Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:46 AM Jun 2016

What's more important for Sanders: contesting the convention or a prime time speaking spot?

Sanders can't be actively running against Hillary Clinton and also get a major prime time address at the convention to campaign against her.

Having won the primary voting, Clinton will not only be the presumptive nominee (endorsed by President Obama by that point), but will be in charge of the convention schedule. Her supporters, being a majority of all convention delegates and all governing bodies of the party and the convention, are not going to give her political opponent a platform in prime time to try to hurt her politically.

The entire purpose of the convention will be to help her defeat Donald Trump. Because, she won the voting.

So, if Sanders wants a prime time speaking slot (or any slot, in all likelihood), he'll have to abandon the pretext that he can persuade superdelegates to overrule the voters, and to publicly show that he's all-in to helping Clinton defeat Trump.

There is clear precedent for what happens when a candidate is actively contesting the nomination. In 1992 Jerry Brown refused to concede before the convention. He was therefore not given a primetime speaking gig before the nomination vote (neither did Bill Clinton). Instead, he was able to give remarks while seconding his own nomination. (thanks to Recursion for pointing this out)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1992_Democratic_National_Convention#Jerry_Brown


But, it's his choice to make. He has to consider his options, understanding he won't get everything he wants.

So, what should he do?








2 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
It's more important for Sanders to get a prime time address to speak about his values to a national audience
2 (100%)
It's more important for Sanders to get every last second to try to flip 500+ superdelegates
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's more important for Sanders: contesting the convention or a prime time speaking spot? (Original Post) geek tragedy Jun 2016 OP
Brown didn't get a prime time spot in '92 because he was still campaigning to the end Recursion Jun 2016 #1
Ah, good catch. I'll supplement the post with a hat tip to you. nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2
tough one as sanders never turns down the opportunity of a microphone beachbum bob Jun 2016 #3
Bernie expects both because BeyondGeography Jun 2016 #4
he won't get both. if he wanted both he should have won nt geek tragedy Jun 2016 #5

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
1. Brown didn't get a prime time spot in '92 because he was still campaigning to the end
Thu Jun 2, 2016, 07:49 AM
Jun 2016

He got an address when he seconded his own nomination, but that was it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What's more important for...