Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:38 PM Jun 2016

Why don't either Sanders or Clinton have the simplest most honest

component of a strategy to combat climate change in their proposals?


The 3Rs:
REDUCE
REUSE
RECYCLE


the step which can be done immediately without any dependency on changes in law, political environment, or technology is REDUCE

Everyone who cares about climate change should take immediate steps to reduce the amount of energy they use.

its summer or nearly summer for most of the country.
Either don't use or minimally use air conditioning...raise that thermostat.
At home, close off unused rooms and prevent air conditioning from cooling that unused space.
Don't use an air conditioner in your vehicle when you can use an open window instead

Make every trip in your car serve multiple purposes...

If you can reuse something, reuse it or recycle it.


14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why don't either Sanders or Clinton have the simplest most honest (Original Post) Fresh_Start Jun 2016 OP
This doesn't work for you? BootinUp Jun 2016 #1
From Fracky McClinton? Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #4
the president doesn't have authority to stop fracking Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #6
What IF Congress stopped fracking? Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #7
no Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #8
There is room for disagreement about fracking. randome Jun 2016 #9
until there is a replacement energy source..or a reduction in need for energy Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #10
There's also a HUMONGOUS reason for opposition. Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #11
I know. I agree. I want it banned. randome Jun 2016 #12
they all take time..... Fresh_Start Jun 2016 #5
ask bernie if there are any good ways to recyclel his F-35s. nt msongs Jun 2016 #2
Then ask Hillary if there's any way to recycle her cluster bombs Fumesucker Jun 2016 #3
She had cluster bombs? And she didn't drop one on the GOP Congress? What a waste! nt Jitter65 Jun 2016 #13
Clinton loves the F-35. Both of them are correct not to want Vattel Jun 2016 #14

BootinUp

(47,085 posts)
1. This doesn't work for you?
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:43 PM
Jun 2016


That’s why on day one, Hillary will set bold, national goals that will be achieved within ten years of her taking office:

Generate enough renewable energy to power every home in America, with half a billion solar panels installed by the end of Hillary’s first term.

Cut energy waste in American homes, schools, hospitals and offices by a third and make American manufacturing the cleanest and most efficient in the world.

Reduce American oil consumption by a third through cleaner fuels and more efficient cars, boilers, ships and trucks.


More details:
https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/climate/

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
6. the president doesn't have authority to stop fracking
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:03 PM
Jun 2016

and I'm pretty certain that individual states which enjoy fracking revenues have little interest in stopping fracking

Now Congress could make a law which may or may not be upheld by the SC.
Though I think I saw a recent federal court decision which undermines the clear air act

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
8. no
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:12 PM
Jun 2016

she wouldn't

but sadly, there won't be any drive in Congress to do so...until there is reasonable energy replacements
now if everyone would cut their energy use by 1/3....we wouldn't need fracking

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
9. There is room for disagreement about fracking.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:22 PM
Jun 2016

It's less harmful to the atmosphere, for instance. I'm against it and I think Clinton, now that she's headed for the White House, will re-think her tepid endorsement of it.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
10. until there is a replacement energy source..or a reduction in need for energy
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 07:26 PM
Jun 2016

a-fracking we will go

which is why we need to be serious about reducing our usage in our homes, cars, offices,....

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
12. I know. I agree. I want it banned.
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:53 AM
Jun 2016

I think Clinton was trying to go down the middle on the issue, get Republicans on board to do something. Her clean energy initiatives don't mention fracking so I'm betting she's already rethought this one.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
5. they all take time.....
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 06:54 PM
Jun 2016

asking supporters to better manage their own energy usage could happen instantly
its a revolution with guaranteed immediate benefit
just 5 degrees warmer reduces energy used for air conditioning by more than 10%

all of the others take time and money and to some degree good fortune. in order to cut oil consumption by a third...we'd need to replace 1/3 of the existing cars/boilers/ships/trucks....with new ones which use zero energy which isn't feasible in the next decade.


 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
14. Clinton loves the F-35. Both of them are correct not to want
Sat Jun 4, 2016, 06:58 AM
Jun 2016

to cancel the project now that it's almost finished. Only Trump is crazy enough to want it to be cancelled now.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why don't either Sanders ...