Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts) Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:48 AM Jun 2016

It happened...my #1 all-time favorite Skinner post, reflecting on GD-P during the Primaries.

He pretty much nailed it.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/125910600

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It happened...my #1 all-time favorite Skinner post, reflecting on GD-P during the Primaries. (Original Post) Miles Archer Jun 2016 OP

Thanks Skinner Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #1

If i offended anyone outside of GDPeeee I apologize. stonecutter357 Jun 2016 #2

I think the existence of Discussionist made them make some bad decisions here. onehandle Jun 2016 #3

Enforcing the TOS instead of the current system geek tragedy Jun 2016 #4

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)

1. Thanks Skinner

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Sat Jun 4, 2016, 07:57 AM

Jun 2016

stonecutter357

(12,693 posts)

2. If i offended anyone outside of GDPeeee I apologize.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Sat Jun 4, 2016, 08:00 AM

Jun 2016

onehandle

(51,122 posts)

3. I think the existence of Discussionist made them make some bad decisions here.

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Sat Jun 4, 2016, 08:50 AM

Jun 2016

This place has been Discussionist Jr. for the entire primary and is no longer a safe 'underground' place for Democrats.

I am curious to see how they plan to undo the damage.

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)

4. Enforcing the TOS instead of the current system

Reply to onehandle (Reply #3)

Sat Jun 4, 2016, 08:53 AM

Jun 2016

of jury nullification.

Once all the Breitbart and racist posts started getting a pass, there was little reason to respect the rules.

Reply to this discussion