2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe new anti-Sanders ads are funded by anti-Clinton donors.
And judging by DU, they're having the desired effect. People are swallowing them, hook, line, and sinker.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/esa-fund-anti-sanders-super-pac_us_56ae76cae4b0010e80ea89fa
About a week ago, a super PAC bankrolled by a wealthy conservative donor announced that it would run an ad attacking Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) for being too far along the ideological spectrum. The group, called ESA Fund, was reportedly backed by $600,000 in spending from TD Ameritrade executive Joe Ricketts. And its ad went after Sanders for supporting things like free college tuition, Medicare for all and tax hikes on the super rich.
Something was obviously suspicious. The strategy reeked of an attempt by conservatives to actually bolster Sanders in a Democratic primary under the guise of an assault. The method has worked before famously deployed by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) in her Senate campaign to bolster her most conservative opponent in the Republican primary, Todd Akin.
ESA Fund pled ignorance, insisting that the spot was merely in response to Sanders strong positioning in the polls. And Sanders, as was certainly his right (really, it would have been malpractice for him not to) proudly noted that Wall Street interests were going after him.
On Sunday, however, more evidence emerged that ESA Fund is, indeed, trying to prop up Sanders as a means of taking Clinton down. In the groups filing with the Federal Election Commission, it revealed some massive contributions from high-profile donors, including $500,000 from hedge fund manager Ken Griffin, $850,000 from Ricketts wife, Marlene, and $500,000 from Paul Singer, another hedge fund manager (who has now given ESA over $1 million).
Those names are familiar to anyone who follows campaign finance. Theyre some of the biggest Republican donors. And not only that, theyre the same exact individuals who already started another super PAC, Future45, to go after... wait for it... Hillary Clinton.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)And some of 'em are HEEEEEEEEEERE!!!!!!
I am glad someone is following the doggone money!
Txbluedog
(1,128 posts)After these ads have run
MADem
(135,425 posts)Let's see how Clinton does when Obama and Biden can formally endorse/campaign for her.
MFM008
(19,803 posts)Trying to divide and conquer.
worse than it already is. Keep crap stirred up.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)NT