Survey Shows the Hillary Clinton Supporters are More Racist Than Sanders Supporters

[JRLeft]

https://m.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016_qnaire.pdf

That report showed both Bernie and Hillary supporters are racist.

[Trust Buster]

1. This thread should be locked.

[JRLeft]

8. Why it's a study. You hate the results?

[MattP]

93. Its a opt in poll belongs on drudge not du

[barrow-wight]

124. Yep.

You folks are just going to keep diving down to the very bottom of the cesspit in this last two weeks. No grace at all.

[Cheese Sandwich]

32. LOL no it should get thousands of recs

[ucrdem]

36. It probably will.

[B Calm]

139. K&R

[Duckhunter935]

60. Why?

[merrily]

76. I know that you would have leapt to make that same post if the study had come out the opposite way.

I can just feel it in my bones.

[LanternWaste]

144. I too pretend bones and tea-leaves tell us "what would have been," though science giggles at us.

I too pretend bones and tea-leaves tell us "what would have been," though science giggles at us.

[B Calm]

138. LOL, it's a study.

[ucrdem]

155. No it's a #BernieStudy.

[phleshdef]

2. Most racists are supporting Donald Trump because he is one of their own. Hillary and Bernie are not.

[Peacetrain]

6. +1111

[JimDandy]

78. Excellent point.

[Number23]

3. Yep. The millions of black and Hispanic and Asians ones are the worst of the lot

[Haveadream]

11. My first thought, too

[ucrdem]

17. Apparently they surveyed reddit.

[Number23]

19. DU's demographics are pretty abysmal too. Which explains GDP better than anything anyone could

ever hope to.

[ucrdem]

20. Yes it's been eye opening.

Disappointing but instructive. It's like the Civil Rights Act has to be written and debated every day.

[JRLeft]

44. Did you read the report?

[ucrdem]

48. What report? You linked to an empty questionnaire.

I've looked for some kind of report at the ANES site and can't find it there either.

[passiveporcupine]

82. This is the best link I can find, but the study is real

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[Number23]

52. Why in the world would I read or listen to anything that attempts to portray the supporters of a

candidate that are the most diverse, ethnically racially and economically as the more racist?

This is nothing but a classic and desperate attempt at projection. Like all of those online surveys that mysteriously (and hilariously) portrayed Clinton supporters as the more aggressive. Because Sanders supporters don't know anything about skewing online polls, do they?

[Cheese Sandwich]

65. They probably can't see the data because they aren't registered at that site.

A lot of times you will need to login to view academic studies. That's totally normal.

To view the links to the data files for each study,
you must register and agree to our terms of use.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/download/datacenter_all_NoData.php

[ucrdem]

66. It's not "totally normal" to pretend an empty questionnaire contains data except in #BernieScience.

[Cheese Sandwich]

67. yeah right. He linked to the site where you can get the data apparently if you register

I'm not sure if you need a school credential to login or what.

He named the reference. It took me 3 seconds to look that up.

[ucrdem]

68. OP links to a YouTube and empty questionnaire. The YouTube has the same link. No data. nt

[Cheese Sandwich]

69. Well I guess the questionnaire from the survey. What's wrong with that?

[ucrdem]

71. No data = bogus link to bogus story. nt

[Cheese Sandwich]

73. No, you can't see the data unless you register on the site. That's YOUR problem.

That's not my problem, not OP's problem, and not Mr. Dixon's problem.

The data is here: LINK

It's not a bogus story, it's just that you personally are not logged into the site to see the data.

American National Election Studies, ANES is a collaboration of Stanford University and the University of Michigan, with funding by the National Science Foundation.

[passiveporcupine]

85. the study is real

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[ucrdem]

109. No data at that link. nt

[passiveporcupine]

83. the study is real

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[TimPlo]

72. POC can be bigoted just the same.

My Grandfather a full blood Mohawk Tribe member would spout racist crap all time about Whites,blacks, and as he called them celestial(Asian). So don't think just because someone has different skin color they are either more or less likely to be racist than a white person.

[JimDandy]

81. Intolerance/bigotry has been openly displayed here on DU by POC.

A significant part of Clinton's campaign strategy has been based on not just exploiting, but creating racial divisiveness, for goodness sakes.

[LanternWaste]

147. I'd allege the same as well were the candidate I'm supporting in second place.

I'd allege the same as well were the candidate I'm supporting in second place. No doubt, you have objective evidence to support "a significant part of Clinton's campaign strategy..." (If not, I understand-- statistical math can be difficult)

[Number23]

103. EXCEPTIONALLY cool story, Tim.

And it's clear from your response that you didn't watch the video or read the thread before responding to my post. Don't feel bad, I didn't watch the video either.

[ucrdem]

108. It's a guy in his car giving made up numbers. No data has been provided. #BernieScience. nt

[JRLeft]

116. Signup

[ucrdem]

126. No data = bogus link to bogus story. nt

[Cheese Sandwich]

150. Just because you personally don't have access to it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

DU links are sometimes to resources that are behind newspaper paywalls and registration walls.

[ucrdem]

152. .

[Cheese Sandwich]

153. Get an account and log into it if you're so concerned.

[ucrdem]

154. LOL. You're not taking this very well. nt

[Cheese Sandwich]

157. On the contrary I couldn't care less. You're the one obsessed with "debunking" an academic study

on the basis that you personally didn't register on the site to see the study.

[ucrdem]

158. . . . that only exists in your imagination.

[Peacetrain]

4. Oh Lordy..

[Exilednight]

5. I just looked at this study, and looked up the source. Everyone should read this.

[UMTerp01]

7. Who said Sanders supporters were more racist?

First of all, who said that more Bernie Sanders supporters were racist? What I have pointed out is being sick of the lecturing from Bernie Sanders supporters about why the overwhelming majority of Black voters have chosen to support Hillary Clinton. As a matter of fact, I wouldn't doubt that Hillary Clinton's supporters may be more racist. Lest we forget the 2008 campaign and a lot of racist comments coming from her supporters about then Senator Obama. So the result of that survey doesn't surprise me.

What has bothered me is this sort of elite white liberalism tinged with racial overtones that somehow White liberals need to be telling Black folk about "Stockholm Syndrome" and "MississippiBurning" hashtags after Hillary had overwhelming Black support in the Mississippi. But neither of these can be put on the candidate (although Bernie has been dismissive of the southern vote, which was heavily African American).

But still...the topic here is racist supporters and that can't be put on Bernie Sanders nor Hillary Clinton. Because more Blacks are supporting Hillary of course there is going to be more commentary about the lack of Black support for Bernie Sanders and therefore this implication that Bernie supporters are just a bunch of racist White people. Not the case. You don't hear it talked about with Hillary's folk because she has the majority of Black votes. So while I hear what this vlog guy is saying I don't see how one candidate having more racist supporters has anything to do with why African Americans chose Hillary Clinton in overwhelming fashion to Bernie Sanders. But hell yes there are plenty of racist Democrats. In other shocking news, water is wet.

[JRLeft]

9. I felt the same way about white Hillary supporters, lecturing me about Hillary.

[UMTerp01]

22. As you should!!!!

Nobody should be lecturing anybody. Make the case for your candidate in a general manner but don't get all "why are you voting for Bernie" or "why are you voting for Hillary"

[bravenak]

134. I get that.

[Luminous Animal]

28. On the first day that he announced his campaign in his home state, the narrative was written...

"Not good enough, Bernie." To add fuel to the fire… The, "Not good enough Bernie" article was illustrated (and replicated here on DU) with a picture of an injured or dead black man with his head being held up by two white men and depicted as the result of a game hunt. It was absolutely sickening to tie Bernie to such a racist and violent act. But you see, people didn't know Bernie. They were not aware of his civil rights activism… his arrest… his consistent criticism over the years of over-policing and criticism of the mass incarceration of black and brown youth. You see, Bernie hasn't, throughout his career promoted racist policies; whereas Hillary has. So they had to kneecap him early. Near simultaneously, 2 white conservative authors mirrored the the narrative.

So the narrative was threaded; and over months, stitched into a whole with BernieBros; and then tied off. It was a brilliant piece of advertising. More brilliant than the kneecapping of Gore smearing him as a fabricator… When Gore was probably the sincerest candidate since Carter.

[UMTerp01]

31. Despicable

I never saw that picture of the dead Black man and the head being held up by two White men. Thats absolutely despicable.

[Cheese Sandwich]

99. It was a whole image, a major negative branding campaign. Just awful.

Now I don't want to let the Sanders campaign totally off the hook. Bernie left himself vulnerable to that kind of attack because he didn't anticipate it. He didn't really have much on his website about race issues until after he got attacked. But nothing warranted what was done. Like you said, they had the story written on the first day.

[Ohioblue22]

10. Lol

[ucrdem]

12. "pilot survey of 1,200 individuals online opted in"

What's a pilot survey and why is this story broadcast from a car?



p.s. answer: A pilot survey is a strategy used to test the questionnaire. In other words, it hasn't actually been administered yet. Also, there is no print story, and the linked document is a draft online questionnaire without any data.

And in other #BernieNews . . .

[JRLeft]

15. The study is legit, but it doesn't fit your narrative so throw it out right?

[ucrdem]

18. There isn't a study. There's a youtube somebody made in their car.

Where did you find this link, anyway?

[passiveporcupine]

87. Nope, you are wrong

The study is real

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[pnwmom]

24. No "opt in" online study is legit. But it fits your narrative so you believe it. n/t

[uponit7771]

26. +1, some of them are still in anger stage

[JRLeft]

100. The study is real. Watch the video if you don't want to sign up.

[ucrdem]

128. The video is a guy in a car talking to his laptop. nt

[uponit7771]

133. No its not, some dude sitting in is car with an online poll... yaw desperate no? tia

[JRLeft]

137. You didn't read it, and it's not his poll. You hate the results so you decided to ignore it.

[BootinUp]

13. Appropriate thread? Seriously?

[Cheese Sandwich]

14. Duh. Anyone who follows the Clinton vs. Sanders wars on Twitter would know this

And read between the lines a little bit and you can see a lot of it on DU too.

And thank you for posting this.

[JRLeft]

16. No problem.

[ucrdem]

21. What lines?

[cherokeeprogressive]

23. I don't need a survey to know that.

[hrmjustin]

25. This is garbage!

[ucrdem]

27. It is indeed. There's no such study. nt

[passiveporcupine]

88. If you are going to spam this thread with your insistence that the study is fake

I'm going to spam you with links to the study.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[ucrdem]

107. No data there, either. More #BernieScience. Did you think I wouldn't check?

[passiveporcupine]

123. You are unbelievable.

I posted the link to the website connected to that study, with the text explaining the study and the dates it was conducted on, and you still say you don't believe there was a study because you don't see the actual data?

From that 'bogus' link:

To view the links to the data files for each study,
you must register and agree to our terms of use.

There is a button on the study link page that takes you to the data center. Click on that and register to see the data.

ANES is committed to protect the privacy and confidentiality of our survey respondents and to provide our data in ways that are most useful to the user community. To that end, we now require people who want to download the data to agree to our terms of use. We also ask that you provide some information that will help us better serve the research community.

STUDY HIGHLIGHTS:
The ANES 2016 Pilot Study was conducted for the purpose of testing new questions and conducting methodological research to inform the design of future ANES studies, particularly the ANES 2016 Time Series. Much of the content was based on proposals from the ANES user community submitted through the Online Commons. The survey included questions about preferences in the presidential primary, stereotyping, the economy, discrimination, race and racial consciousness, police use of force, and numerous policy issues.

Data collection was conducted between January 22 and January 28, 2016. The sample consisted of 1,200 individuals who were part of an opt-in internet panel and who completed the 32 minute (median) questionnaire online. See the Codebook for more information about the sample.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

To see the data you need to register and I'm not giving them my e-mail address. You are welcome to go there. But even without the data in your face, the above text proves the study is real and you are just being deliberately obtuse or obstinate or you are trolling. Yes, I've gone through shit like this with you before. I should have expected this.

I'm not wasting any more time on this. I think it's pretty obvious to most people here the study is real.

[ucrdem]

125. There's no evidence of data, no link to it, no HINT of it. Just a guy in a car and his webcam. nt

[passiveporcupine]

129. I"m not talking about the video link

I'm talking about this link that I gave you in all the posts I replied to. Geeze...you obviously didn't even look at it.

Here, there is a link to the data (upper left where it says return to data center). But you have to register to have access to it.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[ucrdem]

130. There's no data at that link. No data = bogus story. nt

[passiveporcupine]

132. Now I know you are trolling

Buh Bye!

Plonk

[merrily]

102. You probably meant to say, "These are not the droids you're looking for."

[nadinbrzezinski]

29. That is the second one

downloaded that


And yes, systemic is the word to use

[underthematrix]

30. My response - CORNEL WEST

[MFM008]

33. Come on

Noone is as racist as Trump supporters and Trump himself.

[ucrdem]

34. It's baloney. There's no such survey, just an empty questionnaire and a guy in his car.

#BernieSurvey.

[JRLeft]

47. So you didn't read the report.

[ucrdem]

49. There isn't any report. You linked to an empty questionnaire. nt

[passiveporcupine]

89. the study is real

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[Miles Archer]

35. Bullshit.

I agree with many of the comments here. I'm a Sanders supporter and no fan of Clinton but this kind of horseshit has no place on DU.

[guillaumeb]

37. Most racists do not like being named.

At least not in public. Perhaps the study makes them uncomfortable?

[ucrdem]

40. Ask yourself, who would make such a video and then try to pass it off as legit?

That tells you all you need to know about this primary.

[guillaumeb]

42. I read the accompanying link.

It surveys, or claims to survey, attitudes among voters. If someone here can post a criticism of the methodology or the analysis I would read that also. But my opinion is that racism is endemic to the US electorate irrespective of party or candidate. To claim that HRC supporters are more racist than Sanders supporters is inflammatory.

[ucrdem]

45. The link goes to an empty questionnaire. There's no data, just a guy in his car. nt

[guillaumeb]

51. In the questionnaire is this:

[DISPLAY ONLY] This survey is sponsored by Stanford University. If you have any questions or comments about the survey you may contact Dr. Matthew DeBell at 650-725-2239, or by email at [e-mail].

Given this, either the name and number are not valid.........or they are. I have not and will not attempt to validate the information, but I am unsure what you refer to by an empty questionnaire. It appears to be the template for the questionnaire.

[ucrdem]

54. There's nothing to validate. There's no data. nt

[guillaumeb]

56. That is a question for the poster.

But whether the lack of data in the post reflects an actual absence of data or is simply an incomplete post is another matter.

And again, racism and general hate is something that is part of both parties. Look at all the anti-Muslim hate speech at DU.

[ucrdem]

57. I've searched the ANES site and can't find any such report there either.

And you know what? This kind of cr#p is what really ticks Hillary supporters off because it gets posted here constantly.

[guillaumeb]

58. I agree with you that it is posted constantly.

A desperate search for something, anything, to derail HRC as a candidate.

She was not my first choice, but this type of grasping at straws is a bit foolish.

If you cannot find the information at the site, perhaps someone should contact the Doctor and let him know that his name is being referenced.

[ucrdem]

59. It's up to the OP. Now that he or she knows they can either leave it or nuke it.

I'd recommend nuking as it might not survive a jury.

[passiveporcupine]

92. Here you go again

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[ucrdem]

114. You keep posting a bogus link. No data, no study, no article. nt

[JRLeft]

143. register

[passiveporcupine]

91. Someone who is telling the truth?

the study is real

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[gollygee]

38. I have to call bullshit on this

I could buy it if they got similar numbers for both, but 43% of Hillary supporters saying black people are lazy vs. 20% of Bernie supporters? I'm just not buying that. The "opt-in survey" got trolled.

It looks like people opted in and you just believed they were supporting whoever they told you they were supporting and you have to just trust that no one is lying about that. And that no one is trolling the "survey."

I do. however, agree with the Youtuber's comment that America as a whole has a lot of work to do.

I was interested when I first read this, assuming the numbers would be roughly the same and that it was an actual survey. But this just doesn't sound legitimate at all.

(I would also have to assume that only or mainly white people chose to opt in. Otherwise, it would be nice to have numbers on how many people of color were included.)

[dubyadiprecession]

39. Hillary's group is more diverse than BS's..

That makes absolutely no sense.

[gollygee]

41. Well if it were an opt in survey

It could be that only or mainly white supporters opted in.

However, as I said in my post immediately before this, it looks like they got trolled.

[passiveporcupine]

43. He's right

In this country racism is still alive and well...all over.

[MattP]

46. This is the kind of sleaze that right wingers bring into du

Horrible post and attacking other dems is repulsive

[JRLeft]

50. Just because you don't like the results you want it trashed. I'm black I know there is a lot of

racism in the Democratic party and in this nation.

[ucrdem]

53. There are no results. That's what people are objecting to. It's bogus #BernieNews.

It's just another deceptive YouTube video. Now that you know you really should self-delete.

[Cheese Sandwich]

63. "To view the links to the data files for each study, you must register and agree to our terms

of use."

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/download/datacenter_all_NoData.php

[ucrdem]

70. A log-on link is not data. And neither the OP nor YouTube link to it anyway. nt

[passiveporcupine]

95. Here is some info on the study...just for you

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[ucrdem]

120. You've posted that link ten times but it's not a study or data set. Post the survey results. nt

[ucrdem]

112. No data = bogus link to bogus story. nt

[Cheese Sandwich]

115. You're being intellectually dishonest. I've shown you the link to the study data

It's a very reputable survey and site.

You just don't want to register for an account to get access to it.

That's your problem.

[ucrdem]

117. A log-in page is not a study or data set. nt

[Cheese Sandwich]

118. I can see why you're voting for Hillary Clinton

[ucrdem]

127. Because I'm not a sucker or because she won't put up with bullshit?

Or both?

[passiveporcupine]

94. This is not a link to the data

but it is a link to the study, which is absolutely NOT bogus. You are becoming pretty repetitive.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[BootinUp]

55. I implore you to take this down. Its disgusting and without merit. nt

[zappaman]

61. What a pantsload.

[Cheese Sandwich]

62. More on this here...

There's an article on this today on jacobin.com.

Nor do the ANES data furnish much evidence that Sanders voters have been motivated by white racial resentment. Among Democrats and non-Republican-leaning independents, in fact, white Clinton supporters were more inclined than white Sanders supporters to say that blacks are “lazy” or “violent,” and that black people should work their way up “without special favors.”

Only 22 percent of white Sanders supporters indicated that “being white” was “extremely” or “very important” to them (compared to 43 percent of white Clinton supporters).

By contrast, 74 percent of Sanders supporters (compared to 56 percent of Clinton supporters) reported that “the difference in incomes between rich people and poor people” has grown “much larger” in the last twenty years. Sanders supporters placed income inequality among their most important political issues twice as often as Clinton supporters.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/06/bernie-sanders-achen-bartels-white-men-krugman-election-clinton/

[passiveporcupine]

74. Thanks for this link

drawing from their new book, Democracy for Realists — they argue that the difference between Sanders and Clinton voters lies not in ideology or policy views, but “social identities, symbolic commitments, and partisan loyalties.”

Sanders voters, in short, are not “the vanguard of a new, social democratic–trending Democratic Party,” but chiefly a group of “disaffected white men” and young people drawn to “campaign labels, not policy preferences.”

Of course, this is music to many ears. Nothing would please corporate Democrats and establishment pundits more than if the largest left-wing insurgency in American primary history could be exposed, once and for all, as an accidental combination of confused children and angry white dudes.

An ecstatic Paul Krugman, crowing that Achen and Bartels had laid bare the true essence of the movement, was even inspired to formulate a set of Myers Briggs–style personality types for Sanders voters, in which every shade of fool, narcissist, lunatic, and failure was duly represented.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/06/bernie-sanders-achen-bartels-white-men-krugman-election-clinton/

OK, now I, an old woman who is a Bernie supporter, officially hate Paul Krugman. I've disliked him for some time but this goes beyond the pale of nasty.

[passiveporcupine]

75. Another great thought from the link

and yes...this link does prove the existence of this survey. Also in the link they explain that the survey also included some republican participants.

now I loved this paragraph:

Sanders has reminded observers that collective action and organized people remain the driving force behind social progress. The rough and tumble quality of strikes and protests and mass rallies don’t debase democracy — they are among its highest expressions.

And this (we keep saying this but Hillary supporters here don't want to accept it):

43 percent of voters — and 70 percent of young voters — opted for the social-democratic candidate, even though he was facing an opponent with greater institutional backing than any non-incumbent in history. (If more independents were allowed to vote, the result would have been even closer.)

[passiveporcupine]

77. and this just has to be said loud and clear

74 percent of Sanders supporters (compared to 56 percent of Clinton supporters) reported that “the difference in incomes between rich people and poor people” has grown “much larger” in the last twenty years.

Even though it is a known fact to economists, Hillary supporters don't believe there is an income and wealth inequality problem in this country that has been growing for a long time. They either don't know about it, or don't accept it as truth.

I wonder why?

[Generic Brad]

64. You linked to a You Tube video and blank survey form

Survey shows nothing.

[passiveporcupine]

96. Here is a link to the study

Not the data...but there is a button to go back to the data center, where you might be able to find the data.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

[passiveporcupine]

79. Yes, the study is real

Just posting this link again to this excellent article about Sander's supporters. Bernie people, you've gotta read this.

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/06/bernie-sanders-achen-bartels-white-men-krugman-election-clinton/

Now, for the study, I found a link to the ANES 2016 pilot study in an article (Writing in the New York Times, political scientists Christopher Achen and Larry Bartels) linked in the link above, and it says this about the study:

STUDY HIGHLIGHTS:
The ANES 2016 Pilot Study was conducted for the purpose of testing new questions and conducting methodological research to inform the design of future ANES studies, particularly the ANES 2016 Time Series. Much of the content was based on proposals from the ANES user community submitted through the Online Commons. The survey included questions about preferences in the presidential primary, stereotyping, the economy, discrimination, race and racial consciousness, police use of force, and numerous policy issues.

Data collection was conducted between January 22 and January 28, 2016. The sample consisted of 1,200 individuals who were part of an opt-in internet panel and who completed the 32 minute (median) questionnaire online. See the Codebook for more information about the sample.

http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm?version=meter+at+null&module=meter-Links&pgtype=article&contentId=&mediaId=&referrer=&priority=true&action=click&contentCollection=meter-links-click

So yes, it is a real study. This is not the page with the study data on it...you may have to register or something to see that, but there is a button to click to go back to the data center.

[BootinUp]

90. I went to that site once. And It was one time too many.

Its a Socialist site that spins current Democratic party philosophy and the media as being racist to white working class people, why? Because whenever it is often pointed out that white working class voters don't vote for the D party that is being racist. So obvious. /sarcasm

[TimPlo]

104. You mean like if a candiate made the statement like

“I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on,” she said in the interview, citing an article by The Associated Press.

It “found how Senator Obama’s support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me.

[BootinUp]

105. Yeah, I've seen the quote. Whenever a politician brings up race, its

a landmine, because it will be spun by whoever doesn't like them. Bottom line, polls showed something, she described it. BFD.

[Luminous Animal]

159. Sure it does. Yep, Bhaskar Sunkara, inspired by the Black Jacobins in Haiti has a soft spot

for the white working class.

[ucrdem]

111. So far no one including the OP has provided an actual study or data set. nt

[JRLeft]

119. There are plenty of links up the thread yet you keep repeating the same crap.

[ucrdem]

122. LOL, they're all the same bogus links. No one has posted any actual data. nt

[jfern]

80. David Brock is the one who claimed Michelle Obama said whitey

Funny how he then made up the whole myth of the sexist and racist white male BernieBro. Screw the Hillary campaign for their projecting their discrimination onto us. I will never vote for a campaign of hate.

[MattP]

84. Opt in internet panel

so anonymous people clicked yes I'm a racist Hillary supporter or a racist Bernie supporter, sounds legit

[MattP]

86. Sounds about as legit as a Drudge opt in poll

[Demsrule86]

97. This is why many of you will be purged, you will not stop bashing our nominee nt.

[BootinUp]

98. This is what we have to look forward to for the next 2 weeks. nt

[ucrdem]

131. How about for the last eight years??

[BootinUp]

142. Of course. Its been dreadful. nt

[Demsrule86]

167. True that

I will try to ignore the worst of them.

[Scootaloo]

101. I coulda told you this easy enough

[bbgrunt]

106. man, the denials here by Clinton supporters is

very telling.

One only must ask what kind of people are most likely to USE race as a divisive issue: people who are less racist or people who are more racist.

[B Calm]

140. Exactly, I can't count how many race baiting posts I've seen from Hill supporters

during this primary.

Very telling indeed!

[ucrdem]

110. Sanders campaign in miniature: deceptive claims defended by true believers. nt

[ContinentalOp]

135. There are far more racists among Hilary supporters

because she has far more supporters than Bernie!

[Nye Bevan]

136. #BernieStudies (nt)

[passiveporcupine]

160. This is a non-partisan election study

But I suspect you knew that.

Nice try though.

[Nye Bevan]

161. It's not even a "study", partisan or otherwise.

Did you even open the PDF?

[passiveporcupine]

163. I would have called it a survey,

but they labeled it a "study" on their site.

[Nye Bevan]

165. Nope, not a "survey" either (nt)

[passiveporcupine]

166. Not playin,

this could go on forever.

[asuhornets]

141. What a shame you would post this....nt

[B Calm]

145. Bwahaha...

[NorthCarolina]

146. I would venture to guess that would be a given.

Remember "Super Predators" and "bringing them to heel", giving the poor a choice between voluntary military service or making money for the private prison industry as a long term inmate?

[ucrdem]

148. It looks like Ford Fairlane got his video taken down. nt

[Cheese Sandwich]

149. What did Hillary supporters post porn on his site until it got removed?

They been known to do that.

[ucrdem]

151. Don't let Tink die!

[geek tragedy]

156. The PDF isn't a study, it's a template for an interview.

and LMAO at the youtube

[Nye Bevan]

162. Don't be ridiculous. It's a serious, peer-reviewed study conducted by a respectable academic,

who is a faculty member at a prestigious university.

Just kidding. It is, of course, a #BernieStudy.

[Spacedog1973]

164. That report showed both Bernie and Hillary supporters are racist.

Seems to me both groups are losers here. Nobody cares if you aren't as racist as the next guy if you too are racist.

Seems like a king of the midden heap fight to me.