Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:36 AM May 2016

Hillary's server

Why she did it:

Before the Freedom of Information Act, I used to say at meetings, "The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer." [laughter]

—?Henry Kissinger, United States Secretary of State, (March 10, 1975)




The fact that she had the server set up by an incompetent hack demonstrates, once again, her utter lack of judgment.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
2. It was reconfigured by an incompetent hack at the orders of a crooked politician.
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:44 AM
May 2016

The fact that Pagliano (or was it Cooper?) wiped the settings that the Secret Service had initially coded (directing the server to link with the authorized State Dept. IP address) is legally significant. Avoiding the authorized Departmental system was no random thing, but entirely intentional and thought out on the part of everyone involved.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
3. That doesn't give an accurate picture of what really happened.
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:49 AM
May 2016

Once the Clinton team got control of the server, they made it do what they wanted.

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
5. heh, it was not meant to imply antything mroe than said
Tue May 31, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

hack is a hack, I fell off my chair laughing when it said the virus definitions were out of date - I Think That is the easiest thing to get right and even that was wrong. a hack s a hack is a hack. NBut you know it was a trusted hack,that is how he got his job, competence be damned. If you are on the friends list, it's a go.

JudyM

(29,225 posts)
7. Lack of judgment and also, arguably, intent to keep it under the radar...
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:23 AM
May 2016

Had they retained an IT firm of the quality that would be befitting wealthy heads of state for their confidential/national security needs, or even appropriate for a normal business, that firm would have known that the setup they wanted was improper. They needed people who would do their bidding and keep mum about it.

They are finding, as is the rest of the world, that they may not be quite as clever as they think.

 

tk2kewl

(18,133 posts)
8. yes... i think you are right
Tue May 31, 2016, 09:52 AM
May 2016

they "why" she wanted it separate was clearly to avoid oversight. The "why" it was done so poorly is likely that actual IT security experts would have understood what she was up to and not have been willing to get involved risking their careers and possibly their freedom.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary's server