2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Bernie was a Female
Imagine that. If a woman who had the same sensibilities as Bernie was running for president, wouldn't she have won already?
It is obvious a lot of the Hillary support is because of the glass ceiling. And I can't say I blame women for wanting to see a woman break that ceiling.
If Hillary had close to the same ideas and practices as Bernie, he probably wouldn't have even run, he'd be supporting her and this whole election kerfuffle would be all but over.
So, Ladies, might I suggest yall find and nurture a female candidate who is more like Bernie and primary him 4 years from now?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I hope Bernie runs an ad using your logic.
Maru Kitteh
(28,313 posts)Peacetrain
(22,872 posts)Imagine that. If a woman who had the same sensibilities as Bernie was running for president, wouldn't she have won already?
It is obvious a lot of the Hillary support is because of that glass ceiling. And I can't say I blame women for wanting to see a woman break that ceiling.
If only Hillary was close to the same practices as Bernie, he probably wouldn't have even run, he'd be supporting her and this whole election kerfuffle would be all but over.
So, Ladies, might I suggest yall find and nurture a female candidate who is more like Bernie to primary him 4 years from now?"
That is so dismissive .. . I voted Obama 8 years ago.. I am a woman..and now that have decided that I will back Hillary I am just voting to break a glass ceiling.. God give me strength
coco77
(1,327 posts)Most are voting for because she is a woman.
Peacetrain
(22,872 posts)She is the best in the race that we have now.. and I did not vote for Hillary last time because I thought Obama was the best for the times that were then.. so saying women are voting their ovaries is insulting.. demeaning.. and stupid.. and most women are not voting Hillary because she is a woman.. where do you get off with that crapola..
coco77
(1,327 posts)and many women are voting for her because she is a woman and the think it is her time. Before Hillary announced her candiacy I told some of my friends if i started hearing her use a being a woman or relating everything to women there would be a problem.
On one hand she wants to be looked at as an equal then when someone attacks her she plays the woman card which i knew the republiCONS would use against her.
Peacetrain
(22,872 posts)DO you stop and read stuff before you post.. and yes she needs to hit back if someone can only relate by demeaning her because she is a woman.. her skills less than.. throw everything you got at them when they do that..
She does NOT play the woman card.. she refuses to be demeaned as less than because she is a woman
Edit to add... this whole "womans card" meme is just a way to get out of being called to the floor for not letting someone get away with it..
Response to Peacetrain (Reply #74)
Post removed
Peacetrain
(22,872 posts)Your post.. 10:02 on May30, 2016
"Will she start crying..
once Trump begins his attacks. Yes I read my posts. She is not being demeaned because is a woman she is being attacked for what she does or does not do. You are proving my point every time someone says something about her she runs to the "Woman card." "
I also would like to add. In her stump speeches Hillary runs off her list of things she will do for women. I have four sons...and one daughter. What does she have for my sons????
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)That's all it is for many -- minority denial syndrome.
Otoh, anyone who degrades the principle of all men are created equal to the idea of playing a phony "woman card" may be revealing a contempt for the giant issue involved, like Trump.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Otherwise, why would you support Clinton?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)then you have no problem at all I dictate Sanders communist dictatorship, right?
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)And of course there is capital punishment, torture, healthcare without profiteers, expansion of social security, Medicare, and Medicaid, and living wage. So I don't see why you would support such a candidate and simultaneously deny tending toward conservative policies.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Did it pop out when you pulled the lever on your Smear-o-matic? If you can't rebut the point in my previous post, why not just drop it?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Now please self-delete.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I only keep you off my ignore list because you are so funny.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)If a female was trying to pull on the party the things Bernie is, she would be called all sorts of names associated with women who are not considered nice enough.
Warren was, at first, our best hope, but she was not up to the task.
Besides, Bernie has been called all kinds of names, so your argument is baseless and kinda dumb.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I don't understand why the Siren's song didn't lure her in.
Maybe she was tied to the mast... or maybe she put wax in her ears.
Surely it can't be that she doesn't want what others would lie, cheat and/or steal to hold as their own.
George II
(67,782 posts)...you're doubling down and and attacking Warren?
She is WELL "up to the task", she just isn't interested in running for President.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)You can bet the people he attracted had something to do with it.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)She didn't run for President but hopefully she will in 2020.
Elizabeth Warren.
LuvLoogie
(6,913 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Henhouse
(646 posts)JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)"emotional fairy tale"
A woman would never have made it or been invited into the party.
Oh, btw... gentleman, I will get right on that nurturing. Ya, I get it. Old, and I get it.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)This OP
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)But the GOP would attack that if Bernie had gotten the nom. If Hillary had had a child out of wedlock? She never would have even been allowed into college, let alone law school, etc.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Seems to be what is on our mind. Along with Sanders continue the play of the "man" card, running the show to fix all the wrongs these women, ... PP, Clinton, DWS are doing. They are lying, and stealing, and cheating.
Sanders needs to come to our rescue. Pick our VP, cabinet, adopt his policy. He needs to guide us and direct us.
So, do tell me what you have to say.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,729 posts)Buzz cook
(2,471 posts)Because a female Bernie would still be disorganized and ill prepared. Bernadette would also have come into the race very late and faced a well prepared organization that had been in place for 8 years.
Why primary Sanders? His time in harness gives him valuable seniority. Primary some of the blue dogs instead.
skylucy
(3,737 posts)Or maybe Robert Earl....If Bernie came close to the same ideas, practices and EXPERIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE as Hillary Clinton, he wouldn't be losing to her by three million votes. Reality Check RobertEarl.....Bernie lost to Hillary. He lost. She won. We don't have to "find and nurture a female candidate" in four years. We have a Democratic candidate right now who has soundly beat Bernie and is going to beat Mr. Trump in November. Unbelievable...If I didn't know better I would think your post was written by Trump. HILLARY 2016 HILLARY 2016 HILLARY 2016
lmbradford
(517 posts)I think she will be indicted for mishandling classified info at the least. I am exactly like Bernie policy wise but i have never run for office before and doubt id win in OK anyway.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Good grief.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Any other pronouncements you'd like to make at this time Federal Judge obamanut2012?
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)It is, at best, a departmental policy infraction. Even if the facts bore out what she has been falsely accused of, it would still e a civil matter. You do not indict over minor civil matters. You can fine or fire, but you don't indict or imprison.
It has nothing to do with judging what she did, it's a fact it isn't a criminal matter, thus not indictment. That is the law. That is legal procedure.
So:
right back at you.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)It has EVERYTHING to do with Federal Law, except up Denial River at Camp Weathervane among the starry-eyed True Believers.
lmbradford
(517 posts)You should put your ss# and bank acct# on an unsecure server and do not password protect it. Then leave that server in a public place where guards, maids, aides, and any vitors come and go.
Do you see now?
Secret agents names and secret military ops were on that server.
This is HUGE!
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)... we wimmin folk should "find and nurture" a candidate who is obnoxious, demeans the Party, whines incessantly about how long-standing primary rules should be changed to suit her, repeats the same speech she's been making for decades, can't get her colleagues to endorse her, knows nothing about foreign policy, and ultimately can't win the nomination?
Thanks, bit no thanks.
Henhouse
(646 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)I don't know exactly why it irritates me when the word female is used as a noun. It's like we're some weird species someone is doing some scientific research on. Something like that.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)It should be girls and/or women. That's why it rankles 0 it does me, too. It's dismissive f us as PEOPLE.
Ford F-150
(72 posts)Hillary does hit 5 out of 7 on your list...your almost there!
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)Hillary couldn't get her colleagues to endorse her? They have.
Hillary demeans the Party? When?
Hillary wanted primary rules changed to suit her? Which ones?
Ford F-150
(72 posts)But the other two I'll give her credit for.
Funny how you included the two that I gave her a pass on...
NanceGreggs
(27,813 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)peggysue2
(10,823 posts)Why couldn't we find a woman who was a poor-ass loser like Bernie Sanders?? Yup, that's not Hillary Clinton because she did lose in 2008 and was a class act at the same time.
So thanks but no thanks. We little ladies are perfectly happy with Hillary Clinton as she is. As opposed to Bernie in a skirt (or pant suit as the case may be).
Plus we love to be talked down to, makes our day. Pick that up from Bernie by any chance???
Tarc
(10,472 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Hard to believe the meanness exhibited by some in this thread.
The idea is that if Hillary had the same political leanings as Bernie, Bernie would have never run. But since they are miles apart, he did. And if Bernie was not a male, then many of those who so desire a woman president, would also be backing Bernie.
Simple truths meeting such resistance is weird. Kinda like what we see in Hillary backers who deny she's made a huge mistake getting caught messing with government email.
okasha
(11,573 posts)Have a hanky.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Their Heroine is about to bow out of the race and it will be a crushing blow to their sensibilities as the man left standing will be the one they have been smearing all this time.
We should stand ready to forgive them for they knew not what they were doing.
Of course they shall repent and become Berned or they may never show their monikers on DU again. When they do repent and asked to be forgiven, we Berners shall exude the greatest Love we can muster and allow them some space.
But the days ahead will be hard for them from the top down for their dream is crushed and put off until someone like Warren is able to take up their banner 4 or 8 years from now.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)Go to bed.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)It's a long way to sure. LOL!
okasha
(11,573 posts)and you expect ME to get you out?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Was once. But saw it was going to sink.
I am now sailing on the Good Ship Bernie. And what a fine voyage it is. Lots of really good people, in good spirits, except for that during that damned crooked NY primary. But we weathered that and now we are all so pleased to see the inevitable $$ Clinton going down, thanks to Obama and Kerry pulling the plug.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Awkward. That's gonna bern.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)REPLYING TO "YOURSELF"?!
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)I've read your post several times and still can't make sense of it. Ye gods.
But maybe I shouldn't worry my pretty little head about things reserved for menfolks, like politics.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,313 posts)Also: you seem to have dropped something?
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I'm shocked anyone would think she has an advantage because of her sex. That's not how it works in real life.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Society to go back to its default setting and realize that white dudes have ALL the skills.
obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Judge Judy would have a field day with that, and does, let alone the GOP admen.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)Hillary could have played dirty, and she didn't, and shame on those who say she has.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)adult. She was presidential. And still, Sanders whines, is picked on.... A conspiracy, I tell you.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)That is all too common. Sucks.
Tal Vez
(660 posts)Sanders seems to me another edition of the Democrats that I've been voting for since I became an adult. The problem right now is that even incremental changes are nearly impossible with a Republican Congress.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Do we vote for the same old, same old that got us into this mess, or vote for a leader who vows to change the course of history?
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Just 13% of the SC democrats actually voted in the primary. Thanks for reminding me.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I deleted it after a few days, just to let it sink in, first. Unlike some here I don't take pride in just making people go mad and act crazy.
I see it made quite the impression on you. What was there, something like 60 recs?
Now, back on topic. Would you vote for Bernie if Bernie was a female?
Demsrule86
(68,456 posts)Poor Bernie ...if only?
LexVegas
(6,030 posts)barrow-wight
(744 posts)uponit7771
(90,301 posts)pnwmom
(108,955 posts)Practically jumping out of her skin in the debates, trying to get the moderator to notice her while the other candidate was still talking?
Acting like there was only one right answer and she always had it?
Yelling "ARE YOU OR ARE YOU NOT .. .. . !" and then interrupting the answer to scream: "YES OR NO!!!" (like Bernie's behavior in the NY debate.)
No, Bernice wouldn't have had a chance.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)let alone taken seriously as a Presidential candidate. This is specifically something a lot of Clinton supporters have called out as bothering them and you're pretending it's working against him?
Oh, nevermind... just saw who posted this.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I have seen your name here before and remember that once in a while you post something worthy. Once in a while. But not this time.
I love your ""Ckintin supporters"", tho. LOL.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)I heard for years, when does this stop??
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)Yeah, I'm sure she'd do great. She'd win the Bernie coalition minus the angry white men who make up the majority of his voters? What could go wrong?
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Bernie has been winning the majority of younger female voters?
Interesting, isn't it? Check the CNN exit poll data to see for yourself.
Besides, like so many here have not cogitated, the only way I equated Bernie with Hillary and being female was if the female candidate was like Bernie in his politics.
Read it again. For the first time, apparently.
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)I'm glad the OP brought this topic up because it gives us a chance to envision the optics of what the woman equivalent to Bernie would be. That doesn't even begin to address his poor record of accomplishments, lack of ability to work with Dems or Republicans, inability to define his plans, harmful votes on immigration, the crime bill, guns, shipping of nuclear waste to poor communities and exploitation of the military industrial complex.
Or....
Still voting for Hillary.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Never Hillary. They will always believe a man is better. The stats always bear out. Thank god we don't need them.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)BainsBane
(53,012 posts)She wouldn't dream of running for president, not with that resume and poor record of achievement. I expect she wouldn't be in the Senate either. Women always have to be more qualified, and even when they are people hold it against them.
This article explains the phenomenon well. You need to read through to the end.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anna-kegler/hillary-clinton-and-the-opposite-of-imposter-syndrome_b_9553190.html
Sparkly
(24,149 posts)Bucky
(53,940 posts)now send your girl over here to come pick it up
still_one
(92,061 posts)demographics are voting for Bernie, but I won't
What makes this even more outrageous is the OP isn't even a woman, and yet presumes to speak for that experience.
Pretty arrogant, pretty presumptive, and pretty bigoted
Codeine
(25,586 posts)like a man afraid he won't be in charge.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)This takes the gender issue off the table. Cannot vote for HRC and cannot vote for Trump. Stein has some very good proposals.
"May your choices reflect your hopes, not your fears." -Nelson Mandela
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Except in 2004 when working late kept me from getting to the polls in time to vote.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)MyNameGoesHere
(7,638 posts)"Bernice" would have better hair?
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)obamanut2012
(26,046 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Would have made no difference. It's the populist aspect they disagree with because it empowers that group of people at the bottom of the ladder that the establishment considers "undesirables", or "super predators" and the like, who they feel are best relegated to either volunteer military service, or filling a cell in one of their for-profit prisons.
Spazito
(50,151 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)Meh, nothing would have changed. Hillary would still be on her way to the nomination.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)policies, record of bad decisions and flip flops, and the fbi circling overhead, that person would have no chance at the nomination, let alone the white house. I'm also fine with people voting for Clinton because of her gender; I do wish they would stop denying that it's true.
murielm99
(30,717 posts)had behaved like Bernie, she would have lost by now, like Bernie.
We don't want a Bernie, male or female. The votes and delegate count prove it.
dsc
(52,152 posts)so many of them have been nominated by the major parties. I can't remember the last time we nominated a male. No wait, I can it was 2012 and before that 2008, and before that 2004, and so on.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)It's better to not go there.
lmbradford
(517 posts)Cant tell you how many times i have asked for a discussion about policies that Hillary supports. Im still waiting.
Plus Bernie is not perfect, but he at least has integrity, which is NOT a gender issue.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)If Hillary had as much integrity as Bernie, Bernie would not have challenged her.
I notice all the nasty personal comments from the Hillary campers. All nearly devoid of any political differences, which is about par for the course from them.
lmbradford
(517 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)You're not one of those, are you?
valerief
(53,235 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)Or do you think that we can't support ourselves and have a fulfilling and productive life without a man in our lives?
Chauvinist much?
LuvLoogie
(6,913 posts)cynatnite
(31,011 posts)That we're so stupid and ignorant that we think with our female anatomy?
What does that say about black voters who voted for Obama?
What about white males who voted for Bernie? Are they thinking with their dicks?
This is an offensive post.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I wish the front runner had the same politics as Bernie.
And that a lot of opposition to Bernie is because he is a male.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Let me count the ways your obtuse postings on this subject fails.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)But yeah, like I said, if Hillary had the same politics as Bernie, everyone would be happy to vote for her.
Viewing the nasty replies to me, nearly all devoid of the main topic, makes me think there is some deep-rooted misandry run amok.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)Why do you think there are so many nasty replies? Your argument is complete idiocy.
Men and women both have chosen Hillary over Bernie for their own reasons. To assume it's because it's some sort of man-hate towards Bernie is just ludicrous.
Your reaching for the idiotic because you can't comprehend why someone would choose her over your guy.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I can't comprehend how any forward thinking person could pick H over Bernie.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)Can't we just agree that Elizabeth Warren would have easily won this nomination if she had run?
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...would be a very different one.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)I have to log off to see all the abuse I am getting for mentioning the unmentionable!
Bwahahahaha