2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow To Organize/Perform a Citizens' Election Verification Poll (Exit Polling)
From 2008 Election but a good model:
Citizens' Election Verification Poll (EVP)
Election Verification Poll
Election Defense Alliance, Election Integrity and The Warren Poll are organizing an Election Verification Polling (EVP) project as a safeguard for the November 2008 presidential election -- and we're calling on you to help.
Exit polling provides an independent check on "official results" reported by suspect computerized voting systems. Citizens applying professionally managed, scientifically designed polling methodology will conduct exit poll voter surveys in strategically selected locations, presenting brief survey forms to voters exiting their polling places on Election Day (Tuesday, November 4th) 2008.
The voters' anonymous responses reporting how they have cast their votes will be processed and analyzed in real time.
Unlike the national exit poll conducted by a private consortium of newsmedia corporations, who withhold their raw polling data and heavily "adjust" their results to match the reported election results (!), this Citizens' Exit Poll will fully disclose the data so there can be no doubt about the truth of the numbers and what they reveal about the purported truth of the official election results -- and, for that matter, the purported truth of the corporate newsmedia exit poll.
Fully transparent exit poll data is crucial in assessing the validity of the announced election outcomes. Accept no substitutes. Volunteering for EVP will be one of the most effective contributions you can make to guard against another stolen election.
Are you ready to volunteer for the Election Verification Poll?
Read more: http://electiondefensealliance.org/evp#ixzz4AFwYfr95
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Citizen_exit_poll
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)...and this operation have any significant success in 2008?
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)My response to them is always "No thanks. I voted inside." No exit poll is equivalent to the real one at the ballot box.
Lodestar
(2,388 posts)as verification. Particularly since the advent of electronic voting.
Maybe you are more trusting of e-voting?
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)optical scanners or manually counted (as they were in California for many elections I've participated in). I've watched more than one manual recount in both California and Minnesota verify the results. I've not experienced any election fraud in any place I have lived, and I follow such things closely.
I have nothing to do with election policies in states where I am not a resident, but am very interested in proper vote counts in the states where I am. I recommend that everyone look to the election verification procedures in their own states and be militant if they are not fair and accurate.
I am a firm believer in the secret ballot, which is why I refuse to participate in exit polling. My vote is my business, and none of the business of anyone else. Period.
I do not trust exit polls. Where I live, I can justifiably trust the official election results. If you can't where you live, then you have a job to do, I think.
Lodestar
(2,388 posts)But I'm glad you've found a state with a system you can believe in. If you're
comfortable with it, that's all that matters. But I think you may be a minority
as I think most citizens, if asked, would request more verification than the current
systems provide.
Lodestar
(2,388 posts)In this case citizens actually signed their names to the questionnaire.
http://www.rense.com/general81/exit.htm