Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:06 PM
KoKo (84,711 posts)
Another NY Newspaper Editorial Board Raises Questions about Hillary/IG Report
(Yes, the NYPost is Conservative but many in the NY Metropolitan Area and New Jersey read it. Plus the NYDaily News Editorial Board and the NYT also have come out against Hillary over the IG Report's findings.)
------------ Team Hillary’s Latest Email Lie --By Post Editorial Board May 31, 2016 | 8:24pm If one lie doesn’t serve, try another: That’s clearly the idea behind the Hillary Clinton campaign’s response to last week’s blistering review of her email scandal. The report from the State Department inspector general notes multiple violations of law in her use of a home server and private email. But her campaign chairman, John Podesta, calls the IG’s work wonderful news for Hillary — because it “gets us one step closer to resolving” the issue. That is, to having Emailgate fade into history, with Clinton paying no price for her simple, uh, “mistake.” After all, anyone can accidentally set up a secret email server at home and use it to hide government correspondence, even after being warned it’s illegal, right? Yet Podesta might wind up “correct” in thinking Hillary will get a pass. After all, it wouldn’t be the first time she and Bill got away with hiding digital correspondence. As Paul Sperry noted in Sunday’s Post, the Clinton White House “lost” a huge trove of subpoenaed emails in 1999 — as it faced probes of Whitewater, Travelgate and other scandals involving Hillary. Back then, the White House blamed a “glitch” in a computer server. And, at the center of that affair (dubbed “Project X” internally): a young aide named Cheryl Mills. That’s right: the same Cheryl Mills who served as Hillary’s aide when she used her home server — and who oversaw Team Hillary’s deletion of 32,000 of the emails stored there. Clinton insisted those emails were just personal — but several (recovered from other sources) have proven directly relevant to her State business, including emails about her refusal to adhere to State rules on email security. Like Clinton, Mills refused to cooperate with the IG’s investigation. Podesta might prove right, if the Obama Justice Department opts to whitewash the lawbreaking to protect Clinton’s White House bid. Or he may prove wrong — if the voters decide they’ve had enough of history repeating itself. http://nypost.com/2016/05/31/team-hillarys-latest-email-lie/
|
32 replies, 3699 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
KoKo | Jun 2016 | OP |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #1 | |
DURHAM D | Jun 2016 | #3 | |
Fawke Em | Jun 2016 | #19 | |
IdaBriggs | Jun 2016 | #2 | |
senz | Jun 2016 | #4 | |
Merryland | Jun 2016 | #5 | |
senz | Jun 2016 | #6 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #9 | |
senz | Jun 2016 | #12 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #15 | |
Fawke Em | Jun 2016 | #20 | |
morningfog | Jun 2016 | #26 | |
Segami | Jun 2016 | #25 | |
Gregorian | Jun 2016 | #7 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #10 | |
hellyall | Jun 2016 | #16 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #17 | |
Fawke Em | Jun 2016 | #21 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #23 | |
840high | Jun 2016 | #32 | |
morningfog | Jun 2016 | #27 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #28 | |
morningfog | Jun 2016 | #29 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #30 | |
morningfog | Jun 2016 | #31 | |
unc70 | Jun 2016 | #8 | |
WhiteTara | Jun 2016 | #18 | |
Fawke Em | Jun 2016 | #22 | |
unc70 | Jun 2016 | #24 | |
nadinbrzezinski | Jun 2016 | #11 | |
senz | Jun 2016 | #13 | |
Uncle Joe | Jun 2016 | #14 |
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:09 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
1. Why not link to Breitbart? Or Moonie Times
for that matter. Loving right wing papers seems to be in style with BoBs these days.
|
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:17 PM
DURHAM D (31,557 posts)
3. or Ruppert's WSJ ? nt
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #1)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:46 PM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
19. OK. How about the Chicago Tribune, then?
Democrats have something else that wakes them up screaming in the middle of the night: the prospect that the FBI will recommend charges against Clinton or her aides when it completes its own probe. If Clinton loses the FBI primary, Trump could have an unimpeded path to the White House.
For most of the past year, Democrats have been happily distracted by the GOP's apparent urge to blow itself up. They failed to notice they were walking into their own minefield without a map. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-president-clinton-trump-0601-jm-20160531-story.html |
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:09 PM
IdaBriggs (10,559 posts)
2. There was a connection I didn't know about -- history tries to repeat.
Cheryl had 7 lawyers for a civil deposition. The FBI interview must have been hysterical.
![]() |
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:20 PM
senz (11,945 posts)
4. Why do Hillies always ignore the message and attack the messenger?
Is it because that's ALL they have?
|
Response to senz (Reply #4)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:24 PM
Merryland (1,134 posts)
5. yes, as Good Ship Hillary sinks slowly beneath the waves... n/t
Response to Merryland (Reply #5)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:27 PM
senz (11,945 posts)
6. That is a lovely image.
Thank you, Merryland.
|
Response to senz (Reply #4)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:52 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
9. Perhaps because the messengers have been
convicted of perjury, are considered Crazy Frank by their peers, or known right wing shills.
![]() |
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #9)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:20 PM
senz (11,945 posts)
12. Nah, they consider all Hill criticism "rightwing."
If it's an opinion piece, authorship should be taken into consideration. But content is still more important -- is it factual? Is it reason-based, logical? Does it make sense? Does it appeal to the reader's rational capacities? Etc.
|
Response to senz (Reply #12)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:28 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
15. Here's the latest on the Sanders scandal
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #15)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:49 PM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
20. I didn't realize Jane was running for president.
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #20)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:53 PM
morningfog (18,115 posts)
26. You have to excuse the Clinton folk, they work on the 2 for 1 theory.
Response to senz (Reply #4)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:45 PM
Segami (14,923 posts)
25. Hmm,....let's see....ok, I got it.....that's ALL they have!!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:41 PM
Gregorian (23,867 posts)
7. But there are FBI agents who are going public if she gets a pass.
That's kind of a problem.
I read a post this morning that suggested she's trying to get into office before the indictments so she can quash them. |
Response to Gregorian (Reply #7)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:54 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
10. I read a post a couple of days ago that
the FBI were investigating Sanders for influence peddling and that there is a DOJ investigation having to do with Burlington Collegegate.
|
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #10)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:32 PM
hellyall (9 posts)
16. So you buy Republican pablum?
I'd look up the Toesnings, as soon as possible.
|
Response to hellyall (Reply #16)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:38 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
17. This was in response to a post that said
you should use that kind of crap if it sounds logical to you. Just pointing out the stupidity of the thought.
Welcome to DU ![]() |
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #17)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:51 PM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
21. Except that what hellyall said is correct.
I work in InfoSec and we work with the intelligence community quite a bit. Yes... they are planning to leak if she's given a pass.
There is no FBI investigation into Bernie or Jane. |
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #21)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:58 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
23. Is it allowed for the FBI to leak?
Response to Fawke Em (Reply #21)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 10:32 PM
840high (17,196 posts)
32. A leak is guaranteed.
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #10)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:54 PM
morningfog (18,115 posts)
27. No you didn't.
Response to morningfog (Reply #27)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:58 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
28. Yes, I did.
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #28)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:01 PM
morningfog (18,115 posts)
29. I call bullshit. And projection.
I know you wish your candidate wasn't subject to a criminal investigation by the FBI. In fact i wish the same.
But making shit up is poor form. |
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #30)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 09:30 PM
morningfog (18,115 posts)
31. Thanks for confirming you are full of shit.
That link does not support your claim. Unless you have more, it is clear you are desperately projecting and wishing it wasn't your candidate subject to an actual FBI criminal investigation.
|
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:51 PM
unc70 (5,419 posts)
8. New to me info on Mills
Had not heard that Cheryl Mills was part of the lost/deleted email problems in Clinton White House. And to think that Comey was one of the investigators seeking those records.
Things don't change much with the Clintons. |
Response to unc70 (Reply #8)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:39 PM
WhiteTara (27,752 posts)
18. It isn't the Clinton White House yet
but you get the idea that it will be in January.
|
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #18)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:53 PM
Fawke Em (11,366 posts)
22. Uhhh.... she meant Bill Clinton's White House.
Hillary might end up in another Big House, all together.
|
Response to WhiteTara (Reply #18)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 08:41 PM
unc70 (5,419 posts)
24. "1999 ... Whitewater ... Back then ... young Cheryl Mills"
Did you actually read even the OP? I don't need the snark.
For the record, I think the odds are dropping below 50% that there will be a HC WH. |
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 03:57 PM
nadinbrzezinski (154,021 posts)
11. I just note the increasing chorus
From editorial boards regardless of leaning
|
Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #11)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:21 PM
senz (11,945 posts)
13. Yep, sort of like dominos falling.
Response to KoKo (Original post)
Wed Jun 1, 2016, 04:25 PM
Uncle Joe (53,270 posts)
14. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, KoKo.
|