2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Needs To Go Away
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/dnc/20160601_Sanders_supporters_planning_to_rally_at_convention.htmlThe Sanders campaign wants to hold a "traditional Bernie campaign rally" July 24 at FDR Park in South Philadelphia, campaign spokesman Michael Briggs said.
If you needed more proof that Bernie is in this all for himself, and has little to no interest in actually helping the Democratic party win the White House in the fall, here it is. Blatant evidence that Bernie is going to try to steal some of the spotlight for himself, and make the convention as much about him as the actual nominee.
For months, Sanders fans have been asking why so many were complaining about him not being a Democrat before he needed to be for a run. THIS is why. Because he is still trying to give the party the finger, even when any good or decent person would be helping lead the charge to defeat Trump.
Bernie has lost every ounce of my respect.
Merryland
(1,134 posts)and I think that pretty soon the FBI will solve this problem for us.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)and lose.
I know it's not a laughing matter. I just couldn't help it.
840high
(17,196 posts)StevieM
(10,500 posts)It hasn't been a coronation. She isn't going to jail. And she is not going to lose.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)n/t !!
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)thinkers has been saying for over a year now.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)I guess real democrates are suppose to sit on their hands and tape their mouths
Response to Merryland (Reply #1)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Response to Merryland (Reply #1)
Th1onein This message was self-deleted by its author.
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)How will Bernie ever get past it??? The pain of losing that ounce of respect must be killing him. Hopefully, he'll have the millions of people who do respect him to console him through this tough time of losing the respect of some nameless, faceless internet poster.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)We're talking about a negligible amount of respect to begin with.
Did you ever notice it's the ones that never had any respect in the first place that say shit like this?
Matt_in_STL
(1,446 posts)It's also the ones who got here long enough to have lost any respect or goodwill anyone might have built up for them.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)one more round of that tired old meme: "Bernie should go away". - You wish.
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)Except straight to that White House place that is!
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)after the way he's behaved ?
Well maybe she's definitely shown more class and grace than he has.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)puffy socks
(1,473 posts)SFnomad
(3,473 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)handle with care
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)the people. The ones below the top 10% threshold that are mostly considered undesirables, super predators, lazy unmotivated leeches on the government teat, cell warmers for the private prison industry, and meat shields for the volunteer armed forces.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)Suggest you reconsider your blind faith.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)a simple party line voter.
avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)Hillary has presumed far too much. Her arrogance is primary among her many failings.
She will never be POTUS.
I would much rather see Bernie Sanders an honest candidate who has real commitment to the issues be our next President.
Hillary is weak tea on all levels.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)She is reacting to Trumps stupidity. She reacted to Sanders and steadily lost ground for a year, and is still receding.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)is to say he has the right to stay in the race, and that he is committed to keeping Trump out of the WH.
I don't see much agreement with the opinion "It was weak".
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)She is doing the same thing, she just has a lot more ammo with Trump. If she wants to get into a shit slinging contest with him, instead of talking about her own policy positions, he wins.
If she merely reacts to his idiotic nonsense, he wins.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)the ONLY reason she has soft balled Bernie is for better party unity looking forward to the GE.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Problem was, she didn't have anything to throw at him. All she in her surrogates have on Sanders is a bunch of made-up dramatic nonsense.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)I am less and less confident that will happen.
merrily
(45,251 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)and it was delightful to hear, but it was not a strength. It was schoolyard banter, totally enjoyable but not presidential in tone or delivery, a desperate ploy to get a bump, and she will get one.
SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)Is it blind faith, a delusion, or is it pipe dream, make up your mind? The two party system is a sham. We're lucky to get one good candidate in the whole bunch!
Yet the stupid masses still vote for them, and cheer when the biggest whore of them all wins.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)Talk about wishful thinking.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)more cops and mandatory minimums?
Voted For war and military aid in Yugoslavia, Kosovo, Somalia, Egypt, Israel and the 08 iraq liberatoon act..the ousting of Saddam Hussein, the 2000 CFMA , to dump toxic waste in a city of impoverished people?
So obvious he's in it for the working man.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)From:
http://crooksandliars.com/2015/12/surprise-bernie-sanders-voted-act-crashed
The Commodity Futures Modernization Act, that greased the skids for banks and other financial institutions to run roughshod without any messy government oversight, was tucked into a bloated 11,000 page conference report when no one was looking, and passed by a lopsided 377-4 margin during a lame-duck session with a veto-proof majority -- not that it needed one.
President Clinton, who had been lobbying behind the scenes in support of the act while publicly harrumphing about the evils of deregulation, signed it into law without batting an eye.
Buried in the act was a yummy provision exempting Enron and other companies from energy trading regulatory oversight.
Not coincidentally, in the years before the energy giant self destructed, it was a generous contributor to Texas Senator Phil Gramm, he of Gramm-Leach-Bliley, and later presidential candidate John MCains financial adviser. Gramm's wife Wendy was paid over $1 million in salary, stock options, dividends and other goodies from 1993 to 2001 as an Enron board member, but of course was deaf, dumb and blind to the energy company's rampant books cooking with the acquiescence of the late unlamented Arthur Andersen accounting company.
Sanders complicity in the passage of the Commodities Futures Modernization Act may help explain his fixation on restoration of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall Act, which barred commercial banks from investing in the very speculative financial deals which contributed significantly to the 2008 meltdown. (President Clinton also supported the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which overturned Glass-Steagall.)
Many of Hillary Clintons top donors have, of course, been Too Big to Fail financial institutions, and she has said she would not restore Glass-Steagall, opting instead to better regulate speculators, whatever that means. etc......
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)Clinton veto would have been over ridden and it was a GOP bill.
Bernie still voted for it the CFMA he gets no excuses --just as Bernie's camp holds everyone else to. You made the standard you live by it.
Hillary is correct reinstating Glass Steagall wont solve the problem --the exact same problem was avoided in mid 90s when the bankers got together to thwart it with Greenspan, Summers, and Rubin. and guess what? Glass Steagall was still in effect at that time. So obviously reinstating it isn't going to solve the problem.
"opting instead to better regulate speculators, whatever that means"
It means regulating the different kinds of collateral backed securities etc. and the CDSs that were supposed to insure defaults were covered..obviously you don't care enough to actually analyze the problem. You'd just rather bandwagon bash Hillary and continue the dumb idea that breaking up banks doesn't touch the systemic problem. It also would add to the cost of banking for customers because of undoing cost effective synergies.
SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)It's just some more ratfucking - A word used in the Nixon White House for dirty tricks. We will see a lot of ratfucking before this campaign is over. And the media will call it the best speech ever!
From:
GAWKER
gawker.com/why-would-hillary-clinton-criticize-bernie-sanderss
Apr 15, 2016
Brendan O'Connor4/15/16 8:18am
Filed to: Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000
Why Would Hillary Clinton Criticize Bernie Sanders's Vote for Legislation Her Husband Signed Into Law?
At one point during last nights Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton tried to use Bernie Sanderss anti-Wall Street message against him. Im the only one on this stage who did not vote to deregulate swaps and derivatives, as Senator Sanders did, she said. That contributed to the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and started the cascade.
Clinton was referring to the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, which Sanders voted for as a member of the House of Representativesand which President Bill Clinton signed into law. In fact, there were significant differences between the bill Sanders signed, which passed the House by 377 to 4 (with 51 abstentions) in October 2000, and the one that became law. The bill was introduced into the Senate in December, but thanks to its chief architect, Texas Senator Phil Gramm, that body never voted on it. From The Huffington Post: In December, Gramm after coordinating with top Clinton administration officials added much harder-edged deregulatory language to the bill, then attached the entire package to a must-pass 11,000-page bill funding the entire federal government. After Gramms workshopping, the legislation included new language saying the federal government shall not exercise regulatory authority with respect to, a covered swap agreement offered, entered into, or provided by a bank. That ended all government oversight of derivatives purchased or traded by banks. He also created the so-called Enron Loophole, which barred federal oversight of energy trading on electronic platforms.
Those top Clinton administration officials, according to the Sunlight Foundation, were members of the Presidents Working Group on Financial Markets: Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, CFTC Chairman William Rainer, and SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt.
Also, while it is true that Clinton didnt vote for CFMA, that is a meaningless claim to make, as she wasnt in the Senate at the time any of the relevant legislation was being considered.
aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)This is a moment for Democrats, progressive, and leftists and not just one person.
I think this is a great idea for Bernie to meet with supporters in conjunction with the convention.
SamKnause
(13,093 posts)He is an honorable man.
puffy socks
(1,473 posts)that yuuuuge campaign debt he has that will probably grow after he's forced to send back all the illegal donations he took in.
frylock
(34,825 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)From:
http://freebeacon.com/politics/feds-flag-thousands-of-illegal-bernie-sanders-contributions/
FEC sends second letter this month to Sanders campaign noting prohibited contributions
BY: Lachlan Markay
February 26, 2016 10:50 am
Sanders campaign has relied on small-dollar individual contributions to a far greater extent than any other presidential campaign, including the Super PAC- and dark money-fueled efforts of Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
The Vermont Senator and self-described socialist is running on a platform of transparency and campaign finance reform, contrasting his grassroots support with Clintons high-dollar donors and use of loopholes in federal election laws that allow her campaign to coordinate with outside groups that can accept unlimited contributions.
The FEC sent a letter to the Sanders campaign earlier this month flagging an additional 1,316 excessive, prohibited, and impermissible contributions in the fourth quarter of 2015.
The commission also noted disbursements from the campaign that failed to include required documentation.
The Sanders campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Some of the campaigns legal problems stem from enthusiasm for Sanders candidacy from foreign nationals, many of whom have publicly revealed donations to the campaign in violation of U.S. election laws.
I am German, live in Germany and just donated to Bernie Sanders campaign on www.BernieSanders.com simply using my credit cardIs this illegal in any way? asked a user on the website Quora.
UPDATE: Donation rescinded based on your answers, the user later added.
This entry was posted in Politics and tagged Bernie Sanders, Campaign Finance
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Of $2700 per donor, he has ask for an extension on the second letter. He will indeed have to return those donations. He thinks too much money in campaigns and he is not following the current campaign finance rules, why go for more rules.
Response to Thinkingabout (Reply #180)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #191)
Thinkingabout This message was self-deleted by its author.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)of his issues is to work with the party to push forward legislation that he favors. His current strategy is going to leave him without senate Democratic allies, and push his goals into the background. Therefore, it is not a strategy to "fight for" you. Look closely. He is a man unwilling to accept reality. One who is loving this ride, and doesn't want to go back to his everyday life. Understandable, but not good for his cause, the party, or the country.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Bull fucking shit!
"He is a man unwilling to accept reality."
He is the ONLY one who DOES see reality and tells the truth about it.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)Then they insult to the max. How can they be so stupid?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)some inner anger issues. It comes out here where they do not have to actually confront anyone face to face.
panader0
(25,816 posts)They have just about ruined DU for me.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Instead they built walls
Irony
pangaia
(24,324 posts)The owner of the site has basically decided to shut up the Bernie supporters, however he chooses to explain it.
In one way it disturbs me, but in another way I can not really fault him. He has run a very good site for many years. He owns it. I guess it is his choice.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)As the site devolves into an echo chamber not unlike Free Republic.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)But I certainly understand your feelings about it...
panader0
(25,816 posts)And tells us long timers that we won't be welcome here. And proud of it.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)But, that's the usual copy and paste reply so..
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)cha ching!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Disappear.
But hey, beds made. Whatever
pangaia
(24,324 posts)That stuff can go both ways. But to me, maybe because of the candidate I support, I find it bothersome that those on the side of Goliath gloat at the prospect of winning.
I also do not see anywhere that they see the enormity of the difference in the reasons Bernie and Hillary are running for president. It just totally escapes what seems to me to be most of them. ( I don't like using THEY, THEM,, but----)
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)They just put Bernie shirts on before rioting last night in San Jose.
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)any of you will ever see reason. We have taken to attacking you instead...all the fun of Free Republic with none of the nausea.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)In November too?
Then perhaps you are correct and progressives should move on to another party.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)than you and "your kind."
Profile information
About anotherproletariat
Statistics and Information
Account status: Active
Member since: Mon Feb 8, 2016, 01:56 PM
Number of posts: 1,278
Number of posts, last 90 days: 1182
Favorite forum: General Discussion: Primaries, 899 posts in the last 90 days (76% of total posts)
Favorite group: Hillary Clinton, 262 posts in the last 90 days (22% of total posts)
Last post: Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:21 PM
Jury
Willing to serve on Juries: Yes
Chance of serving on Juries: 45% (explain)
1278 total posts: +13
116 days of membership: +12
20 or more posts in the last 90 days: +20
Star member: +40
2 posts hidden in 90 days: -40
TOTAL: 45
Detailed explanation | Close
PaulaFarrell
(1,236 posts)If anyone's kind shouldn't be allowed here it's yours, Mister/Miz Been Here Less Than 4 months and want to ban people
Response to pangaia (Reply #78)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)But, I made rules for myself that there are certain folks to whom I will not reply, no matter what.
I just disobeyed my rule.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)You forgot to finish the sentence.
Merryland
(1,134 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)So you're saying 80% of DUers should go away.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)Skinner's 'property' is going to severely lose much of its value.
bvf
(6,604 posts)not to mention political connections, I'm guessing.
I doubt he'll take much of a hit, given his obvious allegiances. He's just a businessman, nothing more or less in that respect, and probably gave his ledger a good look or two well before the Big Amnesty.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)The rest is an old and tired and worn out meme.
His problem is that he is not a 3rd Wayer, so it took an Independent-turned -Democrat to represent what is clearly half of the party and stand on our traditional long-time values.
The Coronation clearly did not. Sorry, but true.
Demsrule86
(68,553 posts)but no more...Bernie makes me sick at this point...I have a gay daughter. God knows what would happen to her if Trump wins...and Bernie does not give a damn about the people his action could hurt.
frylock
(34,825 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)but deleted it. It's just an opinion, after all
anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)He accomplished his goal of pushing progressive issues into the forefront, and for that he and his supporters should be proud. I think if you are honest with yourself, you will see that he does not represent "half of the party" but that he was able to bring in people who are not Democrats. This is clearly great, if those people remain engaged and work for liberal causes. However, given Sanders' rhetoric, it will be almost impossible to bring many of his supporters into the Democratic fold.
I will concede that most Dems thought it would be an easier primary in terms of money and time spent by the candidate. Most Hillary supporters were never really worried that she would lose, the concern was over the divisions being caused within the party. I attended a fundraising breakfast yesterday with one of Hillary's senior advisors, and they have firm plans to keep her in the spotlight, no matter what happens in CA. It started with the foreign policy speech yesterday, which pretty much put the primary behind everyone who is watching. Then, if she wins CA, it is expected that Sanders will leave the race, either voluntarily or for all practical purposes because he will lose all media coverage. If she loses, she still will have been declared the presumptive nominee and she has all the Democratic Party 'big wigs' ready for a series of press conferences to endorse her. This will dominate the MSM for the remainder of the week, and it will be difficult for someone who lost the primary (even if he won the biggest state) to make any real impact. Remember that Hillary won CA in 2008, so you can expect to hear about how she handled that loss and worked tirelessly to make sure that her supporters voted for Obama in November.
forjusticethunders
(1,151 posts)It's the fact that he's literally burning down his movement instead of setting it up for further gains. Sanders got 41% of the delegates; he pretty much could have had any number of big consolation prizes if he agrees to unity after the last vote is cast. DWS gone and replaced with someone of his choice, including himself, Senate Majority leader, lots of primetime committees, just about any cabinet position short of VP (or maybe even VP before the meltdown of the discourse). But he had to go full Don Quixote and now he's pretty rapidly making himself radioactive. Keep in mind primary losers have a tendency to lose in their home states after losing a primary and a lot of traditional Dems REALLY dislike Bernie now, because people don't like being called corporate shills or w****es.
Maybe he took that sheepdog shit from the pro-lefts on Counterpunch and stuff personally. The far lefties were basically calling him an Establishment shill for even running as a Democrat and pledging to support the nominee. So he has to get in some shots before the convention to keep his "street cred".
SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)We're not recruiting for the Democratic Party. We are working to elect the most likely candidate that represents our views.
There are two wars going on right now and who really is discussing that? Not the media - that's for sure!
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts). Clinton is a sinking ship. Her lies have finally caught up with her.
chascarrillo
(3,897 posts)leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Until then, please keep talking about him. I'm sure he thanks you for keeping him front and center on DU.
chascarrillo
(3,897 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)He lost...
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)will fight with him on the things WE WHO ARE WITH HIM think are important for, well, forever.
So, if you think the Democratic Party is just going to get rid of us, or our ideas, or our feelings about things and the way things should be, and go back to being a brain-dead reaction to a bad Reagan dream, you are sorely mistaken.
ancianita
(36,025 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)being like 68. If one expects crowds with energy and a desire to express themselves it is very wise to create organized events to allow that expression and to channel that energy. All political conventions have crowds outside the event and of course the people of the city don't get into the hall either. Holding rallies which include those who are not convention attendees is a great idea.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)Bernie has run a great campaign and generated much enthusiasm but he is short of votes and there is no way he will win the nomination. Trump must be defeated, and the stakes are too high to fail in that endeavor. This should be the focus going forward.
emulatorloo
(44,117 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Bernie has galvanized support for issues that millions of Americans have been passionate about yet before his campaign got almost no widespread attention.
He has changed the discourse in this country profoundly and will continue to change it, whether he's elected President or not.
Why should he go away?
Thanks to Bernie, we're just getting started.
Response to RufusTFirefly (Reply #36)
Post removed
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Bernie is one of the best things to happen to the Democratic Party.
He is restoring us to our New Deal roots.
Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton is one of the worst things.
CountAllVotes
(20,868 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)FSogol
(45,480 posts)permit for the day before the the 2017 Presidential Inauguration kicks off in Washington, DC!
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)You have seen it here, the claim that Bill Clinton campaigned openly as a conservative and now Hillary is and if we vote for them we are voting for the globalist agenda.
Why do you want that for yourself?
Autumn
(45,057 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)Not 2%. Not 5%. Not even 10%.
Nearly half. That's the part HRC supporters do not get, and that is a big reason for the friction.
It is a neck and neck election. So don't get all haughty about anything whatsoever. We have just as much right to a say about things as you do.
If Bernie wants to have a gathering in Philly, he will damn well do so. The constant complaining does not help her image.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)A 10% margin is a landslide, not a close race.
Also Sanders actually at 42.7%, not 45%. A 12.7% percent margin.
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/D
ancianita
(36,025 posts)Berners -- without Bernie -- have already obtained three demonstration permits for the convention period, anyway.
Three weeks ago: http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/05/20/sanders-supporters-secure-rally-permit-near-democratic-convention-in-philadelphia/
Yours is not proof at all. His permit request is not about giving the party the finger; it's about giving his supporters the progressive voice outside or inside the convention. Which they've already arranged for themselves on theirs and his behalf, anyway.
If this is all it takes for you to lose respect for him, you likely didn't have much, anyway, beyond a total misunderstanding of who he stands for.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Bernie was never a Democrat. He joined the party so he could run. Now that he's lost, he's still threatening to hold an event outside the convention that will draw attention away from the party coming together around the nominee.
As a Democrat, what am I supposed to respect about someone putting themselves above everyone else, above the party, and above doing the right thing for winning in November?
ancianita
(36,025 posts)Do you know that his decision to run as a Democrat was the realistic, practical one made from knowing that progressives never even get a voice through third party campaigns?
Do you know that "lost" is still not factually final? That the party hasn't closed the deal for Hillary?
Do you know that this Democratic Socialist has helped revive the historical strengths and appeal to a large population that would otherwise have remained politically disengaged? Do you respect that at all?
The right thing for you and this party is to give credit where credit is due, thank the man for reviving the party by infusing youthful engagement in politics and joining The People again?
This isn't about "doing the right thing" in November. The right thing is to make sure that there is a clear cut choice between candidates to GOTV.
Respect his and his millions of supporters' efforts, even if they're making you feel uncomfortable right now. This process is how we get more of what we want from playing politics for the long haul.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)There is a word that comes to mind... hmmm... what am I looking for? Starts with an A... You know who agrees with you on this? George W Bush and Donald J Trump, They both hate demonstrators as well.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Every convention on both parties has this as a feature. This is hardly new. This year, due to dynamics on the ground both will be a hoot to watch, and I hardly mean the proceedings inside.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)I never said Bernie COULDN'T do it. I said he SHOULDN'T.
Tell me, when do conventions regularly feature the losing candidates giving campaign speeches outside while the nominee is being celebrated? When do the losing candidates get to make the case that they should have won?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts).lThis primary has disabused me from the notion that people are cry babies and authoritarians on both sides.
As to a recent example, 2012 Republican convention
Or you forgot Ron Paul?
ContinentalOp
(5,356 posts)Response to nadinbrzezinski (Reply #74)
Post removed
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Millions of his supporters need to come back, and vote for the Democratic candidate.
My first choice would be for Sanders to endorse Clinton on Wednesday after there is no longer any incentive for him not to do so, and spend the next 6 months helping beat Trump.
Failing that, he should at least stop helping Trump beat Clinton.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)We found out within hours of his announcing his run that Sanders supporters were sexists and racists, plenty of posters right here on DU were keeping us informed of every horrible thing they said and did.
No, the Democrats are better off without such people in the party, all they will do is bring down the high standards of inclusiveness and civility the Democratic party is widely renowned for.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Even accepting your premise (which, obviously, I don't), it's not relevant.
The Democratic party shouldn't offer to do racist or sexist things to encourage racists and sexists to vote for it, but if they do so even so, great.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)The Dem party is going to reap what they sowed.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)9 months ago, I was deeply pessimistic about this election cycle - no party has won the presidency three times in a row since the war, except in 1992.
That's all changed now, thanks to Donald Trump. I'm far from certain of a Democratic victory, but I now think it's the more likely outcome, and the prediction markets agree with me.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And the pundits were wrong. He was never, ever, like ever, get the nomination.
The messaging by a core group here has been off putting. The dirty tricks have been historic. Even now people keep sowing the wind.
Oh and yes, I can see Trump winning. I said my piece months ago. Now it is even more likely. Your party is about to make a Weimar Republic level mistake. But please, do proceed. The whirlwind will affect all of us though.
And it has precious little to do with how people vote. Part of that is how stupidly we do elections in this country. Enjoy that harvest though.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I think the comparison between Sanders and McGovern has far more accuracy than one between Clinton and the Weimar Republic.
Arguably, O'Malley would have been a better choice than Clinton, but he never got anywhere, and I don't think there was much to choose there either way.
The important thing is that, unlike the Republicans, the Democratic party avoided shooting itself in the foot by nominating an unrealistic, unvetted, dishonest, hardline populist who doesn't care about appealing outside his core ideological constituency, and is consequently now well-placed to win the election, albeit far from certain to do so.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)And myself. I consider neither party my ally anymore
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)He's like the obnoxious party crasher who refuses to take the hint, who sticks around, hogging the bathroom, crashing on the couch, and leaving his crap all over the living room.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)She and her husband are like a couple of spoiled children who think they're entitled to all of the attention all of the time from people.
840high
(17,196 posts)ancianita
(36,025 posts)The man is no guest at your "first woman President" fiesta. Nor has he left "crap" or been a "hog." Bernie's 28 years of good service in Congress made him part owner of this election house and he ain't leavin' 'til he's damned good and ready. When your own party's candidate has been blacked out by fearful establishment media lapdogs, and when Sean Hannity even feels guilty about it, you know this man is not getting due respect.
This "pain in the ass" attitude, added to accusations of "subconscious misogyny" toward millions of young people who've been more sensitive to feminist issues than any generation in history, suggests that the OP and you are among a huge number of thin-skinned sore winners. If you consider your camp the winners.
There has been nothing gained in DU with all this "pain in the ass" attitude from Hillary supporters. I've stayed away from it.
But now that we should be in the "may the best wo/man win" mode, people just can't quit talking shit about Berners or Bernie, instead of challenging his record, agenda or weaknesses as a leader.
Hillary hasn't engaged in these personalized resentments. She and Bernie have engaged in the adult politics. People around here need to shake off GOP general political habits. Because we're going to have NoDrought Trump on the horizon and his folks are enthusiastically united in their stupidity, with plenty of oligarchic money to back it.
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)HOW DARE HE GIVE A RALLY BEFORE THE CONVENTION BEFORE HIS SUPPORTERS!!!
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)second of all, no, if his supporters want to go to a rally after he loses, what's the harm?
mmonk
(52,589 posts)If we go away, how will you non racist corporatists defeat the racist ones? Do your lords on Wall Street have an answer for that one?
jack_krass
(1,009 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)I am so grateful he has done what the rest of our party was too afraid to do.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Bernie Sanders' ego. He promised to run a positive campaign and he completely abandoned that when it became evident he could not win. My wife voted for Bernie Sanders in the Illinois primary and I voted for HRC. I agonized over that decision because his rhetoric appeals to my values. It has since become evident to both of us that I made the right decision. If Bernie gave a fuck about the ideals he espouses then he would get behind the nominee... but he doesn't... why? Money, ego?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)He is in it for other human beings.
THAT is the difference between him and and almost every other presidential I can think of in my long life time..
And ESPECIALLY Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton is in this for herself first.
ecstatic
(32,685 posts)dinkytron
(568 posts)politicaljunkie41910
(3,335 posts)In between the 4 year span of presidential election years, millions of people turn 18 and are eligible to vote for the first time. Who knew? This is not some new phenomenon that exists due to Bernie's candidacy. Stop trying to turn Bernie into a saint or some kind of genius. He hasn't done anything that hasn't been done before him. He might have a few more first time voters than Obama, but not enough to change the outcome, that Hillary will have more pledged delegates as well as super-delegates and will be the nominee.
dinkytron
(568 posts)Bernie achieved with no super pac $$$ is a game changing milestone? Don't you find value in the empowerment of regular folks?
I call bullshit on your attempt to minimize his achievements.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)it's things like that which lead to a demonstration
Sandersdemocrat2020
(91 posts)I am a Sanders Supporter, but I think Peace needs to be made between the two camps- Hillary and Bernie. It is not productive for both sides to be at each others throats. Hillary and her People must recognize the power and legitimacy of the Sanders Political Revolution and the Millions of People who support it. That is on the one hand.
On the other hand, The Sanders People must recognize that Hilary is the likely Democratic Candidate. As a Sanders Supporter, I am still hopeful for a strong result in California. Regardless of how that Primary turns out, Bernie has already earned a place at the Table, and Hillary and her People need to acknowledge that and respect that if we are all to go forward to oppose Trump.
Both sides need to develop more respect for each other. The real Enemy at this point is Trump. We need to get past our differences and unite against Trump.
portlander23
(2,078 posts)I hear there's going to be a vacancy in the White House ...
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Too bad so sad that we all can't get what we want. Isn't it?
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)skylucy
(3,739 posts)so many "talking points" to help Trump. I still hold out a tiny bit of hope that after June 7th, Sanders will do the right thing and show that he was telling the truth when he said he will do everything he can to ensure that Trump is not president. Every loyal Dem will be watching on June 8th. We will find out if Sanders cares more about himself or more about his fellow Americans. And when he reveals himself, I do hope the Democratic Party remembers that "when someone shows you who they are....believe them." And then the DNC needs to plan their convention accordingly.
jillan
(39,451 posts)We hear ya loud and clear
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)SouthernDemLinda
(182 posts)I'm sure they don't know that if Bernie drops out, after he pays all his bills, the left over funds will go to the DNC. Why give the money to the DNC when they worked against Bernie Sanders.
43 states allow write-ins. Sanders can win. There is a write him in movement.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Fla Dem
(23,653 posts)At the last reporting he had about $5 million left and that was before he really started to campaign in Ca. He'll blow whatever he has left campaigning there. Most of his donors are maxed out. Either they can't afford to give anymore money to a losing effort, or they've reached their $2700 limit. Then once the audit is done on his campaign finances, they'll find many ineligible contributions which will have to be returned. Money from foreigners, and contributions from individuals over the $2700 limit. Bernie will be going hat in hand to the DNC to bail him out.
If Bernie had really been interested in starting a revolution, he would have gotten out of the race and used what goodwill and funds he had to reach out to all his supporters, create an organization that would build on his candidacy and push for the ideals all his supporters thought he believed in. Instead he has created a lot of animosity on the left, depleted his war chest and he will go slink back to the senate where he can rail against the system like he's done for the past 35 years with nothing to show for it.
It will be a major disappointment to all his supporters when they find out their hero has feet of clay.
rateyes
(17,438 posts)About CrowCityDem
Statistics and Information
Account status: Active
Member since: Wed Mar 30, 2016, 10:09 AM
Number of posts: 1,401
Number of posts, last 90 days: 1401
Favorite forum: General Discussion: Primaries, 1188 posts in the last 90 days (85% of total posts)
Favorite group: Hillary Clinton, 112 posts in the last 90 days (8% of total posts)
Last post: Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:17 PM
Jury
Willing to serve on Juries: Yes
Chance of serving on Juries: 0% (explain)
1401 total posts: +14
65 days of membership: +7
20 or more posts in the last 90 days: +20
Not a Star member: +0
4 posts hidden in 90 days: -80
TOTAL: 0
Logical
(22,457 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)You really are looking for unity...give me a fricken break.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)cliffordu
(30,994 posts)MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Derp!
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Number23
(24,544 posts)most Democrats too.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...with that event:
- Single Payer.
- Free tuition
- Legal marijuana
- Carbon tax
- Bigger Social Security benefits
840high
(17,196 posts)larkrake
(1,674 posts)indigoth
(137 posts)That Bernie sanders is "in it" to help the common American citizen regardless of which party you back.
And that seems far, far, FAR more important than any political party
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)"It's not me.....It's WE"
We're gonna have a rally, big deal
Make it like a Woodstock for Bernie Beatniks...why the hate?
MFM008
(19,806 posts)for many to make the transition on June 16 away from nominee bashing.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)him speak in prime time at the Democratic Convention.
potone
(1,701 posts)I took a few hours off, and this is what I come back to??? Why can't the Hillary supporters just wait for the convention instead of bashing Bernie for having the unpardonable audacity for actually running for the Democratic nomination in the Democratic primaries? These Hillary supporters need to calm down and stop harassing Bernie and his supporters!!!
My goodness, I have never seen such pearl-clutching and vapor-salts=grabbing in my life! Some of these Hillary supporter need to take to their fainting couches until the primary in California is over.
I am glad that we Sanders supporters are made of stronger stuff.