2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat The Heck Is This "It's Not Over Till The Convention" Business ?
It's OVER, Comprehension 101. New Jersey. Pop Goes the...! ...How Bizarre.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)get used to it.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Every four years at the end of the primaries if not before, we have two presumptive nominees, one from each party.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)2008 was even closer and Obama was even further from the magic number, yet he was the presumptive nominee shortly after the last primary. Why would Clinton (who will end up with a greater percentage of delegates than Obama had in 2008) not be the presumptive nominee even earlier this time around?
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)That you can't tell the difference. Like truly sad. Since you paint yourself as a middle of the road type of person who will support HRC as the nominee (despite every post being an endorsement of her)
Barack Obama, a man with few to little qualifications beat Sec Clinton. Yet he was not the subject of an FBI investigation. Our front runner is in 2016. Thus an entirely different scenario than 2008. Literally light years apart
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)It's just that I don't think this FBI investigation is as substantial as you and others think it is (or wish it to be). Clinton's been the target of scandalization for decades, and while this email-server issue may actually carry a bit of truth/weight to it (as opposed to all of the other non-scandal scandals), I'm quite confident it won't sink her. It certainly doesn't change the fact that she's the presumptive nominee once she achieves a majority of delegates, as has been the case every other time.
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)She suspended her campaign....she did it all on her own...when she did that, it made Obama the presumptive nominee.
Sanders isn't suspending anything...he's in 'till Philly...so there'll be no presumptive nominees this year.
Garrett78
(10,721 posts)He was the presumptive nominee because of the numbers.
It's that damn math again.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)by not allowing her to pivot to the GE.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)JudyM
(29,236 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Another perfectly good word made into a cliché, like 'pragmatic.'
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Hmm?
Jack Bone
(2,023 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Before you can pivot there
It's not about Hillary. It's not about Bernie. It's about defeating neo-liberalism, it's about turning the Democratic Party back into a party for the 99%, and keeping it relevant.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Now that they can't and see that a California landslide for Bernie is a massive joke, and see that the pledged delegates from New Jersey and California expose their campaign for the comedy it is, they move the goalposts on down the road.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)To where a month ago someone said Bernie would win the pledged count? Not a maybe or a perhaps. A link where someone reputable said he would win that.
The comedy is the most famous woman in the world struggling and having to campaign in June against a 74 year old avowed Socialist
TimPlo
(443 posts)The DNC can not just hand it to her. That is unless she gets a majority of delegates off of just pledged delegates. If DNC proclaims that she is nominee with Sanders still in the race and she does not have the majority with out counting Super Delegates, then they are being corrupt. That is not something I nor anyone else made up it is the rules of the DNC party. The Super Delegates do not vote until the voting at the convention and they are not pledged to vote for Clinton. I know many here think that the DNC should just give it to her and ignore the party rules but that is just wrong.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Its the voters. Pesky thing that Democracy, no?
TimPlo
(443 posts)Seriously the voters do not elect anyone, the delegates do at the convention. There are two types of delegates at the convention. Ones that are pledged(ones assigned via % of votes and must vote for the assigned candidate) and there are Super Delegates(Ones that do not have to note a set way.) If Clinton does not have enough of the pledged delegates to have a majority then it is up to the SD to vote at the convention. No matter what people say that is the way it works, that is unless Sanders drops out, then Clinton can be named the nominee. Why do people even want her to get the nomination with out following the rules, I just don't get it.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Hillary will have the majority of pledged delegates. Also the Superdelegates (not democracy) and the popular vote (also not democracy)
What else do you people want?
Actually, you don't have to answer that, its pretty clear what you want.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Our democracy allows for our Supers to prevent a god damn train wreck from losing the GE. Not our fault those are the rules. You all reminded us Tad Devine made them.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)because apparently, Democratic voters are on top of things.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)No you don't. Neither the convention or November are direct elections. Nope, not direct democracy.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Or are you just being obtuse?
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)is not only undemocratic, but downright dictatorial.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)No will can be overturned. Good try though. Every vote is represented by a pledged delegate.
Really good try
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)glad we are in agreement.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)700+ supers have every right to vote as they wish
Glad we agree.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)and Hillary has the majority of both! And the popular vote!
But you Berners believe that he should win? How is that democratic? How does that coincide with our Democratic values?
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)why is that so hard to understand?
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)But it's funny to watch you pretend it does
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)cry out and weep when everyone but them accepts that Hillary is the nominee.
Actually, no, it will be sad because you all have made it clear that you will burn the earth to the ground in an attempt to get Sanders the nomination he hasn't earned.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Bernie Sanders didn't make the system, but he damn sure should use it.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)then you aren't a Democrat, you are a authoritarian.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Then you don't know what SD actually are. I remember my first election too.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)to overturn the will of the electorate.
Aint happening this time around.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)They were created for a reason. Not by me. Not by Bernie.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)and the will of the people don't you guys get? What kind of country do you want to live in where the will of the people is overriden by a select few?
I agree that SDs have a purpose, but it isn't to give Bernie the nomination.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Hillary has not and will not be indicted.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)Will not?
Is your crystal ball more clear than mine?
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Samantha
(9,314 posts)Then she could be legitimately the Presumed Nominee.
Sanders had it right when it said neither he nor Clinton would have enough delegates to cinch the nomination before the convention.
Sam
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)The nomination will not be given to her, she has worked for it and has received the most votes and pledged delegates. Most of the super delegates have already announced their support.
To keep insisting that she is not the presumptive nominee is either willful ignorance or outright denial.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and they'd be morally bound to support her. Bernie would have zero moral legitimacy to seek to disenfranchise the millions of women, black and Latino voters whose votes gave her the majority.
There is no special double standard that gets applied to Bernie because he is so dreamy or against Hillary because she is a woman.
The candidate who wins the voting and has majority of all delegates is the legitimate winner.
That is democracy, not corruption, regardless of the sour grapes.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)k8conant
(3,030 posts)It's amazing that so many folks are impatient and can't let things happen in due time.
LoverOfLiberty
(1,438 posts)when the voices of victory will drown out the salt.
SpareribSP
(325 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)ProgressiveEconomist
(5,818 posts)segment of the egotistical, opportunistic, cynical and sleazy Bernie Sanders Show. These new rules say that it's optional whether or not a sore loser spends nine figures coordinating attacks on the first-ballot nominee with Republicans, for three months after anybody who can count would have conceded.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Do you really think she will be a viable nominee in that case? Unless you can answer with an unambiguous yes, It isn't over until the Party picks a new nominee.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Not sure if that's the case with everyone in the room.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Ten more minutes then I'm gone.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)WASHINGTON (CNN) -- For the second time in three days, Sen. Hillary Clinton told reporters that the pledged delegates awarded based on vote totals in their state are not bound to abide by election results.
Sen. Hillary Clinton lags behind Sen. Barack Obama in the popular vote and in pledged delegates.
It's an idea that has been floated by her or a campaign surrogate nearly half a dozen times this month.
Sen. Barack Obama leads Clinton among all Democratic delegates, 1,622 to 1,485, in the latest CNN count. Among pledged delegates, Obama leads Clinton 1,413 to 1,242.
"Every delegate with very few exceptions is free to make up his or her mind however they choose," Clinton told Time's Mark Halperin in an interview published Wednesday.
"We talk a lot about so-called pledged delegates, but every delegate is expected to exercise independent judgment," she said.
Clinton's remarks echoed her Monday comments to the editorial board of the Philadelphia Daily News.
"And also remember that pledged delegates in most states are not pledged," she said Monday. "You know there is no requirement that anybody vote for anybody. They're just like superdelegates."
Clinton also made similar comments in a Newsweek interview published two weeks ago
Meteor Man
(385 posts)Pretty confusing I know. I'm also pretty sure the ground rules even say that it's not over until THE VOTE is taken at the convention.
This will sound pretty outlandish, but even if every single Hillary supporter at DU said it was over, it still would not be over until the convention. Very confusing, yes?
Now try to keep up. Here it comes. Are you ready?
It's NEVER over! Even after the convention, it will still not be over.
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)if for no other reason than to vex those who want him not to.
larkrake
(1,674 posts)its not over til its over
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Gothmog
(145,191 posts)bvf
(6,604 posts)is this "What The Heck Is This "It's Not Over Till The Convention" Business ?" business?
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Bernie supporters can pretend we don't know the outcome of the Democratic Primary but common sense dictates otherwise.
Arazi
(6,829 posts)It has a perverse effect and makes me want to dig in my heels even harder