2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumA Frenzy of Anti-Clinton Posts on DU Won't Affect Anything
As the June 7 primaries loom closer, it seems like there is a redoubling of the effort to post just about anything that is negative with regard to Hillary Clinton. From the frequently seen photo of the Clintons standing at a wedding reception with Donald trump to a plethora of right-wing bloggers with "bad news" about Clinton, DU seems to be pulling out the stops all the way and kicking the FULL ORGAN piston in an attempt to fill the Internet with the loudest possible sound (sorry about the pipe organ reference).
It's a lot of work digging up that stuff, but it's a total waste of time. One look at the view count for posts in GD-P demonstrates that only a handful of people see that stuff, and even fewer live in June 7 primary states. So, what's the frenzy about, really?
In California, New Jersey, New Mexico and the other states that vote next Tuesday, voters will be making their choices based on all sorts of criteria. They won't be checking into DU to see what right-wing pundits think or to go over the email controversy one more time. They already know who they'll vote for, and what they do will be duly reported on Tuesday night and Wednesday morning.
DU is a great place for Democrats to discuss politics, but it has almost nothing to do with the actual voting. A couple thousand people read this site every day, and a few people post things for them to read. Most have already voted. Most have already made up their minds. Most know that electing Donald Trump is about the worst thing that could happen in November.
I'm sure the posting will continue apace, but it's not going to change the outcome one bit. We'll know the results after people vote. That's how it always works. People vote. Pledged delegates are allocated in states, and we get to see what happened. But we don't make any of it happen. We just don't.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)But what do I know before you tell me what I'm allowed to know about myself. lol.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Unlike the Sanders camp, I seem to be able to do more than simply trash all that is good around me. I appreciate that question from you. Some other things make more sense now.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)You do a fair share of trashing Bernie and his supporters.
And Camp Bernie as you call us have plenty of positive things to say about Bernie that you and yours mock.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I don't doubt that for a second. A couple of Sanders posters here are my favorites of all time. Still are.
"You do a fair share of trashing Bernie and his supporters."
I do think on a number of instances I have gone overboard on my attacks of Sanders. Ok. Not think. I know I have. Sanders is overall a solid guy and the parties tent should be big enough to include him. I have said that from the beginning. "Supporters" on the other hand, I have been very generous and tempered with. Some of them deserve much more scorn than given. Please not I said some.
"And Camp Bernie as you call us have plenty of positive things to say about Bernie"
Not really. GD P has very little positive about Sanders at all times. There are always more complimentary ops on Clinton than Sanders. I do think that is a part of human nature as well. Most Sanders supporters are more displeased with the system than Clinton supporters so they automatically are on a more pessimistic/negative footing. I don't think that is a bad comment. I share many of their deep concerns.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)I'm glad you think the party's tent should include Sanders and his agenda. Only 40-45 % of primary voters think he should be the nominee. Maybe even a seat at the kiddie table inside the tent.
I know you're trying to be magnanimous here, but like most HRC supported you have to diminish Sanders while trying.
Barring some catastrophe HRC will be the nominee and president. The Clintons have worked a long time for this. I'm glad the Democratic Party will be the party to get behind the first female US President. I always hated that Reagin beat us to the Supreme Court.
Having said that I will be changing my affiliation to independent because of this primary. As I said elsewhere I may end up voting for HRC because of Trump but I will never support her. I dont think I'll be able to admit to anyone that I voted for her out of shame. And I know HRC supporters won't care because all that matters is HRC winning. POC and women think they will get something with her presidency and I hope so because then there will at least be some good to come from it. I'm doubtful.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I'm not talking kiddie table crap. Our tent should include Sanders. He simply isn't that far left. Much of his support is further to the left than he is and they aren't a good match for the party. Sanders himself fits in.
Some have difficulty separating Sanders supporters from Sanders himself. Overall, they aren't on the same page.
Nothing magnanimous here.
Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)"Bernie will be the Savior of the Democratic party." (yes that was an actual post)
Some of ya'll have been living in a bouncy castle built on rainbows. What's not to mock?
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Maybe you're happy with the party and the current state of economic and social affairs but there are a lot of us who think it needs to change.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)No sir, easy as pie to find. It's no trouble I assure you. The news media is absolutely rife with bad news for and about Hillary. You'd have to shut your eyes or else enter some kind of echo chamber... oh I see. Carry on then.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)keep Donald Trump out of the White House. How about you?
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)The thing is, a lot of people worry about Hillary's numbers.
It's nice you are so confident in her.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)But she has an insurmountable delegate lead, thus you trash her and reduce the numbers further...sounds like helping Trump to me...anger and spite.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)It's close to over, but it's not over.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)The train collides with the side of the mountain on June 7.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)coming up and the Donald Trump train is on the tracks, heading the opposite direction from the Democratic train. A train wreck is possible unless we can move the rail switch and put the Trump train on a siding. That's what I'm trying to do and that's the thing I'll keep trying to do until November.
think
(11,641 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)That will happen after the "corporate" media starts "lying" to the public by calling Hillary the presumptive nominee.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)And there is no indictment I hope someone has grief counselors standing by for the Berners here because they're going to need them.
Actually at this point it's down to hoping the presumptive nominee gets a visit from the indictment fairy. The Cali results are not as relevant to them as hoping for that.
What began as an issues campaign has quickly devolved into a BoB sewer.
Sad.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)To come here much less often.
Waiting with bated breath to see what changes on June 16th.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)The subject matter of the most recent posts tells me that Hillary's political future isn't in the hands of the voters anymore.
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)I see the insulation within the bubble has begun, ticking off as each day passes and gets closer to the 15th...
I will fully expect majority of HRC supporters out with 'post pitchforks' and 'topic torches' to snare folks into banning action
Once that 'purge' has run its course the bubble will be complete
This 'DU is a great place for Democrats to discuss politics', let me correct... 'DU is a great place for establishment Democrats to post'
There isn't much 'discussion' going on, let me give one example
HRC's unfavorables are historically high, same as Trumps, knowing these are the facts and that both are running dead even... any post that points this out is met with an instant pivot away and statement that these numbers will 'change', really? Let's discuss that point... but alas that 'topic' will be met with the ban hammer in some way shape or form....
Here's one of those lovely establishment type posts: http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512101832
So taking that post, primaries don't really matter now do they...
then there's this...
'Most know that electing Donald Trump is about the worst thing that could happen in November.'
If Trump is that bad, or the 'worst thing', why is HRC dead even with him, why are her and his unfavorables both at historic levels?
You point to party, I would reply with principle, which I believe is more important that party... but you would disagree... so if you want HRC to 'win' then you better get crackin' at making a better case since the folks standing for principled policies / issues are quite numerous and your only option to beat 'Donald Trump...the worst thing that could happen in November.' will require more than just DEM party
you can tout party... but this fight is going to need more than just DEM party to win
randome
(34,845 posts)If 3 million more voters have said they prefer Clinton, what business is it of yours or mine to say they're wrong? Maybe, just maybe, you're wrong?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
HumanityExperiment
(1,442 posts)principles stand on their own merit, HRC has shown to have a much tougher time with principle.. hence my point about historic unfavorables
We live in a 'reality tv' culture, where name recognition is a premium and can be leveraged into catapulting someone into a 'lead' position in most contest involving public input...
Bernie started out at 3%, was labelled 'fringe candidate', scroll through the posts here in GD-P and I'm sure many HRC supporters posted that very narrative...
what's 'wrong' is that you're missing the point about public gullibility and reality tv mentalility, so maybe, just maybe you're missing the more critical point
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)At this point the endless tirades against Sander's supporters should be considered deliberate efforts to sabotage the Democratic Party's chances in November.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Your OPs seem to be a lot of work for you and are probably a waste of time, but yet you do them. Even if you are correct about anti-HRC pieces, why would you try to persuade others to not do the very thing you indulge often?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)corralled here, now they will be turned loose on the wider net with a much larger audience
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Trump's too broke to hire them.
They'll be ignored.
David__77
(23,371 posts)Some people might be motivated by posts to take some action or to not take some action. Others might have some emotional reaction or another.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Nothing posted here impacts US politics.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Those glory years are very much gone. But congressional staffers used to read this place, especially for the deep though investigative pieces that good people, since chased or banned, or who have passed, produced. Those days are not just long gone, but as more people are chased, that institutional memory is gone.
But you are right, that moment in the sun is gone, and damn was it fleeting
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,674 posts)It's an internet message board where people work themselves into a lather fighting with total strangers whom they will never meet and who might be paid trolls. It's entertainment, basically.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)Though I doubt anyone is getting paid to post here.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)All he can do is con his supporters at this point
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)says, they are kicking the views, so when the memes are (re)searched during the G/E, by the people that haven't been paying attention during the primaries, the memes will be all the more convincing because ... "this must be true/important ... it came up first in my google!"
LexVegas
(6,059 posts)MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Instead, I think people should support the candidate they prefer. If their candidate doesn't succeed, however, there's a far more ominous consequence lurking in November. People of sense recognize that and shift their support to the better of the two options.
Now, those who can't see their way to do that are simply acting out of spite, and spite is one of the ugliest human responses.
Once it's certain who the nominee will be, spiteful people will be way off my radar. We have a nation to save in November, and the threat is real. We must act. We must vote together.
But I won't be gloating. I'll be welcoming Democrats who understand what the real race is.
840high
(17,196 posts)childish and sad.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)children
This is the way children behave in the face of a very serious issues. Don't Danders me, the emails and the FBI investigation is her own doing.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,674 posts)Sore losers are annoying; sore winners are assholes.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)And you will have no one to blame but yourself for supporting such a damaged candidate...except that you won't. You'll probably act like those other idiots during the mid-terms and blame the people she was unable to lead.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)Good luck to you...
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)She might be able to count on my vote, but I don't think it will matter. She, and folks like you, have proven what a sham is our democracy.
If she wins the primary, it will be because TPTB have deemed it so. If she wins the general, it will be for the same reasons. Our voting franchise means nothing.
You are a brick in the wall.
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)And that wall is still standing strong. Maybe someone will put you back in that will with a little mortar and make it even stronger.
We do need education, but education does not equal thought control. Real education teaches people to think clearly and visualize future results of actions.
That's the kind of education I've had. Sorry you missed that part.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The FBI continues apace
MineralMan
(146,286 posts)will do.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Of a case, I recommend you pay close attention to whom the veep is. And the FBI investigation continues apace. That you cannot stop. I am sure you wish you could.
Unlike you, I put my country far ahead of any party. My ethics are not situational to letters behind names. If this was Paul Ryan (R) you people would be demanding his head. And that is the truth.
By the way, fully anecdotal. Two of my neighbors were hard core HRC supporters. They also happen to have pesky clearances. Guess what? June 7 they are staying home. If she is on the ballot in Nov...again they are staying home. They say that this is the view with a few of their friends and they have talked more than a few people to not vote for her on national security grounds.
My goodness they had no clue, but they read the editorials and they do understand the issues.
Fully anecdotal as well. Local party leaders are getting a tad panicked. This is a military town, so they got those issues explained. So now we are starting to see this small scandal penetrate the fog. I expect DU to be the last place where this is aknowledged. You should be familiar with this, not unlike Free Republic. It will be treated by me the same way...a place to point and laugh at the very much willful ignorance.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)was an indictment of State's archaic email system more than anything...and the FBI is bullshite...so keep waiting...
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)experts who know this better than you, hardly agree. I am sorry if I will take their words over a mere partisan on the internet.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)And I strongly doubt many of their employees will keep doing this for free.
Stuckinthebush
(10,844 posts)Perhaps a few $27 donations here and there. But, the account is depleted and the game is long over.
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)- A Democratic win on November will be a miracle in my view.
- Either a Clinton or Trump presidency would be a disaster for the country in different ways. Clinton comes ahead by a bit, but far less than I am comfortable with. There are quite a few reasons for that.
- Not much would change at this point, so I've resolved to help outside my area for local races.
At some point or another however, as Hillary is the presumptive nominee, I would like to know what is the threshold for reporting and bashing?
Bad behavior by any politician is worth mentioning, even though uncomfortable.
The problem I have with some of the mentioned bad behavior done by Bernie, is that it generally misses the point and they are mad at him for something he did not do or say, merely attributing positions on him that is not his. This is the case with the gun issue, the super delegate issues and so forth. Once put in context, the argument tends to loses validity.
That happens quite a bit with Clinton as well. When put in to context her Iraq War Vote can be easily understood and forgiven, however in a broader view, the way she is hawkish puts to light that she did not learn her lesson, and that militaristic attitude towards tackling foreign affairs is just... well, pointless.
I do not blame Clinton for the voting irregularities. However, the glee people have here in dismissing such matters is sickening. What Lange, has done in changing the rules being the sole executor of that, and the bald-faced lies done by the DNC, and surrogates in regards to reports of violence, is unfortunate and merely hardens opposition towards Hillary. Not to mention all the videos that came out of that. Lange changing the rules, bringing out the police, Barbara Boxer blowing sarcastic kisses and flipping people off, with nary a video of an actual thrown chair. The one video where there was one almost thrown, was put down, hugged out, and looks to be in the Clinton area.
Finally, even though I have not waded in to the email issues of Clinton, it looks like there is now more information coming in. Even if I am not going to press her on this, others will, and I can only see it hurting her even more towards the General Election.
If by some miracle, she does win the Presidency, it will be mired by this controversy by those who will not let it go, affecting job performance via Republicans spamming this issue like there is no tomorrow, and probably passing laws that mostly give Republicans what they want.
So... Corporations win.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)again, like it will make a difference. Even if the whole site switched to Sanders, it'd wouldn't make a dent on the primary.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Thank God for voice to text on my phone.