely everything at face value and posting this garbage as quickly as their fingers can copy and paste, apply some freaking common sense.

As for "both sides are bad", two wrongs don't make a right. "She did it first" is not a compelling argument.

[Armstead]

74. I saw that and brushed that one off...But I've seen enough otehr crap....

And I am not saying two wrong make a right. Wrong is wrong, no matter where it comes from.

What is also wrong is that one side has decided to tar a candidate and all of his supporters -- the vast majority of whom are just average well-behaved folks -- as some alien horde of barbarians.

[oldandhappy]

10. yes, very presidential!

[TwilightZone]

11. Oh, look. Obvious trolls.

Did you miss Hillary Clinton, "HillarySuxNutz"?

Hillary supporter, huh?

Sam Grady is libertarian, a Pat Buchanan fan, and posted "SHAME on Hillary Clinton for continuing to run for president when people don't want her to!!"

That took me two minutes.

You guys are hilarious. Try some critical thinking and deductive reasoning once in a while.

[felix_numinous]

14. How very feminist of them

they wouldn't know one if they saw one.

[AgingAmerican]

18. Their OPs lately are more and more desperate

And bullshitty. I think they are worried Hillary will have to drop out, and Sanders might become the defacto nominee.

They would rather see Trump than Sanders.

[Lizzie Poppet]

19. They can attack Jane all they like.

She's still be a remarkably accomplished, gracious woman, and they'll still be vermin.

[Jester Messiah]

29. Amen to that. n/t

[NCTraveler]

20. The Twitter. Nt

[Sky Masterson]

21. Hillarybros

All of them. All are sexist frat boys in their 20's.
Every.Single.One!
All ages and Gender identifications are sexist frat boys.

[B Calm]

23. LOL

[mac56]

55. ---

[KingFlorez]

30. No one really cares about her

I've heard no Clinton surrogate attack her. Although people at that college she sunk might be concerned with her, but not for good reasons...

[Jester Messiah]

31. Do you even realize that you're talking about a person?

"Less than nothing," really? Ye gods, what kind of monster talks like that?

[KingFlorez]

34. Monster? Wow

That's pretty strong. Anyone who dismissing the votes of an entire region doesn't get much respect from me. "Nothing" is a fairly tame expression.

[NWCorona]

44. It's not tame at all.

[senz]

35. We see them clearly now.

[B Calm]

36. That's pretty low, wow how hateful, almost republican like.

[KingFlorez]

39. It really isn't that serious

[B Calm]

40. Seriously, that was pretty bad. You should self delete.

[KingFlorez]

41. Are you a moderator?

I'm sorry, I didn't realize you were in charge. Stop being overly sensitive.

[Jester Messiah]

46. Chicks, right?

[KingFlorez]

48. That's your thinking, not mine

[Jester Messiah]

49. I doubt it.

And yeah, I'm mad. People of conscience get that way sometimes.

[B Calm]

50. No, just a concerned DUer.

[Cobalt Violet]

45. That what I thought.

They may as well stop pretending.

[NWCorona]

47. To say that someone is less than nothing. I've heard that kind of talk before... Terrible

[B Calm]

59. Pretty strong attack and rude as hell. She is somebody's wife and he loves her.

[NWCorona]

42. "less than nothing" that says a lot.

[Armstead]

71. You're really doing a good job at helping to ensure a Clinton victory in November

not

[Metric System]

32. How are random people on Twitter "surrogates"?

[Number23]

61. I was just about to ask that exact same question and then lost all interest entirely

Thanks for asking for me. Let me know if you get an answer.

[wildeyed]

64. Yeah, because @hillaryclintonsuxnuts is her surrogate!

Brock alert, woot-woot!

OMG, what a bunch of nasty clickbait. A bunch of the other tweets are from obvious libertarians, too. Even a cursory glance reveals an inordinate amount of interest in Gary Johnson and Ron Paul.

[Number23]

65. Meeeeeanwhile, the Wyoming Dem party is praying to whatever God will listen that Sanders supporters

ACTUAL real life ones, don't do the same thing in Wyoming that they did in Nevada. Which is kind of a moot point anyway because the Wyoming folks have already received love letters from Sanders supporters.

The problem is that Sanders defeated Clinton in the state's April 9 Democratic caucuses by 56 percent to 44 percent, but each candidate was allocated seven delegates — an outcome that deeply frustrated the Vermont senator’s supporters. Since the state’s four superdelegates all back Clinton, Sanders actually suffered a net delegate loss out of Wyoming, despite comfortably winning the popular vote.

In the aftermath, top Wyoming Democratic officials, especially those publicly backing Clinton, reported receiving angry calls, letters and threats.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/05/democrats-wyoming-bernie-sanders-revolt-223668

It never ends. But yes, let us all pretend that @IHateHillary381 on Twitter is the one we should really be worried about.

[wildeyed]

66. And I don't blame them for being frustrated over WY.

Wyoming has a needlessly complex system. BUT it was that way long before Sanders came along, and if Clinton had won by that much, the same thing would happen. There is nothing that can be done about it now. Making nasty calls or raising chairs over your head isn't going to change the outcome.

The thing that was infuriating about NV was that the delegate totals reflected the actual popular vote totals, so I could not figure out what they were so mad about.

[Armstead]

72. Same way random "Berniebros" have been portrayed as surrogates

Every asshole who attacks Cklinton in a vicious and out of bounds way is trotted out here and used as an example of what a horrible man Sanders is and how those of us who support him are terrible people.

Sauce for the goose....

[dlwickham]

78. because bern bros say they are?

[B Calm]

33. Now Now the Clinton campaign is the only ones allowed to use the woman card.

[left-of-center2012]

37. Is this their outreach to Sanders supporters?

[Cobalt Violet]

43. they are nothing more than bullies.

[Tarc]

51. I have never made a statement against Jane Sanders' physical appearance

I have commented on several occasions that she has a Palin-esque level of contrived ignorance when speaking about the issues; she tries to strike that I'm-one-of-you down-homey-folksy images, and it flops miserably. I think she's a poor voice on the Sanders campaign trail, and am not at all surprised that she's been benched from the talk show circuit lately.

Her looks do not come into the equation.

[WhiteTara]

52. Bankrupting a college to give her kids money

isn't sexist, it's just wrong.

[Demsrule86]

53. I have never seen a post like that here.

So where are those posts from? Are the even real? Jane has issues with her college thing...but that is possibly fraud ...nothing to do with that...I have seen posts like that directed at Bill Clinton thought. This is a Bernie site...anyway. It is very sad that Bernie won't get out and stop the crap.

[MFM008]

54. ENEMY= TRUMP

NOT Clinton
NOT Sanders (either)
NOT the democratic party
NOT Sanders supporters
NOT Clinton supporters
DONALD J TRUMP.

[JoePhilly]

57. Let's talk about Bill's weewee more!!!!!

Did you miss all the DU Sanders supporters obsessing over Bill's dick over the last few weeks?

[Jester Messiah]

60. Yeah, that excuses it.

Notwithstanding Bill willingly did what he did. Are you saying Jane was asking for it?

[TheSarcastinator]

62. are you referring to Bill Clinton's proven extended association

with a pimp of underage girls? Yeah, how dare we bring it up. Spot on mate: no flies on you.

[Duval]

79. Bill who? And who listens to that crap? nt

[Dem2]

58. Rather ironic I think

Burn Bill at the stake, lay off the loquacious Sanders wife.

[wildeyed]

63. No they didn't.

Those are Twitter trolls. Most are not even real supporters.

One goes by the handle @hillaryclintonsuxnuts so pretty sure that is not a supporter.

@samgrady mostly tweets about Gary Johnson, so pretty sure that is not a supporter.

@antistatis1962 likes Ron Paul.

Also ironic that Pivot America, the blog making the attack, couldn't find a single female candidate to support.

[AgingAmerican]

67. They are bottom feeders

Like Limbaugh

[RandySF]

77. But it's ok to call the other candidate's husband a rapist.

[SunSeeker]

80. This from the website that claimed "HILLARY FACING 1-10 YEARS; LIKELY TO BE INDICTED IN EARLY MAY"

https://pivotamerica.com/clinton-likely-be-indicted-by-may-for-breach-of-national-security-facing-1-to-10-years/

None of those tweets are from actual Clinton campaign surrogates. That website is full of bull puckey, to use Rachel Maddow's words.