2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBombshell: Clinton aide claims that if Bernie wins California he wins the nomination
The Wall Street Journal Published a bombshell analysis today from a Clinton Pollster, Doug Shoen, explaining that Hillary may lose the nomination if she loses to Bernie in California.There is now more than a theoretical chance that Hillary Clinton may not be the Democratic nominee for president.
How could that happen, given that her nomination has been considered a sure thing by virtually everyone in the media and in the party itself? Consider the possibilities.
The inevitability behind Mrs. Clintons nomination will be in large measure eviscerated if she loses the June 7 California primary to Bernie Sanders. That could well happen.
A recent PPIC poll shows Mrs. Clinton with a 2% lead over Mr. Sanders, and a Fox News survey found the same result. Even a narrow win would give him 250 pledged delegates or morea significant boost. California is clearly trending to Mr. Sanders, and the experience in recent open primaries has been that the Vermont senator tends to underperform in pre-election surveys and over-perform on primary and caucus days, thanks to the participation of new registrants and young voters.
To this end, data from mid-May show that there were nearly 1.5 million newly registered Democratic voters in California since Jan. 1. Thats a 218% increase in Democratic voter registrations compared with the same period in 2012, a strongly encouraging sign for Mr. Sanders.
A Sanders win in California would powerfully underscore Mrs. Clintons weakness as a candidate in the general election. Democratic superdelegateschosen by the party establishment and overwhelmingly backing Mrs. Clinton, 543-44would seriously question whether they should continue to stand behind her candidacy.
There is every reason to believe that at the convention Mr. Sanders will offer a rules change requiring superdelegates to vote for the candidate who won their states primary or caucus. A vote on that proposed change would almost certainly occurand it would function as a referendum on the Clinton candidacy. If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in New Jersey, he could well be within 200 pledged delegates of Mrs. Clinton, making a vote in favor of the rules change on superdelegates more likely.
Another problem: In recent weeks the perception that Mrs. Clinton would be the strongest candidate against Donald Trump has evaporated. The Real Clear Politics polling average has Mrs. Clinton in a statistical tie with Mr. Trump, and recent surveys from ABC News/Washington Post and Fox News show her two and three points behind him, respectively.
http://marshallreport.com/2016/06/02/bombshell-clinton-aide-claims-that-if-bernie-wins-california-he-wins-the-nomination/
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Who urge Obama to move to the right in 2014.
A real bombshell. Not.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)And it is. "Former Clinton aide" would have been more accurate.
Oh, and it is clearly an opinion piece, so the credentials of the individual are important.
And it seems to me that it is less of a bombshell if the person in fact is not a Clinton aide.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)f-a-n-t-a-s-y?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Never mind the content; just dismiss it with a cheery "LOL" and you will impress people with your rapier wit.
Gomez163
(2,039 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)Zen Democrat
(5,901 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,513 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)of Corp-America. Some apparently are willing to give up their freedoms and liberties for the weak promise of security or maybe they just like to side with the Big Corp Bully.
Arkansas Granny
(31,513 posts)nominee. The super delegates are not going to ignore the large lead she has over Bernie Sanders and award him the nomination just because he and his followers think he has a better chance of beating Donald Trump. We are not giving up any freedoms or liberties.
Bernie has fought hard and has a lot of good ideas, however, many of his ideas are not realistic. He has been given an opportunity to influence the party platform during the convention, but he will not be the nominee.
madokie
(51,076 posts)Hide and watch.
BTW: What ideas of Bernie's are not realistic? Pray tell...
Response to Arkansas Granny (Reply #16)
artislife This message was self-deleted by its author.
findrskeep
(713 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)PPP?
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)YouDig
(2,280 posts)Not mentioning Hillary would also get 225 delegates in that scenario, meaning Bernie only really picks up 25. Which would mean Hillary still leads by 250 pledged delegates overall, not to mention the amount she picks up in NJ and DC next week.
This is the pinnacle of #berniemath.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Not the home stretch.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Hillary - PA, IN, WVa, KY, PR, SD
Obama - NC, OR, MT
A +44 for Hillary?
How'd that work out?
frylock
(34,825 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)of general election success or failure. You then pulled "oh yea, but but but....FBI! So neener neener!" out of your ass.
frylock
(34,825 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)She's further ahead of Bernie than Obama was EVER ahead of her.
frylock
(34,825 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Because of DWS. Ok.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Look what he's accomplished with the deck stacked against him. On an even playing field, your candidate would've been dust months ago.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)Remember how Tony Rezko was going to end Obama's campaign?
How did that work out?
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Notice the headline says "if he wins CA he wins the nomination", the article says "if she loses CA she may not win the nomination"
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)This is a former BILL Clinton pollster, not a current HILLARY Clinton pollster as the title implies.
SFnomad
(3,473 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)taradiddle...tommyrot...twaddle...piffle... poppycock...and that's not the half of it! LOL!
But, feel free to believe!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)the spotlight off of her problems. A closely contested election is better than being thrown out by the super-delegates or trounced by Trump or being impeached if she somehow won.
Arkansas Granny
(31,513 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)LOL. I laugh because there is no way that Hill can come out ahead. if it wasn't for shenanigans and out right voter fraud at polling places in a number of states would she even be able to say she's ahead at this point in time.
No, Hillary Clinton will never be elected President of these United States of America. No matter how much many here want to see that it ain't going to happen.
Arkansas Granny
(31,513 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)so no I'm not going to be disappointed, rather I'm going to be doing the happy dance and thats says a lot for an old oxygen dependent man who really can't dance anyway
Bernie is what this country and world needs right now
mmonk
(52,589 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Lets do it and make society a more just place.
lunamagica
(9,967 posts)If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in New Jersey, he could well be within 200 pledged delegates of Mrs. Clinton, making a vote in favor of the rules change on superdelegates more likely. If Mr. Sanders wins California, Montana and North Dakota on Tuesday and stays competitive in New Jersey, he could well be within 200 pledged delegates of Mrs. Clinton, making a vote in favor of the rules change on superdelegates more likely."
Not happening, not even if this fantasy scenario came true. Obama's lead in '08 was way less than 200, and he won the nomination.
Keep dreaming...
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And not mock this as it deserves.
Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)The one who wrote this:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/12/AR2010111202846.html
Or this?
http://www.politico.com/story/2011/12/nh-voters-should-draft-hillary-070623
Doug Schoen is a Fox News/WSJ "Democrat" whose sole function is to undermine the election of Democrats by sowing discord regarding the party's nominee. Hillary was a great foil for him in 2012 when he was attacking Obama. Now that she's the nominee, he throws his lot in with Sanders, Biden, etc.
Do you really not see the pattern?
jcgoldie
(11,627 posts)So if superdelegates are required to vote for the candidate who won their states primary or caucus... it doesnt change the outcome. She still wins... by a rather large margin... even if he won California.
All of this analysis reminds me of a college basketball coach calling all of his timeouts to stop the clock in the final minute of a game his team is losing by 20 points... its just a waste of everyone's time.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)All of a sudden, Berners love Doug Schoen.
Sid
Gothmog
(145,064 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Why are fellow Democrats trying to deceive us?
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)And one doesn't count.
Mike Nelson
(9,951 posts)...funny. Thanks for the laugh!
RandySF
(58,706 posts)eastwestdem
(1,220 posts)feel free to believe it. I would stock up on Ambien, though, for next week.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)Look here:
http://DemRace.com/?share=DE3wnbMR
Have Bernie winning every race except New Jersey and DC.
I have him winning CA by 10 points.
Guess what? He still comes up about 200 delegates short.
The dude is FINISHED. There is NO FREAKING WAY (short of the indictment fairy) that the supers will overturn a 200 delegate advantage for a main stream Democratic candidate. That's just delusional.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MFM008
(19,803 posts)and of course ALL the polls.
Renew Deal
(81,852 posts)Oh it's so good.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The OP could easily clear it up.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)end of the party to put Hillary over the top with SD's. I think a realization is setting in, that Bernie frick'in Sanders is beating the Clinton/DNC machine.