Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:03 AM Jun 2016

"Presumptive" versus "official" nominee.

There won't be an official nominee until the convention. This is true for Democrats and for Republicans. Trump is not the official Republican nominee yet.

There will be a presumptive Democratic nominee on Tuesday. We get a presumptive nominee when one candidate, in this case Hillary, clinches a majority of delegates through a combination of pledged delegates and superdelegate commitments.

One's there's a presumptive nominee, for practical purposes, the primary is over. It's true, something weird could happen so that either Trump doesn't end up being the GOP nominee or Hillary doesn't end up being the Dem nominee. They could get struck by lightning. Or maybe it will be revealed that Hillary and Bernie are jointly operating a heroin ring. That would mean a chaotic convention.

But in real life, once someone secures the majority of delegates, they are the party's nominee. Even though technically pledged or superdelegates can switch sides, that's not going to happen. And there won't be a lightning strike either.

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Presumptive" versus "official" nominee. (Original Post) YouDig Jun 2016 OP
"Or maybe it will be revealed that Hillary and Bernie are jointly operating a heroin ring." grossproffit Jun 2016 #1
Agreed. moriah Jun 2016 #3
Or maybe Hillary is a gyroid robot and the Donald is an android robot? k8conant Jun 2016 #30
100% correct beachbum bob Jun 2016 #2
Hope Washington, DC can somehow get statehood. moriah Jun 2016 #4
Definitely DC needs statehood. Or at least become part of Maryland or VA. YouDig Jun 2016 #5
It's long past time. DC has a bigger population than RI or even DE. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #11
YOUR Assertion, Given The "Current Circumstances" W/ Hillary Is LAUGHABLE... She Has MUCH Ahead... CorporatistNation Jun 2016 #6
It's the truth yo. Mika Brezinski gets one vote, same as everyone else. And she already YouDig Jun 2016 #7
so what... beachbum bob Jun 2016 #9
What is it about the definition of this word that they cannot grasp? Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #8
the premise sanders LOST beachbum bob Jun 2016 #10
Exactly...first they have to get their brains around this: Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #12
zealots don't think the way the rest of us do beachbum bob Jun 2016 #14
Indeed, they share the same mental organization and a Manichean view of the world. Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #16
the pyscholgy isn't to odifficult to figure out beachbum bob Jun 2016 #21
Ah...there's the sticking point workinclasszero Jun 2016 #17
The revolution has just started. RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #19
Well the proof of that will be off year elections workinclasszero Jun 2016 #22
Wait and see. RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #25
Prove it in two years workinclasszero Jun 2016 #26
Like I said, wait and see. RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #28
Odd how about half of Democrats Mike__M Jun 2016 #31
What is it about the definition of this word that they cannot grasp? Wilms Jun 2016 #15
Nice word play, but NO win. Sorry, the operative word is indeed Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #18
When Hillary gets past 2026 pledged delegates late Tuesday/early Wednesday... moriah Jun 2016 #20
See now? There's your problem! You're relying on facts ... NurseJackie Jun 2016 #13
I love that picture. FSogol Jun 2016 #24
"Criminal investigation" versus "security review" frylock Jun 2016 #23
So, in your world, presumptive nominees can't be indicted or if they are they can't or shouldn't be highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #27
They why do we use the term "President Elect"? Waiting For Everyman Jun 2016 #29

grossproffit

(5,591 posts)
1. "Or maybe it will be revealed that Hillary and Bernie are jointly operating a heroin ring."
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:07 AM
Jun 2016


Thank you for the much needed laugh.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
4. Hope Washington, DC can somehow get statehood.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:15 AM
Jun 2016

I don't think our Founding Fathers intended for the District of Columbia to ever have so high a residential population, or they would have made different rules.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
6. YOUR Assertion, Given The "Current Circumstances" W/ Hillary Is LAUGHABLE... She Has MUCH Ahead...
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:17 AM
Jun 2016

to contend with... LEGALLY AND PERCEPTUALLY... w/o question... All of her own accord... e.g.,

e.g., MSNBC To the deniers... Watch THIS Video... It is not comforting to think that she may well be the Democratic Nominee...

Hillary really betrayed Andrea Mitchell... The entire context of this report was of a solemn nature... A Funeral so to speak...

Andrea Mitchell "I do not see this report as ...ANYTHING BUT... DEVASTATING!"

Chuck Todd "After this I don't think that she could get confirmed for Attorney General!"

Lots of FIBBING by Hillary here.. for more than a year!

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
7. It's the truth yo. Mika Brezinski gets one vote, same as everyone else. And she already
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:19 AM
Jun 2016

voted, she lives in New York, which Hillary won in a landslide. What she says on TV doesn't change the delegate math.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
9. so what...
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:24 AM
Jun 2016

I'll take a hillary over a trump any day of the week....and sanders is just a plain disaster...burned thru $200 million and still lose BIG....hell...his campaign so incompetent they didn't know how to google state primary rules so instead of just accepting their own malfeasance they sued everybody.... put its all been rigged....all to cover how they weren't even smart enough to google each states rules...bernie hire incompetent staff...wasted $200 million to lose


thank god we saved america from this level of incompetence

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
8. What is it about the definition of this word that they cannot grasp?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:21 AM
Jun 2016
presumptive

adjective pre·sump·tive -ˈzəm(p)-tiv

Definition of presumptive

1
: based on probability or presumption <the presumptive nominee>

2
: giving grounds for reasonable opinion or belief

3
: being an embryonic precursor with the potential for forming a particular structure or tissue in the normal course of development
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
12. Exactly...first they have to get their brains around this:
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:28 AM
Jun 2016
lose verb, ˈlüz

Simple Definition of lose

: to be unable to find (something or someone)

: to fail to win (a game, contest, etc.)

: to fail to keep or hold (something wanted or valued)

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
14. zealots don't think the way the rest of us do
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:31 AM
Jun 2016

rightwing and leftwing zealots share much more in common

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
17. Ah...there's the sticking point
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:38 AM
Jun 2016

Bernie LOST.

The revolution is a fail.

Once people got to know Bernie and his plans they rejected them and went with Hillary.

Berners can't seem to process that information, starting with Bernie Sanders himself down to the reddit troll living in mom's basement slamming hot pockets and dreaming of riots at the democratic convention where "the people" will Bern it down to the ground.

Maybe they will come around eventually. Or not.

Maybe they will start a new religion, who knows?

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
19. The revolution has just started.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:54 AM
Jun 2016

Although we may lose some of the battles, the war against oligarchy is far from over!
Neither Clinton, nor Drumpf will help the revolution, as they are part of the oligarchy.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
22. Well the proof of that will be off year elections
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 09:10 AM
Jun 2016

If the "revolution" shows up at the voting booth in massive numbers when its not a presidential election year, Ill believe its real and not a lot of hot air.

I highly doubt they will seeing as how they mostly haven't shown up for Bernie this year, but we will see.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
28. Like I said, wait and see.
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

WE HAVE BEEN ORGANIZING!
You can take that to the bank. Some of our candidates will be elected THIS YEAR as well. We are stronger than the third wayers.

Mike__M

(1,052 posts)
31. Odd how about half of Democrats
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:48 PM
Jun 2016

are completely fine with the Reagan Revolution, and have no desire to turn it around.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
15. What is it about the definition of this word that they cannot grasp?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:33 AM
Jun 2016
presumptuous

adjective

1. full of, characterized by, or showing presumption or readiness to presume in conduct or thought, as by saying or doing something without right or permission.

2. unwarrantedly or impertinently bold; forward.

3. Obsolete. presumptive.
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
18. Nice word play, but NO win. Sorry, the operative word is indeed
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:39 AM
Jun 2016
presumptive, much as it must pain you.

moriah

(8,311 posts)
20. When Hillary gets past 2026 pledged delegates late Tuesday/early Wednesday...
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:56 AM
Jun 2016

... the one who would be presumptuous to believe they should have the nomination would be Bernie, not Hillary.

4051 was magic pledged delegate number. If Bernie is going to talk down about Superdelegates, expecting them to overturn rhe will of the people just because he didn't win isn't just presumptuous, but hypocritical.

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
27. So, in your world, presumptive nominees can't be indicted or if they are they can't or shouldn't be
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

replaced.

Such a cozy little world.

Does it sound like 'OLIGARCHY"?

That was a little Church Lady impression there.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
29. They why do we use the term "President Elect"?
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 02:45 PM
Jun 2016

Why not just call a new Presidnt-to-be, "Mr. President" right after the election?

Because things are official when they become official, and not before.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»"Presumptive" versus "off...