Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:27 PM Jun 2016

Bombshell: Clinton aide claims that if Bernie wins California he wins the nomination

The Wall Street Journal Published a bombshell analysis today from a Clinton Pollster, Doug Shoen, explaining that Hillary may lose the nomination if she loses to Bernie in California.

There is now more than a theoretical chance that Hillary Clinton may not be the Democratic nominee for president.

How could that happen, given that her nomination has been considered a sure thing by virtually everyone in the media and in the party itself? Consider the possibilities.

The inevitability behind Mrs. Clinton’s nomination will be in large measure eviscerated if she loses the June 7 California primary to Bernie Sanders. That could well happen.

A recent PPIC poll shows Mrs. Clinton with a 2% lead over Mr. Sanders, and a Fox News survey found the same result. Even a narrow win would give him 250 pledged delegates or more—a significant boost. California is clearly trending to Mr. Sanders, and the experience in recent open primaries has been that the Vermont senator tends to underperform in pre-election surveys and over-perform on primary and caucus days, thanks to the participation of new registrants and young voters.

To this end, data from mid-May show that there were nearly 1.5 million newly registered Democratic voters in California since Jan. 1. That’s a 218% increase in Democratic voter registrations compared with the same period in 2012, a strongly encouraging sign for Mr. Sanders.

A Sanders win in California would powerfully underscore Mrs. Clinton’s weakness as a candidate in the general election. Democratic superdelegates—chosen by the party establishment and overwhelmingly backing Mrs. Clinton, 543-44—would seriously question whether they should continue to stand behind her candidacy.

There is every reason to believe that at the convention Mr. Sanders will offer a rules change requiring superdelegates to vote for the candidate who won their state’s primary or caucus. A vote on that proposed change would almost certainly occur—and it would function as a referendum on the Clinton candidacy. If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in New Jersey, he could well be within 200 pledged delegates of Mrs. Clinton, making a vote in favor of the rules change on superdelegates more likely.

Another problem: In recent weeks the perception that Mrs. Clinton would be the strongest candidate against Donald Trump has evaporated. The Real Clear Politics polling average has Mrs. Clinton in a statistical tie with Mr. Trump, and recent surveys from ABC News/Washington Post and Fox News show her two and three points behind him, respectively.


http://marshallreport.com/2016/06/02/bombshell-clinton-aide-claims-that-if-bernie-wins-california-he-wins-the-nomination/
70 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bombshell: Clinton aide claims that if Bernie wins California he wins the nomination (Original Post) Playinghardball Jun 2016 OP
Lol Bill Clinton pollster in the 1990s itsrobert Jun 2016 #1
Can you spell Ad Hominem? LOL. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #11
I think he was just pointing out that is misleading to say "Clinton aide" yellowcanine Jun 2016 #34
Can you spell LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #42
Yes, Clinton Aristocracy Fantasy. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #43
"LOL" - (adj.) lahl - backed into a rhetorical corner; got nothin'. syn: ROFL lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #30
Doug Schoen is a Fox News Democrat. Ignore him. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #2
...and Berners are trying to pretend they are the "progressives". YouDig Jun 2016 #8
Lanny Davis has been a long-time Fox News Democrat. He's Go Go Clinton. Zen Democrat Jun 2016 #45
Keep on dreaming. That is so not going to happen. Arkansas Granny Jun 2016 #3
We aren't dreaming of a Clinton Aristocracy, we are fighting for freedom from the domination rhett o rick Jun 2016 #12
No, some of us are accepting the reality of the situation. Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic Arkansas Granny Jun 2016 #16
Bernie will be our next President madokie Jun 2016 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife Jun 2016 #68
K & R nt findrskeep Jun 2016 #4
LOL n/t Lucinda Jun 2016 #5
"LOL" - (adj.) lahl - backed into a rhetorical corner; got nothin'. syn: ROFL lagomorph777 Jun 2016 #31
I would put more faith into this if it weren't in the execrable WSJ Fast Walker 52 Jun 2016 #6
"Even a narrow win would give him 250 pledged delegates or more". How dumb can someone be? YouDig Jun 2016 #7
Yep, losing California in 2008 was really the deal-breaker for Obama's candidacy Tarc Jun 2016 #9
That was in February. frylock Jun 2016 #22
Oh, you mean this home stretch? Tarc Jun 2016 #23
Worked out well for Obama, considering he wasn't under investigation by the FBI. frylock Jun 2016 #25
You don't say... Tarc Jun 2016 #33
You were the one brought up Obama. frylock Jun 2016 #44
Yes, I did, when pointing out that late-season primary losses are not an indicator Tarc Jun 2016 #46
Hillary is no Obama. frylock Jun 2016 #47
You're right. auntpurl Jun 2016 #49
That was prior to DWS' reign of terror. frylock Jun 2016 #51
Sure. That's why Bernie's lost the primary. auntpurl Jun 2016 #52
It's not like her thumb was on the scale or anything. frylock Jun 2016 #55
Sanders is no Obama Tarc Jun 2016 #66
Actually, he was fending off a much meatier scandal. OilemFirchen Jun 2016 #48
Bait and switch going on here SFnomad Jun 2016 #10
Another bait and switch: auntpurl Jun 2016 #50
Good catch n/t SFnomad Jun 2016 #56
Codswallop...bullpucky...claptrap...blatherskite...hogwash... Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #13
You just about covered it. lol. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #35
It would give her a good way to back out gracefully and take jwirr Jun 2016 #14
Hillary is not going to back out and she's going to kick some Trump ass in the GE. Arkansas Granny Jun 2016 #17
Dream on Neighbor madokie Jun 2016 #62
I hope you're not too disappointed when your prophecy fails. Arkansas Granny Jun 2016 #63
Not a chance that one is going to happen madokie Jun 2016 #65
If that is true, we need to ride our horses hard. mmonk Jun 2016 #15
How much longer can you beat those horses? NCTraveler Jun 2016 #29
As long as the middle class and poor can be. mmonk Jun 2016 #36
Fight Fight Fight. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #39
"If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in lunamagica Jun 2016 #18
We shall see. n/t leeroysphitz Jun 2016 #19
I'm going to do my part in reconciliation. NCTraveler Jun 2016 #20
Really? That guy?? Bleacher Creature Jun 2016 #21
uhhhm jcgoldie Jun 2016 #24
... SidDithers Jun 2016 #26
Shoen is a fox news hack who ceased to work for Democrats a long time ago Gothmog Jun 2016 #27
Huh, thanks for the info Dem2 Jun 2016 #38
I'll give you two guesses. auntpurl Jun 2016 #54
This post is so... Mike Nelson Jun 2016 #28
Uhhhhh ok RandySF Jun 2016 #32
This is hilarious. But, if it makes you sleep at night... eastwestdem Jun 2016 #37
That title is hilarious. And WRONG! SharonClark Jun 2016 #40
Well, let's see how this work out... Adrahil Jun 2016 #41
Breaking: Fox News wants to run against Bernie. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #53
This is the same guy who said Obama should not run for a second term. hrmjustin Jun 2016 #57
I always believe everything in a Murdoch Rag MFM008 Jun 2016 #58
Oh yeah. Give me another hit of that stuff Renew Deal Jun 2016 #59
Since When is Shoen a 'Clinton aide'???? Nope. He is just a commentator riversedge Jun 2016 #60
Shoen is a Clinton aide? Beacool Jun 2016 #64
OP appears to be lying, or disconnected from reality. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #70
If Bernie ends up with more pledged delegates than Hillary, they know it would be the NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #67
Clicked expecting an OP full of bullshit; was not disappointed. baldguy Jun 2016 #69

yellowcanine

(35,699 posts)
34. I think he was just pointing out that is misleading to say "Clinton aide"
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:00 PM
Jun 2016

And it is. "Former Clinton aide" would have been more accurate.

Oh, and it is clearly an opinion piece, so the credentials of the individual are important.
And it seems to me that it is less of a bombshell if the person in fact is not a Clinton aide.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
30. "LOL" - (adj.) lahl - backed into a rhetorical corner; got nothin'. syn: ROFL
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jun 2016

Never mind the content; just dismiss it with a cheery "LOL" and you will impress people with your rapier wit.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
12. We aren't dreaming of a Clinton Aristocracy, we are fighting for freedom from the domination
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jun 2016

of Corp-America. Some apparently are willing to give up their freedoms and liberties for the weak promise of security or maybe they just like to side with the Big Corp Bully.

Arkansas Granny

(31,513 posts)
16. No, some of us are accepting the reality of the situation. Hillary Clinton will be the Democratic
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 01:10 PM
Jun 2016

nominee. The super delegates are not going to ignore the large lead she has over Bernie Sanders and award him the nomination just because he and his followers think he has a better chance of beating Donald Trump. We are not giving up any freedoms or liberties.

Bernie has fought hard and has a lot of good ideas, however, many of his ideas are not realistic. He has been given an opportunity to influence the party platform during the convention, but he will not be the nominee.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
61. Bernie will be our next President
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jun 2016

Hide and watch.

BTW: What ideas of Bernie's are not realistic? Pray tell...

Response to Arkansas Granny (Reply #16)

YouDig

(2,280 posts)
7. "Even a narrow win would give him 250 pledged delegates or more". How dumb can someone be?
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:41 PM
Jun 2016

Not mentioning Hillary would also get 225 delegates in that scenario, meaning Bernie only really picks up 25. Which would mean Hillary still leads by 250 pledged delegates overall, not to mention the amount she picks up in NJ and DC next week.

This is the pinnacle of #berniemath.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
23. Oh, you mean this home stretch?
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 02:38 PM
Jun 2016

Hillary - PA, IN, WVa, KY, PR, SD
Obama - NC, OR, MT

A +44 for Hillary?

How'd that work out?

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
46. Yes, I did, when pointing out that late-season primary losses are not an indicator
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 04:11 PM
Jun 2016

of general election success or failure. You then pulled "oh yea, but but but....FBI! So neener neener!" out of your ass.


frylock

(34,825 posts)
55. It's not like her thumb was on the scale or anything.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 05:30 PM
Jun 2016

Look what he's accomplished with the deck stacked against him. On an even playing field, your candidate would've been dust months ago.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
48. Actually, he was fending off a much meatier scandal.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 05:18 PM
Jun 2016

Remember how Tony Rezko was going to end Obama's campaign?

How did that work out?

 

SFnomad

(3,473 posts)
10. Bait and switch going on here
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:43 PM
Jun 2016

Notice the headline says "if he wins CA he wins the nomination", the article says "if she loses CA she may not win the nomination"

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
50. Another bait and switch:
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 05:25 PM
Jun 2016

This is a former BILL Clinton pollster, not a current HILLARY Clinton pollster as the title implies.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
13. Codswallop...bullpucky...claptrap...blatherskite...hogwash...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:49 PM
Jun 2016

taradiddle...tommyrot...twaddle...piffle... poppycock...and that's not the half of it! LOL!

But, feel free to believe!

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
14. It would give her a good way to back out gracefully and take
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jun 2016

the spotlight off of her problems. A closely contested election is better than being thrown out by the super-delegates or trounced by Trump or being impeached if she somehow won.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
62. Dream on Neighbor
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:17 PM
Jun 2016

LOL. I laugh because there is no way that Hill can come out ahead. if it wasn't for shenanigans and out right voter fraud at polling places in a number of states would she even be able to say she's ahead at this point in time.
No, Hillary Clinton will never be elected President of these United States of America. No matter how much many here want to see that it ain't going to happen.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
65. Not a chance that one is going to happen
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jun 2016

so no I'm not going to be disappointed, rather I'm going to be doing the happy dance and thats says a lot for an old oxygen dependent man who really can't dance anyway

Bernie is what this country and world needs right now

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
18. "If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 01:12 PM
Jun 2016

If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in New Jersey, he could well be within 200 pledged delegates of Mrs. Clinton, making a vote in favor of the rules change on superdelegates more likely. If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in New Jersey, he could well be within 200 pledged delegates of Mrs. Clinton, making a vote in favor of the rules change on superdelegates more likely."

Not happening, not even if this fantasy scenario came true. Obama's lead in '08 was way less than 200, and he won the nomination.

Keep dreaming...

Bleacher Creature

(11,256 posts)
21. Really? That guy??
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jun 2016

The one who wrote this:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/12/AR2010111202846.html

Or this?

http://www.politico.com/story/2011/12/nh-voters-should-draft-hillary-070623

Doug Schoen is a Fox News/WSJ "Democrat" whose sole function is to undermine the election of Democrats by sowing discord regarding the party's nominee. Hillary was a great foil for him in 2012 when he was attacking Obama. Now that she's the nominee, he throws his lot in with Sanders, Biden, etc.

Do you really not see the pattern?

jcgoldie

(11,627 posts)
24. uhhhm
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 02:40 PM
Jun 2016

So if superdelegates are required to vote for the candidate who won their states primary or caucus... it doesnt change the outcome. She still wins... by a rather large margin... even if he won California.

All of this analysis reminds me of a college basketball coach calling all of his timeouts to stop the clock in the final minute of a game his team is losing by 20 points... its just a waste of everyone's time.

 

eastwestdem

(1,220 posts)
37. This is hilarious. But, if it makes you sleep at night...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:06 PM
Jun 2016

feel free to believe it. I would stock up on Ambien, though, for next week.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
41. Well, let's see how this work out...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jun 2016

Look here:

http://DemRace.com/?share=DE3wnbMR

Have Bernie winning every race except New Jersey and DC.

I have him winning CA by 10 points.

Guess what? He still comes up about 200 delegates short.

The dude is FINISHED. There is NO FREAKING WAY (short of the indictment fairy) that the supers will overturn a 200 delegate advantage for a main stream Democratic candidate. That's just delusional.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
67. If Bernie ends up with more pledged delegates than Hillary, they know it would be the
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:56 PM
Jun 2016

end of the party to put Hillary over the top with SD's. I think a realization is setting in, that Bernie frick'in Sanders is beating the Clinton/DNC machine.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bombshell: Clinton aide c...