Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
Sun May 29, 2016, 04:22 PM May 2016

The new anti-Sanders ads are funded by anti-Clinton donors.

And judging by DU, they're having the desired effect. People are swallowing them, hook, line, and sinker.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/esa-fund-anti-sanders-super-pac_us_56ae76cae4b0010e80ea89fa

About a week ago, a super PAC bankrolled by a wealthy conservative donor announced that it would run an ad attacking Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for being too far along the ideological spectrum. The group, called ESA Fund, was reportedly backed by $600,000 in spending from TD Ameritrade executive Joe Ricketts. And its ad went after Sanders for supporting things like free college tuition, Medicare for all and tax hikes on the super rich.

Something was obviously suspicious. The strategy reeked of an attempt by conservatives to actually bolster Sanders in a Democratic primary under the guise of an assault. The method has worked before — famously deployed by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) in her Senate campaign to bolster her most conservative opponent in the Republican primary, Todd Akin.

ESA Fund pled ignorance, insisting that the spot was merely in response to Sanders’ strong positioning in the polls. And Sanders, as was certainly his right (really, it would have been malpractice for him not to) proudly noted that Wall Street interests were going after him.

On Sunday, however, more evidence emerged that ESA Fund is, indeed, trying to prop up Sanders as a means of taking Clinton down. In the group’s filing with the Federal Election Commission, it revealed some massive contributions from high-profile donors, including $500,000 from hedge fund manager Ken Griffin, $850,000 from Ricketts’ wife, Marlene, and $500,000 from Paul Singer, another hedge fund manager (who has now given ESA over $1 million).

Those names are familiar to anyone who follows campaign finance. They’re some of the biggest Republican donors. And not only that, they’re the same exact individuals who already started another super PAC, Future45, to go after... wait for it... Hillary Clinton.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Astroturfing bums--I suspect some of that money was spent on online personalities too.
Sun May 29, 2016, 04:30 PM
May 2016

And some of 'em are HEEEEEEEEEERE!!!!!!




I am glad someone is following the doggone money!

MADem

(135,425 posts)
5. Let's not. He's out of the race in 9 days, so it's an academic exercise.
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:49 PM
May 2016

Let's see how Clinton does when Obama and Biden can formally endorse/campaign for her.

MFM008

(19,803 posts)
4. smart people should have pinned that down already
Sun May 29, 2016, 05:41 PM
May 2016

Trying to divide and conquer.
worse than it already is. Keep crap stirred up.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The new anti-Sanders ads ...